Garmin’s Biggest Competitor Is Their Own Software Instability


To the casual observer, one might assume Garmin’s biggest competitors are Apple, Fitbit, and in certain cycling circles – Wahoo. But in reality, I’d disagree. Garmin’s biggest competitor is themselves. Or more specifically, their lack of focus on solving bugs that ultimately drive consumers to their competitors. In effect, my bet is the vast majority of time a person chooses a non-Garmin product over a Garmin one is not because Garmin lost the features or price battle. It’s because that person has been bit one too many times by buggy Garmin products.

And sure – that intro paragraph might seem unfair, after all I do record the vast majority of my own workouts on Garmin products without issue. But the reality is that the ‘Garmin bugginess’ is also true, and everyone knows it. The sole reason Wahoo has slowly gained market share in cycling GPS computers isn’t because they have a technologically more feature laden or better priced product (they don’t). It’s because they have a product that seemingly has less bugs (and also as everyone points out, because you can configure your data pages via phone app).

The reason someone chooses a Suunto watch over a Garmin Fenix series watch isn’t because Suunto has more outdoors features or even better accuracy these days (they don’t). It’s because Suunto spends the time to ensure the vast majority of bugs are never seen by customers. Be it hardware or software related issues, the products are just more dependable.

Which isn’t to say these other companies are perfect. Far from it. But this isn’t a post about whataboutism. It’s not about some random bug that Apple, Wahoo, or Polar hasn’t yet fixed. Or Suunto’s site. It’s about the a cultural problem Garmin seems to have around software stability and bugs, that appears to be ‘features first, stability later’.

Understanding the Scale:


Before we talk bugs though, we do need to talk scale to put things into perspective. Any conversation that skips this isn’t really truthful.  Said differently, when I evaluate the steady stream of issues that land at my virtual doorstep via comments, e-mails, tweets, and carrier pigeons, I try and question a few things (no matter the brand):

A) Was someone just confused?
B) Was this already fixed in a firmware update?
C) If this is a legit issue, then is it widespread, or a very limited edge case?

Whether or not people want to hear it, the vast majority of items do tend to fall into buckets A & B above. That doesn’t mean the company (Garmin or otherwise) is not at fault. Perhaps the product user interface was poorly designed, or perhaps the experience was otherwise ripe for failure. But if ultimately the user (even on a technicality) did something ‘wrong’, then that roughly falls into those first two buckets.

It’s that last bucket (C) I’m more focused on. There, methodology goes like so:

A) When was the last time I saw/heard of this issue?
B) What’s the rough frequency of how often I hear of this issue?
C) Is this a super rare combination of factors/environments, or something that should always just work?
D) What’s the rough ratio of units shipped to problematic units

The first three are pretty easy. I’m trying to figure out if this is a one-off, which may never be seen again, or is this something that’s happening super frequently to a lot of people.

The last question though, the ratio, is trickier. But essentially I’m mentally doing a numbers game. For example, I know that while I might see 5-8 cases of a given problem on a Garmin Edge 520 compared to 1-2 instances of a problem on an Wahoo BOLT, I know that unit sales wise, in that scenario the Garmin actually trends better. That’s because if we look at the numbers, Garmin absolutely dominates the marketplace in wearables for sporting events (obviously, Apple dominates overall sales, but we’re setting that aside from this sport/fitness focused site).

For example, here’s two major running races recently on two different continents showing Garmin wearables market share:


This is especially true the further up the endurance ladder you get. In a 5KM event you’ll see higher Apple Watch market share than in a 10KM event, and even less Apple Watches from a marathon. Garmin typically has 10:1 adoption rates compared to Apple in 10KM and above events. And compared to Suunto? It ranges between 25:1 upwards to 50:1. Polar often half of that again.

From a competitive side, no matter which continent I look at the numbers from – the other brands aren’t even close. Again, we’re just talking people using these for sport. Obviously, if we look at total Apple Watch global sales numbers, they easily beat Garmin. But the vast majority of those watches are going on people’s wrists who aren’t running a mile.

On the cycling side, things are shifting however. In some cases pretty drastically in the last year. Previously Garmin dominated at about 90% of GPS head units on people’s bikes. But in certain events this past fall and spring, Wahoo is coming in at between 15-30%. Way higher than events a year ago. A bit of that tends to be semi-environmental and race-specific. Meaning, in other regions we see them at about 10%, especially when you move towards non grand fondo events (just picking various smaller races or stretches along the side of the road).


So what’s the point?

Well, simply put: With more units in the wild you’re going to see more issues. I’m going to see on average 20x more comments about a Garmin issue than a Suunto or Polar issue. And on average about 4x-10x more comments on a Garmin cycling issue than a Wahoo cycling issue.

Same goes for forums. Garmin actually has their own forums (kudos), where people can post troubleshooting issues. And just like Apple’s forums, they’re packed with troubles. But that’s just like going to a hospital, that’s where you go to find sick people (and hopefully ways to get better). I’ve never understood the logic of saying ‘Their Garmin forums are packed with people with problems’.  Of course they are: That’s the point of them. Problems happen, the point is to resolve those problems. Something that Suunto, Polar, and even Wahoo all lack (Wahoo technically does monitor a Google Group you’ll never find though). Yet similarly, nobody says ‘The Apple forums are packed with people with problems.’

So, with that bit of data-backed caveating, let’s get to the meat of the issue.

Perennial Problems:


Garmin LiveTrack.

See, you just giggled a bit.

Not because LiveTrack is funny, but because you know – just like I and everyone else – that Garmin LiveTrack is horrifically unreliable. It’s actually almost impressive how unreliable it is. I certainly don’t bother to use it. I know better. Almost every time I do use it, my wife gets more upset than if I hadn’t used it. She wants to follow me, not assume I got hit by a car every time the connection drops permanently.

And it’s been this way for years, and yet has somehow gotten worse in recent years. And it’s easy to pick on LiveTrack. But I can do this all day with other bits.

Garmin Edge Bluetooth to phone connectivity.

See, you just giggled again.

Because you know that’s a pain in the butt. You know that getting it paired can often be cumbersome, and when things go wrong, there’s more steps to the dance than the Macarena. And sure, there’s lots of reasons for some. Some technical, some just ‘because it’s the way it’s been’. None matter to most people though – it’s just architecturally broken.

But let’s go back to LiveTrack for a second. One only has to look at my Facebook post or my recent Garmin Live Event Sharing post to see that the vast majority of comments are on people’s semi-unrelated LiveTrack failures.

And I get it, as a technically minded person, I really do: LiveTrack is actually more complex than people realize.

You’ve got basically two levels of things that go can wrong: Edge connectivity to your phone (interference/dropouts such as being in your back pocket), and phone to cellular tower connectivity. At present, if the Edge to phone aspect breaks, the whole thing crumbles, usually permanently. Whereas it really shouldn’t. There’s no reason the phone can’t take over GPS position responsibilities until connectivity can be re-established to the Edge. Companies like Fitbit do a variation of this within their ‘Connected GPS’ functionality for certain devices. I asked Garmin why it doesn’t simply use the phone’s position instead, and here’s what they said:

“The phone does not perform any ‘backup” GPS position transmission if the Edge device connectivity fails.  From our experience, this is typically not the cause of dropped points.  Cellular network availability is believed to be the main cause of dropped LiveTrack points.”

I don’t have the underlying data that can refute that directly. However, I have never-ending data points from people. Even one comment barely 12 hours old posted to the Edge 830 review.

“Hi everyone. I have purchased successive Garmin edges…the latest being the 830. What is going on with the LiveTracking feature? Garmin heavily promotes it but Live Track has not been working for over a year!! I’ve downloaded, deleted the app numerous times, paired, unpaired the phone hundreds of times. NOTHING!!!!! It won’t even send out the Strava Beacon…let alone Auto Start The message I keep getting is “Cannot send invites at this time. Try again later.” This should be the EASIEST function for Garmin to get right being in the GPS business and all. Can someone finally get to the bottom of this. New 830, new IPhone….same old problem. Second, the sync function works only half the time….why does the Edge 830 have two different Bluetooth connections?”

Of course, I have no idea if this comment is fake. Or if the user is somehow at fault. I suspect neither though. Given our (The Royal Our) collective experience with LiveTrack, I suspect it’s an accurate and real issue. As it always has been. And in this case, they wouldn’t show up on Garmin’s ‘cellular connectivity is the issue’ bucket, because frankly they can’t even get to that point.

Now ironically, I’ve actually had pretty good luck lately with it, even while testing the new Live Event Sharing. And in talking with Garmin they aren’t seeing any meaningful numbers of failures – outside of period a few weeks ago where they had backend server issues. The challenge is reconciling that with the torrent of people saying a variant of: ‘It’s hopeless’. Heck, even trying to take the photo above (this morning) would crash my Garmin Connect app each time I opened Live Track. I’m serious.


But let’s shift to something else near and dear to my heart: Openwater swim tracking.

This past weekend I did a triathlon (race). Nothing complex, just a simple sprint triathlon where it had to track my openwater swim for a mere 750 meters. I was wrapping up my testing of the Garmin MARQ Athlete watch, which is Garmin’s top of the line $1,500 GPS multisport watch.

Yet the watch lasted a mere 34 yards in the water before it forgot how to track my swim. The next time it started tracking GPS was when I exited the water.


Now in the world of endurance sports, openwater swim tracking is among the hardest things to do. Half of the time your watch is under the water without signal, the other half it has about 1 second to gain signal and determine a location before being plunged back in the water. So yes, it’s hard. But it’s also something Garmin and others have been doing for almost 10 years. Yet somehow in the last year or so, Garmin has gotten really bad at it. An issue their competitors mostly haven’t had. In fact, Apple has laid down some of the most astonishing openwater swim GPS tracks I’ve ever seen (yet, they somehow can’t track a casual neighborhood run properly, sigh).

But my issue here isn’t my lost 750m sprint swim. It’s that I called out this issue a year ago in my Fenix 5 Plus review. Then again in an openwater swim video comparison video in July 2018. Again in the fall of 2018 in another openwater swim compilation piece. And more times privately and publicly since then. Yet it’s still not fixed.  And now it gets worse, this same issue is impacting the Garmin Forerunner 945 too – where some users are reporting 4 out of 5 swims are producing data that stops tracking after a few dozen meters.

Let’s be frank: The entire point of a multisport watch is triathlon (multisport is the politically correct term to not offend duathletes, but really it’s a triathlon). And yet it fails less than 60 seconds into the main event.

In discussing this issue with Garmin this past week they believe they have a fix in that may resolve the issue. Here’s what Joe Schrick, Vice President over Fitness said this Saturday when I asked what that timing looked like for both the new slate of products as well as existing ones suffering under this:

“We are working on releasing a public beta for the GPS software sometime next week for 945 and MARQ.  Pending positive feedback from beta testers and additional internal testing, we are targeting a formal release at the end of June.  We are also targeting a formal release for GPS software for F5+ and 935 at the end of June.”

However, last summer they said they had fixes in for it too. I refuse to believe people actually tested this functionality prior to this past week. If they had tested it, even just swam a handful of times, they’d have seen the issues that so many others see. In noting though, Garmin says they do work with a large number of people to trial units:

“Our test pool is significant in size and consists of internal and external testers all over the world in both hemispheres (to smooth out seasonal variations).  We obviously have more runners and cyclists in the test group compared to swimmers, but we are continuing to add swimmers to help provide better real-world test coverage.  We are continuously refining our testing procedures to provide the most comprehensive test coverage possible before public release.”

And while I don’t doubt any of that (and I know it to be true), it’s clear that population either isn’t large enough, or isn’t given enough direct guidance on what to test specifically. It may be that population is told to just use the device like normal. Whereas when I worked at one of the largest software companies in the world, for test devices or software that I ‘brought home’ to test, we were given weekly focus areas within the device to push hard on. And almost always with incentives for the people that filed the most bugs in that section.

My Proposal:


My proposal is simple, at least on paper. In fact, it mirrors one of the most famous tech company driven initiatives to date: Bill Gates’ ‘Trustworthy Computing’ letter of 2002, sent to all employees. It was at that point that Microsoft made a significant mindset shift around security bugs/issues. Not everything was a bug per se, but rather, just a lack of focus on security. Whether or not you like Microsoft is besides the point, anyone in the IT industry will tell you the long term impact of this initiative was huge on/for the company. You can read the famed letter here.

But in particular, there are two small paragraphs that I think should resonate the most for Garmin:

“In the past, we’ve made our software and services more compelling for users by adding new features and functionality, and by making our platform richly extensible. We’ve done a terrific job at that, but all those great features won’t matter unless customers trust our software.


So now, when we face a choice between adding features and resolving security issues, we need to choose security. Our products should emphasize security right out of the box, and we must constantly refine and improve that security as threats evolve.” – Bill Gates, Jan 15th, 2002

In many ways, Garmin could replace the word ‘security’ with ‘stability’ (or bugs), and then press send.

But it goes beyond sending a pretty letter. I think Garmin needs three things to occur:

1) A CEO driven leadership letter that organizationally prioritizes stability over new features
2) A customer-facing bug reporting site that allows people to quickly and easily send Garmin issues
3) A team within Garmin that’s specifically (and solely) tasked with proactively finding bug/issue trends and getting them resolved

Since I’ve already talked about the letter, let’s talk next about the bug reporting site.

Today when a customer has an issue, they’re required to open a support ticket. In some countries/regions that’s as easy as an online chat session, whereas in others it requires a phone call or e-mail be opened, and in yet further countries the support is mostly just a digital shrug. One reader last Wednesday reported a pile of issues to their local country support desk and wasn’t assisted on any bugs or given a replacement unit due to lack of stock in that country. While other country support desks (such as the US and UK) are really good about handling customers.

Either way, the current support system doesn’t really focus on known bugs. Mostly because the vast majority of customers actually don’t encounter bugs, they encounter general issues. So funneling them through bug triage wouldn’t help if they just had a normal support problem. But ultimately, that current support system doesn’t appear to adequately compile the frequency of bugs seen by customers – often instead just applying a short-term band-aid to get the customer going again. I know from talking with these support groups that they do consolidate the most frequent issues back to engineering teams, but it’s clear that’s hardly global and even in those well-established support centers, many times the goal seems to be to close the customer case, rather than to close the underlying bug.

If Garmin had a simple customer facing webform that allowed people to describe their bug and include relevant files/etc, I suspect that might make it clear to engineering teams where the bugs actually are, versus depending on support desks that people either don’t want to call or get lackluster results from.

Next, and perhaps most importantly is a team that has ship-blocking authority within Garmin. Meaning, right now the decision for whether or not a product (or firmware version) ships is within the product team itself. And in most software development realms, that’s a logical place for it. But Garmin has consistently proven – product after product, year after year – that those software development teams are incapable of judging that bug bar. Now don’t get me wrong: Bug-free software at the complexity level of devices Garmin is making is a virtual impossibility. No different than Apple or Samsung, Microsoft or Facebook. But, the goal threshold needs to be moved up. Right now that acceptance gate is either too low, or too short in duration to be catching the issues people are seeing.

That team needs autonomy from product group organizational charts to act as a bit of a backstop for customers, and also support. They should be leveraging support division expertise, forum posts (in Gamin’s own forums), and the sifting the internet at large to ferret out issues and hold the product development groups accountable to fix those issues in the next firmware version before more features are added or new products are released.

And I know that this sounds easy on paper and is hard to execute in practice. But it’s also not. It simply starts with organizational direction from the top of the company. Once that ball starts rolling, a cultural shift can occur. It won’t be overnight, nor will it be painless. But it can happen. It took Microsoft years for that organization shift to occur around security (albeit in a vastly larger and more complex company), but the fundamental building blocks are not terribly different than what is outlined above.

Going Forward:


It’d be easy for Garmin to dismiss this post as just a knee jerk reaction to a bad week or two of issues. After all, their Fitness and Outdoor divisions financially speaking are doing better than ever. The company is selling more units than ever before. But it’s also true they’re losing sales of more units than ever before to their competitors. Be it the obvious ones like Apple (which has arguably carved out new market areas), but also to Wahoo in the cycling realm.

It’d also be easy for Garmin executives to dismiss this post as an attempt to get clicks or views. But realistically, the views from a piece like this are inconsequential for this site in the scheme of a month’s worth of posts. Just like they could argue that James’ tweet (a very well respected cycling reviewer and journalist) would naturally become an echo-chamber of 518+ replies. But we’d all know that’s not true. We’d all know that what those 518 replies represent is paying customers’ frustrations with products they’d otherwise love. After all, Garmin’s social media team actually tried to respond to two people in that storm, before they realized they were driving their vehicle the wrong way during a hurricane evacuation.

Just like my tweet a week ago with swimming frustrations would be easy Twitter fodder, but it shows that some 59,000 people saw it, and more importantly: 13,374 people were interested in it enough to actually look at the images.


Finally, some might ask whether I’d continue to recommend (or use) specific Garmin products. And the reality is that every product is different – and more importantly, so are the alternatives. The reality is that for my specific requirements, Garmin generally ticks all the boxes better than most other products. Further, it can be challenging to fit in a larger organizational/cultural arc (like software instability) into a given product review unless that specific product was impacted by it. Or unless I actually saw that specific issue during my review time-frame (such as the case with the upcoming MARQ review).

What I hope Garmin takes away from this is that consumers want the company to do better. They aren’t asking for them to reduce their ever-growing prices, or give things away for free. They aren’t asking for more features or swankier watchstrap materials. They are just asking for the things they want to buy or have bought to work consistently from Day 1.

It seems like a simple request.

With that, thanks for reading.

Tags: ,

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
If you would like a profile picture, simply register at Gravatar, which works here on DCR and across the web.

You can click here to Subscribe without commenting

Add a picture



  1. Michael

    in certain countries the support is very far from good. They insisted there are no problems with my VA3 BT for a long time. Then the altimeter broke and again they did not see it as an issue, fortunately amazon did and allowed me to return a faulty device. Overall the devices are pretty good but where for me they sail is garmin connect which seems user hostile with cumbersome navigation

  2. Deeko

    Unfortunately Garmin’s quality of software and levels of support seem to be inversely proportional to the unit price. I’ve had quite a few Garmin GPS watches (205,305,405, 910xt, Fenix 3, Fenix 5 x & Fenix 5+) and the worst supported seem to be last one I have in my possession!

    Thankfully I didn’t buy a FR 945 to replace my Fenix 5+ as it seems to be just a bad.

    Give these watches are starting to cost a fortune it is nit unreasonable to demand that the watch meets the advertised features. My F5+ for examples loses around 10% battery per hour with only GPS on and no OHR. Nowhere near the advertised figures and I’m not the only one. If it’s not fixed in the next firmware drop it’s getting returned for a refund.

    I think my next watch is going to be something else unless they start sorting things out.

  3. Emiliano

    I use my Garmin watch in isolation from reading about Garmin online. I had no idea the issues I had we’re quite widespread. Live track is nearly useless on my 235 and Bluetooth connection is always dropping out. I actually pinned those issues to my phone (a 3 year old Pixel). I cam imagine people who are having issues but think it’s due to something else. Damn, Garmin… Get your shit together.

    • Dave

      Hi Emiliano… I share your pain. I have exactly the same problems with Live track and bluetooth connection on my FR235 purchased in July 2016.

  4. Michael Harman

    I ride with a Wahoo Bolt and anytime anyone asks me how I like it, my response is along the lines of “it’s never lost one of my rides”. I’ll admit, I’ve never owned a Garmin bike computer. But I know plenty of people that do, and I can’t count the number of times they’ve had a ride disappear, their computer crash during, or right after their ride. I find it absolutely fascinating.

    • Louis Matherne

      For what it is worth, I’ve been using a Garmin (800, 1000, and now 830) since 2013 and I’ve never once lost a ride. I’m not saying that Garmin’s aren’t buggy, particularly at introduction, but I’ve never experienced this particular problem.

    • Grzegorz Zawadzki

      I lost a few rides – including 300km one (corrupted file). After recent lost ride at the beginning of the year (did 78km, Garmin reported some ridiculously high number) I’ve switched to Wahoo. I do like Garmin but didn’t want to risk unstable firmware.

    • Neil Mc Cormack

      I too use Wahoo element bolt, switched from Garmin after too many unresolved issues. Thankfully I’ve never lost a ride with Garmin and my problems were relatively small compared to what some people have been through. The only reason I’m happy with my bolt is that it does basically what it’s supposed to do, something which Garmin can’t unfortunately!! The next time I’m in the market for a new cycling unit I will look at Garmin first because they are the trendsetters but for now I need reliability, not magic just do the simple things ok!!

    • nate

      wahoo is not without its issues either. a friend i follow on strava has mentioned on a handful of occassions especially on longer bike rides where the wahoo just stops recording the ride and he is left frustrated where my garmin 520 is still going strong.

  5. Zeb

    What irony– I bought a Garmin because the TomTom I had failed to update maps more often than not.

  6. Dave Lusty

    Well said. Hopefully Garmin are listening because this could end up killing them in the long term if it’s not resolved. Something akin to uservoice would be awesome for Garmin, although I get the impression they are happy with the status quo.
    Now is a great time for them to make this transition though. They are definitely out ahead in a way that Suunto and Polar can’t catch up in a reasonable timeframe. As such Garmin have the luxury of time to really refine the software.
    Of note though, Suunto has a single software platform accross devices – could it be that Garmin’s artificial feature differentiation is causing too much extra work? The Garmin kinda sorta similar codebase approach must absolutely suck resources like there’s no tomorrow! We all get that no baro means no baro, but the artificial limitations need to stop to make development cheaper and easier which would in turn mean fewer bugs and more time for testing.

  7. garmin 830 fail

    Thanks for posting this. I’m having significant issues with my Garmin 830. The GPS Galileo is notoriously inaccurate (but at least there are two other options – GPS / GPS + GLONASS). Bigger problem was that on an 80 mile ride this past weekend, I lost access too all sensors – my power was frozen at 15 watts for several minutes. Every other sensor (except for speed) was disconnected. I did several restarts and this didn’t solve the issue. Based on the garmin 830 forum (link to forums.garmin.com), seems like many others are having this issue as well. So frustrating to pay up for the brand new unit and for it to fail so miserably. I think it’s related to the iPhone connection – that seems to be the common issue in the Garmin forums.

    Dare I switch to a Wahoo or back to my Edge 520 plus?

    • Louis Matherne

      Are your sensor connections Bluetooth or ANT+? ANT+ is more stable.

    • TODD

      The new 3.33 beta may resolve the connection issues. You can get it on the forums.

      I’ve lost connectivity to my power meter during my ride a few times now. Seems to be only on the 830. Very frustrating. I mean, how is this not found during testing?

  8. JDW

    Nice timing. This literally just happened when I went to check my tri data from this weekend….

  9. Sam

    Ive been running with Garmin for the last 15 years, as my running improved, along with my salary, I have upgraded and upgraded and 6 months ago culminated in me buying a premium watch, the Fenix 5s+.
    I wish I hadn’t bothered. My first Forerunner wasn’t great but st least it didn’t cost a fortune and disappoint me every time I did something other than run to the shops.
    Whilst still a Garmin user, if things don’t improve I’ll downgrade to their most basic running watch again. Lost revenue and no longer an ambassador for their buggy products…

  10. Alex Masidlover

    I absolutely agree on the principles here; although I don’t think its just prioritising features over stability Garmin also seem to try and release as many devices as possible as frequently as possible all with very subtly different feature sets – which has got to make testing and QA harder…

    Also Suunto now has some rather slick new forums: link to forum.suunto.com

  11. I’ve been all over the map with Garmin after years with the original Polar (way back when Polar stuff was the bomb). Recently however (2 years?) I’ve had a love-hate with Garmin, especially with the Fenix series and more specifically the crude/unstable/unreliable BT pairing architecture (both Android and iPhone). After finally exceeding my threshold a few months ago I took the claw end of a framing hammer to the Fenix and reduced it to silicon dust, felt great, done.

    After swearing off Garmin watches (520 stays because it works) and pondering the direction of my next fitness-watch foray, I took a chance on an Apple Watch 4, which is undeniably an impressive piece of technology. I had to figure out a way to not only get it syncing with my Sporttracks account but also to Garmin Connect as a backup platform. It took several months of testing and mucking around but given that GC does not accept automatic sync from anything but Garmin products, I realized that I had hit a bit of a wall.

    Long story short I’m back with a VA3 that more or less works, my multi-platform sync issues are solved, the Apple Watch stays as a backup and drawer gadget, and life goes on.

    But as Ray so eloquently says, Garmin needs to radically revisit their entire approach to product development, execution, delivery, and support, otherwise they are going to go away faster than they care to imagine.

    Kudos to them for at least making the Fenix 5 quite physically robust…it took about 8 full force smashes with the hammer to completely destroy the watch.

  12. Michael Prytherch

    Ray… I’ve been a long time reader of your blog and a DCR Supporter, never in all my time have your nailed an issue in one simple paragraph of text as the first one in this article, I don’t need to read the rest of it (clearly I did though), I hope Garmin sit up and listen, I’ve owned a lot of Garmin devices across lots of sports and navigation, I’m thinking of an 830 but I’m too scared to get one as I just know it is going to be a nightmare with software issues, I have an S20 Golf Watch which I want to throw into the bin due to crappy software, I hope somebody at Garmin sits up and reads this.

    • Paul S.

      Actually the 830 hasn’t been that bad. My first ride with my 830 was May 16, and since then I’ve done 21 rides with it. I lost 2 miles of a 20 mile MTB ride last Friday, and that’s it. I’ve had other minor problems, but I haven’t been affected by the sensor drops that so many others have had problems with, and it’s stayed connected to my iPhone XS so far as I can tell. Usually I won’t buy a Garmin device within 6 months of release, but I’ve made exceptions (Fenix 1, VIRB Elite and 360, Edge 705). With the 830 I wanted to try out the new MTB stuff and my 1000 was showing signs of age, so I took the chance.

    • Dave Lusty

      Said differently, 5% of your rides have had issues, and you’ve also had problems and niggles on top of that.
      It’s 2019, you should be seeing 1/10000 rides with issues not 1/21. FWIW I firmly believe sensor drops are due to the power being too low on transmission. If it’s a choice between changing the battery every 6 months instead of a year, sign me up to more power drain with dependability.

    • Paul S.

      Maybe now, but over the lifetime of the device, it won’t be 5%. It wasn’t with any of the others (well, maybe the 705, where I carried my 60CSx along with for a long time). And the 830 so far has had no problems with out and backs and loops during navigation, which wasn’t the case with the older devices.

    • Michael Prytherch

      Thanks Paul that is good to know, I want an 830 to get rid of the utter crap screen and slow performance of the 820, I use navigation a lot and Garmin are simply the best at Navigation (especially with detours and going off route) so I don’t want to move away from them.

    • Ed Felker

      And the photo at the top of the post should scare Garmin. When Ray displays the brand new Edge product with a hammer, it might be time to better address consumer frustrations. Interesting that James H. with Cyclingtips has a planned interview with Garmin’s software development chief.

  13. Harry

    Spot on, Ray. These longstanding problems will require a culture shift within Garmin to resolve, and we both know that changes in company cultures are disruptive to “business as usual” and the short-term bottom line. I suppose the questions are whether Garmin recognizes that their current approach as an existential threat, or if people will continue to pay them for the opportunity to be their beta testers and/or be willing to live with software with core features that may, or may not, work. I sincerely hope that they have the resolve to address this, but only time will tell.

  14. Dave

    Current livetrack status for me:

    Garmin Connect App (iPhone, IOS 12) says I need to allow the app to have access to Contacts before i can even use liveshare (even though it has worked in past versions). It directs me to Settings – Privacy. The privacy settigns don’t have any way to allow Connect access, nor has Connect requested access so it’s not disabled. In Settings – Connect, theres options to allow the app to access things such as location and calender. But not contacts.

    Not sure how the heck they broke it so well, but they did.

    • Michael Prytherch

      It’s been like this for ages in the App, same with incident detection saying it needs access to Contacts, even though Apple removed that feature a long time ago, Garmin are just shit at software

    • Chris

      I uninstalled and reinstalled the app, and went through the pairing process again to finally get this working.

  15. Hi,

    “Was this already fixed in a firmware update?”
    I am using an edge 800 user for navigation on long distance events (brevets). I absolutely avoid updating firmware for fear of worse. I prefer to live with bugs I know and have found cumbersome workarounds rather than finding out new ones far into an event and loosing navigation. It’s very hard to test for intermittent failure or bugs that appear after several hors and hundreds of kilometres. I stay with the unit for two reasons: 1) the unit I know best is more useful than the quest for the best unit. 2) Excellent hardware/build quality for this old Edge 800.

  16. Reginald Brown

    From the podcast, and the fact that there are isolated responses in this, I get the feeling that you gave Garmin plenty of time to respond. Instead of acknowledging that they have work to do, they’re defending specific instances. This is a sure sign that they have no desire to put in the work to fix the problem. I’ve been working to find a replacement for my Edge, though I’m giving them one last shot with the Edge 530.

    For a multisport watch, my Fenix 5 Plus is going to last me quite a while, but I’ve been strongly hoping that Suunto can figure out their online platform, or Coros can add a few specific features I’m looking for before I’m ready to replace it. Because I’ve come to the conclusion that I’ve worked with their product management team before, and they just don’t understand the nuanced stuff. Like alerts during structured workouts covering the whole screen, giving me total workout pace at the end of an interval workout, the list goes on. They don’t take the time to understand the best way to implement a feature. At least Coros, for all their faults, actually listen to their customers.

  17. Mxm

    Has Garmin more bugs than competitors?

    Comparing a Garmin 735xt gps watch I have been using since 17 months, GPS Lezyne bike computer (Mega XL) and Tomtom multisport gps watch I need to say that Garmin is the most stable and most reliable. This is exactly the reason I consider Garmin as the next watch/computer I would buy.

  18. Let’s not forget the barometric-altimeter issues with the 920xt and Fenix lines.

    • Marshall Spradling

      I was getting ready to post this before scrolling through and finding someone else already had. I’m on my third 920xt for the barometric-altimeter failure (Garmin has replaced under warranty each time), but everyone I know that has owned a 920xt or a Fenix has had it happen at least once.

    • It’s never been clear to me whether that was a hardware or software issue. I’ve heard arguments for both.

      There are absolutely known *hardware* issues with Garmin’s gear too (like the problems using crank-arm power meters with ANT+) but that discussion is mostly orthogonal to Ray’s points about software quality and design so I wasn’t going to drag it in.

    • Joel

      Not just the 920… Im on my 3rd 935. All have failed the same way…barometric/temperature sensor. I think is a chlorine water from the pool. Its a tri watch tho. They should know better!

