Recon Instruments previews cycling heads-up display

Recon testing sport HUD for sunglasses

Today Recon Instruments gave a small sneak peek  of their upcoming heads up display unit aimed at cycling.  And by ‘small sneak peek’, I mean a single image, with a handful of text.  Perhaps ‘very small sneak peak’ was more appropriate. But, it’s potentially significant depending on how the ultimate execution of the device goes.

image

As you may remember from two weeks ago, Recon Instruments has products within the skiing/snowboarding segment.  Their current products provide an actual display within the frame of the goggles that runs Android and display information to the skier about their current ski outing (note: They connect to both Android and iPhones, but the unit itself is running Android).   You can see the small display behind the red Recon logo at the edge of my goggles.

IMG_0754IMG_2479

Within that small screen, you’ll get metrics related to speed/distance/descent/etc… Essentially, the same type of information you’d see while running with a GPS watch, you’re getting from the heads up display for skiing.  Depending on which model you have, I’ve found that I can get the heads up screen placed in such a way that it literally looks like the content is projected in front of me with no obstruction.  But other models have less ‘play’, and thus less of a HUD effect.

IMG_4001

(Taking photos of the display thingy is really tough to do given it’s the size of your pinky tip…actual clarity looks great in real life).

They have a few models of ski goggles, mostly tied to specific goggle brands.  I’ve tested a couple different brands, but have been trying out the Oakley variation recently.  I’m still looking to do some variation of a review of them – just haven’t figured out if I’ll manage to squeak in one more ski weekend or not this year.  In doing so, I’ll probably provide you with a pretty good base for what to expect in the cycling-focused glasses.

So what do I expect to see on the cycling variation?  Well, for one I think we’ll see metrics related to cycling.  When I’ve talked to them in the past about areas I’d like to see covered, I noted that following as a minimum bar they’d need to have all of the same data metrics I’d find on an Edge 500 (including GPS).  I think that’s the minimum baseline.  In my mind I see this as a replacement device over a Garmin/similar.  I don’t see it as a secondary device.  Simply due to the likely costs – people aren’t going to buy both.

Second, it’s gotta have solid smartphone integration.  It can’t be a ‘me too’ app that companies want to release these days.  I don’t see that being an issue though on the Recon side because they already have app connectivity today, and as one of those features they offer a buddy tracking function for tracking other friends on the ski hill.  I’d like to see that expanded to allowing folks on the internet track your current location and other metrics in real-time.  Given the addition of that to the Edge 510 and Edge 810 – again, this product has to have that.  Otherwise it fails test #1 above (have what an Edge 500 has).

Third, I’d expect to see both ANT+ and Bluetooth Smart support.  Today on their skiing units they actually already have support for Polar HR straps, as you can see below.  But performance cycling is a market dominated by ANT+ today, followed up by products from Polar, and then in a far-distance last place, products on Bluetooth Smart.

IMG_9546

Now Bluetooth Smart is actually the easy duck.  That’s because the current recon units already have Bluetooth 4.0 in them and already utilize Bluetooth Smart to connect to smartphone devices that support Bluetooth 4.0.  The catch though being that since the unit is already using that channel to talk to the cell phone in slave-mode, it’d have to likely route the data back through the phone to the glasses.  Which, may impact battery life on both.

But honestly, I see ANT+ as a far more important connectivity point than Bluetooth Smart accessories.  As I noted above, cycling is dominated by ANT+.  And in particular, the market segment that would pay for something like this are cyclists that are likely already using ANT+ technology in costly power meters, or other ANT+ accessories in use with GPS computers today (such as speed/cadence sensors or heart rate straps).  Translated: They’re looking at a high-end market, not a low-end market.  And the high-end market is mostly using ANT+.

IMG_5786

Next, battery life will likely pose a challenge.  Today, even on the much larger Recon skiing variant, battery life is less than ideal.  I was getting 4.5 to 5 hours on a charge – causing me to have to break out a USB charging block during lunch to try and get me to the end of the day.  In my opinion, you’re going to have to cover a 6-7 hour battery life nonstop (enough to cover middle of pack Ironman athletes).  Now, the warmer weather that most cyclists ride in will help battery life (compared to the cooler weather that skiers face).

IMG_9360

In addition to battery, they will also have to find a way to control the unit that doesn’t involve taking ones hands off the handlebar and up to the users face.  Today, they use a small wrist-band that works pretty well skiing.  But for cycling, it’s one thing to keep your hands on your handlebar and touch a cycling computer a few inches away.  But it’s an entirely different thing to bring your hands up and tap or otherwise interact with something on your face out of view.

IMG_0783

Perhaps something like the O-Synce remote ANT+ lap button is a best bet?

IMG_0038

Many may wonder how this jives against some like the 4iiii’s Heads Up Display.  The core difference is the 4iiii’s unit display a series of LED lights on a bar, whereas this displays an actual small screen with live information.  And from a price-point standpoint, the 4iiii’s unit is sub-$200, and doesn’t include the glasses themselves.  The 4iiii’s with it’s ANT+ connectivity is best at keeping you in zone (be it power/speed/HR/cadence), but lacks the ability to provide you more detailed ride status (such as ‘where are you’).

IMG_74874iiii-sport-iiiis-ant-heads-up-display-system-5

Lastly, what happens in relation to Google Glass that’s on the eventual train tracks?  Well, we know roughly as much about Google Glass as we do about the Recon offering.  We have lots of publicity/marketing items on the Google Glass, but as you often see in my reviews, the devils are in the details.  In the case of Google Glass, we’re still talking a pretty significant price tag (over $1,000US).  Recon remains unknown at this point, but I’d guess for the mid $400-600 range given that it looks like you’ll be buying the sunglasses with the HUD molded into the unit as well.  Thus the sunglass would be a component of that price from a cost standpoint.

Now, they haven’t said much, other than the below statement:

“Information should be easily and instantly available when you want it and out-of-sight when you don’t.  We have always made it clear that Recon intends to bring this technology to sunglasses for both professional and recreational athletes, and the public will get a first look at this sunglasses solution this summer.”

And, technically, they didn’t even imply that it’s a cycling-only device.  It could also tackle running.  Though, I’d guess that swimming is out for this iteration.

In the meantime, stay tuned, hopefully I’ll get to poke at one before we hit summer.

Thanks for reading!

Tags:

11 Comments

  1. Aha! Thought they might do this....saves me hashing something up on a HUD Live. Waiting for them to infiltrate the NFL....live tactics, instant coach feedback, plus lots of interesting post-processing possible for the coaches using GPS/accelerometer data eg impacts, sprint intensity, positioning etc.

    Reply
  2. Tom

    Interesting product, although I think for cycling purposes I'd gravitate more to the 4iii model than this. Inexpensive enough that you can have a handlebar mounted display for the details (bigger screen, easier to interact with, etc.), but capable enough to allow you to stay within a target zone. Naturally, this plus a handlebar computer would be great, but as you note it'd likely be hard to justify the cost of both.

    Where I think Recon could have a huge benefit would be in swimming goggles. Unlike running/cycling/etc. there aren't currently any elegant methods to see your metrics while you are actively swimming. Watches are good for checking things between sets and after you're done, but they don't really help a whole lot during them. Plus, while open water swimming it'd be awesome if it could help with navigation - mount a forward facing camera, GPS and electronic compass on the strap behind your head and you'd easily be able to stay on a perfect line without having to sight :D

    Reply
  3. Steve Knapp

    Given their ability to display a map I still see a huge market for this in powersports. I'd love to have this for motorcycles and snowmobiles as well as skiing and cycling.

    Reply
  4. Christopher Lyle

    This will be a great product if it can capture all type of sports. If it can track cycling, running, and snowboarding data and even provide me with GPS information on the fly...I will be the first one to line up for the device. Besides who wouldn't want to become Robocop or Terminator while racing or training.....I would!

    Reply
  5. Bob Quindazzi

    Very interesting. I'm wondering if having a version that slaves to an existing Garmin/Cycleops/etc computer wouldn't be a a nice market; in other words just make a display unit. There are (as you know way better than I) a heck of a lot Garmins out there already.

    Reply
  6. Kenneth Chen

    Nice to see Recon moving their product forward after a pretty quiet winter. Outside of some serious advances in technology, they will probably use an existing Android app… my bet would be on a collaboration with Wahoo. This was essentially how they integrated Contour camera's into the ski goggles. It would be great if they adopted ANT+ and 802.11g/n or even better "draft-ac". Bluetooth seems to be a stumbling block for Recon from an integration perspective. given Hero went the WLAN 802.11 route.

    Reply
    • Rainmaker replied

      The WiLink 7 chips have WiFi on them, so still a possibility.

      Reply
  7. Mayhem

    From what I can tell none of the products mentioned are a proper heads up display. For me to be at all interested the information has to be transparently overlaid on my natural field view, requiring me to avert my eyes far out to a distant corner isn't much better than looking at a handlebar mounted display.

    link to en.wikipedia.org

    Reply
    • Rainmaker replied

      It actually depends. For some of the Recon units I've tried (the one with more flexibility), it really is complete in my natural field of view, with no changes in eye direction. However, I found with the Oakley Recon goggles, due to lack of flexibility, I did have to change my eye direction.

      On the 4iiii's, no change in eye direction was required, as the bar is just in the peripheral vision without issue.

      The challenge you have with any HUD technology at the face is that the focal distance is so shallow that you'll need to change focal point slightly to see it. The strength of the 4iiii's system is the color LED's mean focal length is irrelevant since you can still see color in peripheral vision.

      Reply
  8. cycloscott

    What's up with your chain (pic of the Quarq)? It's barely engaged on a single tooth on the chain ring.

    Reply
    • Rainmaker replied

      It was out in a field while taking lots of photos, I probably had turned the crank and/or changed something so it ended up there.

      Reply

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
If you would like a profile picture, simply register at Gravatar, which works here on DCR and across the web.

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>