Note if you're reading a watch review: Note that over the past few months new Garmin, Timex and Polar watches have been released. If you're stopping by to read one of my many watch reviews, you'll definitely want to check out the new Garmin FR910XT In Depth Review, the Garmin FR610 In Depth Review, Timex Run Trainer and Polar RCX5 In Depth Review. Always best to know all your options out there. Enjoy!

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

To improve my running, I need to improve my cycling

I was chatting with the coach the other day and noted that one of my goals for 2009 is to really improve on my run off the bike.  I can run quite well independent of a triathlon, but my runs are a mixed bag when it comes to tri’s.  Don’t get me wrong, I recognize that my run’s are still pretty good – but everyone wants improvement, right?

So naturally my first way to resolve this issue was to somehow modify or otherwise increase focus on my run.  My coach countered that I was going about it the wrong way.  To improve my running post-bike, I needed to improve my bike.  In other words, I need to increase my power and efficiency on the bike so that I come off the bike stronger – thus transferring that energy to the run.

What’s even more interesting is looking at my historical run times over the past year at the Half-Iron distance (which is what I’ve raced the most):

image

Now of course, there are differences in courses.  For example Wildflower (May 08) has a harder bike/run course than some of the others.  And that 1:36 run was at Oceanside 70.3 on a pancake flat course.

image
(Note: I didn’t include transition times above, hence why the numbers won’t add up perfectly)

So…why the graph?  What does it show?  Well – it shows my coaches point.  I started with him the first week of May (right after the Wildflower  race).  We poured a ton of time into the bike in the 11 weeks between then and July Rhode Island 70.3…and it shows.  My bike split blew my others out of the water – while my run was constant.

You might then say – well, didn’t you want your run split to improve?  And to the casual observer it would look like my run split didn’t improve.  However, I spent considerable time at IMRI70.3 on the side of the run at mile 2 (stopped) throwing up due to a reaction to a gel I consumed.  Nobody gets ‘tired’ at mile 2 of the run.  Had I not had that happen, I was on target for a 1:33-1:35 split.  Thus both improving my bike and my run – two for the price of one.

So there ya go.  With that…it’s back to the trainer.  Pedal on.

5 comments:

Eric December 10, 2008 8:48 PM  

hey I ll be out there on Sunday I ll be slower than you by 10 minutes due to all the food I am eating hope to see u there let me know how you plan to bike and run or the concept behind the base

Kelly December 10, 2008 10:01 PM  

::Rubs Chin:: Faaaasscinating.

Danielle in Iowa December 11, 2008 1:08 PM  

Ugh, I guess that means I have to get on my trainer too... My run has not been great the last year so I was focusing on running, but perhaps that is the wrong approach...

Sarah December 12, 2008 2:04 PM  

Thanks for this. I keep thinking I should be running more but as we all know, I love cycling the most. I just needed an excuse to do more cycling and now I have it. ;)

Zinazinabobina December 15, 2008 1:12 PM  

The great tri training maxim: Biking will help your running, running does not help your biking.

  © Blogger template 'Isolation' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP