Garmin Launches ‘Connected GPS’ Functionality For Wearables Without GPS (Vivosmart 4 & Vivomove 3)

Last week Garmin ever so quietly added so-called ‘Connected GPS’ functionality to the Garmin Connect Mobile application, while concurrently releasing a firmware update for the Vivosmart 4 (which came a year ago), as well as incorporating it into the base Vivomove 3 announced last Thursday. The functionality essentially gives these wearables GPS, as they don’t have GPS chipsets inside already. This functionality follows with what Fitbit added many years ago for their GPS-less wearables, under the ‘Connected GPS’ name as well.

This allows you to not only record a GPS track leveraging your phone’s GPS capabilities, but also get/see speed and distance on your wearable, despite not having any sensors or GPS in the unit itself. This is especially notable with cycling, since it can’t instead use the accelerometer like it can for walking/running activities. Which, by the way, is a good time to note that Garmin also now added in cycling as a sport to the Vivosmart 4 too.

Since this is something that many people have been asking about for years, I figured I’d give it a super quick whirl around the block. Or more specifically, a whirl on this morning’s bike commute.

Setup & Configuration:

Setup is silly easy, but first you’ll want to make sure your device is fully up to date. In the case of the Vivomove 3 it comes with the required software, whereas if you’ve got the Vivosmart 4, you’ll need to update the firmware. Garmin’s smartphone app has likely already done that for you in the background in the last week or so, but you can force the issue using Garmin Express on the desktop with the charging cable. You’re looking to be on firmware version 4.0 or higher.

The above screenshot was the highlight of my little Vivosmart 4’s life. It’s been living its life from box to box, ultimately now in a clear Rubbermaid container on a shelf next to dozens of other containers. But today….today it was called into duty!

And in fact, it’s exactly why I go out and get my own units after returning the loaner ones – for posts like these (and comparison shots in reviews). This would be the first time this device got to experience the wilds of outdoors. Or even being charged. It’s life is now fulfilled.

In any event, assuming you’ve got your wearable all updated, also go ahead and make sure your iOS or Android app is updated too. You’ll need the latest version of Garmin Connect Mobile on there in order to see the new connected GPS features.

And that’s it, there’s nothing else to do or configure.

Using it:

This is equally as simple. To use the connected mode you’ll go to start a workout like you normally would by tapping the little runner man (or woman) icon.

You’ll then choose your sport (remember you defined those within the app under More > Garmin Devices > Activity Options), which is a good time to point out that as part of this same firmware update (4.00), Garmin has added cycling as an activity.

 

So, I selected cycling for my ride to work:

After you’ve selected your sport on the device itself, it’ll ask you whether you want to “Use Phone GPS?”:

If you choose ‘Yes’, it’ll go ahead and ensure it can connect to your phone.  Once it’s done, it’ll confirm that. It might take a few seconds, and in some cases I had to open my phone up for it to make the initial connection, then I could stick it in my pocket.

After confirming it’s connected you’ll see a small phone icon next to your sport, indicating the connection to your phone for connected GPS. Simply double-tap like normal to start the workout.

And then at this point you’re off and recording like normal, now with heart rate and GPS for distance. In fact, you’ll see distance as well as speed for cycling as options within the configurable data fields on your smartphone:

  

And while out riding (or whatever it is you do), you’ll see that metric here as well. In my case, I just did a commute to the office as my test. Nothing fancy. The top line is the distance. Sorry, the photo makes the display look funky, the refresh rate on these types of wearables makes it really tough for cameras to get good clean photos (and in this case, my main camera battery had died so I had to use my phone).

Afterwards I saved the short track, and sure enough you’ll now get a map on Garmin Connect/Garmin Connect Mobile. Note you’ll see it shows ‘Connected GPS’ on the lower left side.