    • Jordan A

      I had a F3, barometer died, but was out of warranty. Then got a Fenix 5X which had the barometer die, luckily it was covered (barely), and they sent me a refurbished. On my call with Garmin the tech even said to me that the swimming (salt or chlorine) causes issues with the Barometer. I was kind of baffled as this was a Garmin employee stating that doing one of the very activities this watch is created for will break one of the key features of the watch. Not to mention the F5X in Canada is nearly 1000 bucks. I swim 3X a week (8-12K a week) and I’m just waiting for the barometer to go on this one…. anyone know if I can get a warranty replacement on a warranty replacement?

      Can’t begin to express the frustration level, and add the on top of my Edge 510 that has bricked itself umpteen times. I have been in the endurance sports world for 6 years and have been Garmin loyal the entire time, but I must say, I have and am seriously considering switching to another ecosystem as a result of these frustrations.

    • Marshall Spradling

      Jordan A, I’m on my third 920XT, and it’s a warranty replacement of a warrant replacement. So yeah, they should honor it.

    • Marie Hughes

      They didn’t honor mine. Insisted it was “out of warranty” when the replacement watch was less than a year old.

      I ended up lending it to someone who didn’t care about altitude (just wanted pace and time) and getting a 935. Only minor problems with that watch but I find the button placement completely counter-intuitive and frequently press the start/stop when I mean to press the lap button. It also for a while wouldn’t pick up my speed & cadence sensors during group rides but that was minor and short lived.

      I develop software for a living and it’s clear to me that Garmin doesn’t have software in their DNA.

    • Norma

      I thought it was just me! After my altimeter/barometer failed on my second Fenix 5S, I googled to see if it was a general problem, but didn’t find many results. I’ve just resigned myself to the broken feature. It is still better than the TomTom it replaced. (Although it should be at 2x $).

  19. Andrei

    for the apple watch statistics in races: I presume these are from Strava; but there’s a major drawback there. If you use the native apple watch Workout app and upload via HealthFit (as I believe more than half of the people are doing) you don’t actually see that the workout was recorded with an apple watch.
    So I believe those numbers would only show runs done with the Strava watch app

  20. tfk the5krunner

    A timely post. VERY nice job. Strategically useful to refer to as evidence of non-Garmin bias too 😉

    This comment of yours sums it up for me ” I refuse to believe people actually tested this functionality prior to this past week”

    I agree “the acceptable bug threshold” appears to be too low with Garmin. I would imagine that the underlying drivers here are release schedules and the cash/profit they generate. Stock markets nearly always drive shortermism.

    Having said that, I suspect that Garmin could continue as they are and everything would be alright for them for several years to come.

    I agree that people use products like Wahoo because ‘they just work’ (I do). After a while, the niche features just become yet another time-waste for a time-poor athlete and you just want a nice set of features that do the job.

    Ultimately though Garmin are going to PROPERLY come up against Apple and Chinese low-cost competitors. Then the sparks will fly. I can’t see Garmin continue to grow whilst winning at both those extremes of the market.

    • Garmin already *has* run up against Apple, as have Fitbit and Pebble. The race-usage statistics bear this out; look at the Apple Watch penetration (keeping Andrei’s point in #24 in mind) vs Polar, Suunto, and Coros, and then think of how long it took Garmin to get their market share vs how long it’s taken for Apple to take some of it.

    • todd sparks

      It makes me wonder what would happen if Apple decided to release a ‘true’ sport watch and made it more rugged and added just a few more advanced sport features (like interval training). I for 1 know I’d consider it. Between software issues and the inconsistent build quality of their devices, Garmin has seriously frustrated me lately.

    • tfk the5krunner

      that’s a great point about the strava app ON the apple watch.

      I think the Apple/China point still has to play out tho. Apple’s watch is not quite a proper competitor for many user segments of the market, although i think last year’s iteration showed more serious intent from them when it comes to sporty abilities
      And some chinese companies are tantalisingly close to giving Garmin some serious problems on a cost-per-feature basis eg Coros/AmazfitStratos…the features on the STRATOS are extensive and generally great but the hardware was not quite up to it. Apparently, there could be a STRATOS 2 some times this year, if they have upped their game on the hardware front then that will be a great sports watch (but I bet they won’t have put in good enough ohr/gps components). so I think 2020/2021 is when it will be more obvious that there is ‘clear and present danger’ for Garmin.

    • JR

      Of course Apple could be a threat to Garmin, but that’s not Apple’s goal. Apple will never make an always-on display with multiple physical buttons. Apple will never make a product that can last much more than a day without being recharged Even as lower-power chips and better batteries are developed, Apple will just use that tech to make its stuff smaller and higher performance. A single day of battery is the threshold that matters in their market.

    • Charles Borlase

      Apple has some basic software weaknesses as well. Bugs that Garmin hasn’t made, or if the did, they made them 15 years ago.

      One bug: a coworker uses Apple watch for runs. He noted his average HR was 140 for a run, and the minimum was 60, mid run.
      It was clear they missed a beat, but didn’t do beat averaging, so they picked the value that was clearly abnormal as the minimum. (turns out the funny beat value can be deleted and recalculated, so there’s that)

      I’ve not seen my Garmin(s) do this, Garmin does a reasonable moving average to get it’s data.

      It’s clear Apple doesn’t have the fitness background, but I suspect they will improve.

      Just like Microsoft years ago. Don’t give me a new windows. Give me the same one but without bugs. That’ll provide real value to me.

    • Ward Yorke

      I completely agree with your thoughts. If Apple sets up a true sport division and aggressively chases this market, I think many people will give it a serious look before their next purchase. I’ve often wondered why they have given scant effort to a huge purchasing sector.

  21. I must say, it’s quite comforting to know that everyone else has issues with Livetrack. I thought it might be a two year old Sony Android phone, but it’s probably Garmin. Which is a pity, as the Fenix 5S is quite nifty. I use Livetrack so my husband knows where to start looking for my body if I don’t appear at the logical time at the end of my run, but when I see ‘Livetrack Failed’ more often than ‘Livetrack Started’ it seems a bit pointless. It’s even worse when it appears to me to be working but the email link advises that the Livetrack has not occurred, so he worries that something has happened.

    I still send my husband a text with a full body photo of my outfit and my expected route, and stick to places with CCTV so I should be able to be followed on video if I disappear, but surely Livetrack shouldn’t be quite so hard to get functioning? If it is so hard to get to function, why offer it in the first place?

  22. Anirudh

    My brand-new Edge 530 rebooted 3 times while navigating a road ride. Fortunately for me, it resumed navigation correctly each time.

  23. mack

    I actually have switch back to garmin (Edge 830 and forerunner 945)from Polar (v800) because of how bad Polar has been, losing activities completely, the indoor swimming metrics being completely unreliable.
    I did submit a support request a couple of weeks ago and the garmin website says 10 day turnaround (which is totally unacceptable), I did get a response in 3 or 4 days, but luckily had solved it myself first.

  24. Brad

    So what would your recommendation be for the best-ish non-Garmin running focused watch right now? Apple? Suunto? Which would you say is the most stable/reliable?

  25. Mick

    Ray, In summary, Garmin or Wahoo?


  26. Stuart

    I have a Garmin 810 and 1000 gathering dust on a shelf. After experiencing the ‘typical issues’ I side-graded to Wahoo, and have been happily using an Elemnt and a Bolt for the last two years. No problems.

    I’d really like a Garmin 830 or 1030 because of the extra features. But the primary purpose of a head unit (for me) is always to record my ride faithfully, and (often) to track a pre-prepared route.

    Unless Garmin can consistently demonstrate that it meets the core competencies, the fact that there are additional nice-to-have features simply cannot be relevant, unfortunately…

  27. Reu N

    I just purchased my first Garmin, the Edge 530 and while it didn’t lose the first decent ride, it did drop all external sensors, tell me my fresh power meter batteries were low, and drop about 10 miles of a 70 mile ride. It also locked onto the last read numbers telling me I did the most of the ride at 111 watts, 93 RPM, with no heart rate. I still have yet to hear back from support on how to handle issues like that. Maybe DC can do a video on mid-ride troubleshooting!
    I really wanted some of the new features and Wahoo’s new offering, Roam, was so disappointing I went with the Garmin. Even a small ride I took over the weekend dropped a mile or 2.
    I’m was just assuming it’s just new product bugs, but I have my doubts that the Edge 530 will actually be able to replace my older, less featured but stable, rarely fails, Wahoo Bolt.

  28. Roberto Cuadro

    If I was not already wrapped up in the Garmin ecosystem I would switch.

    Heck, I was a “proud member” of the Vector 3 beta test team and by that I mean that I paid a grand to be a guinea pig as they got them working properly.

    • The Real Bob

      like x 1 million.

      My vector 3 pedals worked for 1 ride, just 1!!! I got a new set of end caps. Then the pedals literally fell apart and I had to spend 10$ to ship them back to garmin to get a replacement. Garmin owes every vector 3 owner money.

      But don’t worry, they said the 3rd version of the endcaps work . As long as I buy the right batteries, use baby oil, say a prayer, etc.

  29. At this point, as a long-time Garmin user, I cannot get my head unit to be recognized by my computer or by my iPad or iPhone. I am technically competent but man, I cannot do it. I am not commenting here because of this current issue but because this type of problem has been consistent with all my Garmin my running watches, multi-sport watches and head units. As read your article and looked at my woes with Garmin both current and previous…I am questioning my own sanity…why am I still using Garmin? (Great article, as always)

    • Reginald Brown

      You’re probably still using it because the competitors tend to occupy niches that you don’t occupy. I have made multiple attempts to leave the Garmin ecosystem and come back reluctantly. But I think the competition is really ramping up. My Fenix 5 Plus and Edge 530s will probably be my last Garmins, though that 530 is going to probably last quite a long time.

  30. rkantos

    It is a wonder how they manage to produce GPS devices for aviation…

    • This isn’t entirely a fair point– they spend a LOT of money on their aviation work and those devices are *very* expensive, relative both to their competitors and to what non-aviators think of as reasonable. It’s also true that there are rigorous standards for how they have to write and execute test plans for various things, which perhaps they don’t do on the consumer-device side with quite as much emphasis.

    • Anirudh

      Those need to be FAA-approved, along with a bunch of other aviation-specific standards. Makes a big difference.

    • Fred Lee

      Maybe Ray could start a DCR approved certification process.

    • Greg Franks

      I wouldn’t put too much weight on FAA approval: link to spectrum.ieee.org

  31. Neil Jones

    I’d like to understand how Garmin identify formal issues from CS tickets. I call Garmin, say I’ve got a problem with X. They tell me it’s not a known issue, do a hard reset, goodbye. Next person calls up with same problem X, and is told the same thing. So you end up with lots and lots of people talking on the forums who all share problem X, but on reporting it to Garmin, each and every one of them is told they’re the first person to report it. It seems that it’s catch-22, your issue won’t be acknowledged unless it’s a known issue, but to become a known issue it has to be acknowledged.

    How long were people calling Garmin CS for about Vector 3 issues and still being told that their problems were unique?

  32. Chris Watson

    I spend a lot of time on the Garmin Forums. The recent forum software upgrade is a complete horror story. They should downgrade and the old software was far superior.

    • JD

      DCR – Would be curious to hear your opinion on the new forum format.
      I’m with Chris Watson. Old forum was at least navigable and searchable to some degree.
      The new forum format has been perplexing so far. I gave up trying to locate a thread specific to BT connection issues and Live Track. You could run around in circles for hours. I don’t have the patience for that. Plus your reset instructions resolved my problems (for now).

    • Charlie

      I agree. The forum “upgrade” is a step in the wrong direction because it makes it harder to see the full scope of problems for a given product.

  33. Peter Johns

    So this is an interesting problem that requires a different view than Ray’s. While he suggests a solution that is oriented to fixing the software, I would argue that nature of the problem might be much different. It lies in the mindset of the users. Think about Ray’s recent failure of his fancy new Garmin watch. If that happened to a normal user (mere mortals) we would just simply try again and decide down the line, if it continue to fail, to replace it with a different brand unit. It drives me crazy that these companies try to complete software changes (that are complicated) without simply getting the minor upgrades right first. Take the recent testing Ray did on the Garmin units for “Live Tracking”. They are trying to predict time for the race you are doing today, but have not yet conquered simple Live Tracking. Let’s try to walk before we sprint!

    In the interest of full disclosure, I am a Wahoo Element Bolt user and I use Live Tracking all the time. It works well most of the time. But I would never need or want them to predict my time for finish of some race, I think I can give my wife the right approximate time to pick me up after the race. On the other hand she can use Live Tracking to figure out if I crashed and will be delayed (like at the hospital).

    Ray is right, they need a new solution to solve these issues. I am a simple user, when it does not work three times, I move on to a new more dependable set of software and hardware. Garmin, are you listening?

  34. Perfect words of wisdom, and exactly the reason I stopped using Garmin…

    605 was perfect, 800 was good – Only replaced it when the battery life deteriated, 1000 after the first one randomly didn’t know where it was in the world, the warranty replacement also had issues, then got condensed inside descending in the Pyrenees… The battery life was shoddy anyway!

    Since moving to Wahoo Elemnt Bolt, it simply does what I want with no fuss….

    If they focused on a solid reliable product instead of a list of useless features that don’t work, I may have remained as a customer

  35. Mark J.

    Manually starting Live Track has been working for me lately. I still get the occasional drop out, but 9 out of 10 times it works. What’s driving me nuts is the “updated” Garmin forum. It’s horrible and has no forum for the Edge 1000, which is till a very viable piece of kit. Garmin claims they’re trying to finish updating the forum to bring back the missing sections, but as someone who runs my own forums, I don’t see that as a problem that would take weeks or months to fix. I almost wonder if Garmin farmed out the update work to some 3rd party who can’t or won’t fix their final product.

    • Paul

      Garmin deleted the edge 1000 forum a month before they new forums, which implies to me that they are done with it… It’s a shame, it’s finally stable, and would be great if my bloody power button hadn’t just fallen off.

  36. CJ

    Here’s another issue symptomatic of Garmin’s corporate culture: bugs labeled “features” that would take minimal effort to solve but aren’t.

    A personal pet peev is the lack of granular selection of units. link to forums.garmin.com

    In Canada, we use kilometers for distance, Celcius for temperature, pounds for weight, feet/inches for height. No option – we have to select between statute, metric, metric UK.

  37. jwk

    I think in particular they struggle when more than one thing is connected to another…ie power meter and phone, phone and radar; radar and lights etc… also when the N of connected devices is more than 1 the bugs seem to go up exponentially…. not sure if some of this is a bandwidth, memory, or computing power issue but it is very frustrating and i own a lot of garmin products….but if i had critical data needs would be looking elsewhere at this point.

  38. A

    I stopped buying my Garmin since Fenix 3 HR, not that I can’t afford anything latest from Garmin , it is just the exact issue that you pointed out above. Their software sucks and they can’t never seem to fix it no matter how many firmware they developed later on especially the ability to track GPS or the sync issue with iphone.

    I don’t need to buy Garmin Fenix 5 or 5+ to know that the users will have similar issues here and there that will be very frustrated to use.

    I think I will stick with my Fenix 3 HR, it don’t have a lot of features but at least It went throught many iteration of firmware updates to be stable for me

    • Zoltan

      I still deem that Garmin triathlon watches has ‘travelled’ on a reverse U curve. And from this aspect I consider Garmin outdoor wearables as some sub-sort of triathlon watches, because both of these groups have too many features.

      We could argue and disagree that which one was on the top based on the accuracy and stability (unnecessary to dispute about the number of features, because it is a monotnous function), but there must have been around 310XT-910XT or at the earliest Fenixes.

  39. Alvaro

    What a great article. Garmin I hope you are listening.

    What always surprises me, being in the Aviation industry, is that my buggy Edge 820 comes from the same company that makes the majority of Aviation Avionics. That is right, there are millions of airplanes flying out there with a Garmin controlled software! Thankfully, these software are WAY WAY better than the edge. How is it that this portion of Garmin can iron out their bugs but cycling and recreational can’t? Is it because the FAA is involve?
    Do we need a cycling regulation board that approves each software for Garmin to get on top of their bugs? If so, I vote for Ray to be president of the board.:)

  40. Chris

    100% agree. I’m about to switch from Garmin to Wahoo for my cycling for this same frustration. More stability is indeed needed by the Garmin product(s) I’ve used. And I’m not very fond of the software or UI – quite clunky.

  41. Alfred

    You hit the nail on the head. Nearly the only reason I’m strongly considering giving up on Garmin and going to a non-Garmin phone/watch combo for tracking is Garmin’s software. (The other minor factor is the charging connector on the new Fenix watches, which has been totally unreliable.)

    Garmin has a great hardware lineup, overall. They would do well to invest some effort in consolidating and cleaning up their software. Even as a casual user, I feel like I have a pretty good glimpse into the horrendous mess that most likely is their codebase every time I use one of their products.

  42. Hugo McHugh

    Nail. Head.
    Thank you.

  43. Michael Falk

    I do not seem to have these problemes – i have not used live track that much, but when i do i have no issues. Phone connectivity is also fine. Is there any statistic of which phones seems to have these troubles? I know huawei bluetooth implementations sucks. I have used samsung and Lg phones with no issues. (a huawei was returned because i did not work with my garmin)

  44. Paul S.

    Something I’ve always wondered is how much of Garmin’s problems with software might be due to H1B abuse? Are they not retaining programmers because they don’t want to pay them what they’re worth, and is that showing up in the quality of their software?

    • scott g.

      The crack Garmin tech goons work on avionics and radar,
      sport equipment is done by trainees and interns.

  45. Dmitry Pupkov

    Speaking about different Garmin support in different countries. Russia is not the largest market for Garmin, however it is quite large (fun facts – Russia has the largest amount of banks supported by Garmin Pay). However, Garmin distributor here is completely rubbish. They will never ever support you and your device, if you bought your Garmin outside of Russia.

    I’m not even to mention that Garmin MSRP price in Russia is almost twice price for the same devices in EU or US. For an example, Fenix 5 plus (non spahire, not X) has an MSRP price here at 68’322 rub (1’000+ US$), while F5X plus starts at ~1270 US$… And VA3 (sic!) is 24’390 RUB here (376 US)…

    So, many people have to purchase devices via US or EU distributors. I have several cases when I send my devices back to US, because Garmin support in US doesn’t care where you’ve bought your device, and will support you in any case.

    Funfacts #2. Suunto here in Russia is almost as popular as Garmin amongst sport people (definitely not at 1:20 ratio). Mostly because their pricing is the same as EU and US. And they will support you even if you purchase your device outside of Russia.

  46. Darrell

    Finally a review puts this print. Well Done!!!!

    I’ve owned several of the 500 series and 1000 series Garmin Edges. The software experience has been HORRIBLE. Actually its the worst I have seen from a well know company.

    My issues focus mostly in 2 areas.
    1) Upgrading software version can trash your Garmin. When that happens you have to reload the software, and load back setting files, courses, activities, etc. Its a long process and still you may not get all your setting back. I’s gotten to the point that I dont upgrade Garmin software until I see its been out for 1-2 months and others havent had issues.
    1a I had to slip another in. I used to check for this info on the Garmin website. They recently upgraded the website software and screwed it up. The site is terrible now and they haven’t even reloaded the Edge 1000 forum.
    2) Sometimes you “upgrade” only to find new bugs. This happens with other companies, but where Garmin is different, is that they introduce huge obvious bugs. And when you upgrade software they often over-write user settings. You set things up they way you want, then Garmin wipes out your settings. Sometimes the Garmin wouldn’t even talk to their own product (Varia,etc).

    Root Cause) The root cause in my opinion, of all these problems is that they don’t test their software after the developers make their code changes. I know it sounds cruel, but when I think of the Garmin Testing department, I visualize 3-4 moneys in a room flinging poo at each other. The testing (lack of) is the worst I’ve ever seen.

    You are right that Garmin, not outside competition is their worst enemy. Each time a Garmin product of mine stops working, I replace it with a non-Garmin product.

    I’m glad I started moving away from Garmin products. I want to get power meter pedals, but refuse to buy the Garmin Vector 3. I am so glad I went with another maker. The Faveros have worked flawlessly, while the Vector 3 has had huge, frustrating issues.

  47. Dave Lusty

    50 comments in two hours. I hope you’re charging Garmin for this market research, it’s worth a lot for their business!

  48. Justin P

    *Copied and pasted from my Facebook response.

    Ray, I’m glad a high profile person in the sector is commenting on this (finally). I’ve been vocal about this online and in particular, on Garmin’s forums for YEARS about this. I’m just adding my voice to the point here now because of it, but also to contrast one of your solutions (consumer side bug report site), which I don’t think is going to help.

    We have that right now, albeit in an obtuse fashion. Garmin, for some absurd reason, sends out Beta updates solely on the forums, a place not every user either goes to or even knows about. On top of this, the only way anyone can report a perceived issue either with beta testing or with live updates is via email or talking to customer support. I’ve done both; NEITHER are useful with speaking to a Garmin rep being the most useless, because in my experience they don’t have a clue about the device and tend to either funnel you to someone else they think will understand, or tell you to email the beta team.

    And that’s what we have right now; a makeshift, consumer side bug reporting system that doesn’t really work.

    How many people do you think download a beta update? How many of those treats that update as nothing more than an early update to the final release? How many do you think download the beta, want to bug test it, but have no clue what to share to the beta team? And then finally, how many of these people that download the beta, email the team consistently and actually know their info is making a difference?

    I’ve emailed the team for years with issues, all that amounts to is a bunch of words from me explaining the problem and either

    A: Get no response,
    B: Get no response for weeks well after the beta has ended or
    C: Get a response that only leads to more questions that they never conclusively tell you if they are looking into it or if they confirmed the problem.

    They also NEVER tell you what, if any internal files on the device, you should or could send to them so they can see if there’s a bug in the code or if it’s something isolated to your device.

    This, this system, this obtuse testing system is the problem and leaving it up to the user(s) to describe the issue(s) is not helpful. What I think they should have done is created an Opt-In user beta test program where they alone will get exclusive Beta updates that are tied to the user’s I.D and the device(s) S/N. You can have a different GC Express or option in the App where you consent to Garmin taking a snapshot of your devices drive while using the beta updates.

    You’re sending them actual files on a consistent basis so they can assess how their software is working in the wild. There also should be a built-in system that the beta tester can report inside the beta testing ecosystem any perceived bugs or general faults directly to the team and when it is sent it’s tagged with what Software build you are on. What config you are running and what files for the device you are reporting for to look at to confirm the perceived issue.

    With this, you’re getting dedicated info from dedicated users using a beta-testing system for you to fine-tune and correct all these problems from the ground up and automating the system for those users to send you real-life data regularly.

    What they do now though, contributes to the never-ending confusion of Garmin device releases. They are dealing conflicting, piecemeal info from users across devices and no intuitive structure to help fix the products, so future releases don’t have to deal with this.

  49. Geezer Geek

    It’s about freakin’ time! This issue has been the elephant in the room since I started with Edge units in 2010. I spend 3x the time screwing around my Garmins trying to get it figured out and working than I do riding…and I never really get it working. I don’t even know where to begin.

    The fact that something my be difficult or tricky to implement is irrelevant. It’s feature, they’re selling it and taking your money, it should work.

    As a systems engineer, I don’t understand how it’s possible to run a project like this. I can’t imagine working in an environment where this is possible.

    But what do I know. Look at their market share.

  50. Gennaro

    I am not going to repost what I wrote a few days ago regarding the Garmin Forerunner 645, but it’s good to remind that:
    (1) It has a widely reported problem with barometer and altitude during runs, when it records high elevation gains and skyscraper floor counts on flat runs
    (3) The 645 Music is getting firmware updates, whil the 645 (non music) is getting NOTHING.

    Other than that, I’m not very happy with the support. It is very difficult to make the problem understood (and Garmin should know it well), and after weeks of useless suggestions (reset, clear the barometer hole etc. etc.) nothing gets solved.

  51. Ian S

    Good article, sums up the problem well. For me it’s basic product development methodology, Garmin have a consistent track record of releasing products without adequate testing. To give them credit, they seem quick to address issues when identified but anyone who buys a Garmin product in the first year of release is basically signing up to being a beta tester. And that’s not acceptable.

    I like the idea of moving the ownership of go/no-go. I would add to that a clear incentive and measurement of problems reported post go-live and frequency of firmware fixes required post launch. It’s very clear that there is no assessment of the huge amount of post launch fixes that always happen.

  52. CharlesAtBc

    It would be interesting to see the market shares (as provides on 10k road race) on trail races. My bet is Suunto has a larger market there, and even larger if you only take into account the leading runners.

  53. John Kissane

    Garmin’s UK support is pretty good if a little slow, going by the post guess they’re busy. I’m about to have a 645 replaced for the second time(!) due the jagged elevation graphs it produces turning the stair climbing stat to garbage. Of course given lots of others on the Garmin forum see the same thing, I’m dubious that a second replacement will make any difference.

    Apart from that the watch is pretty good although does drop the connection to an external HRM & footpod every now and again during events. Both at the same time so can only blame the watch.

    It did cross my mind as to how much testing Garmin do on their products.

  54. Davis

    They should focus on collapsing their product line too. When they have 2x to 3x the products of their competitors for the same segment and it’s hard to decide which is truly the better watch (cycling computers excluded). I couldn’t decide between the Vivoactive 3 or the Forerunner 245… so I bought an Apple watch! I wanted a barometric altimeter but I also wanted the longer GPS battery life. Now I know the Apple watch doesn’t have the longer GPS battery life, but my thought was it would work until a better Garmin unit came (and I didn’t want to spend 600 for the 945, and the 645 didn’t have PulseOx which the lower 245 had). Not the most logical choice, but Garmin’s line-up doesn’t give me easy choices.

    If they had less models to play with it would probably be a lot easier to focus on making bug free software.

    • Brandon Gittelman

      I agree they have too many products. Why does the Forerunner 45 even exist when the Vivoactive 3 does at the same price?

      IMHO, they need 4 products –

      Entry level: Forerunner 45 – $200
      Mid Level: Forerunner 745 – $350/400(Music) – Essentially what the 645 is, but with multisport mode
      High End: 945 $550 – Adds in mapping, barometer, etc
      Premium: Fenix 6 (essentially 945 with metal case) $600

      There’s next to no point for the VA3/45 to coexist, same for the 245/645. It’s also sad that the 735XT was pretty much identical to the 235 but with different software, giving it more features than the 245 and 645, except for Garmin Pay/Music.

    • It’s a tough thing though. At a basic consumer level, I agree: The product lines are getting too muddled and hard to understand/explain.

      However, at the business level, it’s hard to agree. Garmin is selling more devices than ever before and at more price points than ever before. And from a sales/etc perspective – they’re dominating there. So it’s hard for someone (me or otherwise) to be like: ‘Garmin, I know you’re having your best years ever in the fitness/outdoor categories, but really, I think you should make less products’. I don’t really have any proof that reducing SKU count would make it clearer. Especially as you get into the FR245 vs VA3 type discussions. For most athletes, I suspect they skew towards buttons. However the general public tends to prefer the allure of touch screens. Garmin seems to understand this.

      Sure, one could look at the Apple Watch, but even they now have 2 core Active SKU’s (Series 3 & 4), plus size and LTE/non-LTE SKU’s. And that’s also a different market (as much as we all like to compare to Apple, not everything can be compared to Apple).

      I’d insert a shrug/confused emoji here, but I’m too lazy to lookup the right character codes on my keyboard.

    • Bob

      vivoactive and 45 have very different screen sizes. Makes a difference to many.

  55. Harris

    Great and helpful article for Garmin. I was one of those faithful Garmin users, who had just had enough. I owned multiple devices for both running, cycling and navigation, and after the continuous problems with my Garmin Edge 510, I went over to the Wahoo Bolt. There have been no issues with the Bolt, and it just works. The ease of set-up was amazing! I am now looking at the Garmin Edge 530, which seems like it has some great new features, which the Bolt doesn’t have, and also seems like good value for the money, but I am definitely gun-shy with the Garmin software. Thanks Ray for bringing this to Garmin’s attention, and I think I’ll wait awhile until I hear about the issues with the 530 before buying one.

    • Johann

      I think Garmin has to learn from History here. Remember Nokia they had too many devices and a Software eco system which was too complex and worked terrible Music being one. Nokia got killed by Apple and Samsung devices which offered less features but essentially provided more ease of use that worked.

      Sadly I think Garmin is going down the same path we have just not seen the new killer device but based on new players and existing players we might see this sooner rather than later as getting 10% or Garmin’s current market is a substantial motivator.

  56. Pat

    I have an 810 that i absolutely can not use for auto-navigation- it constantly tells me about the slightest turn with repeated warnings. This drained the battery on a 125 mile in under 100 miles, leaving me to navigate back to the car using the maps on my phone. Not a good day, now I just set a route to be always visible so i can manually follow it. It also loves to crash if I keep too many activities in memory- that was fun on a ride down the length of Long Island and into NYC to meet my ride home with a unit that went down twice. A few more crashes locally and i started to empty it every time i sync it to the computer. I haven’t had a crash or freeze up in years as a result of keeping the memory empty. Live connect has never worked for me beyond 5 minutes and the bluetooth connection the phone randomly comes and goes, lately it stopped syncing for no apparent reason.It likes to drop the ANT+ speed sensor as well and revert to GPS speed in the trees, even with fresh batteries in the sensor. Meanwhile the F5x stays connected perfectly…

    Garmin tech support offered me a different serial # 810 but could not guarantee it wouldn’t also drain the battery navigating/crash randomly or stay connected to the phone and speed sensor so i passed. Better to stick with the devil i know than to get one i don’t.

    My Fenix 5x has been mostly solid outside of the optical HRM crazing/cracking 6 months in and of course the barometer that’s utterly useless- I live and pretty much work at sea level, walking across the flat parking lot into work usually trips the stair climbing goal. I did get the replacement pretty fast and the 2nd watches HRM is doing good but the barometer is still garbage no matter how many times I calibrate (manually and with gps). Meanwhile the 810 is pretty accurate despite being significantly older and beaten on much harder. It just can’t navigate.

    While the 830 has my interest as a replacement (my battery is starting to fail), I going to wait till at least September, maybe October before ordering one. I’ll know by then if the initial issues are getting resolved, what new ones are popping up and if Garmin is making headway on resolving them in a timely manner. I had a Karoo briefly last year but there were still too many issues to consider it as a replacement, especially at the price being charged. The Sigma Sport ROX 12 also has my interest as a potential replacement unit.

    • Meredith

      >I have an 810 that i absolutely can not use for auto-navigation- it constantly tells me about the slightest >turn with repeated warnings

      That could be caused by map issues. What maps are you using? Have you tried maps from a different source? Are the maps up to date?

    • Pat

      I have the (now very) old garmin city navigator maps on it for road riding- not a lot changes out on the asphalt year to year where I ride.Navigation worked fine for the first 2 years of the devices life, the persistent turn warnings started about 55 miles into a 125 mile ride for no apparent reason (it was perfectly fine up to that point). Garmin had no idea why it failed nor any possible solutions beyond the usual hard reset and update the OS. None of which ever worked on resolving this devices various issues.

      My solution to the navigation failure is to change the route display to “always on” in the map section and change the color to red. Now i memorize the next two turns ahead and refer to the map a little more frequently as i get close the turn. It’s not perfect and not what I payed for but that’s life with a Garmin device for ya.

      When my 810 finally becomes unusable due to battery issues, I’ll be looking around to see what is available outside of Garmins messed up ecosystem. The competition has come a long way since I got my 810.

  57. Ben Udell

    Thank you for writing this and if it helps, I fully agree. I’m savvy enough that I simply shouldn’t have confounding tech issues with products such as this. If I have issues, I know many others will as well and they won’t be able to solve it in a timely manner or with limited frustration.

    I’d echo that their tech really struggles between units. With a 235 and 520 it’s amazing how their mass market products simply can’t always connect with an iPhone, do wonky stuff that requires a hard reset to fix (like broadcasting a heart rate), or can’t sync data and maps. And at the heart of it, these are basic tech requirements.

    I’ve tried to make my life easy be sticking with Garmin products to stay in the ecosystem, but I’m not sure that matters anymore. If I need the basics to work all the extra feature rich options aren’t worth the hassle of simply downloading a map to my Edge.

    Thanks again for the great commentary and though process. Hopefully this is one more voice that further validates your article.

  58. B Silva

    Truer words about Garmin have never been spoken, Ray.

    Ironically, I had a Forerunner 945, which I just got 2 weeks ago, freeze up on me a few days ago while I was traveling in Portugal. It would tell the time, but HR was frozen at 47 (I have a low resting hr), GPS wouldn’t find satellites, and it wouldn’t connect to Garmin Express. I tried to power cycle it but power down would take more than two minutes and rather than going to the off state, it would restart. I tried a to reset via the menus but it wouldn’t do anything. Luckily since the Forerunner was so new, I brought a backup watch (Fenix 5X) and had a watch. I spent hours trying to sort out the problems. It wasn’t till I got home yesterday and in my jet-lagged, can’t sleep state, I figured I’d have another go at it. I was able to press and hold the power button for >15 seconds which caused a full device reset, wiping out all my configurations and setting. As you know, setting up a Garmin device is a pain in butt but at least it’s working again.

    I had switched from Garmin Edge 520 to Wahoo Bolt for a couple years because of the bugginess in the Garmin software, which too often caused me to lose activities. But Wahoo has failed far behind feature wise and I have switched back for my bike computer to a Edge 520 Plus and now a 530. (Better nav, radar tail light, Xert FTP, etc.) They’ve been better than my past experiences with Garmin and I was getting optimistic that they’d (FINALLY!) improved software quality. But then the problems with the Forerunner 945 and I see their software is still super buggy.

  59. Ed Felker

    After using Garmin Etrex, Edge and Forerunner products for the last eight years, some trends have emerged. It’s best to give the Edge and Forerunner products a year or more in the market, while Garmin releases firmware updates. I moved up from a 1000 to a 1030 this spring and it’s been solid. It’s best to check the forums before buying any Garmin device. Some are just better than others — the Edge 510 was a notable turkey, while the Forerunner 920XT has been solid.

    Turn-by-turn routing still takes customer knowledge of Garmin quirks, and I’ve given up trying to explain it to fellow riders who want simple functionality. They buy Wahoo and live with the relatively limited map functions.

    Under the hood, it seems that most Garmin devices have about a three-year lifespan in terms of battery capacity and memory integrity. Garmin looks to be using the same years-old file structure across sports devices and a corrupted file leads to crashes. It would be nice if they could figure out how to quarantine a bad file for instance.

  60. IanM

    Totally on the money. It is a culture thing: Function & Feature vs Usability & retro-fix support.
    A cycling term “The Damn Garmin” and he had a Wahoo!
    Getting a tick in every box only works: when you are at the bleeding edge of Functions and Features.
    A key issue moving forward at market saturation is ensuring repeat purchases. I must have over 10.. or is it 15 Garmin products. Yes I have had issues but the serious ones Garmin has replaced the units. My Edge 705 cf 2008 still works but during its 3rd trip through the washing machine a button fell out. The rubber housing was worn out. And the dran thing works. Yes I am a very loyal Garmin customer. My non-cycling friends just do not get why I do not just get with the program and strap on that Apple watch! I have to say I am tempted more with each turn of the apple watch. As I read your reviews I see apple GPS/Battery balance is compromised.
    Yep Apple and Garmin customer base is different but with each year they overlap more and more. Garmin must protect its’ loyal base by working all the issues to ground, before the simple solution is Apple/Wahoo/Whatever!

  61. Paul

    You are absolutely spot on here. I have many garmin products, but will not buy any product until they are at least a year in the market.

    In most cases Garmin do eventually fix the software (excluding livetrack and swimming), but by the time they have, the hardware is expired.

    Take my Edge 1000 as an example, it was almost three years after I bought it before navigation of routes over 70km was stable, shortly after which the bloody on / off button failed.

    I’d like to replace that unit with a 530, but God alone knows how many software issues there are with that.

    Coupled with the fact that almost every firmware release breaks something that was previously working, I would suggest that Garmin has NO IDEA how to do software, nor does it really care about the customer experience.

    One day, someone will come along who knows, who cares, and is suitably funded, and Garmin will disappear.

  62. Jimmy S

    Excellent post Ray!! I bicycle commute to work and have had some very upset phonically from my wife because of LiveTrack failures. Seems ridiculous that a product “feature” has been so problematic and un-corrected by the company. I seriously home that some Garmin execs are reading these comments and taking them to heart.

  63. David Walker

    From the outside it appears that every Garmin product has the same basic bugs as every previous product . Including bugs that were long ago fixed in previous products. For example, some people are having sensor dropouts with the Edge 530. Previously, the Edge 1030, Fenix 5X, Fenix 5S+ all had the same sort of problems that were eventually fixed with firmware updates. Why is there not a single group in Garmin that is responsible for sensor connectivity and produces a common code base for all products? Why isn’t the bug-fixed code base automatically included in new products? Why does almost every new product go through the same set of problems?

    Another example is Edge phone Bluetooth connectivity. I have had the Fenix 5X, Fenix 5S+, and now the FR945. Every single watch connected easily to my phone with no issues. With my Edge 1030 and 530 there has been an endless sequence of pairing and unpairing to try to get them to talk to each other. My latest problem is that Garmin Connect says that my 1030 is connected and is syncs just fine with GC while the Connect iQ app says it is disconnected and won’t download anything. WTF? The edge guys ought to talk to the watch guys. Also, having two BT connections on an Edge just makes the problem worse. The justification of this supposedly has something to do with activity upload speed. However, I can record the same activity on my watch and Edge and the watch uploads just fine with just a single connection. The whole thing makes no sense.

    • Klaus

      Somewhere (possibel old Garmin Forum) i read about the 2 Bluetooth Connection modes they use. BLE and “normal” BT (not low Energy).

      The Edge is connected all the time with BLE (less Energy on the Phone and Edge) for less Data . And if they need to send more Data to the Phone (or get from Phone), they open the BT (high Energy) Chanel.

      Then the Implementation on differnet Phones (Apple iOS, Android Models form Samsung, Huawei, .) is a mess. i rembemer Apple did change Bluetooth implementation 1 or 2 Times in the iOS-Version

  64. David Walker

    Just another comment on Livetrack- use the RoadID Ecrumb app instead. It works flawlessly.

  65. M3V8

    Unwittingly bought a non-North America FR935….contacted Garmin and they replaced it with North American FR935 for free. My Edge 1030 started to stop recording elevation. After a few emails, I’m now getting a replacement for free, even though I’m out of warranty.

    It’s too bad that they can’t combine this kind of great customer service with better SW.

  66. Brian

    Ray! Are you living inside my head? My last purchase was specifically NOT Garmin. Three things you said that apply to me and my decision to go away from Garmin:

    1. I KNEW a new Garmin device would have bugs. Ok, but


    2. I KNEW there would be bugs around connectivity (device to phone, device WiFi, device to computer… you name the connection…) which would be a frustration every time I worked out making it difficult/impossible to get data on/off the device.


    3. I KNEW Garmin would do nothing to help me permanently fix the problem…if I could get them to help me at all…they would do the minimum to get my case closed.

    So, I went with a different company, even though I knew my post-workout workflow would be harder as I had to compile my data from two different sources (one Garmin and one non-Garmin).

  67. kaz

    And take all your comments about bugs – and then multiply by a factor 10 for APAC device users – who ALWAYS are left out of timely releases and beta participation.

    My 5X+ APAC took 7 months to get Power Meter spike bug fixed. Non-APAC took a while as well – but Non-APAC watches could use the beta software from late December to crush the power meter bug.

    Garmin “fan boys” claim that it is all because Garmin is running Agile software development practice to give us new features as quick as possible. But Agile (or SCRUM) development practices are not an excuse for leaving bugs in the code for ages and not doing builds.

    What Garmin needs to do in no particular order:

    1. Take ownership of bugs – and get them fixed

    2. Implement a bug control system that the public can post to – and read so we all do not double post.

    3. Acknowledge submissions. I have submitted around 20 bugs – and have NEVER had a single reply

    4. Sack/demote their development managers and get someone in who actually KNOW how to manage SCRUM/Agile

    5. Have their teams communicate better. A lot goes wrong when the Connect App vs Watch “mis-communicates” – like resetting your Widget list back to default or settings goes “monkey”

    6. Have someone setup a REAL build server – so a build of a release is simultaneously done to all watches in the same family (5+/5S+/5X+ APAC or Not Apac) – yes it IS that simple – and once done it saves so much time.

    7. Better source code control – so we do not see the same bugs come back – time and time again. I guess Garmin’s implementation of Agile does not allow for code comments and check-in/check-out standards..?

    All the above is an indication of a “defect” software development department – who is not MANAGED by anyone with management experience.

    They act like a “startup” with limited capital and do all the mistakes one normally associate with tiny startups. Not established market players.

    The current managers are probably really great programmers who have been promoted up – and have probably never been given training or tools to learn how to manage a lot of developers. And that issue is so usual it is frightening. Just because you are a great programmer does not mean you are a great manager – or can even become a great manager.

    • Klaus

      Stop working with SCRUM/Agile

      Get ready “bug free” and go out with the product when you are finished and not when the Marketing People say you have to finish now.

  68. Fred Lee

    Thank you for posting this!

    It’s funny, that’s the second reference to Gates’ memo that I’ve seen today. There’s also a sense of Deja Vu here, as this whole article sounds a little to me like the recent Casey Johnston piece in The Outline (and Joanna Stern’s article in the WSJ) lambasting the the Macbook Pro keyboard.

    As an end user it’s aggravating that Apple ignores my complaints about the MBP, and likewise my concerns about Garmin go completely unheeded by the company. Your post will no doubt get more attention.

    I have two major issues that have gone un-addresses over the last year(s). All the more vexing because I am a very basic user. Just record rides with a sensor or two, and then upload them. But I am often stymied because:

    1. Garmin cannot reliably maintain a bluetooth connection to save its life. 80% of the time It Just Works, and 20% of the time I simply cannot get my phone to pair with my Edge 810 or Edge 500. I have to “forget” the phone, and re-pair. Aggravating!

    2. The Garmin Connect app frequently goes into a high power state from which it never exits, literally chewing through a full battery in an hour or two. Force-quitting the app doesn’t work, I have to restart the phone. Which works until I sync a ride and then the app goes bonkers again.

    Of course sucker that I am, just like the Apple users who buy a new MBP every year hoping the garbage keyboard finally works, I just picked up an Edge 530. Largely because it has “wifi” support, so hopefully I can dump that crappy Garmin Connect app. Of course while setting it up last night, it still wants to pair with Garmin Connect. Sigh. I give up. Garmin, please just tell me how much money I have to give you for you to provide basic functionality?

  69. Jazzar

    You could have ended with a quote from Tim Minchin:

    “And if I have per chance offended, think but this, and all is mended: We’d be as well 10 minutes back in time for all the chance you’d change your mind.”

    You make a very good point in saying customers just want their devices to work. And honestly, the things Garmin does well, are remarkably good, but buggy software and feeling like a beta-tester until the current-gen computers are already replaced with the next generation about a year later just ruins the experience.

    And being a tech-person myself I wouldn’t even mind playing beta-tester if there was some way of actually reaching Garmin and getting some response on the submitted bug-reports. And going the extra mile reliably reproducing the bug on my device and submitting the necessary logs would be fine if the general feeling wouldn’t be “Thank you, but we don’t care.”

    Compared to any github project with actual tickets and actual feedback if the issue is dismissed or further data is needed, Garmin support/forums are just a black hole.

  70. Dave West

    I’ll admit that I’m a Garmin fan and have bought everything from their Sat Navs to a series of sports tracking devices over the years (Currently the Fenix 5 Plus). I’ve always liked the hardware, but have had numerous issues with software; Sat Navs that won’t update or freeze and worst of all the Garmin that came as part of my Honda Civic’s infotainment system. On trying to upgrade the maps it apparently bricked the device so no navigation, radio or car setup. Hardware fault said Garmin and Honda (so new device at my expense at it was out of guarantee). In the end a blog suggested a solution that involved pressing the blank touchscreen where the buttons should be – it worked but and the update was actually revised and reissued a few months later although without any admission that the previous one was flawed. To be fair, subsequent updates have functioned well and Garmin Express mostly works (although it insists on me signing in every time and then simply goes back to the login screen at which point I cancel and all is well).

    By and large we’re not talking about PCs here which are infinitely customisable, could have any one of a number of operating systems and badly behaved programs installed. Garmin devices are their hardware and their software. In the case of my car, how does a map update turn a screen black on black when it’s virgin software and hardware?

    I wholeheartedly agree that they need to focus on getting rid of the bugs; however Microsoft seem to be having similar issues so maybe it’s all just got to complicated to iron stuff out on such a short cycle?

    • Paul S.

      The last time I tried to update the maps in my 2016 Honda Pilot (which is something I’d successfully done a couple of times) it failed because of “insufficient space”. Now, of course, it complains that “the maps are more than a year old”. Garmin has since updated the maps and I have them on a USB stick, so maybe I’ll try again sometime.

  71. Alberto

    Well done Ray! I think that after Fenix 5 Plus release, things are simply go worse and worse… Apart for hardware (i just bought a Forerunner 945, buttons are simply sticky and mushy, i have replaced with another one and it’s the same thing). There are some bugs that i and many other Garmin forum users’s are reporting to beta team since one year by now but they refuse to solve them even if they are present in Fenix 5x, Fenix 5 plus and Forerunner 945 (i suspect also in Marq line). I always write to beta team if i found a bug but i don’t know why, sometimes they reply me and solve the bug, sometimes simply ignore me… so, what’s the point of spending my time to help them (and myself) to solve their bug if they do not cooperate?

  72. Pierre

    Great post… To me what exemplifies best this issue with Garmin is the Vector 3 debacle…
    How on earth did Garmin release a $1,000 supposedly “state of the art” power-meter pedal only to acknowledge a major design flaw a mere few weeks after the release, leading to the recall and replacement of the battery covers??? And even the new battery covers did not resolve all the issues and cases of power spikes/drops or the pedals failing to link are still reported to this date.
    I own a bunch of Garmin’s products and I think they are great when they are working properly – but it is kind of random… To me they are getting a little cocky and resting on their laurels since they are getting the lion’s share of the market in sports wearable, and their QA/QC is definitely not where it should be.

  73. Niels

    My use case: do activity, then upload it but only if I want to. And I want live track

    With Garmin: Check altimeter, note it is at -20k again, give up on that. Note battery on Fenix is low, connect to charger, hope it is actually charging because there is zero indication it is. After charging dance around Fenix watch, chant in latin, apply crucifix and pray livetrack will work. Start activity. When finished go to Garmin connect online. Navigate site that does not display properly on mobile. Dowload gpx (until recently the download button waa missing on mobile). Unzip gpx on phone. Upload to Strava.

    With Wahoo: Do activity, rest assured live tracking works, when finished go to Elemnt app, select ride, press upload in case I want to upload.

    It would actually be easier/better if Wahoo would support a running mode and a wriststrap. I would actually use that instead of my Fenix watch to record my runs.

  74. Michael Frazier

    On my 2 month old Edge 1030, Strava Beacon only works on one of every 3 or 4 rides I do. On my last ride, it stopped recording my ride, but continued giving me directions. I had fewer problems with Edge 800 which I used for several years.

  75. Andrew

    I think you hit the nail on the head here. Whilst you have focused on a couple of big issues, there are also all sorts of little pieces that just don’t work how they should.

    e.g. the weather widget on my 945 shows 236ph winds constantly regardless of the weather – the rest appears to be accurate but somehow its pulling a dud wind field – its not important but when you’ve spent that much on a device its frigging annoying that someone couldn’t be arsed to iron that out.

    Similarly I have found with the training peaks plan integration, even after I complete a workout on the Edge I still get annoyingly asked if I want to do it next time I start a session – particularly ironic when you do a session on the turbo then jump on the bike to cycle in 15 minutes later (I checked – the workout had synced to TP so it wasn’t just a time lag problem). Its really really annoying and as you say, it creates frustrations that are entirely unnecessary and impact the joy of a cool new gadget!

  76. Marvin

    Actually this can be done very “simple”. Introduce a logging system on every product that can send this data to garmin. Implement a helpdesk who can read this info and get a technical team behind it. Even logging on the unit in a file could be enough.

    It blows my mind this isn’t implemented on any unit yet. Not only Garmin…. it takes away the “Yes” “No” conversation and gives analyzing the real problem a change

  77. Volker

    Well done. Sad but true.

  78. Chris

    The biggest problem with the Garmin Forums is, that it really got so crappy.

    All begun several weeks when they blocked write access to old forum. The new forum software is a disaster. Basic functions are not available.

    Example: You want to see the newest posts in a longer thread? No can do! You have toreload and reload all postings and then you have to check every single date-stamp/time-stamp. This really suxs!

  79. Frank-enstein

    “Pst – – hey, why don’t we just hire Ray?”

    (overheard at Garmin International)

    Great change of pace article.

  80. Rodador

    Totally agree! Garmin sells so many models so they aren’t able to solve the bugs of each of them. Apple however brings out only one model every year, that’s the reason why they have such good support. However, Garmin has the better dedicated multisport watches. I know a lot of people that has changed from Polar and Suntoo to Garmin.

    Another well known hardware issue are the soft/premium chest strap. No matter the version or how do you clean it. All the straps end up giving erratic readings in less than a year. The cheap chinese ones work better for a fraction of price.

  81. JimL


    I’d agree they still are the best devices, but they can be (and we should expect) better

  82. Phil P

    I’ve been considering an Edge 530 recently, due to navigation and in anticipation of Trainerroad rolling out their workouts. Until now I’ve been using a Pioneer CA500 which I got for free from an internet friend who didn’t need it anymore. As unsexy of a unit as it is, with it’s lack of mapping, it just works. I’m not a huge fan of their cyclosphere site (wish I could just pull the data directly), but aside from one weekend with slow uploads, it’s been a solid and reliable unit which captures data and gps and I don’t get the lost miles I see with garmin users. While I’d love all the new bells and whistles, seeing various issues does give me some pause.

    Ray of course you’re great for consumers, but Garmin and other tech companies really need to work with some outside consultant with your level of knowledge and common sense to produce better products and be more customer focused in addressing any issues.

  83. Sam

    I just wish they had a change of mindset and do like Microsoft do and switch to OpenSource, but that’s probably a pipe dream, if any garmin exec reading this be please do get Carols Dwerk’s book, Mindset, which is what Satyas recommend that made him change Microsoft

  84. GLT

    Most of my Garmin experiences have been trouble-free, but the latest updates for the Edge 1030 were not positive.

    Update 7.30 caused both my of E1030’s to constantly power cycle. One of them seems normal again after 7.40 was applied. Still being patient with the second.

    Probably best to intentionally prepare for those updates by backing up your device, fully charging it, and setting aside time to focus on the update process. Probably worth doing a few test rides to assure the rides are correctly recorded and no unexpected resets would lose data from an important future ride.

    • GLT

      v7.40 does not appear to be an improvement in my case. E1030 owners may wish to stay on v7.20 .

      Will try a complete erase, and potentially the v7.41 beta next.

    • GLT

      Positive results with v7.50, through I did also switch from smart recording to 1 second.

  85. runner-33

    Good summary! I’d like to add: it’s not just about stability, it’s also about accuracy.

    Literally everyone is seeing that the SpO2 feature is very inaccurate. Yet Garmin decided to offer this feature although it’s of no use just as it is. At the same time Fitbit is still holding back SpO2 measurement, roughly two years after announcement, and I guess they have a very good reason.

  86. Sioc

    I unfortunately have to agree… for example, my Edge 520 has been able to connect only twice to Garmin Connect over BT on my Samsung S5 Neo for the last 3 years. The successful attemps were about the first tries. Reinstalled everything several times and digged deep in the forums for any clue but nothing worked. For some reason, in 2019, connecting two BT devices using software from the same company still seems to be too challenging for Garmin. Or, more likely, they just don’t care.

  87. Eric


    Great opinion piece.

    As you know, Garmin also have a very large aviation business. If their Aviation unit had the same quality control issues as their Fitness and Outdoor unit planes would be falling out of the sky left and right. Why does one side of the company understand QA and yet another side doesn’t?

    That is a somewhat rhetorical question – I understand how large companies are not one monolithic entity and the changes to culture are difficult. But if Garmin ready to acknowledge and address the issue, the solution is right there on their corporate campus.

    • The aviation business faces a really onerous set of FAA / EASA / ROW certification requirements that they have to show they meet for each device and each release. As a pilot, I can say that I’m glad of the testing *but* it introduces delays and costs like you wouldn’t believe. Every time I want to update the firmware of my aviation GPS I have to have an FAA- certificated mechanic do it and then sign a logbook entry, for example. I will say that my $400 Apple Watch has had fewer software problems than my $400 Garmin watch; that’s probably a more fair comparison.

    • Paul S.

      Apple gets to derive from iOS and macOS (which in turn descended from BSD, Mach and the old MacOS) to make WatchOS. Do we have any idea if Garmin devices even have something similar to an operating system, or do the code in assembler to the bare chip? I know ConnectIQ uses MonkeyC, but what do they write their own firmware in?

    • Dave Lusty

      Yes there’s an OS, as evidenced by the presence of firmware and drivers, and that occasionally the wireless stack crashes along with the sensor hub. ConnectIQ is a derivative of a JVM (and MonkeyC derives from Java). Not that any of this matters, of course, because it’s your only choice and you have no control over any of it.
      The OS even has a startup sound believe it or not, just like Windows used to and MacOS still has. You need to connect Bluetooth headphones to hear it, but it’s there and part of the boot sequence.
      What you might be asking is whether there’s a BIOS/UEFI in which case I think the answer is no, they just bootstrap into the OS directly because they don’t need to have an intermediary due to the lack of options or alternatives.

    • Sam

      C and assembly (source objdump firmware)

  88. ReHMn

    The issue with Garmin is, that they do not listen to their customers. They are following their own strategy while missing a visionist like Steve Jobs was at Apple…
    The biggest issue, however, is not in their devices, but in Garmin Connect. I keep repeating this since 2009 now…

  89. Bob

    What I really like is for Garmin to stop having regressions in software. Features that used to work should remain working and not regress to non working state.

  90. Chris

    Unfashionable, but I have been really pleased with my 935. There was a period last July when they did a firmware change which broke the Open Water Swim somewhat, but they issued a firmware update quite quickly to fix it. That said, when I look at the Strava data of other competitors in the open water events I do, the accuracy of their swim tracks tends to be shocking – thought the 735XT generally seems OK, the Fenix and Vivoactive really suck.
    I too suffer from Livetrack dropouts for periods on rides sometimes – I have been putting that down to cellular coverage though.
    I agree that both open water mode and livetrack are vital features. As is GPS accuracy (which seems to be being sacrificed on the cross of a battery life so long that nobody really needs it). This stuff is way more important than Pulse Ox, Pay, Maps or Music (though I confess the music is a nice option).
    All that said, I totally agree with your post. And I sincerely hope the 935 firmware update in June mentioned in your article doesn’t break the 935 open water swim track!

    • JP

      I also ride with the 935 and was totally aggravated by the open water swim bug last summer (when unsurprisingly I did most of my OW swimming), but otherwise would describe it as a great device. I also have an Edge 820 whose battery is aging, but I originally got when it was released and have never had any serious bugs with it after thousands of miles. Garmin has me hooked with their radar so the 830 is in my future too. Anyway I just hope the bugs aren’t around too long I want to be able to swim and use my power meter this summer!

    • Chris

      Sorry, forgot a couple of things:
      1) I realise I too have the Bluetooth to phone sync oddities – it is just that I know the workaround: turn off Bluetooth on phone, terminate Garmin connect mobile, restart Bluetooth and restart Connect. Takes less than a minute and always works. In fairness this might not be a 935 problem, could be a mobile device issue.
      2) OK, it is a legacy device, but I cycle with an Edge 1000. It is very patchy on navigating long routes (over 90 K). Frequently tells me I am off course or simply gives up. And yes I have tried all the Forum wisdom on turning options on and off and on route preparation pre download. This is an Epic fail for me as I frequently rides events big routes where I don’t otherwise know where I am going. And navigation is the whole purpose of the device.

  91. Marios


    But I wouldn’t hold my breath for Garmin changing route any time soon as cultural changes are very difficult. I am also one of the people on the thread who would love to buy one of the new Forerunners but I have absolutely no desire to get down the “new-garmin-bug-rathole”, not again.

    I also echo what Paul posted above:
    “One day, someone will come along who knows, who cares, and is suitably funded, and Garmin will disappear.”

    And that’s the beauty of open market effect on complacent companies.

  92. James

    Well said. This is exactly why I won’t upgrade my 920xt. It just seems to work. All the new watches prices are in the stratosphere. If I were to pay that, I would expect a perfect unit, with almost zero issues. Garmin are miles away from that. I just hope my 920xt never breaks…

  93. Nicholas

    Before I forget to note it, the new Garmin forums are trash and by not migrating over the prior forums and their information, even if they were moved to an archived section, they threw away years worth of discussions, solutions and just good information.

    As a previous owner of a Edge 510 and Fenix 2, 3 and 3HR and a current owner of a Fenix 5 and Edge 810 and new 830, I’ll agree something is amiss at Garmin.

    However the real problem is also that something is amiss in the other companies as well. Garmin ends up looking like the least sick patient in the waiting room.

    So part of that to me says that this stuff all these companies is doing is pretty hard and often cutting edge. The customers that are using the products are doing so for a dozen or more hours per week and with a vastly growing array of other technology.

    As others have noted some problems just become know and never go away. The altimeter on the Edge 510 was a joke and always assigned extra elevation gain. This was true of all of them and there was never a fix. My Edge 810 has constant connection issues with my iPhone.

    I’d love to switch away from Garmin but no one else is even remotely close to having all the basic bases covered let alone many of the advanced features that most of us have started to need with all this fun technology. How many of the same people complaining about Garmin were declaring they needed Garmin to work with their Varia radar system?

    I love Apple products and wanted to consider my strengthing attempts at triathlon with a Wahoo/Apple combo. I suspect many here have thoughts in the same direction.

    The Apple Watch workout app has remained basically the same for the last few YEARS. The inability to get workout information on the watch or the fact that you end up going to a few different places on your phone all are frustrating. Crazier still none of this goes up into the cloud where you think Apple would have a huge advantage. Not only can I not see the information on my watch, I can ONLY see it a few places on my phone and cannot use a laptop to dig into deeper analysis on a bigger screen. Also some third parties have been able to add sensor support, navigation, etc to the watch but Apple with all their resources have not done this. It is clear they do not think it a priority.

    Yes there are third party solutions on the Apple Watch but if I wanted to fuss with things I already own fuss with the Garmin products.

    On the Wahoo with their latest bike computer release we didn’t have to worry about the Roam dropping sensors, we had to worry about the actual bike computer dropping because the MOUNT was problematic. Given their lack of central online/cloud platform for tracking information and their array of growing issues (Cycliq front lights have interference as an example) I can’t rely on them to get that heavy lifting done to provide me with a better solution than Garmin. Even if they fix the mount and all software concerns they are still beholden to an array of third parties for basic features. If you want to plan your route, analyze your ride, etc you’ll be working with third parties. Garmin is a one stop shop in that regard and they are trying to improve with regard to coaching, route planning and what have you.

    I own a Wahoo Kickr Snap, TickrX and several bike sensors. Their recent record has been downright worrisome. Slow overpriced Roam with mounts breaking, promised features “coming soon” and the trainers had multiple problems that needed to be dealt with by an actual chat with Ray by the company president as well as users making their own repairs.

    So Garmin is the least sick patient in the room for now. I’d love for them to be less sick.

    I’m a school teacher and the environment right now is ripe for a competitor to sweep in and clean house in Sport Tech. I’m reminded of tech use in schools which was often a mix of PC, Macs, iPads, and so forth and overnight it seems like Chromebooks came in and grabbed a massive share of everything. Not only did they grab that share they grew the market considerably with their solution. Instead of arguing whether kids would use 30 Macs or PC in a lab, the entire school of 600 students used Chromebooks instead.

  94. andrejs

    This is why I left the garmin ecosystem. I want devices that have nice hardware and reliable software. I don’t care to see a new model released twice a year with features that don’t really matter. I’d rather see a solid device updated every 2-3 years with stable software than what garmin has been doing.

  95. Tex Murphy

    I have three Garmin cycling devices:
    * Edge 305 – still works great, limited storage, does a very nice breadcrumb course, NEVER FAILS but does not record power.
    * Edge 500 – still works great, records power, does breadcrumb courses, lots of storage (but don’t push that), buttons dissolved from sunblock so covered with temp tire patches;
    * Edge 520 – works great with OSM mapping for courses, does power, BUT I am using the very old v9.1 firmware which is very reliable. (So no L/R power balance, no LiveTrack, not doing Bluetooth).

    Ray – you don’t mention the battery power level failure of recent Garmin Edge 520 firmware which by many was considered an attempt to force 520 users to upgrade to 520Plus or Wahoo. Garmin has released many firmware revisions to “attempt” to fix the power level bug over the past 18 months.

    I am still on 520 v9.1 firmware and I never allow Garmin to auto-update firmware so I stay happy. Who wants to find new bugs in old features when there was a version which worked from years ago?!?

    • fotis

      Hello Tex Murphy I just downgraded Garmin 520 to this specific firmware you said so and till now not a problem at all. I bought 520 3 months ago and just Gps setting with 3 sensors hr speed cadence battery is realy good 3 hours and 80% left brightness set to 0 and day mode not automatic setting. When i purchased was on 12.80 and sometime was rebooting the ride never lose but i told everyone why that is happening!?! New device freezing rebooting etc not acceptable for such a big company as Garmin.

      i need to know what about this specific software version except is reliable one which is the most basic function of a Gps cycle computer! I used to use a Polar watch M400 which never froze never lost a ride never restarted! With Garmin i need extra information such as cadence temperature and later with power meter.


  96. Mark Wheeler

    100% Fair. Anyone else notice that Garmin Express on Mac turned up last week and is BROKEN. Crashes on startup.

    I WAS a big Garmin customer; I had several iterations of Vivosmart, Edge, Index Scale, Varia 800 and 510, Vector, Fenix 5+ and now having experienced sloppy customer service am down to just an Edge 1030 with the Varia front light and 510 radar. The moment Wahoo supports radar functions I’m almost gone completely.

    • Paul S.

      Sigh. Do I need to take a screenshot, or will you just accept that I just installed on my 2015 MacBook Pro (Mojave 10.14.5) and it’s running just fine? Of course, I haven’t tried to sync anything with it yet. When something fails, it’s often a problem with *your* machine, not Macs in general.

  97. So much this. LiveTrack was actually the feature that made me write an entire long-winded ‘user story’ showing how broken this feature was from end to end. I looked it up and I can’t believe that was four years ago as nearly all of the problems I identified still exist: link to brooklynarches.com

    On a separate bug I actually looked up one of the product owners on LinkedIn and write him a letter. Much to my surprise he forwarded it and the bug was fixed but I have no reason that this would have happened on its own.

    Ugh. It’s 2019, isn’t tech supposed to be improving our lives yet?

  98. Steve Butler

    Well, in the ultimate testing ground, with 3 different riders to track at Dirty Kanza last week, the only one that would not track at all was the wahoo element bolt. Garmin 1030 and 810 weren’t much better. Ended up using Google Live 360 which had a 5-6 minute lag sometimes but was able to track them thru their whole race. That only validates your point that it can be done.

  99. Warren Clarida

    Wonderful and accurate post. I agree that for now Garmin provides the best collection of features for how I like to collect data for my running, that being said I am always looking to jump ship mostly due to this problem – either bugs which exist in a specific product and are never fixed or bugs which seem to exist across many products and haven’t ever seemed to improve.

    Just my (and my wife’s) limited experience (Forerunner 220, 235, Vivocactive 3, Forerunner 645M, Fenix 5S+):
    1) Bluetooth data sync fails or partially fails until a restart(steps will sync but workouts won’t for example) – this seems to have gotten better but just happened yesterday with my 645.
    2) Livetrack – mentioned above but my 2 cents – I enabled this back when Strava first rolled out Beacon for summit users – it worked ok (not smooth updates but at least had updates) for about a month and then stopped working hasn’t worked since.
    3) Forerunner 645 – multiple users noticed a bug early on where the watch would crash mid workout. I had this happen to me a couple times in the first few weeks after I got the watch – I assumed they had fixed it then just about a month ago it happened again. Luckily all occasions have been easy runs – probably the only reason I kept the watch is that it didn’t happen during a structured workout or a race.
    4) Fenix 5S+ – pool swimming a couple times the distance shown on my wife’s Fenix has not matched the distance shown on connect.
    5) Timezone change – I recently flew across the US and this caused me to travel back in time to the previous day. For the next week my all day metrics (like all day stress) read into the future – in the morning it would use the previous days stress as the upcoming day’s stress. I tried several times over the course of the week to contact Garmin about the issue but could not send and email (form didn’t function) or get a support chat window (always all busy). This eventually resolved but only after 4 days of having garbage stats.

  100. Marcos Saad

    Hi Ray,

    Bottom line. Garmin does not care. They are selling a lot…
    Fenix 5x also has perennials navigation bugs.
    Garmin Connect Mobile IOS too. They can not even show a correct chart…
    But at the end they are selling a lot…


  101. Mike Payment

    Well not only are they having problems with their product even trying to upload data from a 500 now seems to be a problem. Then there is a problems downloading maps onto a Garmin for the Car.. ug. The language is in Asian and .. well I’m not and the unit was purchased from Costco years ago.
    You do great work keep up your reviews and views.

  102. Peter

    Quite a timely post. I was one who moved to the Wahoo elemnt when it was released due to constant frustration with my edge units. I was happy with the features that Garmin offered but driven away by ongoing Dropouts or failures. Just this week I have placed an order on a new 530 – deciding that Garmin have added more features than Wahoo recently and the 530 seems quite stable from what I have read. Part of this decision is also due to the WiFi upload now available on the 530, this has been brilliant on the Wahoo with no headaches trying to makes sure the Bluetooth connection to the phone is working – just get home and end the activity and the ride uploads, every time. Here’s hoping I don’t regret my decision to move back to Garmin.

    • wt

      New bluetooth chips come out every year, so it’s hard to compare products if you only have one at a time. A typical Garmin made in 2016 will have worse bluetooth support than a Wahoo from 2017.

      Kind of like phones. If you move from Android to iOS you end up comparing a two year old product to a new one in a world that is evolving at great speed.

      DC Rainmaker has them all at the same time, so he’ll be able to compare them better :))

  103. bupkis

    Great post. And I’m convinced it’s the culture at Garmin. They’re so busy counting the money that they can’t be bothered with support of any kind.

    Look at the Garmin Express app. If you’re on a mac, it’s the only way you have (barring complicated workarounds that I had to figure out for myself) of getting music onto one of the new watches with music. And it’s designed for only the simplest use cases: you have to have only a little music and keep it in the iTunes folder on the main system drive of the machine running Garmin Express. Any other arrangement and Garmin Express won’t work at all. Many if not most users who have a mac and a large music collection on an external drive will give up in frustration. Garmin support, at least where I am (Ireland) doesn’t even understand the most basic problems.

    Another example: have a look at the list of compatible bluetooth headphones for Garmin devices with onboard music: link to support.garmin.com

    This list has not been updated in YEARS even as music-playing devices become a larger part of their offering. Most of those headphones are not current models. There are several threads on the Garmin forums where users are reporting for the benefit of others the results of attempting to connect their headphones to Garmin watches. Those threads were all munged by the forum upgrade.

    You would think that some of this stuff is so basic that a company as big and wealthy as Garmin would take the time to get it right. You’d be wrong, as Ray has pointed out.

    • Paul S.

      Umm, I got a Fenix 5+ during the sale. I put an iTunes playlist on it with Garmin Express with no difficulty. I’m never going to actually listen to it, but it’s there. Whatever the current GE was a couple of weeks ago, MacPro running Sierra.

    • Paul S.

      Of course, playing around with it just now, it’s not very good. There doesn’t seem to be a way of updating my playlist (a playlist of my daughter’s songs, which I’ve added to since). I had to remove/reinstall. It seems to be screwing up metadata. And of course, I haven’t actually tried playing anything yet (mostly because I don’t want to mess with my Bluetooth headphones which are paired to my iPhone). So it’s not perfect, but it’s not unusable either.

    • bupkis

      It’s likely that that’s not the use case I’m describing. Garmin Express will not work if your music files are located anyplace other than in the iTunes folder on your main startup drive. Garmin’s forums are full of reports of this.

    • bupkis

      Since most people these days with macs have internal SSDs and since Apple SSDs are expensive, it is increasingly common that people store the actual music files (well, those of us not using Spotify) in external media outside of the ~/Music/iTunes folder on the startup drive. GE, in those cases starts eating up RAM. When it runs out of RAM, it starts writing swapfiles. Eventually, if the user doesn’t stop it, it will incapacitate the machine. Not exactly elegant or up-to-date design.

    • Paul S.

      That’s exactly my situation. My ~/Music/iTunes is a symlink to /Volumes/Media, a separate drive. Express is taking up a trivial amount of ram, and I don’t see anything untoward in /var/vm. I’ll keep an eye on it, though. This is on a MacPro running Sierra with 32 Gb RAM and I don’t remember how many terabytes of disk, so that may have something to do with it.

    • bupkis

      Ahh. I think I see the difference. You’ve put in a symlink. Good to know that that works. That’s not the usual way people set up music on an external drive in iTunes. Instead, they go to iTunes preferences–>Advanced and enter a location on the external drive in “iTunes Media Folder Location” making sure to check the box for “Copy files to iTunes Media Folder when adding to Library.”

      Most people wouldn’t be up to adding a symlink via the command line. But lots of people want to store their music outside their main drive.

    • bupkis

      The advantage of doing it Apple’s way (via the preference pane) rather than your way for most is that Apple’s way leaves the iTunes database on the main drive (generally an SSD) rather than on the external drive (which may be a hard drive). My library has 115,000 tracks and the iTunes interface would be sluggish connecting to a magnetic drive over USB 3 compared to the internal PCI SSD on my MacBook Pro.

  104. kevin Skelorski

    I have Garmin Product for more than ten years, actually i have an Edge 1000.
    One reason i bought this Edge was the live-track feature, but it doesn’t work because the stupid Garmin Programmers are not able to make good Software. And this since years.
    The Edge 100o is my last Garmin, my next Gadget ist Wahoo Element Roam. I can’t imagine that Wahoo have more bugs and disfunctionalyte than die Garmin Rubbish.
    BTW: a smartphone for 100 Euro is faster than every Garmin Gadget… and works better…

  105. Brian

    The issue I’ve seen from Garmin is that they have no _real_ competition, and they know it.

    You’re obviously way closer to this than I am, but lets take a look at the 935. That watch cost ~$500 new 2 years ago. From the outset, it seems like the hardware is nearly identical to all of their other watches on the market (with some differences here and there obviously), but with firmware changes on each to provide various things. Why can the 935 track OWS, but the 235 couldn’t? It’s almost certainly just firmware. The same goes for the vast majority of their watches – the 235 / 735 / 935 / Fenix series all seem to be stunningly similar hardware, with firmware unlocks on features underneath (and obviously we’re looking at a new line in the MARQ series).

    So that brings us to the 945 – as best I can tell, the vast majority of the differences in that watch from the 935 to the 945 come down to: a new GPS chip (which seems to be a mixed bag right now), and a different OHR sensor. So what does Garmin do? They come out of the gate at $600 on the watch. And to really drive home the point, it seems like they’re done adding additional features to the 935.

    If Garmin wanted to make their customers happy, they’d offer something like a $50 – $100 “upgrade” package for 935 users to allow us to unlock the new firmware features (the Heat Acclimation etc they’re getting from Firstbeat). I’d be happy that my watch that I bought ~18 months ago that is working fine is still being supported. Garmin would be able to cash in a little more, and build a loyal customer base. But it looks like they want us to churn premium watches on a 24 month cycle, which is a little much to me.

    On top of which, as you’ve noted so well in your post, this doesn’t even get into the lack of stability in the software realm. Have you tried adding a non-trivial swim workout recently? For some reason, swimming workouts won’t allow you to create repeats within repeats – every other sport you can though. This doesn’t even touch not activating the OHR sensor during swim events. Oh – and have we talked about not counting training load for swim unless you’re wearing their additional heart rate strap (that you can’t use in real time), or any outdoor rides without a power meter?

    None of these issues in a vacuum are deal breakers, but taken in aggregate a picture starts to really form. I could continue to go on and on in my echo chamber, but it all goes back to the same thing: they have no real meaningful competition, and they’re milking the customer base because they have the premium product on the market right now.

    I hope Garmin recognizes this and starts to focus on customer loyalty rather than sales churn.

    • Ciprian

      The HW differences from 935 to 945 are bigger than that:
      – updated processor (probably to be able to handle maps better)
      – memory for music storage
      – NFC chip for Garmin Pay

      I agree it would be nice to be able to unlock some of the new features on older watches with a small one time payment, but probably Garmin consider that it is too hard/costly to support new features on older watches.

  106. Stephen Hemminger

    The bugginess is one reason I would never recommend the Garmin Descent dive watch.
    In scuba, a failed computer can mean that the dive has to be aborted. Standard protocol is to bring a backup dive computer, and end the dive if the primary fails.

  107. Alan McBryde

    Great article, however I am a UK customer and have just had a huge RMA issue. I wrote a strongly worded email to the CEO Jon Oliver, guess what…. No response! I will never buy another Garmin device as long as I live, nor would I recommend their products to anybody. Shocking customer service.

  108. Benedikt

    Another possibility:
    Introduce new bugs with bug resolving features.

    In the last 945 Beta, they did something witch broke music list saving. Before 2.48, it saved the playlist of an activity into it and displayed it in the activity. Now, with the new firmware and the changes to connect, it’s gone. It was a neat little function.

  109. Damon

    My n=1 as an ultra-distance cyclist, I sold a nearly-new Garmin 5xx series computer a couple of years ago after it repeatedly crashed mid-ride and generally acted nuts. Bought a Wahoo Bolt, which has successfully navigated me over thousands of miles on multiple continents with easily 50% better battery life than Garmin. Also, the live-tracking is bomb-proof, which is a necessity given my overnight solo rides in Nowhereville. I don’t understand the reluctance some folks have to move away from the Garmin ecosystem, at least as far as cycling goes. Give it a try — the water’s fine. Maybe the screen isn’t quite as pretty, but it is amazingly clear and ideally one doesn’t spend too much saddle time staring downward anyway.

  110. Jens

    I’d like to know what brands and models (except Apple) are better or good for open water swimming. Especially now that the season starts here 🙂 I personally own quite a few alternatives but am looking forward to using my Fenix 5X Plus…

  111. Johnston Orr

    Great post, Ray. Hopefully it helps Garmin to wake up to the challenge ahead of them. I won’t be a Garmin user by then though, and here’s why:

    – Edge 520 battery life crippled by a software update circa v12.60 and never restored, meaning the maximum it can cope with is a 5-hour ride (3 ANT+ sensors, no Bluetooth)

    – Edge 130 battery meter of wife’s computer is a work of fiction and comedy, making it impossible to know how long the battery will actually last (but knowing it’ll never get to the 15 hours claimed). And no new firmware for 6 months for this device which was only launched a year ago.

    – Garmin Express for Mac completely broken for my FR645, claiming that my one and only activity tracking device isn’t my default activity tracker (broken for almost 6 months)

    – Garmin Connect iOS won’t upload workouts to my FR645 either, meaning that I’ve got no way to upload a Workout to my watch other than to go through the pain of trying to create it in the watch. Again, broken for around 6 months.

    So I’ve had enough, and I’m off to Wahoo later this summer for an Elemnt Bolt or maybe even a Roam that just works and lasts as long as claimed. I don’t use Varia radar, so I just want a cycling head unit that works. The watch will probably become a Suunto in time, and I’ve stuck with TrainingPeaks all these years as my master repository of training data so I don’t need Garmin Connect.

    I got no response from Garmin on their forums so I’m glad the issues are being aired here for all to see, and hope that they might provoke a positive response. Too late for many here however. Goodbye Garmin. I’ve had enough.

  112. Brian McMahon

    Having had successive Fenix and Edge units I have only ever had a few problems on the software side, currently using a Marq Athlete coming from the Fenix 5X plus and both units have been faultless in their performance. I went from the 820 to the 830 and live track has worked every time on the 830 without fault. Not sure if it’s down to the network but the 820 dropped a few times so you would think it would be the same sort of performance.

    Wife is super happy now she can track me and apart from setting off the seek assistance/incident detection accidentally on the Marq while cycling it’s been plain sailing, at least I knew she cared as she called straight away and wasn’t auctioning off the bikes asap. I did briefly try a Wahoo Bolt before I got the 830 but went back to Garmin without hesitation because I’ve got years and years of data on it, hopefully the new devices are a good indication of their product roadmap and continue to improve.

  113. Dick ( R J ) Morris

    Regrettably I have to agree MOST of what you have written.
    My exception is that you said that customer support was good in the UK.
    That was NOT what I experienced..
    When my Edge 510 became totally erratic in operation I asked if there was anyway that I could remove the firmware and load new to solve the problems. The support technician first misread my request and I had to start again and then finally Garmin UK just refused to answer my e-mails.

    My personal experience is that Garmin hardware seems solid, but their firmware and software is rather poor.

    Note, presently the family has five pieces of Garmin hardware, plus the usual HR strap and bike sensors. etc.

    Garmin need, as you say, a strong push to improve software.



    • Dick R J Morris


      I had loads of problems with Bluetooth drop out on my Edge 520 Plus. A new Motorola phone WITH BLUETOOTH VERSION 5 has solved ALL the problems.

      Bluetooth version 5 is a vast improvement in overall reliability.


  114. Interesting perspective and review! I just drove past one of their main offices in Cochrane, Alberta, Canada this past weekent. I am still (amazingly) using my bug-infused Garmin Fenix 2 (hanging on to it as long as it is somewhat working; my smartphone no longer connects to it via bluetooth so have to connect via cord to laptop to upload rides). Contemplating what to get next. Main activity I track is mountain biking, with some hiking. What would you recommend as best option for mtn biking (watch and/or GPS device). Thanks!

    • Dick R J Morris

      I am using a Garmin 520 Plus for mountain biking.. Has worked perfectly thus far, and I have updated the firmware regularly.
      Note that to make the Bluetooth connection work reliably I went to a Motorola phone WITH BLUETOOTH version FIVE.
      Bluetooth 5 has longer range and I have proven this to make a mighty big difference.

      Happy riding


  115. wt

    Garmin has always been ahead of its competition because of the quality of its software development. Garmin has more developers than any other sports company, and it supports its products with updates for longer than any other sports company. Garmin developers seem to understand what’s important. I’ve never had a Garmin product that refused to pair, that didn’t have enough battery, or wasn’t strong enough for its purpose. That deserves an immense amount of respect.

    The way to develop a new feature is to get a first version that works some of the time, and then iterate until it works. That can take many years. If during those years more important stuff pops up, than it’ll have to wait, and possibly be shelved.

    A new team that focuses on bug reports is known as a ticket routing department. Software industry experience says that that bureaucratic layers make things worse. So Garmin would be spending money to make things worse.

    A website that allows reporting of bugs is a customer-facing bug report system. But customer reports are notoriously unreliable. You’d end up with endless support requests (f.e. “USB doesn’t work”). Which is why this has never worked for anyone (see Microsoft Connect.) The best you can do is a forum with moderators that report what they see. Which Garmin has already done.

    If other companies can do better than Garmin that’s only good. But I don’t think Garmin can easily improve its game from best-in-class to perfect.

  116. James Palmer

    Great post. I moved to Wahoo/Suunto for the reasons listed above.

  117. David

    Garmin 910 and fogging
    Garmin 1030 and halo effect
    Garmin 945 and mushy buttons
    Garmin 945 and cracked LEDs

    Not just poor software….

  118. Hans

    I was following the 945 as replacement for my aging V800 but not I am wondering. Better go for the V.

  119. Steve

    I reported a problem with their course creator the other day, they just didn’t care, told me to put it on their suggestions site.

    They are too busy flogging new hardware to bother fixing all the bugs

  120. Andrew Greenfield

    I remember getting that letter from BillG back in 2002 when I was in WINSE. It was a GIANT thing.

    I agree Garmin needs something like that to shake things up. I’ve never found their items super buggy, but that live track thing, yeah. It’s a mess. I just had it work for the first time in 3 years on Saturday, and I don’t know why it chose to work, instead of erroring out as usual.

    Good report Ray, I hope you sent them an invoice.


  121. Bill

    I’ve had Garmin GPS units for cycling for the last eight years. This week I bought a Wahoo Elemnt and it has changed my life! Set up my own training info page though the link on my cell phone in about a minute. The whole Wahoo / phone app interface is awesome. And I actually chuckled in amazement when I finished my ride and I received a notice from Strava that my first ride had been posted. AUTOMATICALLY!

    Technology is great. Sorry Garmin all the trials, tribulations, units sent back for warranty, has led to this.

  122. Greiglarr

    I bought a Garmin Epix 🤣🤣

    Worst Garmin product ever. No customer support after 12months! Garmin released a faulty product and then left customers high and dry with a $600!

    Never again!!

  123. Just switched back to Garmin (Edge 830) from Wahoo due to new features and better battery life. My Bolt had literally zero issues over the past couple of years. Recorded every ride flawlessly. My 830, so far, is zero for one. It treated my dual sided power meter as a one sided one and doubled the power. It was also far more cumbersome to set up, which is a problem that should be solved by now.

  124. Patrick

    great article and as a long time garmin user i fully agree. i’m perfectly happy with the functionality of my fr935, i may not know what i’m missing but it does everything i want (though smaller bezel and thinner would be good). rather than adding new features that i will never use i would prefer garmin to just make it work reliably. it seems if anything things are getting less and less reliable, perhaps specifically because of all the useless features being crammed in.

    the one thing i would add is that they have hardware issues as well as software – i had an fr920 lose reliable gps tracking which may have been hardware or software. i replaced it with a fr935 which hard a hardware failure with the barometer/thermometer. to complete the set, in both instances garmin support was disappointing to say the least.

    to be fair, i have had no issues with edge cycling computers – i have an old 500 still serving reliably and my 820 has had no issues either (apart from the inherent issues with the touch screen).
    i have also had a lot of problems with fitbit activity trackers but their support has been far better.
    i get that its hard but garmin need to realise that in the specific area of multisport watches, they are used by serious athletes who just want them to work and have minimal interest in extra features. this is what separates the forerunners from the fenix/marq in my opinion – athlete vs general consumer market.

  125. Greg Franks

    I’ve never understood the reason for live track given that anyone I know who cares can simply use “find my friend” on their iPhone. The weather app crashed my 235 in Baie St. Paul QC, but otherwise, the watch is great. Using the navigation with an 800 did have its “quirks”. I do believe Ray said at one point that there were different software teams working on different products and that they were all using different code bases. I suspect that Apple’s advantage here is that Job’s was ruthless at keeping SKU’s down to a minimum and sharing stuff between products as much as possible (i.e., Mach on iOS and Mac OS).

  126. Sam

    I have a 1030 but never bothered with live track, I usually just use Google Maps live share or even that whatsapp live share one,

  127. johan

    Garmin really don’t care.

    But look at me.
    Garmin user from the black and white etrex (2001?). Used and bought a lot of devices.

    Lost functionality
    Got abused by the warranty service more then 1 time
    Have been complaining about software for about >10 years
    Have gotten promices time after time. And all of the broken.

    But what do I do? Just buy a other Garmin
    They know that we keep doing that. So they don’t care….

    Until it is to late. But the wil don’t change.

  128. Dave

    Glad you’re being our ambassador for this Ray.

    Garmin have users complaining about these day in/day out. The real issue is Garmin’s tech and management. Their tech and tool sets are so behind the curve with their bespoke non-standard development that to fix these things takes weeks. Recently a critical issue took 2/3 weeks to fix. Their management means they choose not to fix these. Check the developer forums and there are endless lists of unfixed bugs

  129. Hans

    Thank you, Ray. You nailed it. I have Garmins going back a decade and with increasing complexity Garmin’s ability to identify and fix software errors has gone out the window. I’m a lifelong software guy, also at Microsoft for some time, among others. I can relate. A big part really appears to be prioritizing features and release dates over stability, but that can’t possibly be all there is. Product management teams must be getting away with murder when the software in their product doesn’t perform. Their reward system must be hugely skewed towards sales and profitability over everything else, like support cost for example. The senior management messaging in support of delivering stable products also seems to be missing entirely, like you said in your post. It’s super frustrating as a dedicated Garmin user.

    The broken part that’s visible to the Garmin user is their software error/bug reporting, prioritizing and fixing process, but I wouldn’t be surprised, if their software development process for Sport and Outdoor was chaotic and disorganized. I often wonder what kind of tools they use to track their submissions, versions and releases.

    By the way, it’s not just software that gets released before its time at Garmin, it’s sometimes hardware too. I own Vector 3 pedals with hardware issues still unresolved 18 months after launch and unfortunately I also bought a Fenix 5 [not plus] that dropped sensors all the time, because its RF performance sucked. Admitted and since fixed by Garmin with the release of the plus versions.

    The lingering Garmin software problems suck big time and it’s super annoying that Garmin doesn’t appear to care enough to make an effort to improve the situation.

  130. Jimmy

    Lol live track worked maybe 10 percent of the time for me on my 520? I got the 530 hoping this would be more reliable but it’s still the same. I basically just send my wife find my friends on IOS so she can make sure I’m ok.

    Also after every ride it doesn’t upload my rides either automatically. I have to power down the unit and power it up before it uploads. Now I’m debating if I should just return the 530 back to REI. At least the back button is working without issue.

  131. Tim

    I’m sick of Garmin. I’ve gone through 3 edge 1000 and 2 edge 1030 in the last 2.5 years. The failure rate is unacceptable. Even when they work the headunits regularly lose the sensors. For the price these units should last longer than a few months

  132. Giles E

    My suggestion is a friendly collaboration of Suunto and wahoo. One makes good hardware but sucks at the software, the other has a clear success on software and usability but has been struggling with hardware reliability, together I think they could take on garmin and succeed where individually it’s got half way.

    A beautiful Suunto 9 with wahoo written software, convince me it wouldn’t be good…..

    • Taurmur

      Heavy and big Suunto 9 with unreliable OHR, downgraded GPS and removed apps support (yes, apps ended at Ambit3, which is 2014, but that is still their best model)? I’m Suunto ex-fanboy waiting for my first Garmin (945), but even if that turns out ugly, my next brand will be whatever, but never Suunto.

  133. Wim

    I agree. I had in mind to buy a 945 but last year i’ve seen such a list of unsolved bugs, Also mine LiveTrack issues. That i’ve decided not to buy a new one from Garmin

  134. robert horowitz

    after years of struggling with Garmin products have been wearing a Suunto baro for six months and everything simply works…no resets, no dead batteries, no calls to tech support…I always assumed my Garmin experience was the price you paid

  135. Dave

    The issues with Garmin boil down to the fact that they likely perceive themselves as a hardware company that have to do software thing to sell hardware. The fact that they haven’t really tried to monetize Garmin Connect is a testament to this. Once they associate software quality with opportunity cost, then they’ll likely see that they need to invest in better skills and processes to make sure the software they produce is of better quality. The current management team isn’t doing the job of identifying this opportunity cost. Look at the response to your article. Hopefully this shakes things up there ..

  136. Niclas

    What i can tell the new Sony gps chip cant do OWS with the same alogritms as the former gos chipset. I talked to one of the OWS tester of Garmin and they say its a hardware thing for sure. It will not be totally fixed until sony release a new chipset next spring so OWS is kinda brooken in the new watches of Garmin for now. The rumour is that Garmin have to completely revamp alogritms for OWS on the Sony chipset in this generation so no good OWS tracks this summer. Have you or anyone else heard any of this from more officials sources?

    • Klaus

      What is OWS?

    • Jimmy S

      OWS = Open Water Swim

    • Markus B.

      I was swimming with my Fenix 5 Plus just yesterday. That one should have the “previous” GPS chipset. I added the GPS data field and could see how the moment the watch got even only half a centimetre under water, all 5 blue bars turned grey and the watch didn’t know where it was anymore. So I wouldn’t say it’s a problem with the new chipset, it’s rather a thing of GPS radio frequencies and water blocking them. So if you want to track your swim, strap the watch to your head or find another way to make sure it’s always above the water.

    • I don’t think the specific issue that Garmin has is 100% tied to the Sony chipset. After all, neither Polar or Suunto have this specific stoppage issue (where it just stops counting so quickly after starting the swim). They might have their own accuracy issues, but not this very distinct issue.

      Also, as it impacts the FR935 and Fenix 5/Plus series, which are on the MediaTek chipsets. What’s funny to me is that the FR935 was great when when it first came out OWS-wise, and then sometime in early 2018 things changed across the board.

  137. Joop Verdoorn

    As a developer of paid apps for the mid- and high-end watches (like Datarun premium), I was surprised how many people mailed me in a years time that they had a RMA (as they needed a new license). I guess it is around 5%. That’s all hardware related. In the Dutch sport watches forum at tweakers.net every now and then an experienced user makes the remarks that during the first months of a new watch people pay to be a beta tester

  138. Klaus

    Garmin Software sometimes real terrible.

    1) Since Edge 800 User ask in the Forum to change Routing Color . Nothing happend.

    2) Sometimes old fixed bugs come back for new models. Do they use a “basic develop Box” when start programming for new Models and do they not fix the Bugs in this “basic develop Box”?

    3) Look at the Forum Migration, all english old Forums (for Edge 1000, Edge 800, …) are away. Think they didn’t check how todo a good Forum Migration with this old big Forums. They announced to bring them back, bat that announcement is deleted.

    4) How can you make such a stupid decision and put Edge 520 and Edge 520 plus in one new Forum? Looks for me like this and other is driven by Marketing SEO People .

    The Marketing People don’t understand the Edge and other Garmin Products because they don’t use them. Garmin ist driven by Marketing People and not from Software Developers. Hardware most time good, so there is not such big problem like on the software side.

    5) They announce Edge 830/530 in Northern Spring. But now it is Summer and you can’t buy it (in Germany). Garmin can be happy that Wahoo same time has the broken mount problem with the roam.

  139. Darren Meier

    This article was needed, but somehow missed one of the key points: Garmin makes TOO MANY DEVICES. The constant carrot, here, is: buy this new device because it has the new software feature you wanted, or it fixes the big your previous device’s software suffered from (the 520+ is the most comical example of this). I don’t know if it’s that Garmin is that bad at software so much as it’s true that they don’t have enough experts to support software for so many devices, and they definitely don’t care enough to remedy THAT problem.

  140. Bernard

    Amen brother, A-MEN

  141. Gareth

    I bought an Edge 530 a couple of weeks ago, eyes fully open to the various issues, but it has actually been pretty decent so far. All the buttons work, the routing has been quick all except one time, and the navigation mostly decent.

    The main issue for me is probably one that isn’t going to be fixed – it’s that the turn-by-turn directions seem to be mostly based on “which way you need to physically turn?”, so for example if the road curves to the right but you are turning off a road to the left (but going straight ahead) it will NOT actually tell you to turn left. Likewise, for roundabouts the direciton indictor seems to be mostly made-up, and you need to look at the map to figure it out. Yesterday the arrow was telling me to turn left but the rounabout exit was at 1 o’clock!

    • Paul S.

      Turn by turn can be weird at times. My favorite local example is that there’s a road that’s going northeast, which then makes a 90 degree turn to the southeast before turning northeast again. At the second turn, another road comes in to an intersection. My Edge 800 would always prompt the first turn (where there’s absolutely no way to do anything other than follow the turn) but say nothing at the second where there’s an actual other road you could take a wrong turn onto.

  142. Andrew

    90% of my problems with my 820 could be fixed just by having an option to configure the lap button to scroll through the screens. It seems an obvious and simple fix for the poor touch screen responce.