 

And here’s how that GPS looked accuracy-wise connected to my iPhone X on my bike’s handlebars with a Quadlock mount, as compared to the dedicated GPS of the Garmin Venu on the other wrist:

In general it’s pretty close, but there are cases where the Connected GPS Vivosmart 4 goes a bit askew, such as this section here (the Venu is spot-on):

And then again a bit later where it went to the wrong road again. In fact, in both cases it appears to lock onto a nearby road (yet I was on the bike path next to it). Which is kinda funny. I’m not aware of any logic to do that, so these could be just coincidence versus some sort of actual logic using phone data.

Ultimately, the dedicated GPS of Venu was better than the iPhone X connected Vivosmart 4. Here’s the full GPS track for those that want to dig into it. As I noted, it’s not very long, just my commute with a bit extra/tweaked for good measure.

In general when I’m looking at ‘Connected GPS’ type implementations, you have to remember that the phone’s GPS accuracy is a big part of it. But it’s not the whole picture. Virtually every mainstream app that leverages GPS for fitness also does some smoothing, tweaking, and otherwise modification of the data coming in. Sometimes to ‘fix’ issues with it, and sometimes making things worse. While undoubtedly Garmin has boatloads of GPS experience, they don’t to my knowledge have boatloads of phone-based GPS fitness track experience. As such, I suspect we’ll see them stumble through all the weird idiosyncrasies of various phone models/vendors over the next few months as people find weird quirks. This can also include quirks around things like dropouts of GPS or connectivity.

These quirks are realistically the same stuff Fitbit has had to deal with for years, so they’ll have a bit of a jumpstart there. Though I don’t think that’ll matter a ton. Garmin’s launching this on two products that in the grand scheme of the wearables world are pretty low-volume. Thus, they’ll be able to work things out without too many nitpicky folks noticing.

In any case – for now though – it’s a cool little feature that seems to work as expected, once you get it up and running.

(Side note: Some folks (including me) have noted some quirks with getting the new cycling sport to show up in the app, or on the device. I tried restarting the app without luck, but I followed someone on the Garmin Forums saying to restart the phone (yes, it’s odd). That didn’t work for me though does for some. Nor would the device successfully connect to GPS on the phone either initially. Ultimately, after ensuring my firmware was fully updated, I went into the settings on the Vivosmart 4 and simply reset it back to factory defaults with data deletion, and then deleted the Vivosmart 4 out of my Garmin Connect Mobile app, as well as deleted the listing in the Bluetooth control panel. Then I re-paired it like a new watch. Note you don’t lose any data in Garmin Connect this way, so as long as you’re sync is done before you delete, the whole operation will take only about 2-3 minutes. I suspect that something was stuck where the smartphone app wasn’t seeing the new 4.0 firmware on my device, and thus not opening the doors to all the new features. In any case, hope this helps someone.)

Going Forward:

It’s pretty much a no-brainer that Garmin’s going to include this in any new GPS-less wearable products going forward, such as they did last week with the Vivomove. Though, I suspect, like Fitbit, they’ll keep it to the mid-range GPS-less devices. For example, Fitbit doesn’t actually offer this on their lower end ($69) Fitbit Inspire trackers. Only things starting at about $99 with the Inspire HR support it. In Garmin’s case, I’ve gotta believe that’d translate to the basic Vivofit series not getting it. But perhaps I’ll be wrong in the future.

I think there are actually some cooler use cases within the Garmin ecosystem for this though. For example, the new V2 speed sensors that have offline storage on them. I’d love to see a simple toggle where I could have it automatically create an actual GPS track when the speed sensor wakes up and talks to the phone (anytime the wheel starts). Then from there I’d love to see heat-maps of my cycling over time in my Garmin Connect account.

Given that functionality of the new sensors is really targeted at bike commuters, it’d be a super cool feature, especially in a monthly summary report like what Google and others do around location data.

And of course longer-term I’d love to see clean hand-offs between devices and the phone. For example – say your Garmin Edge device is running low on battery during the final few miles of a century ride, down to its last 1%, and you need a bit more time – how about handing off the completion of that GPS track to the phone? This way it all ends up on a single activity. Again, I’m not asking for Garmin to recreate Strava, I’m looking for Garmin to find ways for this to complement the devices people buy. And this feature is hardly unprecedent – Apple actually does the inverse to save battery: By default, if your phone is with you, Apple Watch will use that signal instead.

In any case, you and I can come up with cool ideas all day long (perhaps drop them down below), but for now – this is a perfectly functional first attempt at connected GPS for Garmin’s wearables.

With that – thanks for reading!

DC Rainmaker:

View Comments (73)

  • Given these news, are you expecting any news short-term within the vivo-world, or are new wearables ( e.g. vivosmart 5) far away down the road?

    • I'd argue that'd be bad for a lot of reasons:

      A) Unlikely to be device-agnostic
      B) Unlikely to do anything but be a drain on Garmin's other product divisions
      C) We rarely see Garmin innovate in web services

      On the flip side:

      A) We rarely see Strava innovate
      B) Maybe that'd make Strava do something
      C) Garmin pretty much 'own' Strava anyways these days

      *Own = Indirectly via requirement for Strava's premium services in order to use certain features on a Garmin.

  • I really hope this is the start of Garmin revisiting their Garmin Fit app. Would love to once again be able to record an activity with my phone.

    • surely the problem there is that garmin want to sell hardware?

      an app (unless paid for) will reduce the sales volume of hardware

      and, garmin software is usually rubbish

    • Or its the gateway drug like Polar Flow was with me when I started running. When I got serious about it, I ordered the Polar bluetooth HRM, and then a little more serious and I got an M400.

    • @Benjamine This! With a little extra effort in Garmin Connect and a companion app Garmin could get people “hooked” on their ecosystem. This has been Apple’s approach, and slowly building their paid offerings after getting people on the free iCloud services. Although you do now pretty much need an Apple device, they started with iTunes which ran everywhere. Having all my data on Garmin Connect is the primary reason I tend to only consider Garmin.

    • Wouldn't introducing new users to Garmin's rubbish software drive them elsewhere?
      People buy Garmin wearables because the hardware looks nice.

  • On the topic of Activity trackers, do you have any thoughts on Whoop? I’m not a fan of their subscription model but I wonder if it deserves the following.

    • Yup, I've got one here in the pile I bought this summer. Just getting through the other things on my wrist first.

    • I tried one awhile back. I was disappointed. Not that great. I do have an Oura Ring and like most of the info. Of course, my trusty Garmin 245 handles all the running.
      Shout out to Ray,76 today- current road running miles-91,602 and counting! Nick

  • So can you record an activity directly through the Garmin app?

    I was on holiday and forgot my Garmin 935 charger, so ended up using the Strava app. Then had to export the TCX and import into Garmin Connect.

    Would be useful if I could record through the app directly as a backup.

    • No, still requires a Garmin wearable device to initiate the recording. Nothing actually in the app itself to start one.

  • Any idea if this will come to the Vivomove HR? It's a really expensive device to not have GPS but otherwise perfect, adding this would make my wife very pleased.

  • As your final comments note this is also how Garmin should safeguard LiveTrack when connected to a device that does have GPS.
    If you start LiveTrack it should continue working regardless of whether the phone is actively paired to your Edge device. You can always stop Live Track manually after your ride/run.
    As long as the phone is functioning Live Track should map your movements whether paired or not.
    If cell phone coverage is spotty during a ride/run, update the track as soon as phone service returns.
    The only thing that should affect LiveTrack mapping is loss of GPS signal, but even that could be "patched" as soon as the connection resumes (connect the dots).
    Hopefully this is how Garmin intends to fix LiveTrack once and for all.
    If you start a LiveTrack session it should never go dead unless your purposely stop the session on your phone -- or the paired device ends the workout session.

    • Yup, totally agree. Though, I would caveat it that it shouldn't use the phone's GPS (since that kills battery), until the point of loss of connectivity to the Edge/Forerunner/whatever, in which case it should failover gracefully.

      I know there's a bunch of backend changes around LiveTrack that they started earlier this summer after my post, which they say will manifest itself sometime later this year.