  143. austex2019

    I agree Garmin’s EDGE products are maddeningly unreliable. I struggle to choose a specific “feature” I mean its so hard. Is it the way it “forgets” settings that you only notice while on a ride, like the auto-pause or the auto-sleep. Auto sleep invoked itself for the first time yesterday andd it was such a thrill I could hardly contain my desire to rip the thing off the mount and chuck in the path of a heavy vehicle. Don’t get me started on Vector 3 pedals, each battery change was such a shot in the dark if I could regain connectivity that I tossed the damned things and bought a full pair of Assioma pedals (fantastic). Please offer no kudos for on-line support, it is in my own mind incomprehensible (apply glycerin to the battery contacts? Who the hell has glycerin?). I am on my third EDGE and I swear it will be my last. don’t get me started on device to iPhone connectivity or the default answer for all Garmin problems being reset the device.

    I love my Apple watch, it just works, don’t have to think about it. Hey Garmin, make your products so people don’t think about them…

  144. Maria Luz Gill

    Ohhh I’ve been through it all…. Fenix 5 battery that died in the marathon portion of a triathlon, Edge 830 “unfindable” when trying synchronize with Connect, but absolutely all that is Child Play. Want trouble? Buy a Garmin Vector 3. Horrific experience. Right sensor missing is the terror alert seen often on my display. Also low battery even though batteries are new and Connect tells me they are ok… pedaling full blast in a workout only to read zero power and zero cadence. Heartbreaking.

  145. Perry Hertler

    Agreed. I always say that Garmin has the best hardware, but Fitbit has better software.

  146. For my important rides (mostly anything other than a commute) I typically run two Garmins, my 1030 main and a Edge 520 as a backup.

    I mount the Edge 520 under my stem upside down and I get a lot of people asking “why do you have a second Garmin?” When I tell them that I’m not a fan of losing rides due to failures on my primary Garmin, they nod as if to say “yeah, I should do that”.

    I’ve been running redundant Garmin’s since 2013 when I used two Edge 510’s on the Seattle to Portland ride. 120 miles into that ride, my main Garmin hard reset completely and I lost the ride. I pulled the spare 510 out of my saddle bag (which had been running the whole time) and put it on my mount and finished the 204 mile ride with a full .fit file intact.

    It’s a real shame that this has been the norm for me for over 5 years now.

  147. Paul Zbiek

    Great article. As an ultracyclist and geography professor, Garmin has been quite frustrating in recent years. While they added more features on the Edge series, they neglected the basics. Examples: The 750 charge lasted 18 hrs the 1000 for 10; the 750 speed sensor worked indoors the 1000 is constantly dropping. I hope your article makes Garmin take notice.

  148. Robin

    Just to add my issues for the record:

    Livetrack never works and hence Strava Beacon is also useless (Edge 520 and FR935) (a fault that actually costed me money given I paid for Strava).
    The altimeter on my FR935 is rubbish.
    Syncing takes forever to finish
    Alarms get moved an hour at daylight savings switch over and it’s really difficult to fix as the keep reverting to the “old” time.

  149. JD

    200 comments in 9 hours and counting.
    Glad I didn’t enable “Notify me of followups”..;-)

  150. DAK

    Also having issues with open water swims with my fr735. The reason I upgraded from polar was to also be able to record swims. As written in the article, that’s the whole point of a multisport watch.
    Garmin needs to wake up which has to start from the top, otherwise they’ll look back at these issues 3-5 years on as the beginning of the end. Essentially selling expensive gadgets they know are broken. For now, they can treat their customers like idiots but competitors will soon teach them the difference between repeat purchases and loyalty.

  151. Robert B

    Ray, awesome write up as per. My experience is always keep an old device or two on hand. Love my FR645 but one of the previous updates broke the music widget, that’s been rectified. But there is now way I’m parting with my FR630 until the FR650/655 comes out and the then mature 645 will take up the mantle of old faithful. Been burned too many times,

  152. ms

    Ah yes & this appears on the same day my Edge1030 dropped the Di2 and Varia radar settings. I had to enter the Varia setting manually as the Edge did not find it when searching automatically. I had to reconnect the Di2 last week so this is twice in one week.

    If wahoo ever adds radar support I’m so gone from Garmin.

  153. Mr Mark H Phypers

    Been proper pissed off lately with my watch thinking I can do one /two stroke pool lengths. Proper screws my stats and offers me 100m 400m 1000m records that I just can’t do.

    Fairly sure I could write the logic to smooth that stuff out in software.

    Weirdest one was on finishing a quick 40 lengths – looked at watch – showed 1000m – pressed pause and save – it showed 1050m – whaaaaaaa? ¿?

  154. carl thomas

    “Garmin Edge Bluetooth to phone connectivity.”

    Sweet Jesus why is this so bad? It’s the sole reason I upgraded to the edge 520 and it is such a pain way too often.

    • Neil A.

      I upgraded from my reasonably reliable 500 to the 520 for EXACTLY the same reason and am frustrated by EXACTLY the same issue. I shouldn’t have to start my Garmin, wait for it to pair to my phone during boot-up, then disconnect the BT on my phone, then reconnect the BT again just so I can see important text messages during a ride.
      It should connect and stick first time, every time.
      I was tempted to get the 530 but why would I given Garmin can’t fix such issues on years old products and then allows them to ‘feature’ on their new products?
      On the subject of country based support, in the past the Australasian support was so woeful, I gave up and had to go direct to the US team for answers. Not sure if that situation has improved any?

  155. Michael Faas

    Garmin Edge products have been in steady decline for at least eight years. Garmin Edge 800 functioned well and was mostly capable of the product claims.

    Edge 520 lacked some functionality, but in general lived up to expectations aside from terrible battery life that could barely get you through a five hour ride.

    Now Edge 820 drops phone connections, or won’t connect at all. Third party app offerings are embarrassing, often don’t work and have bricked my device requiring a factory reset, then the desktop app syncs the bogus app onto the unit bricking it again. Battery life is inconsistent and will never make it through a long ride. Display is challenging to see in good conditions and impossible to see in poor conditions. Touch screen never worked right, don’t even think about using it if there’s sweat or rain involved.

    The most frustrating Garmin issue, isn’t even a bug, it’s an intended user interface issue. The unit automatically turns on when you disconnect it from power after charging, requiring the user to wait over a minute for the unit to boot up, just so you can turn it off again. This also happens when you connect it to power, which is especially an issue if linked up to Bontrager Flare RT lights, because they all turn on as well.

    Hoping Garmin recalls faulty products like this.

    • Paul S.

      To be fair, the 800 can’t connect to anything wirelessly and doesn’t have ConnectIQ, so those avenues of failure are unavailable. Navigation sometimes left something to be desired on my 800.

      I’m always very cautious about ConnectIQ stuff. I had problems with a watch face on my Epix, and a Strava data field caused problems with my Edge 1000. I do run the Strava Effort field on my 830 and so far that works (although it doesn’t exactly match what I get from Strava itself afterwards).

    • Jerome

      So true! Why the f*ck does it have to power up when you unplug it? And plugging it as well for that matter. If I want it on, I will power it on myself.

  156. Brian Michael Thompson

    Someone finally said it and I’m glad it was you. When my Garmin works I love it, but I have had so many issues with bugs on multiple Garmin watches that almost certainly my next watch will be not-Garmin.

  157. Jerome

    I’d say they need a ship-blocking authority for hardware as well. While it is not as widespread as their software issue, some of the hardware as been terrible. Ex: forerunner 410, 610, 225, fenix 2, edge 520+, etc. And the worse part is unlike software, you know that hardware issue can’t be fixed.

    I feel like every Garmin consumer is a beta tester. Sometime you are lucky and you get a decent product but other times you just have to buy a new product hoping this time will be better. Take the forerunner 225 for example which was replace only 5 months later buy the forerunner 235. I’ve had customers complain to me because Garmin wouldn’t exchange their watch because the 225 wasn’t technically broken, it was working the way it was supposed to (which is badly).

  158. MiamiC70

    Great article and unfortunately for Garmin 100% accurate and actually quite generous. I am a LONG time Garmin user going at to original B&W eTrex devices. You would think given how long they have been in the handheld game they would have it down pact. Yet, sadly just like the mess described in the article Garmins handheld eTrex and off-road models are in same boat. Not until user backlash did they upload a 64bit Basecamp, they have handhelds in their site for sale right now supported by Garmin Explore and still supported on eConnect. Topo maps are a mess, maps are out of date, refreshes are slow as molasses and what can only be pure greed is what motivates the sale of maps piece meal or by subscription.

    Really sad that the bought Delorme and Oregon Scientific too so there are few options now.

    • Paul S.

      What is the status of Basecamp these days? For a long time it was my go to way of creating routes. Then it seemed that were getting ready to abandon it. Then recently I noticed that there was a new version. I just checked and I have 4.8.4 on my MacBook Pro and Cloud Data (which I think they announced was going away) is there. I’ve been using Strava Routes recently, but is there any reason to think that Basecamp support will be ongoing?

  159. Peter Rexer

    Ray, solid point all around. If you happen to know who at Garmin would be interested in getting some help with getting the right release gate process put in place, that’s basically what I help companies do. I do it mostly in Silicon Valley for platforms, but I’ve also helped everything from Insurance companies, to document management platforms get their release process and developer + customer feedback channels ironed out.

  160. Mel

    Did a 3.8km open water swim over the weekend, and my Garmin 935 only registered a swim distance of 620m…

    Somehow feels like the 13.30 firmware broke the unit for open water swimming…

  161. Robin

    Ray – I don’t know if you’re able to comment on the record, but I’m sure all of us would be interested to hear any comments Garmin have on this post, and the subsequent comments. At the very least it’d be good to know that they’re taking this feedback seriously.

  162. Andrew Macphail

    You’ve hit the nail on the head with this one. I had been a long time Garmin user that switched to Wahoo because I was fed up with Garmin connect and other bugs. Wahoo’s bolt may not have all the features of the 510/530, but it is very streamlined and works flawlessly.

  163. Bsquared

    Edge 520 for 3.5 years, and it has reliably recorded over 1000 rides. Only one issue – Strava complained about a ride and referred me to a free website that fixed a 10 hour time jump near the end of a ride. Very happy it just works with Varia radar, Bontrager Flare RT, Stages power meter (gen2 and gen3), Garmin speed sensor, and Garmin/Wahoo heart rate monitors.

    But there have been annoyances, although its about the same level of annoyances as every other tech device I own include a Wahoo Kickr that had issues with shifting light/shadows causing interference with the Kickr’s optical power meter.

    Great hardware, and I agree they could do better with software starting with allowing users to configure Edge via phone and/or web.

  164. Ken P


    What is the source of data for the pie charts that show the device type at different activities, and how was the data captured? Just curious.

    I bought my Garmin 810 years ago for the Bluetooth connectivity to sync rides. The first year or two was maddening until they finally released a firmware fix. It’s reliable now, BUT….

    One thing I’d add to Garmin’s bottom line: I upgrade all my cycling stuff often EXCEPT my Garmin b/c I’m afraid any new device from them will be unreliable.

  165. Zac

    All I want is the ability to run a custom report (custom dates) in Garmin connect webpage or app.

  166. RickH

    Garmin doesn’t care. Get over it.

  167. Greg

    You should mention the android connect release last week that would force close on open on everyone’s phone. It is as if no one even checked it. God knows how it ever got past basic qa

    Took them a day plus to fix it.

  168. Adam

    Great article Ray. Somewhat timely for me as I have been having more and more issues with Garmin.

    I have been a long user of Garmin. Forerunner 410, then Forerunner 610, Edge 500, Edge 520 and Edge 1030 and Vivoactive 3. Only the last two work now, only bought the 1030 cos the 520 battery life is abysmal, and now it seems the Vivoactive 3 is being killed by Garmin Software division.

    The Vivoactive 3 recently received software 6.1/6.2 and the unit started randomly restarting, and the battery life has gone from 5 days to less than 2. I called Garmin and they dismissed it as a battery thing and I could purchase a replacement (as it’s out of warranty). But looking on the forums this is a widespread issue.
    They released SW6.3, to no effect.

    So the question I have is how is it reasonable that a company release a SW version that effectively ruins a unit? I think Apple got in trouble for doing something similar, plus they were reprimanded for having a 1 year warranty, but selling them on a 2 year phone plan. I.e. a reasonable person expects better life than 1 year for an expensive item. I.e. Imagine a Fenix5 for A$1000 that at 13 months gets stuffed up by Garmin’s own software.

    Not good enough Garmin.

  169. Aar

    Great article and eloquently stated point, as usual. I’m interesting in the reason your proposal doesn’t include software that self-reports bugs? To my recollection, whether Microsoft was using self-reporting software before 2002 or not, they really started leveraging it for continuous improvement.

    Further, Apple is well-known to release buggy software but use their self-reporting software to catalog instances of bugs. They then use that data as a significant input for grooming their Agile development backlog. The result is a blizzard of bug-fix releases shortly after new software version releases. Thus, bleeding edge Apple customers feel much more pain (and whine more) than those of us who wait a few weeks or more to adopt.

    My point is that user reported glitches are a weak source of development prioritization data. I think that agrees with a point you made. Otherwise, I agree with everything in the article. Since I started using Specialized’s ANGi as a supplement to Live Track (and stopped relying upon Auto Start in Live Track), my wife hasn’t reported a failed ride tracking session. Come to think of it, that’s when I started using a Palm Phone as well. That’s a story for another day, though.

    • “I’m interesting in the reason your proposal doesn’t include software that self-reports bugs?”

      I absolutely believe it should. That’s somewhat within my ‘bug reporting portal’, in that I’d like to see them include diag/related information that the user can easily upload with nothing more than a quick tap/confirmation on their device. Many other device companies have that.

      The challenge as I (and I think you as well) outlined is separating bugs from general support issues. I also think Garmin is unique in that their user base on the whole tends to be more tech focused than that of Apple or Polar. Obviously, the majority isn’t tech focused, but moreso than Garmin seems to give credit for. It’s why you’ve got 253 responses here that are surprisingly detailed in their understanding of the specific issues. And I suspect the vast majority of those 253 people would have been more than willing over time to go to a site, explain their issue, upload some log data, and know that it’s actually being tracked.

    • dan

      It is maddening to me dealing with support. I run a business that uses many different software pieces / programs from a host of vendors. I have years of support experience in calling, chatting, and emailing. I have also for one of the few times i have actually had to, reached out to a sporting company over their head unit (wahoo). Invariably because MY industry (automotive repair) is very hands on and diagnostic driven I try to make sure I have exhausted all avenues before reaching out to support. By the time I do I am positive I have a problem that is not user error, nor driven by design AND it is a repeatable problem.

      Without fail every support contact is so very much painful in that I take time to explain the problem FULLY, including exact;y what steps I do to re-create the issue. I include pictures and screen shots where necessary. I pull and save all logs if possible. I do everything I can because the use of this software or product is important to me and I want resolution as fast as possible.

      What i get in return 100 percent of the time is a contact from support that leads me to believe they have not even bothered to read, much less understand what i have reported.

      Is there anyone in the world that does not reboot or relaunch or reinstall whatever BEFORE even thinking about support? Everyone has been trained to power cycle everything and reconnect etc.

      I detail ALL those steps in the report. I tell them everything I have tried including all rebooting, reinstalling etc and that I can STILL recreate the problem by doing x.

      instead I get the banal we’re dealing with a dumbass responses from support. Have you tried rebooting? Have you tried re-installing, reconnecting, whatever? Can you tell us when this occurs etc?

      At that point my blood pressure figuratively rings the bell, i’m probably saying out loud did you even read my initial report and why are you wasting my FING TIME!!!!

      so then i need to recompose because I am convinced that the initial support handler in every industry is simply tasked with going through a flow chart of questions to ask the consumer before then recommending that the “next level” will take a look at your issue

      In the case of Wahoo, everything I initially told them was confirmed and the response was:

      Thank you for providing the logs and files. We apologize for the issue and have raised a ticket with our developers who are actively working on a fix. Though we do not currently have an exact delivery date, the problem is a priority on our road map for future app and firmware revisions.

      Since we have an open ticket with our development team, all customer service tickets related to the issue (including this one) will be marked as “On-Hold” and merged with the developer ticket to be monitored internally. This process allows us to send automatic notifications via email when changes are complete. Full release notes are posted on https://support.wahoofitness.com

      Be sure to keep your app and device up-to-date to receive the fix, when available.

      We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience and support as we strive to serve you better. Please let us know if you have any additional questions or concerns in the meantime.

      Thanks for being a Wahoo customer,

      Well that was January and there has been no fix and no further contact from Wahoo. So either they cannot fix it, or do not care to,

      P.s. I have dutifully downloaded every update that has come down the pipe. I reference their update page weekly and this site to make sure I have not missed any.

      so the moral of my story, They are all the same, the whole tech industry. Just one large frustration morass of imperfection using computers whose sole purpose for being a computer is perfection.

  170. Mark B

    I enjoy Garmin and committed array of products. As a software engineer I get it and can forgive a whole lot, but my recent experience with new vector3s makes me feel betrayed. I really want them to do better. I appreciate the article here, hope they find a way to turn it around

  171. Antonio Silveira

    Excellent post Ray, I couldn’t agree more with it. I have been a Garmin user for a long time, I have and had several Edges and I have Virb cameras as well.

    It is absolutely infuriating when you are on the middle of a interval session and then Edge just reboots out of nowhere. Last year a did a big cycling trip that I was planning for a long time going to climb the big climbs in Spain, France and Italy. Twice when I was climbing absolutely iconic climbs that always dreamed about, I looked down and noticed that my Edge screen was not updating, I did not know for how long the Edge was frozen, I was so upset, so freaking pissed, in the end I missed like a mile of these climbs. Looking at the gps track you have that annoying strait line between the points.

    I just think that Garmin does not care, they keep on shipping shitty software and devices. I just hope that competition catches up, and they lose marketshare. I am already upset again just thinking about the many times Garmin disappointed me.

  172. Steven

    I just want to know why my 920xt can’t use GPS elevation since the barometer is stuck at 22,614ft? It shows up as 0 elevation gain even though it starts off with correct GPS elevation. Heck I’d be happy if it would just do it automatically on garmin connect.

    How can their software not correct for this?

    The barometer is a hardware problem on the 910, less on 920, still present on 935.

    But with Garmin’s official position on open water swimming for the 935 and fenix series to place watch in swim cap there is no upgrade available. Also that’s not swim tracking it’s GPS above water.

    • Marshall Spradling

      I’m on my third 920xt for the broken barometric altimeter. Both times I contacted Garmin support, they sent me a replacement unit for free even though I’m way past the warranty, so I will give them that – although I have a feeling it’s because it’s such a “known” issue they don’t want to fight people about it. It’s upsetting to hear that the problem with the barometric altimeter still exists in the 935/945 and Fenix watches, even though Garmin has known about the issue since the 910xt. I have no reason/desire to upgrade from my 920xt if the “upgraded” models all have the same faulty design.

  173. Pete

    My Garmin history over 10 years:
    405, one day GPS stopped working, but functioned very reliably before that except the funky touch ring
    910xt, power button failed so have to push a certain way to turn on, but functioned very reliably before that though only after they fixed issues with swim stroke identification
    920xt, has worked fine last 2 year except bluetooth to the phone was always unreliable, but started with lots of issues with live track, battery life bad, lost a couple runs
    945xt, setup problems that took reboots and updates to get it to work out of the box, constantly drops bluetooth to phone and won’t reconnect until watch is rebooted, was daily now every few days, still love the screen, best of any Garmin watch I’ve owned
    Fenix 3, worst display ever, sold it on ebay for $10 less than I paid 2 months after purchase, hopefully the buyer liked it.
    800, worked fine as best I recall
    810, worked fine after issues with live track, right power meter missing
    820, worst touch screen I’ve ever used, horrible to this day, would not buy this again, right power meter still missing, though it records and shows data fine, lost left power meter seconds before a race, after race had to remove and reconnect
    Virb, hopeless and returned it, too many bugs, too high cost, value not there for me

    All that said and money spent, maybe I SHOULD be looking for another brand.

  174. John Wayne

    Oh my God! DC Rainmaker who writes something negative about Garmin! Is it because they didn’t renew your exclusive contract???? And so now it’s payback time?

  175. Nik

    Let’s face it, Garmin simply doesn’t give a shit.
    They’re raking in the cash and that’s all that matters to them.
    One gets the impression that Garmin doesn’t test their products, their employees don’t run/swim/ride, don’t use their own products.
    Everyone keeps buying their shitty products, so why should they change anything ?

    • John Wayne

      Let’s face it: Polar Vantage and Suunto are as bad (or even worse) than Garmin!

    • Dirk

      No, I don’t think so.
      I went from a V800 to a FR935. But after two months I went back to Polar. The watch was ok, but I could not stand Garmin Connect. Terribly slow, confusing, did not tell me anything which I could really need for monitoring my fitness. Instead I got something unreasonable about steps I should have done, and I shouldn’t use an elevate and nonsense like that.
      Got a M430, than a A370 for daily rides and now finally a Vantage V, which is really nice. No problems with that watch.

  176. Joe DeWitt

    Great article DCR. Was starting to wonder if this was just me. Usually able to figure out technical issues, but the Bluetooth on Edge 520 Plus got me stumped. Every time I power cycle the headunit I have to forget and re-pair the 520+ to get it connected. Really frustrated after doing it 50 times.

    Always wanted to like Garmin and tried many products. My favorite is Vivoactive 3. Rock solid for more than a year.

    • JD

      I followed DCR’s reset steps below to resolve the same pairing issue on my 1030.

      For totally re-setting connections on the Edge 1030, be sure to complete the following:
      A) Remove pairing on Edge 1030
      B) Remove BLE pairing on settings on phone
      C) Remove BT pairing on settings on phone
      D) Delete Edge 1030 from Garmin Connect Mobile
      E) Airplane mode on
      F) Kill/close GCM app
      Then start from fresh.

      Now my 1030 is pairing again every time I power the Edge unit on (GCM in foreground or background).
      It didn’t resolve auto-start Live Track (50/50), but at least I don’t have to re-pair the unit before each ride.

      DCR — Your reset steps were comment #366 on the 1030 review page, but I don’t see an easy way to send a link to a specific comment. It requires appending the page URL with a mysterious 7 digit number (/comment-page-1#comment-xxxxxxx).

    • Pro tip: To create a link to a specific comment, right click the date/time stamp of the comment and there’s a unique URL there. Enjoy!

  177. Boris

    🥇 article, Ray.

    In the past ten years (or so) I had many many Grrmin devices; always packed with lot features (many of them not really useful, but that‘s another story).

    Support (AKA swapping out devices) was always good, except that it didn‘t solve the issue in „eight of ten“ cases. I had (and have) so many issues, that I‘m tired of it.

    Grrmin’s „bug-fixing ignorance“ and „product patchwork-mentality“ became somewhat unacceptable to me (and many others in my region)… We are not willing to pay (any amount) for a Grrmin product any more.

  178. T v D

    I’m almost 10 years into Garmin products. Never had one that just worked. I did pay a hugh price everytime expecting for that pricepoint a good product.

    I’m going to sell my vector 3. It just does not work. Again f*cking Bluetooth connection, battery caps, you name it. 1.000 dollar people, stopped working within a year. Can you believe it? Well, if you’re also a garmin user you are giggling now. Also have a quarq dzero on my mtb. 100% of the time working….. never, never had a issue with that one. Never!

    Talking about Bluetooth, my biggest complaint. Garmin how hard can it be? If you offer it on your edge devices just get it to work 100% of the time. it’s not rocket science. Cycling 4 to 5 times a week, there’s really not one time it stayed connected. Not 1!!!

    If you offer it make sure it workes, otherwise don ‘t offer it…

    I’m not buying new Garmin devices anymore, even if Ray says the features are awesome. I need stuff that workes.

  179. Let me do something contrarian and defend Garmin: over the years, they’ve introduced features and products that I can’t do without. On-board navigation for instance, is something that pretty much only Garmin does. When you’re out of internet range and need navigation right away, only Garmin even has the potential to deliver. Similarly, nobody else supports the Varia radar, which to me is a game changer. Their customer support is impeccable. Both Arturo Crespo and I have replaced multiple Vivoactive HRs under warranty with a very pleasant exchange process. I once called them up about a broken sensor that was out of warranty, and they extended my warranty and sent me a new one. (Come to think of it, this has happened more than once!) These are all good reasons they’re the market leader.

  180. Circe

    Known bug in f5+: crush during swimming pool app with more than 1000m consecutively. Happen to me (and other people, see forum) 4 times. Now, when i have this kind of workout, i use fenix 3. Mail to fenix team (and beta team): no answer.

  181. Tommy

    My edge 830 constantly loses satellites. Very annoying

    Oh and it doesn’t play nice with a wahoo doors sensor either

    • Paul S.

      My Edge 830 sometimes pops up a “Lost Satellites” message, but it really hasn’t lost them judging from the other indicators (solid satellite icon, no flashing question mark on the map, actual track after the ride). I just ignore it.

  182. Johann

    I consider Garmin as the Microsoft of GPS/watch. So your last paragraph was resonating to me. For me the biggest issues are connectivty between my iPhone and my Edge 820 (which touch screen display DOES NOT WORK), and everything got much worse with the last firmware update. I still have to re-pair them from time to time. An operation that takes less than 10s with most device my phone interacts with (be it headphones, car, watch, pedals…) but can take up to an hour of fight with this stupid GPS. On top of that auto upload does not work anymore and I have to kill the app to have a chance to re-connect to the GPS (no issue with my Garmin watch here).
    That’s unfortunately a common feature when a company has such a dominant position, because they know this mess won’t kill their business so they don’t care. At some point I’ll have to change my GPS. Let’s see then how the competition looks like at that moment.

  183. Zoltan

    Hey Ray,

    it seems that after a long time your “systematic exceptional good luck” with Garmin devices has finally ended and you started to feel a real PITA, a similar one to those bugs that had caused big suffering for other users on a regular basis.

    We’ll see whether your “case” will be handled differently than those of the others.

    Good luck to this bad luck period! 🙂

  184. Volker

    DCR, which amazes me:

    so far you have an intensive and exclusive contact with Garmin. Of course you only name things that almost every Garmin user can confirm. Are you sure that the Garmin just accepts that without any consequences? Did you really think that over well?

    • I specifically picked these items because they were exactly that: So painfully well known that it’s mind-boggling they aren’t fixed yet. Sure, there’s hundreds of other smaller items I could have picked, but then that takes away from the point and becomes distraction salad.

      I included Garmin’s comments on the matter, but ultimately, short of doing at least Item #1 on my list, there’s nothing that they can say that is meaningful in this regard. I’ve heard all the excuses before…for years. It’s time for action, not more words of ‘we’ll fix this’. Show me, don’t tell me.

    • Volker

      Totally agree. Garmin, just listen and deliver!

      I am only a little bit worried, that this article will have consequences for you…

    • Marcos

      DCR, have they got back to you after that?


    • I haven’t asked them anything since this weekend. Not really sure there’s much more to ask. I expect at some point they’ll send over the open water swim updated firmware.

    • Tim

      Beta GPS chipset update:

      link to www8.garmin.com

      Improved GPS performance and reported distance for open water swim activity.
      Improved performance in GPS + GALILEO mode.
      Improved GPS performance for auto-racing activity.
      Other bug fixes and improvements.

    • Nice. Crappy weather today for a swim, but tomorrow is looking solid. Will give it a whirl.

  185. Kloekie

    I have owned for the past 10 years Edge products from the 705 to now the 830, and had some small issues with the software every now and then but never serious problems like crashes lost sensors or…., just little functional things.

    I am software architect as profession, and it is very diffcult to support al kinds of external devices as smartphones for instance, see BT technology the implementation of that is divers…

    Garmin forums is helpfull, because what I see, the major problem is the user self. Bad configuration or expecting functionality what is not there.

    On the Garmin Forum, Garmin itself responses and if there is a major bug they will fix it. But ofcourse here the expectations of users is much to high, software development is a complex thing. It is not simply change a bit of code and ready for deployment…

    For myself, Live track did not function – problem was configuration…..did it wright and it functioned.

    Are Competitors really beter ? Do not think so, so before going to the competitor – read the www how they handle bugs and solutions.

    Oh Yes Garmin is not perfect and have to work hard to deliver a product that satisfies everbody, and they should.

  186. Gunnar Christensen

    To be fair. I recently did a week in Italy and had live track on everyday since I was riding in remote mountains solo. I used a edge explore 1000 and have a Samsung Android phone. My wife could care less about looking at live track, but my daughter always follows it…so I know it works ( at least for me….for that week….).

    I always go for older Garmin technology and buy used for a deal. I wait until a new product comes out and then swoop in omn the deals for the older tech. The bugs by then seem to have worked themselves out.

  187. Andrew

    The Garmin business model relies on never running out of customers to screw over?
    When did it become acceptable to release products that don’t work properly?
    Garmin will never change as too many customers continue to upgrade devices hoping that this will be the one that finally works?

  188. Richard

    I’d disagree with Garmin UK being good at handling customers. It’s probably the worst customer service I’ve had. My 935 had a barometer/altimeter issue. It read 4000m elevation gain for the Chicago marathon. Garmin Checked my files and said it was a software issue that affected my watch only. I don’t get how this could be and how they couldn’t offer a fix, or why a full reset didn’t solve this software issue. They never once offered to look at the watch or offer a repair. I’m trying hard not to buy another Garmin but as I’m finding out Suunto and Polar struggle to do the multisport parts of their watch correctly.

    • Zoltan

      Buy and older Garmin with less function, but greater stability and accuracy!

    • Graham

      I’ve also had mixed experiences with customer services in the UK. My Vivoactive HR died completely (no response to buttons or screen), just out of warranty. They tried to charge me for an out of warranty replacement until I insisted that that was not acceptable. UK consumer law requires stuff to work for a reasonable length of time, which is subjective, but a £200 watch should last for more than 26 months before being dead. They conceded and sent me a replacement for free, so the end result was fine but the experience not great.

      Then just recently I had lengthy discussions with them about my Edge 820. The battery life was unusably short (it would die in about 4 or 5 hours if not in battery saver mode). They suggested that this could either be battery degradation (perhaps my fault because I hadn’t maintained the battery at 30% while not using it (WTF!?)) or could be because of the latest firmware (they had other reports of this). Despite the firmware being their most likely explanation, they couldn’t provide a way to roll back, or to test this in any way, and initially their only suggestion was for me to pay them for an out of warranty replacement which might suffer from the same issues. In the end I again had to state the law to them and raise the possibility of Small Claims Court action before they agreed to send a replacement (which seems to work much better, so presumably not all down to firmware!). So again, the end result was good, but they should have dealt with it properly from the start without victim blaming, and without needing to have the law pointed out to them!

  189. scott

    Conclusion: Garmin sucks. I speak from experience having owned 4 Garmin GPS devices.

  190. andrei

    one of the reasons I’ll stick with Wahoo when it comes to bike gps. sorry.

  191. Georg

    Agree, agree, agree.
    My customer experience:
    – “New SW nag” on phone annoys,
    – Routing in E810 was so bad, never again routing with Garmin
    – OW swims, really bad, only after update…
    – Power Meter reception on 920 horrendous.

    Polar, Wahoo, Stages, Lezyne… Here I come.

  192. Cedric

    Great post !
    Indeed Garmin, stop to add features and fix existing ones !!!
    And don’t release firmware before have seriously tested it … It’s reccurent that new firmware add bugs doesn’t existing in previous releases …

  193. Scott

    After a bug in their Connect mobile app causes it to not initiate the HealthKit API properly to post workouts to the Apple Health app, I was told by support that they weren’t aware of any issues here, and I should instead go away and speak to Apple.

    In the end the “fix” came from the community, that told me a hack I could do in the app to get it to ask for permission and add itself as a Source.

    Except then it posted my cycling miles and walk+run miles to the Apple Health app.

    LiveTrack has also worked for me once, and AutoStart has worked for me about 2 times out of 10 tries.

    So not only do they have insufficient QA, they have unhelpful and dismissive support staff that are being paid to do a worse job than others users do for free.

    Never going Garmin again, for exactly these reasons. Should have got with the Elemnt Bolt or the newer one. Next door neighbour has the Bolt and it just boringly works every time. No cross fingers or superstitions. Garmin can do one.

  194. Scott

    Oh, and the latest Garmin Connect Mobile app update that was supposed to fix a lot of LiveTrack issues: didn’t. Still unreliable. They’ve gone cheap on software development and quality assurance to save money, but they will pay the price as the meme of their unreliability builds and spreads.
    I wish I’d known about it before I bought in.

    For anyone tempted, do not bother. I’m having problems, and when searching for solutions, I’m finding the same problems from others in threads that are sometimes years old. Garmin do not care.

  195. Stephen Gunn

    Great post. It sums up what I (as a 15 year user of Garmin fitness products, since the Forerunner 201) have been saying and thinking about Garmin QA since day 1, pretty much. Whether it is disappearing breadcrumb trails on the Edge 500 and Forerunner 310XT, unreliable touch screen on Edge 820, poor hardware on early Forerunner 305, BT connection causing power dropouts on Vector 3, BT connection to phone unreliable on Edge 820… The list goes on.. Garmin seem to use their users as their QA department rather than employing their own.

  196. Meredith

    My Garmin car sat navs have had no particular issues apart from one where the USB port failed. My Garmin GPSMap outdoor units have just worked. My Virb Elite camera has no issues. My Edge 800 has some navigation quirks but works fine. It is starting to have battery issues now as it is old.

    I have just got an Edge 830 and so far it works just fine. I have noticed that some navigation quirks the 800 have have been fixed. I have no intention of using the Bluetooth or Wi-Fi functions on it though (I have managed without those in the past just fine so I see no reason to start) so I don’t know if they would be buggy.

    • Paul S.

      @Meredith, WiFi works on the 830, so there’s no reason to shy away. Having the ride automatically upload when I get home is convenient, even though I’m going to plug the thing into my computer anyway. Bluetooth has also worked for me (iPhone XS, latest iOS) so far as I can tell. (I do get annoying notifications during my ride.) So far navigation has been nearly perfect.

  197. Harriet King

    As you said- I find the swim on my 735 shockingly bad. This last weekend, I swam in a 150m lido/lake area. I swam 15 lengths, so 2,250m. Now, obviously I am not swimming quite straight and obviously there will be some variations. But my watch picked this up as 3,200m. I had the same with my old 910XT and honestly, if I wasn’t hooked into the garmin ecosystem I’d be looking elsewhere.

  198. Harriet King

    As you said- I find the swim on my 735 shockingly bad. This last weekend, I swam in a 150m lido/lake area. I swam 15 lengths, so 2,250m. Now, obviously I am not swimming quite straight and obviously there will be some variations. But my watch picked this up as 3,200m. I had the same with my old 910XT and honestly, if I wasn’t hooked into the garmin ecosystem I’d be looking elsewhere.

  199. Dick

    Your last paragraph is spot on correct..


  200. A No

    Thanks for bringing this issue to the fore, Ray. Hopefully, this will get Garmin’s attention and lead to changes down the road.

    As a software development professional and longstanding Garmin user, I’m continuously befuddled to understand how the company continues to deliver poor quality software time and time again.

    I’m also at a loss to understand how the problem seems to be limited to athletic products; I have two Garmin automotive devices that have generally worked flawlessly for years.

    Following your recent review, I took a chance and ordered an 830 (previously owned 500 and 810), but it’s the last chance saloon for Garmin; any issues and I’ll be returning the product and switching to something else.

    My final wish is that the integration of Garmin and Tacx won’t ruin the latter’s software, since as the owner of their NEO, I’d hate to see that follow the same path as typical Garmin products.

    • Paul S.

      The one problem I’ve had with Garmin automotive devices is when I get off an Interstate to stop (gas, food, etc.) when I go to get back on it always tries to route me to the next intersection via surface roads rather than the one I just got off. I just ignore it.

  201. greyltc

    Ray, I think you’re giving Garmin too much credit here in assuming they weren’t aware of the MARQ & FR945 open water swimming failure. Of course they extensively tested the most difficult GPS task when they changed the GPS chipset in their multisport watches. Somehow they didn’t care that it fails and advertised/sold the devices as supporting open water swimming anyway. A class-action lawsuit for their false advertising is in order and maybe we can hope that something like that would drive a cultural change in the company. Does anyone know a lawyer who likes to eat low hanging fruit?

  202. Steve Taylor

    When you say Garmin, with a lack of relevant data, you might want to emphasise you mean the Fitness division. Unlike Wahoo they do a whole lot more than bike stuff. If this level of problem were to exist in their Aviation or Maritime divisions, I’d be seriously concerned. Perhaps they could learn from one another?

  203. David

    Hit the nail on the head Ray – thank you.

    Had (and have) lots of Garmin products from their Edge and Forerunner lineups and vivoactive and car GPS. I’m now back to using an E800 and E500 because despite shorter battery life they seem not to crash and lose rides.

    I “want” an new E830 but don’t want the hassle that goes with a new Garmin so I’ll eke out more time with the E800 in the hope Wahoo or someone will come in with something close or at least close enough features wise and go that way unless I hear in the meantime that early E830 users are having a good experience. So, Garmin could have made a sale but most likely won’t.

    Have just got a F945 to replace a F935, it has the permanent 236km/hr wind bug, it has dropped all sensors at the start of a ride, it has kept all sensors but lost the power sensor at the start of a ride, it can’t keep the display screen I want on display even though it’s set not to auto-rotate through displays, battery life is worse than the F935, optical HR is nonsensical (but I knew that was going to be the case – chest strap required if you want something sensible). And that list is just from 3 weeks of ownership – where I haven’t run or been for a swim! Next race will require the F910 so I can be sure I will get the race data. Next watch – well, I’ll see what’s out there but I hope there’s something else that does what i want even if it doesn’t do everything Garmin say whatever their latest watch at that time does. So, again, long time Garmin customer who will happily (even eagerly) jump elsewhere given something close to good from someone else.

  204. Joe

    Garmin Italy is inexistent.
    If you open an issue, the only track for them is the subject and in somebody (garmin team) change that, only post open a different issue and the most “funny” thing is that different replays from garmin team are totaly different from each other. Es: Reset the watch, reset garmin connect app, send back the watch, wait the fix on an known issue and so on…
    It’s not normal that, for issues opened after 2 or 3 days for an expensive watch, garmin doesn’t do the refound. I have had a new watch from garmin that has the same old problems. Is’s so frustrating. I am not able to make sync via wifi with more routers and nobody cares. Here some of them:

    D-LINK DVA-5592 (Wind-Infostrada)
    ADB EpiCentro VV2220 (TeleTu)
    easybox 904 xdsl (Vodafone)
    Archer VR200 (TP-Link)
    Tp-LINK MR6400

  205. Smileman

    Thanks Ray for this post.

    I was a loyal Garmin customer and owned a bunch of Garmin products, but around two years ago the growing frustration over a myriad of software issues (and no feeling there was a light at the end of the tunnel) caused me to throw in the towel.

    I switched to competing products with more reliable software and the trade off has been well worth the switch.

    A few years ago I actually even wrote a similar post to yours and the Garman forums, and incredibly Garmin removed it. There was no harsh language or insults, just a call to arms for Garmin to get its software act together.

    Anyone passionate about sports equipment should be rooting for Garmin to succeed. Let’s hope they can take your suggestions to heart and produce better software. I’d love to be a customer again.

  206. Joe

    The watch is a Fenix 5X Plus and the routers that doesn’t work via wifi are:

    D-LINK DVA-5592 (Wind-Infostrada)
    ADB EpiCentro VV2220 (TeleTu)
    easybox 904 xdsl (Vodafone)
    Archer VR200 (TP-Link)
    Tp-LINK MR6400

  207. davie

    Per my facebook comments, I have an Edge 510. The latest/final firmware v6.1 has a bug which was FIXED in an earlier firmware but re-introduced in version 6.1 AGAIN. The back button just dissapears from the power/light settings screen. The only way to go back is to lock the screen then unlock it which takes you back to the main menu.
    How bad must Garmin’s quality control be to re-introduce bugs which they have already fixed?

  208. Leo

    It’s not only software bugs. Garmin also adds things to their software which reduces usability.

    For example, Garmin Connect (on my iPhone) has a graph that shows both resting heartrate and maximum heartrate for every day.

    Maximum heartrate is not very interesting, but resting heartrate is and more precisely; the trend in resting heartrate.

    But the trend in resting heartrate is not visible because the scale of the graph is from 30 to 180 because they also show maximum heartrate, and my resting heartrate is tipical between 40 and 45. Now resting heartrate is shown as a almost flat line, while in reality there is more fluctuation.

    I’ve complaint to Garmin about it, saying that added the maximum heartrate makes the complete graph useless. There reaction was: “Different users find different information usefull”

    To me, Garmin is a company driven by marketing. As long as their feature list is longer than that of their competition they’re happy.

    And to be honest: it works! They sell a lot of devices, and people do look at the number of features when they chose a watch and don’t know or don’t care if features are useless (or don’t work at all)

    And to be even more honest, I did chose a Forerunner 935 2 years ago because my favorite brand, Suunto, made a mess with the Spartan.

    • Joe

      Ok, but after different garmin watches and actual two models (FR920XT, F5X+) I decided that I don’t by anymore a new model. I have had only garmin for many years. It’s time to change.

    • Leo

      When my Forerunner 935 dies I will go back to Suunto. Also not perfect, but 2 Suunto watches gave me less irritation than 1 Garmin watch.

      At least I learned a lesson: The jealous making feature list of Garmin is not something that makes you happy at the end.

  209. Toby

    OMG! This article resonated so much I had to add my experience with Garmin.

    As noted by Ray, I too have been forced to become Garmin’s beta tester over the years as they continue to release incomplete software/hardware. Whilst the advent of numerous genuine competitors across Garmin’s portfolio has continued to push Garmin’s innovations they are still far from being anywhere close to being good.

    These days I try and wait for at least a year before I pick up any of Garmin’s new releases as I no longer have the patience or desire to work through issues they should have resolved pre-shipping.

    I question whether Garmin employees actually use Garmin devices? If they do surely they would push their company harder to get things right before releasing?

  210. Daniel

    Nailed it! About 5 rears ago I sold my Fenix 2, VIRB, and eTrex (all which were on multiple replacements for bugs). I’ve been using a flawless Suunto Ambit 3 and Wahoo ELEMNT since. I love some of the features of the Garmin devices, but I can’t be convinced to return until their bug reputation improves. I will say that I think when people are sensitive to potential bugs with any product, they are “on the lookout” for future bugs and I think their tolerance goes down. For example, if I returned a device because it would freeze or shut down mid-ride, then the replacement worked fine except that I had to sync it to the app 3x on one occasion, I would be a lot more upset about the latter than I would have been if I hadn’t needed to replace the original already. I’d say the syncing example is less serious of a bug, but then you start thinking “if it can’t sync, I can’t trust it – it might indicate it’s gonna freeze again.” or “damnit!!! I spent all this money and I just want the basic features to work flawlessly; I want my money back.”

  211. Tim Grose

    Little confused by this article. Almost every other commentator cites their gripe with Garmin and yet in your own link to dcrainmaker.com they “win” virtually every watch & bike computer category despite all these issues. If LiveTrack, OWS and BT Edge connectivity were bit better would there even be point anybody else even trying?

    • “If LiveTrack, OWS and BT Edge connectivity were bit better would there even be point anybody else even trying?”

      As you know, it’s not just those three things. One only need to look at the 281 other comments here (or the 173+ on Facebook) to see that. It’s a general frustration with the bug levels of Garmin devices. Those three items are specific tipping points. If anyone, especially Garmin, looks at those specific issues, solves them, and then says ‘Mission Accomplished’, then they’re missing the point.

      As I argued in the opening paragraph – no – I think if Garmin had stable software, then their competitors wouldn’t make any meaningful ground. We rarely see their competitors introduce significant new features in comparison to what Garmin is doing, and in some cases, their competitors actually remove features (see: Polar Vantage series anything, Suunto app/web platforms and app store).

      As I noted in my closing paragraphs, at the end of the day Garmin’s overall product functionality for me generally wins over the bug annoyances. But I don’t think that path is sustainable.

  212. Deane Blazie

    This is a much needed article. Kudos.

    I’ve been in the software and embedded hardware business all my life and I too curse my Garmin cycling computers routinely. I currently use an Edge 1000.

    The main problem I see is that the products are built on VERY poor UI, Human Engineering design and this frustrates users from day one. And this creates an enormous support burden for the company. In many cases it’s not a software bug, it’s just poor user interface design. Garmin Connect is a perfect example. Look at all the posts about Bluetooth connectivity not working. This is not rocket science and yet we all wonder if our ride/run/swim will sync. 50 years in the software business (not exaggerating) and I’ve given up on getting WiFi to work on my Edge 1000. Bluetooth works most of the time with some fiddling.

    Alas, I use Garmin aviation products and they just work, are easy to use and very expensive.

    Garmin, hire a Human Factors Team and build a solid User interface before shipping the first product. I’ll help!

  213. Kevin

    A post that nicely summarises what a lot of us have been thinking for years.

    My ‘favourite’ s/w bugs have been:
    1. FR935 recording an 84m OWS in a Half-Ironman
    2. FR935 elevation smoothing that caused massive under-reporting of total ascent
    3. Edge 520 battery gauge reporting 2% for 2 hours
    4. Vivoactive 3 rapid battery drain when powered off

    And on the hardware front, I’ve had the pleasure of:
    1. FR935 OHR cracked resin (twice)
    2. Vector 3 battery cover debacle.
    3. Edge 510 touchscreen failing

    But like a lot of people on here, I get sucked into the new product hype, with the hope that this new device could be the one that Garmin gets right. One day I’ll learn.

  214. Jim S

    Ray, will you share Garmin’s response, or lack thereof, to this post? I hope this shakes them up enough to change, but it will be telling if it doesn’t. Thanks for what you do.

    • If there’s a big enough response to share, I definitely will. If however, it’s basically a variant of ‘Here’s the latest firmware versions, we hope things are fixed’, then less so.

      Which isn’t to say I don’t want to see things fixed. I’m definitely waiting for them to send over firmware updates for the MARQ/FR945/FR935/Fenix 5 series watches for openwater swimming (which is supposed to be this week). And if that fixes things, then the next week or two is a great time to do some openwater swimming outside the DCR Cave. I’ll happily swim back and forth across the lake each day. Partially because I want to see if things are fixed, and partially because it’s time for another openwater swim comparison showdown. And I’ve got some other swim stuff to test anyway.

      I know that most of the Garmin Fitness/Outdoors leadership is actually at an offsite event with a pile of media folks starting today, so I have no doubt that this post will be discussed there. Both in the context of internal Garmin discussions, but probably also amongst the media. Maybe some of the media will bring it up. It sounds like James for CyclingTips had interviews with Garmin around this topic last week. So we’ll see…

  215. Bruce

    I have always felt you are just renting a device from Garmin, they never seem to support a product after two years. Bugs or no bugs you just have to live with it or buy a newer more expensive device….

  216. Fritz

    Great article…. I am a garmin fan owning a fenix3HR an edge 800 and edge 810.

    Their phone service in the UK is good…. they swooped out an edge for me once that had already gone a month beyond the warranty.

    Would I trust them…. NO WAY. Their software is not stable. I have lost rides on a once in a lifetime tour across the alps. I now know how to use file fixer and rely on Strava to fix and save files…. Garmin connect is simply a conduit because so many files are not on there.

    I have had issues with elevation showing +10 when going down a mineshaft… when I phoned customer service it turned out to be a corrupt file I had to delete. In other words it was unstable software again.

    Then there are connectivity issues where it doesn’t connect and the suddenly connects…. but how or why who knows….

    Oh and have you ever tried to plot a route on garmin…. it’s a nightmare…. I can show you a hill in the English Chilterns that you cannot ride up because garmin has not discovered that you can actually cycle underneath a railway line.

    A lot of moaning yet I do love my garmin I only wish they could be a bit more user friendly.

  217. Will

    Thank you for this article. As a Garmin customer for almost as long as I’ve been running (6 years), I’ve had my share of software issues, starting with when I bought a higher-end Garmin. As others have said, the more the devices costs, the greater the likelihood of issues, for some reason. Then again, 5-6 years ago, the mid to lower-range Garmins didn’t have a lot of functionality, relatively speaking.

    As someone who wrote a couple of third-party Garmin Connect IQ apps for fun, I’ll say that the same kind of culture extends to the API/SDK for developing third-party apps. Just a few examples:
    – Bugs in the API that stick around for years
    – Bugs that they knew about, but forgot to fix
    – Incomplete/misleading/broken API documentation
    – Baffling design decisions — one that sticks in my mind was the decision not to notify CIQ data fields of a new lap during a structured workout. This meant that any CIQ data field which displayed lap stats (which have to be calculated by the app) would display nonsense during a workout, leading to unhappy users. When they finally designed to fix it, they did it in such a way that: all affected apps would have to be modified and resubmitted, and that the fix only applied to new devices.
    – 3 different ways to manage Connect IQ app settings (Garmin Express, Garmin Connect Mobile and Garmin Connect IQ), and they all have slightly different bugs and limitations on different platforms
    – Devices-specific quirks which aren’t reflected in the simulator – this means that sometimes the only way to be sure certain things will work or look good is to own all the devices or to wait for the bug reports to come in

    So none of this is a coincidence, IMO. I’m sure everyone who works on this stuff takes pride in their jobs as well do. But I think there’s cultural/systematic issues, like lack of resources/time, which cause all kinds of problems to surface.

    It’s frustrating for me because I love Garmin running watches and I don’t want to see them crushed by Apple. We all know that Apple won’t release an Apple Watch with physical buttons and an always-on screen that looks good in sunlight. Physical buttons aren’t trendy and the type of low-res, low-colour, washed-out screen that Garmins use seems archaic to people if they don’t understand why a screen like that is better for battery life and outdoor usage.

  218. Joe

    Something else that I do not understand at all. To install a beta firmware I have to do a betatester for Garmin for a watch (F5X +) that in the store costs € 850 but that’s not enough, I have to make everything manualy. Is that so hard for garmin to make a dropdownbox to chose which version to install? Is that so hard to make an firmware area that contains all the user configurations like alerts, page fields and so on, so if I install the new firmware and test for garmin in a watch pay by me, everything becomes more light for the user?

    Thank you DC. I think that a post here make more that 10 issues posted to garmin 😉

  219. *Possible* new bug on the Forerunner 945:

    Data recording is *always* “1-second” despite “Smart” being selected.

    Try it yourself – sit on a park bench for a minute – seems to generate 60 data points in the .FIT file.

    • Honestly, I love that bug. Maybe Garmin will keep it.

      (Tidbit: Selecting ‘smart’ recording doesn’t save battery at all, it simply makes smaller file sizes, which are so tiny already, that it just doesn’t matter.)

    • Beri

      If you have a powermeter sensor attached, it will always be 1 second. AFAIK the smart setting is ignored if you are using power.

    • Correct, power meters always force it to 1-second recording. Frankly, I’d love them to get rid of smart recording altogether. There’s just no good reason for it in 2019. All it does is increase customer confusion.

  220. Jon Niehof

    I think there’s another layer here. I think there’s some level of manufacturing QA issues as well. My fenix 3 is a dog. I keep it up to date, have reasonable config options, etc. and the pacing, distance while hiking, etc. are terrible. This is the *replacement* unit that Garmin sent me, with basically “we think your expectations are too high but try another one just in case yours might be bad.”

    I’ve been next to people with fenix 3’s that do beautifully. So it’s probably not software and it’s probably not design, but some sort of hardware QA. I suspect that might also be true with the fenix 5 sensor connectivity issue.

    Because these are devilishly complicated devices, if it’s not performing up to snuff, the consumer doesn’t know: is this a software issue that will be fixed in an update? Is this a bad unit that I can swap? (And maybe swap several times because Garmin just sends units out without verifying that the received one is “bad” or the replacement is “good.”) Or is this just a bad design? So I don’t buy a Garmin device until it’s been on the market at least 18 months (at which point there are very few updates left) and substantially reduced in price.

    And QA and software can sit and point the finger at each other and neither gets fixed.

  221. Braithwaite Richard

    Ha, Garmin Edge 520 has started randomly freezing during rides, hugely annoying as the only solution seems to be to stop riding, press the on/off button for 15 seconds and it then restarts, and yes it continues to record the same ride but is it now accurate, does it record the complete ride . Is this ideal? Not really!

  222. David Kroter

    5 edges 1030 with the well-known blue halo on garmin screens. 4 years without any solution in 820 and 1030 incredibly reproduce the same defect without any intention of solving it. This company will disappear once known its software and hardware problems and its null intention to solve them over the years.
    PS.-You will not see any picture of any pro cyclist on instagram or anywhere without a blue hallo on their screens. Is this normal? Is this a serious company? Play for years the same problems without the slightest intention to solve them ?.
    Bye Garmin¡¡

  223. I think it’s great that you have started writing about this. I have owned most of Garmin Edges since the 800 and they constantly get worse, even at their basic functions, recording a ride reliably.
    I have now bought a cheap Android phone ( I am an iOS user but won’t use my iPhone Xs on the handlebar) and will try my best to replace my Edge 1030 which makes me crazy at times.

  224. Jeff Haye

    After this weekends event, where my 520 crashed at the 69 mile check point. I was in a “Profiles Loading” screen for longer than I could wait, needed to finish the ride. I AM DONE WITH GARMIN….DONE!

  225. Derek Lessard

    Hi Ray. You pulled my comment from the Edge 830 review. I may be at fault, but definitely not fake ;). In fact I called Garmin customer service yesterday who were very nice but provided the very same solutions as un(re)-pairing bluetooth, ensuring Garmin Connect app was updated; and then re-syncing edge and Garmin connect. Unfortunately, I am writing today to report that the end result remains the same.

  226. This is quite an interesting observation. Not just the article in itself but the comments here as well. I have become used to always having two computers because one of them is regularly crashing or doing something odd. The crashes in and of themselves are annoying but the resulting practice of riding with two devices is actually really nice. My current “setup” is a virb, a fenix and an edge – a nice overview on the handlebar and the haptics of the watch.

  227. Clair Stewart

    Hit it right on the head Ray. I am a Garmin fan, 99% of my workout tech is Garmin and has been for the last 10 years but it’s shifting. I’m riding with an Asioma power meter because the Garmin pedals just had too many bugs. Your review plus Garmin’s own forums was enough to show me that The Vectors weren’t ready. People that are this interested in tracking their workouts and data associated with said workouts are not stupid. They want promised features to work and even when 95% of the features do work well, you somehow feel like Garmin has cheated you because of non-delivery of it all. I love Garmin but they will lose me to other products that just work as promised.

  228. DLF

    Thanks for the honest article. I’ve had a Bryton 330 for three years now and have had almost no issues with functions not working. Granted it’s a much simpler device than something like the Garmin Edge 530 but I am very hesitant to buy Garmin products with all the problems that people seem to be having with them. I really wanted to pull the trigger on the Garmin 530 or 830 because of all the features described but what’s the point if some of the features are only periodically working! I will wait and consider products like Bryton 450 and Stages L50. Thanks again!

  229. Hkgmatt

    Thank you for this post which is as courageous at is it necessary.

  230. Shane Fenton

    Absolutely nailed it. Now if only they’d pay attention. I thought I’d upgraded to the 830 from a Wahoo Bolt last month. It’s locked up waking from sleep mode multiple times and ironically enough after reading this last night I get up to ride and after another forced reboot because it was locked up after waking, it records the ride as having occurred about 30 hours previous and is a complete CF of data – other than GPS coordinates somehow. Have a look. My Bolt was setup in 30s, and used without any issue at all for nearly a year. The Garmin? It took 15 minutes just to get the app to sync (even though my phone connected fine) and I still have to deal with this BS instability.

  231. MrB

    Excellent post Ray, hopefully stakeholders at Garmin take notice.

    My introduction to Garmin ecosystem was last years Edge 130, which for the most part has done what I need it to. Yet, there are still some issues and nits which haven’t been addressed and no FW update for at least 5mos now. Is that it? Is this EOL for this product in terms of attention from their development team?…and FIX LIVE TRACKING FOR PETE’S SAKE!!! one of the safety features that drew me in the first place, and stopped working months ago!

    Not great for giving me ‘warm happy feelings’ about Garmin brand and enticing me to upgrade to one of their latest or higher end devices; and starting all over as an Edge 530 ‘beta-tester’, for example.

    • Paul S.

      Two years is about par for the course, although they abandoned the Epix in about one. And there’s always something that’s never fixed. Of all of the Garmin stuff I have, the only ones I expect to see an update for are the new ones, the Edge 830 and the Fenix 5+. The Edge 1000 is probably over, I’ll never see another update for the VIRB 360, and everything else is older. But that’s not that unusual. Apple only supports the current and the two previous OS’s, so three years, although the current OS is often usable on devices much older that 3 years.

  232. Ken Kilmurray

    I was planning to get a 530 as soon as available but maybe not now. Better the devil I know. My Wahoo Bolt has some irritating quirks and has stopped navigating mid ride, but the rides were saved by up loading to Strava. It drops my HR and cadence, and does not connect to my phone consistently…but it has never lost a ride. Do I want to lose the relative stability of the Bolt to get the cool features of the 530?

  233. Andrea

    Some years ago, I sell my horrible Garmin Edge 820 in favor of a wahoo Bolt.
    Far to be perfect but it’s thousand time better than the Garmin one.

  234. John Wayne

    Honestly, can anyone give me a recent non Garmin watch which can replace the Forerunner 935? Polar Vantage is terrible gps and hrm and that is the same for the current Suunto models… I even went back to my 5 year old Polar V800…
    It seems that, as technology evolves, the electronic devices are getting worse but the prices are goung up way high…

  235. Dr B

    Thank you so much for putting this out there! I so hope that Garmin gets the hint! I have vivid memories of riding along next to the Garmin TDF van in 2009 (as a spectator) grilling the VIPs as to why they didn’t support the Mac platform! I have just given up on things like LiveTrack and this BT thing is just pitiful. Just look at your Strava feed and search “Garmin crash.” A lot of this I thought was just me. It really does seem like they don’t care (hello GM 1979!). I was also part of the E820 fiasco and even gave them a chance to make up for it by giving me a discount on the 530 if I send them their junk back…nope! Hello Wahoo! Great post.

  236. Gustaf Hagel

    I’ve never owned a Garmin sports product but not for lack of interest, but rather the above issue. When I got my cycling computer a couple of years ago, I was scared off to Polar V650 because of the buggy Edges in my surroundings. Sure, it lacked in features, but the only thing I still really miss is smartphone notifications. And I really don’t miss that enough to buy a new one and abandon Polar Flow.

    So now when I was after a new watch, I was again looking at Garmin, but was again scared off due to reading about all the software issues, but there was another factor as well: the sheer amount of Garmin watches out there with just one or two features difference. I couldn’t be arsed to inform myself about the 12 million Forerunner models, 8 different Fenix models and whatever else there were. I went with Polar again, but that one hasn’t arrived yet so I can’t comment on my satisfaction there.

    I think if Garmin could shift focus to reliability, longevity and support, they’d win a lot of new customers and back a lot of old customers.

  237. B.Chan

    You only mention their wearables here, but 2018 was a disaster of a year for their Wahoo Kickr Snaps as well. We bought 12 Snaps, and ended up replacing 14 of them before requesting a refund, which is still ongoing. Defective Snaps were replaced with used defective Snaps. They have barely acknowledged the issue and downplayed it, but I’d be willing to bet it affected far more than the 0.5% of units they have admitted to.

  238. Larryg

    If you want to show your location to friends and loved ones forget garmin and strava. Just use Google maps share location feature. It’s free and always works

    • The reason most people prefer to use LiveTrack (when it works), is that it offloads the GPS work to the device so it saves battery on the phone (since GPS is the biggest battery draw after the display). It also has the benefit of sharing sensor data (HR/Power/etc), and can show where you’ve been, versus just where you are. Again, when it works.

  239. Guillermo Guerini

    Wow, I’m amazed by the amount of comments agreeing with you! Hmmm.. Am I really? Like most people here, I’ve been a loyal Garmin user for the longest time. I started with the Forerunner 305, then 405, 920xt, Fenix 3 HR, 935 and most recently, the 945. While I agree that Garmin’s software is buggy (it is! lots of regressions), they also have lots of hardware problems to sort out.

    I had issues with the Fenix 3 HR (can’t remember what) and 935 twice, separate devices (sync problems, battery). Garmin’s support, at least in the USA is great. I got replacement units and I was happy with them. But then, I got the new 945. Man, total shit show! I had to return it (mushy buttons, poor battery life and unreliable syncing). Now, looking at Garmin’s forums and even here, people are having the same old issues: cracking HR sensor, altimeter/barometer issues because of chlorine, mushy buttons, syncing problems, horrible battery life, etc. WTF!?! And I’m not even going to complain about the new shitty GPS sensor! My 10 year old 505 had better tracking than the “state-of-art” 945.

    In my opinion, those issues are unacceptable. It’s a $600 (!!!!!!!!!!) watch for f sake. Considering the 945 is built on top of the 935, they had more than two years to figure out the issues. But they didn’t. It’s so disappointing Garmin!!

  240. Ross Cadogan

    You’ve hit the nail on the head Ray. I owned the Garmin Edge 510 and 520 as well as several Forerunners and sensors before growing frustrated with their unreliability.
    I moved to Wahoo and never looked back. I won’t touch another Garmin product because no matter how good the feature list looks I know it will be let down by dreadful software.