    • My Livetrack used to be rubbish prior to your previous post (attack?) on Garmin. Funnily enough, since shortly after then, it’s actually been pretty reliable (Kiss of death....).

      Not sure whether there have been any backend changes specifically on the live track piece since then.

    • Oh a working livetrack, that would be something, like a long warm summer or a traffic free bike ride. Maybe I should give it another go if you have had success.

    • Yeah, I don't know to what extent improvements have been made already. I know around the same time my post came out they suffered some semi-unrelated web services issues that took down Livetracking (among other things). So I could see some IT process improvements that might have been easy to implement and would be visible in overall uptime.

  • Garmin should drop this segment (waste of money) and concentrate his developers' effort to improve Connect...
    To users, I would recommend the FR 645. It has everything (except multisport in one activity) they will ever need.

    oooh.. I gotcha... this is for walking zombies, who are smartphone addicted...

    • Nah, this also is for people who either wear an advanced fitness watch on the other arm, but also like often swapping that out for a nice watch. In this case, you prefer the smallest possible wearable for the other wrist that you can wear all the time. Notably, the vivosmart 4 has the most advanced sensors (HRV, pulse ox, minus GPS - so stress and body battery functions) at the lowest price & the smallest package for everyday use. I swap in an advanced garmin device on the other wrist that has GPS but no HR - no constant HR monitoring makes the battery on that watch last much longer for GPS-worthy events. Combining the two creates the perfect scenario for me, and Garmin Connect merges data from the two sources seamlessly. VS4 never comes off, nice watch on the other wrist most of the time, swap in advanced GPS watch when appropriate.

    • +1 - although I now largely ditched the nice watch and the a Vivosmart 3 and just wear the 935 constantly. I do miss my nice watch at times and wonder whether I could pull off wearing the 935 and the auto on different wrists. I see Ray wearing two watches all the time and the recently had a post on HODINKEE about it (albeit in reference to the Apple Watch as opposed to a Garmin watch)....

    • I agree. Once the all-day-every-day thing on your non-watch hand is small enough to be concealed under a shirt sleeve like the VS4, you are free to swap in whatever watch (and whatever brand) is appropriate to the activity. Nice watch, advanced fitness watch, Apple watch, Android Wear, swap 'em around. But further, even the newest, baddest fitness watches only recently (e.g Fenix 6) started using the bio sensors found in the VS4 for a year now. Same for any other advanced watch, there's nothing out there that beats the VS4 biometric sensors, the difference is only in the ABC sensors & specific built-in activity training apps that come with advanced fitness watches (exception: and Apple ECG, but that's probably at most a once-a-day thing). It's far too expensive to upgrade a Fenix every time a new bio sensor comes out. VS line always has the newest sensors available for ~$140, and the data can be correlated. I could upgrade to every one of the next SEVEN Vivosmart models to always have the newest bio sensors (they always come to the simple devices first) for the price of a SINGLE Fenix watch which uses a bio sensor that is almost obsolete on the day it's released. Don't get me wrong, I love a great standalone GPS / compass / thermometer / altimeter / waypoint / mapping watch, and the VS4 has none of that. I just like the combination better. Aside: I don't like the trend we're seeing of the advanced watches being available without the bio sensors; HR and pulse ox seem to be on all the Fenix 6 models (can't get a lower priced model without HR and pulse ox). I think Garmin might be on to my plan. Bottom line, I'd hate to see Garmin eliminate this line like OP is suggesting, making it seem like it's only a device for amateurs. That's *really* not the case at all.

  • I would also really like to see the V2 speed sensor connection. I got the V2 for a commuter bike, and to have a tracking of use would be really cool. If accuracy is poor, than it would not matter.

    Another use case that I would really like would be as a backup for the GPS on most units in case of use in area with poor reception. In running/cycling activities there might be areas with poor reception for GPS where the mobile should be better on track. As an example there will be a local half marathon soon -http://ryfastløpet.no/ - where is 20km in tunnels under water. I would assume the phone would be better to track location in tunnels when your 400meter below sea level than the GPS.

1 2 3 4

By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to the use of cookies