    I suspect it’s a cultural problem at Garmin. I’m a software developer so I know how hard it is to produce good code. You need a development culture that’s committed to quality and a development process that supports reliable outcomes.
    Even as a customer this is visibly present at Wahoo. When there are bugs they are quickly identified and resolved. There were plenty of bugs when I bought an ELEMNT upon its initial release, but a few months of regular upgrades later and platform stability was rock solid, all the bugs driven to ground by persistent attention.

    My ELEMNT hardly ever gives problems now, but I still frequently find it installing the latest over-the-air update when I boot it up. I take that as a reassuring sign that another bug or edge-case has been knocked before I will ever have to encounter it.
    I own lots of other Wahoo kit nowadays too, from the KICKR to the Headwind and various sensors. They’re all rock solid too.

  241. John B

    I have owned a a number of Garmin products including an eTrex, an Oregon 450, an Edge 500, an Edge 520 and a couple watches including the FR15.

    I even bought an Index scale that crapped out on me within 90 days. It would return a weight I knew to be about 20 pounds too light. After alerting Garmin of the problem they eventually allowed me to return it in exchange for another refurbished Index which has been fairly reliable for the past 18 months or so.

    My FR 15 had to be returned and exchanged for another refurbished unit and it has worked as expected for about five years as long as I keep the battery meter showing full power.

    My Edge 500 would auto-pause only when the activity history was empty. This was just another step in the post-ride/post data transfer process. All-in-all a reliable unit for me.

    I upgraded to the 520 because I wanted the LiveTrack feature and It worked more or less as advertised up until I started reading about the failures other folks were having with it. After being off the bike for a few months I got the LiveTrack failure notice for the first time a couple weeks ago. My wife actually liked hearing the reassuing “ding” when she recieved an email telling her my ride had just started.

    My 520 would also cut out and reboot mid ride but that has come and passed.

    This blog has kept me informed of the quirks my Garmin products may experiance so I definately do not feel alone. I guess I just put up with them and lower my expections.

    I am not in a real hurry to “upgrade” to anything at the moment.

  242. staffann

    I wonder how Garmin actually does its software testing. What is the test strategy? Does it use continuous integration? Unit/Integration/System tests? Does it use automatic testing? And since many of the software issues seem to appear in existing functionality, what about regression testing strategy? I find that the only way to keep a good quality in complex pieces of software like this is to go for the combination of CI, automatic tests and (of course) automatic regression tests. Then virtually all tests can be repeated regularly – as often as possible, ideally with every commit or pull request – so that problems in that existing functionality are found quickly. It is a bit of an investment to start going down this route, but it is worth it.

  243. Simon

    lol I’ve been saying this for YEARS. I wouldn’t recommend a Garmin ANYTHING to anybody almost solely based on the underlying software.

    I used to say about my 820 that it was proof that nobody at Garmin actually uses the products they make.

  244. pavlinux


  245. Mark Burns

    I definitely have a love hate relationship with Garmin. I am astounding that they can’t consistently have the steps on my watch match what gets into Garmin Connect and can’t have a weight graph on the app (I’m on android, but may be the same on iOS) where the scale isn’t so ridiculously huge (90 lbs) to make it absolutely worthless.

  246. cptsilver

    Have you communicated to anyone at Garmin directly? I truly believe they’re not interested in improving things, because they’re still selling units, enough people are still buying their stuff, regardless of the amount of negative experiences shared online. Until this has a meaningful impact on their sales, I don’t think anything will change. Curious to hear Garmin’s perspective though.

    • I communicate with them constantly. Also, there are quotes in the piece from their head of the Fitness division (which is roughly one stop away from the CEO, there may be a dotted line in there to someone else in between, but basically the quotes I have are from the top of the fitness world). I also usually have a meeting with the CEO each April as well when I’m in town for the Connect IQ Summit. This topic didn’t come up in that meeting back then.

    • ChuckPDX

      At least in the cycling head unit space, I would hope that their sudden ~15-30% loss of market share to Wahoo has caught their attention! I admire Garmin’s innovations and have been a loyal customer since 1994, but like many others I’ll be voting with my wallet soon (despite the Roam mount misstep). I’m not in the “never again” camp – I hope they can win me back someday.

      Ray, in your conversations with Garmin do you think they understand that stability and ease-of-use issues are the key reason they’re losing customers?

    • Yeah, I think the 15-30% needs to be taken with a grain a salt. As noted, in some markets it was just a handful of percent. I think a reasonable across the board percentage for new units is between 5 and 12%. Again, just a swag.

      (Side note: What’s far more fascinating would be comparing like vs like. For example, ignoring things like older Garmin units – an Edge 510, and only comparing the market-share from the timeframe the BOLT came out.)

      As for Garmin understanding the ease of use issues, I actually think they’re starting to understand it. And to be fair, if you’ve tried their recent units the setup process (data fields aside) is much more streamlined and phone-focused than it used to be. I don’t think they understand how much the whole complete data field phone setup bit sells Wahoo devices. I think they vastly underestimate that feature (and the fact that it’s the leading thing anyone talks about when they talk Wahoo, followed closely by ‘ease of use’).

    • Graham

      (I personally don’t much care about this feature – it’s not that hard to set up or tweak the data fields etc., especially on a touch screen Edge.) However, it is plain daft that they still don’t have a method to do it off-device. It’s plain that people want it, and it’s plainly not that hard to do, at least in a basic way, given the fact that I can backup and restore those settings via a few .fit files. I did consider reverse engineering those .fit files and making something myself, but I can’t really be arsed. 🙂

    • DS

      I recently picked up a 520 Plus and was astonished that Garmin displays still can’t be set up via app or computer. I just assumed Garmin had gotten its act together in the years since I got my 920xt. Instead, my introduction to a shiny new Garmin product was a few miserable hours of scrolling through tiny menus with a 1980’s-era buzzbeep every time I touched a button. Now that I know Wahoos work better, I’m probably going to swap the Garmin for a Bolt.

      The Timex Global Trainer, which debuted almost 10 years ago, let you set up the watch and customize everything on a computer. All you had to do was drag and drop on your computer, then sync the watch and the changes would appear. Garmin is 10 years behind Timex. TIMEX!

    • DJ

      I feel like you need to be chatting to the CTO to see what’s happening here.
      Your proposal is good but it won’t solve the issue. We’ve seen when they’re aware of critical issues they’re too slow to fix them, or they never get fixed. Garmin need to be open with tickets, their transparency is pretty opaque on issues.
      I get the feeling they’re struggling with legacy coding practices and hardware spread across a sprawling range of devices. Leaving them unable to innovate quickly or fix bugs in a timely manner

      And when you’ve solved garmin, can you sort Strava and the chronological feed too 😉

    • ChuckPDX

      Thanks Ray,
      Yes, market share breakdown of similar current product would be useful. I’m sure Garmin tracks this internall, but maybe there are analyst reports that could be somewhat helpful. For example:
      link to marketwatch.com

      Good to know that Garmin is starting to address ease-of-use. I worry that trying to do this “piecemeal” on their current platform will be difficult, as compared with a new software architecture. Yesterday I rode with a 1030 user, and their eyes bugged out when I described Elemnt setup, management and usage workflows.

      Judging by the huge flood of reader comments, you’ve really touched a nerve with Garmin users! I hope Wahoo (Chip and Murray) are monitoring this – stability and ease-of-use are their crown jewels. They’d better not do anything to mess that up (Job#1)

  247. Robert N Gelder

    Edge 830 stopped calculating distance after I activated the bike alarm feature. Also it just from after I paused a ride only 5 minutes in!

  248. Mattv

    Typical lifecycle of cycling computer user:

    1) Buys Garmin
    2) Says “Wow- look at all the features”
    3) Uses for a few months
    4) Reads internet forums documenting all the issues
    5) Buys wahoo
    6) Buys a polar
    7) Buys a Karoo
    9) Buys the the updated version of the same garmin in step 1 with more features
    10 Repeat until you stop riding bikes

  249. Mark Cohen

    Ray, your article released a firestorm of pent up Garmin frustration. Your stance was fair, neutral and painfully accurate. Hopefully Garmin will turn all of the negative experiences into a positive reset of priorities. Here is my Garmin history dating back to my first watch, 310XT in 2010. An amazing watch for its time, too big to wear everyday, but it turned every mountain bike ride into an insightful workout.

    After several very satisfied years with Suunto (Ambit 2 and 3), I came back to Garmin for the Vivoactive HR. Excellent watch but a very short life of just over a year. I went back to Suunto for the Spartan Wrist HR, but was very disappointed, so I came back to Garmin for the 935, which is to date, my favorite watch. Since the 935, I ordered Fenix 5 and returned it, and then Fenix 5+ and returned it. Both had battery issues that were never resolved, even with replacement units. During that time I bought an Instinct for my son, who loves it.

    During the past few years I have also been very pleased with my Apple Watch 2,3 and now 4 as a daily driver and surprisingly consistent fitness watch.

    And now, after reading about so many frustrating issues, I am unable to pull the trigger on a new 945. For me, the 935 fills all my needs, and I have only had occasional software glitches over the past few years. I am happy with my Garmin watch, but I have no confidence in buying new products. I am currently awaiting the new Matrix Powerwatch 2, and I am considering a Suunto 9 Baro.

    A sincere thanks to Ray for his commitment to all of us, and to everyone who shares their experiences on this site. I couldn’t navigate this industry without you!


  250. 9P6

    Second to that

    It is and have always been

  251. 3underscore

    Some things are so simple and infuriating.

    The last two updates to the app completely destroyed the link with my Fenix 5 Plus. I had to go through unlinking, disconnect bluetooth, rejoin to my profile.

    Next day I run a 5k with my kids in about 36 min (I typically run 21 min and have in the past with this watch). NEW RECORD – 5K PB! NEW RECORD – FASTEST MILE – 12 MIN!

    It is stunning how reliably bad the customer experience is. If I wasn’t on android and if the apple watch didn’t look like crap…

  252. Sabi2017

    Ray: Your editorial on Garmin product reliability was spot on. Live tracking is virtually worthless. Every time I attempt to use it my wife worries because it never works. Presently I own use a Garmin 1000 and a Fenix 5, but I am looking to replace my Garmin 1000. While both the 830 and 1030 look enticing, I am looking closely at the new Wahoo Roam for exactly the reasons you state in the editorial; namely, stability of product and willingness to correct software bugs quickly. You are so right in saying to Garmin that it isn’t price that frustrates buyers, its reliability of product function for the price. If you want to charge top price, then the consumer should expect top of the line functional reliability. THANK YOU for your excellent commentary.

  253. Kring

    Thanks for posting this Ray – This has been the state for so long. Garmin can’t get out of their own way. No only is their software so poor, bugs run rampant.. I’ll argue that their hardware department is so far behind the times… they go out of their way to source out of production parts for their new models..

    I bet if you cracked open the edge 830/530 you will find 12 year old chips for Bluetooth, WiFi, processing, barometer, screens, etc… their lack of keeping up with mainstream technology components is costing them a lot of money and frustration. When you combine their poor architect & engineering of the hardware, poor sourcing of technology components and then wrap that in horrific software development and throw in the oven at 75 degrees for two years… out is the standard half-baked Garmin product we experience year after year. If anyone doubts how much garbage tech they pack into their over priced devices – just look at an Apple Watch or iPhone Xr and realize they are nearly the same cost and much of Apple’s tech is readily available from component vendors… for $600… the iPhone XR or Watch Series 4 with Cell or a Garmin Edge 820…. it’s not even close, the brand new Edge 830 is weaker, slower has a worse screen and has less features than an iPhone 3GS.

    Their biggest competitive advantage was no one was willing to challenge them so Garmin’s management made the decision to stagnated and continue charging a premium and use the revenue for pet projects. They show no signs in investing to leap ahead of any potential competitors.

    Wahoo still fall short IMO on a lot of features if you like gadgetry (like Varia radar) – but it appears from my limited use and commentary from people I ride with, the Wahoo devices are far better and simpler if you just need a ride recorder.

    I’ve been a long-time Garmin owner, purchased every single top-end device since Edge 205, My optimism carried me many years thinking they will turn a corner, but now after the 830 was announced — I just think they simply are a poorly run company that won’t be around much longer.

    • Paul S.

      iPhone 3GS has more features? Maybe, it’s a closer to a general purpose computing device, unlike any Garmin device. Better screen? That depends on what you want. For cycling or for cross country skiing, I want an always on screen that can easily be seen in direct sunlight. iPhone and Apple Watches (I have an XS and a 3LTE) have gotten better over the years, but the screens are still worse in direct sunlight than the Garmin devices I own. Maybe an app can make a phone sort of be a cycling computer, but the hardware of any iPhone (battery life, visibility in sunlight) just isn’t up to it. The processor in my 830 may be weaker/slower than the one in my XS, but it has only specific jobs to do, and it’s more than able to do them (or at least the ones I care about).

    • Kring

      To be clear, I wasn’t saying use an iPhone 3GS, I was reference that 10 year old technology that Apple sourced out paces anything Garmin produces today. If Garmin had even a shred of innovative ability or sourced the right components they could easily make a product relevant in modern times… But they choose to hover back about 10-15 years in technology for no reason other then they are poorly managed.

      It’s hard writing software in modern times that supports hardware from 10 generations ago that most vendors no longer support… Garmin continual makes it an uphill battle for themselves.

  254. CP

    I’ve had two Garmin Edge 520s go tits up on me. The first time, it just wouldn’t connect/show up on my computer when plugged into USB. Garmin sent me a new USB cable. Didn’t fix the problem. Since my 520 was then still under warranty, Garmin replaced it under warranty.

    Fast forward a few more years and my 520 gets a “USB drawing too much power” message when plugged in. Tried different USB cords. No joy. I even tried plugging my 520 into a phone charger just to see if I could get it charged up (and theoretically still use and just transfer rides to Strava via BT). Nothing. Essentially bricked. Since my 520 was out of warranty, Garmin was basically “too bad, so sad” about it. Offered to let me buy a refurb’ed 520 for $100. I countered with how about an 820 since I knew the 830 had just been released. Nope.

    Same thing happened to a friend’s Garmin and he got the same response. I read on the web about at least few other people with the same experience. Garmin’s attitude was that they didn’t have tons of people reporting about the problem so not an issue they were going to address. I pointed out that if it wasn’t a big problem, what would be the big deal about them remedying it since it’s not like they’d have to replace hundreds or thousands of units and they’d have a happy and loyal customer. They weren’t interested.

    Customer service person was nice enough but clearly coached on how not to be helpful.

    I’m now a new Wahoo ELEMNT Roam user.

  255. David

    Garmin …..great hardware (ok, stretching it slightly) rubbish software.

    Considering how huge is Garmin one would think they could invest more in software development.

    Did make me laugh when Garmin released a dive computer …..not a chance I’d use a Garmin over my Suunto

  256. AD

    Ray, I really appreciate you writing this article but I hasten to add that until this point you have always come across to me as a bit of a Garmin fan boy – other than a notable Edge review some years back. It’s good to have some (belated) balance back.

    I’m much like other people on here, a long term Garmin user with a love/ hate relationship with their products. I started off with a Geko many years ago and now the family has many different devices. I’ve always viewed the software as being flakey and low grade. For years I’ve been able to kinda live with it. I’ve got used to updates crashing, random power downs, restarting/ reconnecting BT, accepting it in the way in which you might make excuses for an eccentric colleague/ neighbour/ family member.

    Today I have a 935 as a daily driver, old Edge 1000, scales (bombproof to be fair) and lots of other family devices and sensors. Personally Strava is the go to app, but I do like Garmin Connect which definitely ties me in somewhat to the Garmin ecosystem.

    But what has really fried my piss are my Vector 3s. What a useless bit of expensive kit. I waited until they had the physical update with the battery doors and then took the plunge. £1k is a lot of money for something to do one thing. Your Marq might not do OWS but at least it tells the time!

    The UK aftersales has been appalling. I received a replacement which were basically a refurbished pair that didn’t have the updated battery door, ie the version i’d waited to avoid. These are worse than the previous version, so bad that I’ve taken them off the bike and they are sitting in the box waiting to be returned to Garmin. Unfortunately Garmin’s response to this problem is to simply ignore my emails – I kid you not.

    I really hope some other player can build an alternative to this niche monopoly provider who takes us all for granted – the market has to find a solution.

    PS made me chuckle the comment about Edges powering up when they are unplugged. How many times have I been in trouble getting up at stupid o’clock to get ready for a ride and my wife getting woken up by the stupid chirping. That one “feature” tells me for absolutely certain that Garmin’s employees don’t eat their own dog food.

  257. Patrick Myers

    If any Garmin execs are reading this, I own a 920xt and specifically did not upgrade to the Fenix 5 or 5+ when they came out because they had well-documented, seemingly unsolvable problems (the Fenix 5 has compatibility problems with certain sensors, the 5+ still seems to have battery issues). I’m still waiting to see how the 945 shakes out, but the constant problems with devices that we pay $500-$700 for is tough to swallow.

  258. JR

    Had lots of Garmin watches from 410 to 935.

    Love them (when they work) but when they don’t then trying to trouble shoot problems is maddening .

    End game with Garmin CS is always a hard reset, yep lose everything and start again. I get layering upgrade over upgrade can cause problems but an Apple type settings restore would be a great help (copying files from the watch helps but isn’t comprehensive)

  259. Robert Jobb

    I’m another who shifted from being a loyal Garmin user. I just gotbfed up with faults, more faults, fixes that made things worse, and actually garbage suport.
    I have a ticket still unresolved from 2 years+ ago. So does my wife (on a totally different device and problem.

    As Ray sums up nicely… i don’t want more irrelevant ‘fluff’unctions. I want the basics to work well.

    Polar have been a revelation in comparison… they reply to emails and tell me what they are doing. They sorted a hardware (just a strap) simply with 2 short emails, and a replacement was in my letter box within a couple of days.
    And for a software bug, have confirmed right away they are on it / have a fix coming in the next release.
    Garmin… radio silence quite often.

    Oh? Amd the device was fewer £££ too.

    And definitely tracks Open water far better than my 2 previous garmin multisport watches when tried back to back

  260. Brandon Gittelman

    Long-time Garmin user here (Forerunners 201, 205, 220, 230, 735, now 245M, Edge 500, 510, Etrex 20)

    I’ll be honest – the only issues I’ve ever had were with my Edge 510 not always pairing with my phone and locking up when riding a course. Otherwise, everything I’ve had has worked pretty well.

    One thing that Garmin is awesome at is supporting old hardware. I still have my old 205 – and it still uploads to Garmin Connect over a decade later. That thing came out when the PlayStation 2 and Gamecube were still the big video game consoles.

    Also, the grass isn’t greener on the other side.

    I replaced my Edge 510 with a Wahoo Bolt. While it does nail the basics, the build quality doesn’t feel like it’s a $250 device. The case is cheap plastic that scratches if you look at it wrong. Wahoo also has issues with mounts breaking on the new Roam and buttons falling off older Bolts. Then you look at their software platform. The reality is that the Wahoo platform is essentially middleware. You need to connect to Training Peaks to setup workouts, Strava to view rides online, RideWithGps to map routes, etc. All of these software platforms have free versions, but if you want to get the most out of your device, you need to pay extra each month. Meanwhile, Garmin Connect, while not perfect, has all of those features there in a single place and is completely free.

    Let’s move to Suunto – Spartan Trainer/5 has a small crappy LCD. Their online software platform is a mess and you can’t do planned workouts. You can’t review daily HR after 24 hours in the past.

    Polar – Numerous issues with the Vantage M/V have been noted. You talk about releasing a product before the software is ready? When the Vantage series launched, they didn’t even have smart notifications working!

    Coros – Newcomer with a product line all over – personally not sure if they will be around in 3-5 years. You watch their user groups and while they do take to heart user feedback, it does concern me that they don’t have an apparent feature roadmap and are all over with what they do and don’t add. Almost Kickstarter like. Also one of the things was a bit offputting was one of the requests was for being able to follow a course on a bike ride. They claimed they didn’t want to do that because of the concern for user safety. Weird stance to take, IMHO.

    • Simon

      lmao, Garmin Connect alone should have the executive board hauled over for trial at the Hague. Any, and all, of those services you just listed are better IN EVERY WAY than GC, and the majority of what anybody would want in those services is included with the free versions.

  261. Chris Belyea

    Thanks for the great, and well balanced, post

    My experience over the years has been

    FR620 – numerous lock up/freezes when out running. Replaced by Garmin twice
    Vivoactive 3 – generally OK until it just permanently locked up. Replaced battery. No joy. Threw it in the bin
    Edge 530 – my least irritating Garmin until Garmin introduced the battery drain bug which rendered it essentially useless
    Fenix 3 – bought it for MTB riding but randomly dropped sensors, particularly power (Stages)
    Edge 820 – useless touch screen. Intermittently dropped power sensor during every ride
    Fenix 5 – won’t stay paired to any sensors except HR. Ridiculous altitude/elevation bug

    Wahoo Bolt, and now Roam – faultless
    Apple Watch 3 & 4 – faultless

    I’m firmly in the ‘never again Garmin’ camp

  262. BJ

    👏. You nailed it:

    “The sole reason Wahoo has slowly gained market share in cycling GPS computers isn’t because they have a technologically more feature laden or better priced product (they don’t). It’s because they have a product that seemingly has less bugs (and also as everyone points out, because you can configure your data pages via phone app).”

  263. ChuckPDX

    Ray, you’ve written an excellent article here!
    Stability/reliability is certainly one of the things that Garmin has been sacrificing while trying to jam in new/whizzy feature check-boxes.

    The other thing that’s been sacrificed and is just as important is EASE OF USE. Garmin’s first time setup and daily usage experiences have been complex and confusing, creating another huge gap for Wahoo. I’ve lost count of the number of people that I ride with that need help/tutoring on how to use Garmin cycling computers, whereas Wahoo has delivered more of an Apple-like “it just works” experience. A search for “easy” in your own Roam review and reader comments bears this out!

    During my career I was architect/developer for many products, and making a product easy can be a real challenge. For Garmin to respond is much harder because they got lots of architectural and partnership baggage to deal with – big ships are difficult to turn. It will be interesting to see if they are willing to spend on R&D and Human Factors needed to adapt, or if Wahoo and others will be able to disrupt Garmin further.

  264. Jeff

    Long time reader and I implicitly respect your views Ray. I run and I cycle. Never swim.

    Owned multiple Garmin devices (currently the Fenix 5s Plus and 520). I really like Garmin products and have had very few issues over the years. Very reliable recording of my workouts and the connectivity to TP and Strava just works. I am a happy proponent of all things Garmin

  265. okrunner

    Right on point. Besides Livetrack and bluetooth to Edge connectivity, Grouptrack is a train wreck. I still use Garmin but their attitude towards customer complaints is down right awful. “We’ve not had any complaints about that issue before.” Right! The forums can be chuck full of the same issue and they deny any complaints about it at all. Specifically, the original Garmin Fenix and the Edge 130 were a disaster. So glad I didn’t buy an Epix. I just wish once when you called on a warranty issue the person at the other end would say “Yep, we are aware of the issue it’s affecting x percentage of our units. We are going to send you one tested to make sure it’s working and a twinkie for your trouble.” Instead, you get treated like you just came from an OU/KU football game wearing your OU shirt. (Kansas always loses, 41-3 in 2018) Oh wait, maybe that’s the problem. Not going to let them know I’m from Oklahoma anymore.

    • Paul S.

      The Fenix 1? Except for the period I was using the beta releases, it was rock solid for me. Altitude correction actually worked, GPS was fine, and the most amazing thing was not a feature at all, but probably just a mistake by Garmin: you could put maps on it? They were cut down versions of OSM maps, and there wasn’t much storage for them (and of course you couldn’t navigate by map), but they displayed nicely in 4 “colors”. Mine had water ingress and had to be replaced, but it worked well for years.

      The Epix was OK except for the altitude offset bug that they never fixed. If you calibrated it it would display altitude correctly, and it always stayed more or less correct as you did an activity. Then when you got home and got the FIT file off, the altitude was offset by (it varied by user) in my case 100 ft high. Altitude correction never worked, so you had to calibrate it each time you used it. But it had real maps, and could sort of navigate with them (getting it to do turn-by-turn was a chore, but route based navigation worked fine). Garmin is still the only company that has real maps and navigation by map on any of their watches (ignoring things like the Apple Watch which aren’t usable for real activities).

  266. Michael Vogel

    Every word is true…

    I had them all for “sport”, starting from the Forerunner 101 up to the 935 for now (and even think to buy the 945), while I already gave up to buy new “adventure” products (last one was the Oregon 500 or so).

    The reason why I still buy Forerunners? Garmin IQ. Nothing else.

    Without that, I would only see the same pattern as observed for all the other product lines – starting with an alpha version firmware, updating up to a beta level but not more. I still have my Oregon somewhere in a box, but the software did never get stable.

    Garmin also struggles by creating “just” software: I fear the Garmin Connect (GCM) hasn’t been done by real programmers – it seems like an app has been built using LEGO Duplo bricks. I would have expected a reliable small kernel app handling the information exchange (e.g. notifications) and modular add ons for statistic’s, etc. But the actual app wants to do all – but even fails to support a simple tablets/landscape mode.
    Same effect have been seen years ago for the Training Center (GTC) – I sent tons of bug reports, but the unreliable design did never change (at least Garmin modified the database at the end).

    The big question for me is, why Garmin was not able to bundle all energy to create a solid single firmware instance which runs on all watches? Shouldn’t every watch today (Forerunner, Fenix, Marq,…) use more or less the same CPU, the same display processor, etc.? Wouldn’t it be possible to develop a core code identical for all watches? Just disabling a feature here and there? Adding a single different watchface for marketing reasons is okay, but supporting completely different codes for different products will not make Garmin great again…

  267. Michael

    Over the last few days I found out that my new Edge 830 doesn’t “do” roundabouts with Garmin’s stock maps – it always prompts right-turns instead of proper roundabout exits. Replacing the maps was the only solution to the problem, took me probably 8 hours to figure it out and resolve.

    Thank you for shedding some light on Garmin’s shitty software an QA.

    • Roland

      Hello Michael,

      I have the same issue with roundabout exits on my Edge 530. Can you give me some details with which map you replaced the Garmin pre-installed stock map?

      Thanks, Roland

    • Michael

      Most popular site (afaik) is link to garmin.openstreetmap.nl

      Because it was down over the weekend, I have used country maps (Switzerland, Germany) from link to alternativaslibres.org. Worked without problems.


    • Roland Holzer

      Hello Michael,

      great, thanks a lot for the reply.

      I have used garmin.openstreetmap.nl before to download Maps for my Garmin Edge 520 (non-plus) but I was not aware that these maps support routing (since the Garmin Edge 520 doesn’t support routing).

      regards, Roland

    • Michael

      Just FYI:
      One of the OSM generic maps from garmin.openstreetmap.nl gave me a strange behaviour where some of the roundabouts would be displayed upside-down (i.e. the arrow pointing down instead of up). The other one works fine.

      Not sure what the problem is… it’s strange.

  268. Alexander

    Having only experienced owning an Index Smart Scale, Garmin VivoActive HR and then a ForeRunner 645M I would agree that they need to focus more on improving the stability of the software and helping make it easier for customers to report issues and receive responses. I stay with Garmin because I am semi locked into the ecosystem with other family members and we actively share our runs etc between each other.

    I would also add that the Garmin Connect Mobile App (iOS) needs a lot more work to make it more user friendly, fix notifications and generally just improve it.

  269. pavlinux

    – Ale, is the Garmin Russia service center?
    – Yes!
    – Do you repair the Vector pedals?
    – No, they are not repaired at all. Beep, beep, beep ….
    – Al…

    – Ale, is the Garmin Russia service center?
    – Yes!
    – I got a halo on the Ege1030, can you change the screen?
    – Did you buy in our store?
    – Not.
    – Contact where you bought. Beep, beep, beep,…

    • Joe

      – Hi, is the Garmin Italy service center?
      – Yes!
      – I got a Fenix5X Plus. The wifi doesn’t wark with more routers and the watch reboots itself during activity. In the paper of your home page was written that I can request the full refund. I bought the watch 3 days ago. How can I do?
      – Did you buy in our store?
      – Not.
      – Contact where you bought. But nobody can make a refund

    • Within the EU you have the right to return any product you deem defective within 14 days, to the trade (store) you bought it from.

      link to europa.eu

    • Joe

      I asked to garmin that tells to me to speak with the store that sold the watch. The store tells me that garmin doesn’t refund them so nothing to do. The store sends the watch back to garmin and garmin sends a new one. The problem for me is the same. I have the new watch from less than two weeks but I think nobody refunds me any more. The main problem to understand is: “product you deem defective”. For me if the wifi is so weak that doesn’t work with more routers (also with mine two), makes the watch or it’s firmware defectiv, but for the garmin it’s not (for them it’s my router, which by the way works perfectly with a dozen of electronic devices also another garmin). Who refunds me? The store or garmin? To whom should I request a refund?
      I bought the watch at 25 of aprile. The watch after 10 days goes to the assistance for more than 4 weeks on may, I take the new one from the sender the 3 of june. I do not know if I can have a full refound today.

  270. pavlinux

    Russia Edge 1030 now stands, in terms of the euro – 713,86€
    link to garmin.ru
    World price about 446,99 €

    Garmin, tell Russian dealers that they are fu_ked up

  271. Stephan

    Thanks for this post! I’ve seen LOTS of issues with Live Track (and I have 40+ years in software development). I would suggest that reporting an issue should be easier than going to a web site and filling out something, although that is worthwhile.

    For a while, I was running a beta version of the Garmin software on my Android phone, and it had a “feedback” menu item which automatically sent relevant data.

    I think the devices (Edge 1030, Fenix 5, Android phone in my case) should ALL have that ability to “click” feedback and report an issue. It would also standardize some of the data being submitted, which should lead to some automation (which has it’s own pitfalls, of course in missing rare but significant issues).

    This is the MOST RELEVANT post I’ve read from you in a while, and I do enjoy almost all of them Well done!

    • pavlinux

      They do not care!
      The problem of the interaction of the Edge 1030 and Edge Remote they solved 1.5 YEARS!!! From October 2017 !!!

  272. pavlinux

    Everyone saw the quality of the soldering and fabrication of the Edge 1030 (device for 700 euros)

    link to fccid.io

    In Chinese, nameless irons are much better manufacturing 😀

    • pavlinux

      They do not care!
      The problem of the interaction of the Edge 1030 and Edge Remote they solved 1.5 YEARS!!! From October 2017 !!!

  273. Austin

    How long has it been since Garmin put out the HRM-tri and HRM-Swim, but the data still doesn’t integrate into other third party platforms like Strava or Trainingpeaks? 5 Years? When will it get done … my guess is never.

    • To be fair, the file format is an openstandard, and I’m pretty sure it works with TrainingPeaks these days (not Strava though).

      Sure, Garmin could apply some more pressure here – but honestly this particular item’s blame sits squarely on these other companies to implement.

  274. Pub bike

    Excellent blog post. My experience echoes yours exactly.

    I think Garmin must have known you were writing it though, and is that why they deleted all the forum posts for legacy devices!

    • I’m not sure why old forum posts disappeared. When I talked with them about the forum transition back in April in the context of the Tacx acquisition forums, they agreed that having all that old data was incredibly useful for support. I’ll poke and ask what’s up.

    • Will

      Yeah, they don’t care. They broke all the old URLs, which affects bookmarks and search results. And they got rid of all the “general discussion” subforums (like Running, Cycling and Swimming). There were useful threads in those subforums, like convos about training and VO2 Max. As someone who wrote a detailed guide on how to hack your watch settings to set a bike wheel size smaller than 100 mm (which Garmin won’t allow, but which is required for some trainers apparently). I’m pretty annoyed that my thread is gone forever (except for a local copy I saved). You know what? If someone has that problem in the future, maybe Garmin can help them. It’s almost a slap in the face for people who’ve been around for even just 2 years, and spent some of their free time trying to help the community. The irony is I never would’ve even participated that community if I didn’t have so many problems with my 935 at release.

      Pretty obvious to me that management only cares about user-to-user support for *current* devices.

      I’ll also say that they picked a forum platform which has a terrible user experience. Some ppl speculated that forum regulars don’t like it because they don’t like new things, but I can point to several thoroughly modern platforms which have a better UX (like NodeBB or reddit). You can’t even post links on mobile or search within a single thread.

    • Paul S.

      Do they even care about user-to-user for current devices? I’ve been away from the forums for a year or more, but checked the new forums when they were turned on. They look completely unusable. It’s not likely I’ll ever go back.



    I love my Garmin stuff and think they are the best. However with 100% certainty, I encounter a bug 3-4 times over a two hour ride, It’s a very specific use case, but something is up that has not been tested.

    Garmin 820 paired with Di2 connector, Quarq PM, Varia radar and Apple iPhone X. Invariably I will lose connection with all and in worse case scenario, the 820 will shut down completely. This is my road/gravel setup. MTB has only PM and watch/phone and never has these issues.

  276. FatTed

    I have had issues with several Garmin Edge computers, and usually unhelpful support. My 520 died and all I have got is a shrug and buy another, I think not. I liked it and having owned a few know how to work it. It is time for a Wahoo I think.

  277. JuhaR

    Thanks extremely good post!! Have been trying to buy new watch for over year now, but haven’t find anything that I would be willing to buy. fenix5 plus would be the watch I would buy if I would see that the OWS accuracy problem would be fixed and also verified by forums! Suunto is out of question because really bad experience with their support, even though I speak their native language. Polar is lacking saphire glass from latest vantage V titan, otherwise that would fill all the ticks in my list.

    • Joe

      If you want a multisport watch, a good garmin may be an old model. I have my Forerunner 920XT that works good , openwater, pool, running, cycling, mtb so in the forest under trees and so on. Also the battery life is good enough after 4 years of life. Do not buy a new model. It’s a non sense that I did.

    • JuhaR

      Already using 735xt, it works fine when not broken. This is 3rd unit in 2 years. And I would prefer something more robust but still good looking watch. Suunto had good hardware, but the server connectivity problems were never solved. When I send to Suunto support Wireshark log where I can see that their server is not working correctly, they replied to check the cable between watch and computer and then stopped replying.

    • Joe

      I have had 2 FR920XT. The first one I sanded back after 5 days of use (it was a new entry on gamin), than I re buy the same watch after a year and it was like another watch. No significant bugs, solid updates and so on. I wanted to replace with Fenix 5X Plus after 4 years and 4/5 workouts a week (run, pool,bike) and in the winter snowboarding and so on, only to have un upgrade (just a whim). The F5x+ was born at October 2018 so I sad “will be mature”….:(. No way, wrong thought 🙁
      The FR920XT was made in good plastic (I have not a scratch in years), the battery life is good if you do not have to do very long trails, and the battery replacement today costs less then 20€. So I think depends on use but for me is a very good product. Today you can find it new for less then 250€ …

    • Joe

      …of course “good looking watch” is subjective. For me is a “fatigue tool” so i use it when I go in the office and I have a workout on the lunch time.

    • Jens

      Joe I would like to know why the F5X+ is not good enough. I got mine a few months ago. Yes it did reboot itself during pool swim once, perhaps even twice (not sure about one of the times, might’ve been user error) but for me it’s been working well for running, trail running, bike (I don’t use sensors) and pool swim(I swim 2-3 times a week). (My F5S never rebooted in pool swim so ok that’s a drawback for 5X+ perhaps)
      Also the Garmin Pay works perfect for me. Route navigation worked well for me in trails too. Strava live segment is new to me but I think it has been working fine.
      My “only” real problem has been 400m intervals on a running oval. They have consistently been measured 0.43-0.44kms which I think is horrible. Unfortunately my FR935 was equally bad the other week though. I think this might be a firmware problem as last year, my FR935 said my 1000m intervals were 1.02kms which was very good IMO. (older firmware)
      Also, for what it’s worth, the 5X+ is the only Garmin watch I own that correctly sends the temperature to Strava for pool swim. My F5S and FR935 must have a different format in the files cos Strava always gets 0C as average temp (while GC is correct)
      I still would like to know which watch(es) Ray thinks is best for OWS 🙂 Since all Garmins seem to have a bug there.

    • Joe

      After reboot on the pool results 6h of activity after 20 min of real swim. Garmin sends me a new watch but I am pretty sure that the problem is not only mine. For the rest, the temperature sensor of this watch is realy stupid. If you take the watch on your wrist like every normal person did, it signs something between air temperature and body temperature (something realy unuseful). I hope the F5X+ works fine in open water (I will use it soon). The only thing that makes me to do the upgrade fron FR920XT is the music. It works fine for me and with the music my pace goes down about 30s ;).
      I realy hope they fix the wifi problem. If my router works fine I would never have noticed the problem, but this is realy bad. Many peaple have problems with the altimeter, another regression of a bug on fenix3 fixed a year ago, and so on. So for me, music and battery life I give a plus, for the rest, I do not know…I’m really sed


    Very well written and can’t be said any better. I hope the Garmin execs. will be reading this story. Currently I’m having BT connectivity issues on my 830. Upon finishing my ride and with my phone within BT range, the 830 wouldn’t connect to the phone unless I manually open up the Garmin Connect App. Funny thing is my 520 doesn’t have this problem. Upon finishing the ride the ride data is automatically uploaded to GC without me touching my phone. I really hope Garmin will get their act together.

    • After reading this article yesterday I switched on my 520 at the start of a training session based on power and found all my customised data fields had disappeared and some random ones in their place. 2 of the 5 activity profiles I had set up also gone. So I was standing at the side of the road, in the rain, trying to “quickly” program the data fields/screens I needed for my training session. This is the 2nd time this has happened, I’m guessing there was a software update. But the interesting thing is that my wife’s 520 has never had this issue.
      My 935 only recorded about 200m of my Ironman 70.3 Mallorca swim and then completely locked up when I hit the lap button at T2. I spent the first minutes of the run trying to unfreeze it and gave up and then I heard a beep and looked down and it was re-booting and then started working where it had left off apart from a wonky T2 transition time.
      I didn’t bother to report it to Garmin because “what’s the point”, and I wonder how many faults don’t get reported because it’s become normal for software to have bugs and we all just shrug our shoulders and live with it.
      But I also accept that there are probably a lot of “bugs” complained about that are down to user error, unreasonable expectations or not reading the instructions.

    • Andrew Miller

      The Spontaneous Factory Reset. Happens to my 510 about twice a year 🙁

  279. JB

    Very well written indeed, have mixed experiences:

    – Edge 500, bombproof, it still works today even with good battery life. I STILL use it when going for MTB ride where I don’t need navigation

    – Edge Explore, quality/price quite a good unit, I also was able to buy with quite a heavy discount. Yes, there are some bugs but most of them got solved. Recognizing this is not the most complex unit either. But it generally does what it needs to do. Integration with CIQ Komoot app works well planning routes. Yes it sometimes takes a while for the device to recognize the phone and connect.

    – Vivoactive 3, now on my 2nd unit, doesn’t stay connected to ANT+ sensors, battery behaves odd. Don’t use it anymore, is up for sale.

    – Was planning to buy Fenix 5+ or FR945, however the longer I think about it the less I’m thinking of buying one looking at all the feedback.

    How I see the future, if Garmin continues like this they’ll get less and less market space, why?

    – Wahoo and others are taking space from them on the cycling units side
    – Apple Watch will rule the smartwatch & sports watch space in the future. They have the whole backend platform and can do things which other manufactures can’t because of the phone/IOS/Watch integration.
    They have the money, people and board to push these things forward. There are not some many things they need to fix to be on par with Garmin:
    – They need a “sports/ruggedized” variant of the AW
    – Battery life
    – Sensor support (ANT+ mainly)
    – All the other features will be covered by “apps”, e.g. training load metrics, GPS routing,… they just need better integration there. And you already see the 1st signs of that: dedicated app store for the AW.

    Just my 2 cents :-), no I’m not an Apple fanboy, but at this moment they have the platform and money to succeed in this space.

    • Paul S.

      Platform and money, but probably not the desire. If Apple wanted to, they could simply buy Garmin and clean up the software act. Otherwise, the “sports” AW would probably wind up looking much like a Fenix 5+ because they’re going to need an always on screen (so they’ll wind up going to the screens Garmin uses, a little washed out but easily visible in direct sunlight), better battery life, more buttons (the two buttons on the AW are already overloaded), maybe a way to turn off the touchscreen if they even keep it, and the ability to function normally off the wrist.

  280. vojko

    Good one….I also hope that Garmin will take something from that post…it would be much appriciated action…:)

  281. MK

    Edge 500 user for about 5 years and Vivoactive HR for about 1 year. Had been hoping to upgrade the VHR to a 245/945 but the issues make it impossible to do so. Then I looked at the Fenix 5 Plus range, issues still outstanding. Might look at the FR235 as it seems to be stable but not much of a jump from the VHR.

  282. Nevan King

    I know the Apple Watch issue that you’re talking about, where the GPS track can’t handle sharp turns and smooths them out. I do a 5km parkrun and it was always recorded as 4.8km. But sometime last year in a minor update for watchOS 5 it changed. It seems like the watch is now using accelerometer data together with GPS because the GPS track showed much sharper turns. It still has trouble with long slow turns but in general my 5km run comes up around 4.95km. I’d urge you to give it another go.

  283. spidercrab

    Ray – Well written, brave article that really hits the spot and says what others beyond the non influential Garmin Form members, will say in public.

    I have used many Garmin products over the years from yacht chart plotters to bike computers to trackers to my current recently purchased Fenix 5. I am a big fan of well behaved Garmin kit that works as advertised. When Garmin get it right, they really get it right.

    My observation over time, is that Garmin devices that were created pre bluetooth connection to Connect were absolutely rock solid. I continue to use and have used my trusty Edge 500 a great deal and it is an outstanding bit of lightweight reliable kit and I have already bought a back up device and spare battery from eBay to prepare the day that the 500 might eventually die.

    IMHO, when the Connect App appeared, it all went wrong for Garmin, even though Strava was at that time, already well established and all Garmin had to do was build a rock solid Bluetooth comms system and copy Strava. Recently, I really debated with myself whether to invest in another Garmin product, even though I promised myself I would never so this again. My logic was that Connect would only act as a way to transmit my Garmin recorded data to Strava and that surely by now, they had sorted out the connection issues. While I am still in the initial honeymoon period with my new Fenix, I am noticing more and more “no connection” issues. So far I have not tested the features that I expect to work, do actually work well enough to consider it reliable and accurate. If this turns out not to be the case the Fenix will be returned in an instant.

    So far, the Fenix connect to iPhone and stairs counting are unsatisfactory, but I can currently live with it during the honeymoon. The stairs counting has improved from the clown like, random number generator used in my previous Garmin device, but it still behaves like a feature not fit for a beta release in a future untested product.

    There is no reason for any Bluetooth product in 2019 to have crap connection problems other than it is untested, or uses shoddy HW or the SW is flakey or maybe all three. I, like many here, can name the various products in my life such as car systems, speakers, etc, that have either rock solid connections or the ones that cannot maintain a reliable connection. Some companies get it absolutely right and some don’t get it right and can’t get it right, and Garmin has to address this as well as the high number of other outstanding year after year issues.

    It is most disappointing that someone senior at Garmin has not responded publicly to Ray with a “things are going to change”, “new software culture”, “heads have already rolled” type of response. This perpetuates my view of Garmin as a company that doesn’t listen to customers and is not interested in developing and maintaining Software that matches the Hardware.

    The higher end Garmin watches and trackers only exist because Apple have not created a rugged round watch with some more exercise focused HW and that is the competition waiting just over the horizon. Apple may not chase that market because “we” are a tough bunch to please – we are are not difficult to please but do expect all advertised features to work as advertised. I already have a few Wahoo devices and the SW experience has been most refreshing when compared to Garmin, and in an ideal world, I would gladly pay more for a Garmin device that could use a Wahoo app.


    • Paul S.

      Well, again, the 500 doesn’t even have Bluetooth, so there’s no way for it to fail in that way. You can still operate devices without Bluetooth or WiFi if you want, just turn it off on the device. So far as I know, they all still sync via Garmin Express when you plug them into a computer (unlike, say, the Apple Watch).

      But Garmin has raised expectations, so it’s supposed to work, and it definitely should, without all of the problems. Occasional problems, fine, I have them occasionally with my Bluetooth headphones, and even my Apple Watch will now and then show it’s not connected to my iPhone for some reason. With Garmin, though, it’s always a roll of the dice with some big odds that it’s not going to work.

  284. John Burgess

    Open water Swims.
    As with Run Pods why not Swim Pods which go under swim caps, sounds so simple, but probably not.

    • Yeah, the challenge there is water blocks most all signals. So Bluteooth and related signals only go about 1″ underwater (2-3cm). So the headphones would have to actually store music onboard.

    • Tom K.

      Ray, I think what John meant was to have something like a gps-swim-pod to put under the cap like you did a while ago with watches.
      I think of something like simple gps pod with one button(double click start, double click stop) and some straps/clips to attach it somewhere on your googles or under the cap would be fine. Maybe it could be even controlled from the watch as an external gps sensor during swim that syncs after the training like the HRM-Swim does.
      It wouldn’t require transmission through water.
      After I read John’s comment I thought that would the simplest solution to all the open water swim problems.

    • Oh.

      Yeah, that’s a more logical comment.

      What’s funny is that technically speaking there is an ANT+ profile for secondary GPS sensors. I’m not aware of any sports tech company using it however.

  285. Andy Lynex

    Interesting post, i’ve had a number of Forerunner units, replacing every 2 years. Historically i didn’t see any more bugs than on other consumer tech. I definitely see issues more frequently over last 12 months: i’ve had the non-tracked outdoor swim about a month ago, despite working well before that, i always struggle to pair my 935 to phone, most annoyingly the temperature/ altitude readings have now failed repeatedly requiring three replacement units

  286. CuseRunner

    The Fenix 5 connectivity issues and the terrible response from Garmin. An admitted hardware issue with their premium outdoor device at the time, and they offered absolutely no resolution. That one left a lasting bitter taste in my mouth.

  287. Hank Morris

    The article makes some excellent points, but I have mixed feelings reading the comments here.

    On one hand, I personally think that Garmin makes a really good, if not currently the best, hardware-software ecosystem for sports-focused devices. By “the best” I mean a good balance in terms of features, hardware quality and cross-device integration.

    I’ve owned the Edge 500, 520, Fenix 3, Fenix 5x and currently 5x Plus and all these devices have worked really well for my purposes. I mainly mountain/road bike, hike and trail run (two to three bike rides a week, a couple of runs, a few cross-training sessions). They have/had their faults (most notably intermittent crashes on the 520, Fenix 5x OHR sensor cracks which was replaced by Garmin), but nothing to make me really want to switch out of the Garmin ecosystem. My 5x+ has been pretty solid (touch wood!): rather acceptable GPS tracks on different types of terrain, uploads activities wirelessly without a hitch, never drops phone connection (android phone), great battery life, and while opinions on design aesthetics are pretty subjective, I think it is a nice looking bit of kit and usability for a feature-rich multisport device is pretty good.

    On the other hand..there is no smoke without fire. The comments here are evidently overwhelmingly negative.

    I am looking into buying the Edge 830 now, but reading the comments here I wonder if: a) I am one of the few happy Garmin customers…a fluke or b) I am one of the happy Garmin customers who share their positive experience online or c) “The Garmin Experience” is a highly variable one, depending on where you are and what device(s) you own/sport(s) you’re into/ and degree of comfort with technology you have (or all three?).

    • Paul S.

      I bought an 830, and don’t (yet) regret doing so.

      I think that, like forums, a post like this is apt to attract people who have had problems, and the ones who don’t have any aren’t inclined to read all the comments or post. For example, I don’t care about LiveTrack or even Bluetooth, and how many complaints here are due to those? I wouldn’t use LIveTrack because (as we can see from this post!) the chance of worry/aggravation due to false positives far outweighs the chance that it will actually be useful. (I’d turn off Fall Detection on an AW4 if I had one.) Bluetooth I’m not that interested in. It’s on on both my 830 and my 5+, but I pay no attention to whether it’s actually working or not. If WiFi doesn’t upload my rides at the end, I’m going to plug my 830 into a computer anyway, so it’ll happen then, either through Garmin Express or manually if I have to. (The 5+ might be a problem since it doesn’t show up as a disk.) If the HR sensor on my 5+ broke, I wouldn’t care,
      since it’s primary use is cross country skiing and for that I’m not going to be use wrist HR anyway. (Oh, I’d get it replaced if it was still under warranty, but if there was snow on the ground, I might wait until there wasn’t before sending it back.) So I think it depends on what you want out of a device.

    • Hank Morris

      I agree, for the most part. A big part of the extent to which you will be satisfied or disappointed with Garmin (or any other manufacturers’ devices, for that matter) is going to depend on your expectations and the perceived value you think you should be getting against what you paid for the device. Some of the things you mentioned will be very annoying to me if they start misbehaving (I really, really don’t want to plug my devices in to upload activities. I use an HR strap for sports, but I like OHR all day HR tracking and it is an important feature for me, etc.). LiveTrack has been working fine for me, but lots of my mountain bike rides and trail runs are in locations without mobile network reception, so I bought an inReach mini (which integrates beautifully if not perfectly with the Fenix 5x+), so I don’t care much for the new emergency features which I think are still a bit gimmicky and unpolished (if a step in the right direction).

    • Paul S.

      If the altimeter/barometer broke, *that* would bother me. I’m a little ticked at my 5+ right now; I took it hiking (= dog walking) up in the mountains this afternoon and it DEM calibrated to 1955 ft (about right) when I started but when I got back it was 2008 ft. For forty minutes that’s a little too much drift, although there is a front coming in. I think I have auto cal turned on, but that hasn’t worked since the Fenix 1, so I should probably just turn it off.

    • Ernesto Acosta

      Paul, good points. I agree, people often complain the loudest when they are unhappy; they seldom write when they are happy.

      To paraphrase Marc Anthony (when delivering Caesar’ eulogy):

      The evil that companies do lives forever in the Internet, the good is often buried along with their bones.

      I think, however, that your comments miss the mark. It is not that people expect too much from their Garmin products. The real issue is that when Garmin products do not perform as advertised (or work as intended by Garmin’s hype) Garmin turns a seemingly blind eye, or deaf ear, to the complaints, ignoring them. Consumers have every right to work as advertised. If I spent a great deal of money on a new car and it ran only four days out of seven, I would be rightfully upset. It wouldn’t matter to me if it ran wonderfully during those four days. I expect, and want, it to run right all seven days of the week.

      Garmin should be reminded that some of the worst wounds are self-inflicted. They are not the only game in town. There are plenty of competitors out there waiting to take over.

  288. Neil A.

    Beyond all the comments on individual bugs and failures on devices, the one thing the Garmin team should be paying attention to is the most common statement I see being made here: “GARMIN DON’T CARE!”. It could well become their competitors new advertising slogan….

    • Paul S.

      “Garmin don’t care, but we don’t have maps on our watches and we don’t support radar!”. I’ll take the Garmin, thanks.

  289. Stephan

    Google Maps “Location Sharing” DOES work all the time, and has for a long while. It doesn’t give any of the ride stats, but if all you need is “where is my partner/friend, etc”, then it’s something to look at.

    • JD

      Google Maps is woefully inadequate for live tracking. Sure it’s better than nothing if you only want to share your location at the moment, but there are too many negatives. Maximum battery drain for one. Would you use your phone as GPS in your car without the power cord plugged in? Plus there is no route indication (are you on a loop? out and back? half way done? where/when did you start? headed home? etc.), manual start/stop required, no stats, and more.

      If Garmin takes one action item from this article it should be first FIX GD BT connectivity (GCM) then make sure Live Track is BOMBPROOF (device and GCM).
      If Live Track is started (or set to auto-start) your Edge device should maintain the link no matter what happens. If the BT connection is lost for any reason then re-pairing should trigger automatically in background. If that fails for any reason then your Edge device should nag you with a message that can’t be dismissed other than stopping and purposely disabling LiveTrack (contacts receive a canned message – LiveTrack disabled by user).

      In the meantime Road ID’s mobile app looks promising as it supports eCrumb tracking and stationary alerts. I wish it had a simple start/stop option versus defining a duration. Feedback is easy though (click, type, done). Haven’t tested battery drain on any long rides yet.

    • Graham

      I use Real-Time GPS Tracker from greenalp (greenalp.com). Uses very little battery indeed on my Android phone. I’ve never even tried Garmin LiveTrack or Strava Beacon, because this thingy just works fine. That’s how my wife knew that things had gone wrong even before the policeman called about my broken spine…

      Is the Specialized ANGI doodah any good for this?

    • Unfortunately ANGi doesn’t have GPS in it, it just leverages the phone GPS.

  290. Charlie

    I wish Garmin had not changed the User Forums recently because it was the place I went to resist the urge to buy the newest product. The forum does not have the hierarchy by product anymore so you cannot get a view of the full scope of problems. Makes me think Garmin is trying to hide its problems and whoever did that needs to be fired.

    • What do you mean with “does not have the hierarchy by product”? The new forum is organized just like the old one, with areas and then products.

  291. Christoph Krieger

    My experience so far:

    Speed Sensor –> No issues
    Cadence Sensor –> No issues
    HRM Tri –> DOA, the second one worked.
    Vector 3 –> No chance to get it working correctly –> switched to Assioma
    FR45s –> DOA, the second one (FR45) works so far

  292. davep

    It’s not just that there are bugs but that there are bugs in stuff that used to work.

    I suspect some of the problems stem from making changes to legacy code (instead of having a modern code base).

  293. Doug Curtis

    Well said Ray. I’ve never understood why there isn’t a computer or phone based app for the profile configurations. It would be great to have a drag-n-drop interface to configure the data screens. So far my Edge 530 has worked well. Out of the box I got the 3.20 update almost immediately and it has worked well for the limited number of rides I’ve done so far. I’m hoping to put it to a little harder test this weekend.

  294. Deloss Buseman

    Spot on. I have no confidence that my Garmin will make it through a long event without any issues. Wahoo doesn’t have as many features, but it just seems to work. I saw a guy that had two computers mounted on his bike. One was a Garmin and he had a Wahoo mounted underneath for a backup because he had be burned by the Garmin to many times. So yes, Garmin has some work to do to gain the confidence of many of it’s users.

  295. Aaron

    In what probably ranks as the Worst Possible Timing Ever (given this article), Garmin made an update to their website in the last 24 hours so that sync services such as tapiriik using the legacy REST API are now seeing erroneous test data included in requests for user data.

    This data is getting replicated to other services such as Strava, Dropbox, SportTracks and others. And to the user it appears that other Garmin accounts are leaking their private workout data. In the security conscious climate we now operate in around social media and online data, this isn’t exactly a confidence builder. :\

  296. Dengler Franz

    Open water swim on the Fenix 5 is a nightmare. A 2000m swim ends in a 4500m swim jumping around wildly. 100m jumps in 1s are occuring often. In comparison when I have my old 910xt gives accurate tracks. Technically it should not be an impossibility. The funny thing is that before GPS 2.30 it works quite good.

  297. Josh

    Ive had a variety of Garmins over the years and it’s been a frustrating ride. When things are going well, i have been niggled by the unfriendly UI’s and when they are buggy, I’m ready to throw theyin the bush! I stopped using my E500 a couple of years ago after it would display “working…” on the screen for the entire ride.. feels like Garmin is having a laugh as i would describe it as ‘not working’. I’m in the market for a E530 or equivalent. Any suggestions of similar models in other brands?- I’m hanging up my Garmin towel.

  298. Tom

    Garmin Vector 3 pedals never paired with my Samsung S7 phone using GCM.

    Multiple email and phone conversations (including updating to the latest firmware and software) never resolved the problem. One customer rep finally admitted he had the same problem. There was never any resolution so I sold the pedals at a loss.

    I’m currently buying a sports watch, but having a pause at the Garmin models.

  299. I’m more concerned with Garmin’s lackluster response to their widespread hardware issues, mainly the epoxy used to coat their Elevate Optical Heart Rate Sensor (OHR). Through returns, I’m now using my 2nd 735 and my 3rd 935. Of the other units, none lasted longer than 6 months before the OHR sensor developed cracking so bad that water seeped into the sensor and rendered it inoperable, not to mention roughness irritated my wrist to the point of an open sore. My first return was easy, as Garmin said they recognized it as an “engineering issue” and replaced my 735 with a new one at no cost. All the returns after the first have been a nightmare. Garmin suddenly started suffering from amnesia, telling me the OHR issue was “something new”, not widespread and nothing their company was currently aware of. This was after I went back and forth with a few Garmin people as they asked for help to identity what was causing the issue (environment, lotions, skin PH). With my last few returns I’ve had to blog about them and Twitter bash to get the units replaced with new ones, at no cost to me, like I did with my first one. I almost jumped to Polar. Instead I saw the 945 and ordered one because of the number of features it has that Polar does not. I also use many other devices on Garmin’s ecosystem. To my dismay, I’m seeing even more problems with the Elevate v3 OHR on the 945 and they are happening within weeks, not months of use.

    • Guillermo Guerini

      Yeah, I mentioned that before. It’s unacceptable they can’t figure this out. We are seeing the same old problems in the new generation of products. It feels like they simply don’t care and are willing to ignore it’s a problem.

  300. Kenny Dewilde

    I posted your article on the Garmin Forum. Peepz started mentioning some extra troubles and experience with Garmin and just now they locked the thread 🙁

    link to forums.garmin.com

  301. Bob C

    Great piece and on the mark. I love the idea of what Garmin would like to do, however the management of the company has turned unleashing semi-beta software onto the marketplace as part of the business plan. I truly don’t think Garmin cares about customers — and worse when problems pop up historically their support team flat out denies the existence of problems despite customers howling in pain.

    After being a Garmin customer for 15 years, I was one of the first buyers of the horrific Edge 820. I got one with an unusable screen (which left me without navigation 190km from an area of Japan I have no familiarity during a 14 hour rain storm… nice, Garmin). Despite massive numbers of users complaining about the 820 screen, Garmin’s customer support flatly denied a problem. I tried to get a return, no dice because by the time I was done trying to reasonably troubleshoot the issue, I was outside of the return window. So I work with you and THEN you refuse the return??? Later I read at DC Rainmaker that Garmin now acknowledges that the 820 screen issue was manufacturing faults on THEIR end. Well, why didn’t they reach out to registered customers who tried to return the damned thing?

    I moved over to a Wahoo Bolt and encouraged literally everyone I know (in a very, very large cycling organization) to do the same. Garmin lost countless sales — and as you note so accurately, the Bolt isn’t as feature rich, but it is reliable, which is more than anyone can say for a Garmin.

    A couple of years later, I needed to upgrade my running/multi-sport watch. With a gulp I decided to try a 935 (well after the initial issues THAT device had). I was shocked to find that the 935 was a terrific device (early adopters suffered we later adopters did not).

    So when I saw the new features of the 830 and 945 and read your review, Ray, I jumped. So far the 830 has had software issues on every ride I’ve taken it on save for one — including crapping out and freezing and losing sensors (documented issues on Garmin forums) 150k into a 600k brevet. Fortunately, I brought along my Wahoo Bolt as a backup and it worked without issues.

    My 945 has been mostly OK — although I’m experiencing a mild form of the button problems others have been having. I hope it doesn’t get worse. Happily at least for the moment, it appears Garmin support is acknowledging there are issues, which is a big improvement for their customary denial.

    Here’s the thing, as you wrote if Garmin would just value its customers enough to release stable software, acknowledge problems and work HARD with customers to make it right, then it could literally own this space. While there are 50 improvements I’d love to see with Connect, having a unified and reasonably smart place to collect all your training and performance data is great.

    At the moment, no single product universe and backend data collection can match the Garmin universe for bringing together the multi-sport activities that we take part in. (The Inreach mini is a big game changer for some of us too for backcountry exploits….) But if some company does go truly multisport — or if Suunto, Wahoo and Sportracks teamed up to be seamlessly interoperable, for instance, then Garmin would be in very big trouble.

    Garmin has earned almost no loyalty from customers despite its ubiquity — that’s a profoundly dangerous situation for a company because it means your installed base in meaningless.

    When Garmin products work, they’re great. But they are significantly unstable and Garmin ALWAYS treats customers like crap. This means customers, even those who like 80% of the products, tend to loath the company itself. That makes it vulnerable. And honestly, as you say Ray, this is an issue for upper management to address. Either the CEO of Garmin should take a bold initiative to fix this — and announce it to the world in a general “mea culpa, we get it…” — or the board should find a new CEO. As it stands, for many of us, as soon as there are solid alternatives that are unified: we’re gone from Garmin forever.

  302. Eric Buxton

    I got a Fenix 2 2 weeks before the 3 was announced, but used it for 2 years-for the most part it was reliable-a few crashes during biking but was fine overall. I was just envious of the 3’s display and bluetooth upgrades the whole time. Bought a 5X when it was released and so have had it over 2 years now. No issues and doesn’t drop cadence sensor or HR (both are ANT+ and are Garmin) GPS is way better than on the F2-there is an area by work that every time I went running with the F2 it zigzagged all over the place for a bit even though there was nothing other than a parking ramp it was a consistent issue-not so with 5. However, GPS isn’t perfect. Battery life is ok-when biking typically lasts 7 days-when running only stretches to 9 days. (Bike 40miles 2-3x week when biking outdoors, run 5 miles 3x/week when running only). Battery seems to be about same as when new. I wear the watch daily and shower with it, but rarely swim so perhaps that is why have not had altimeter issue. I use the 2 on my bike handlebars as my speedometer/odometer and it still works and battery is decent.
    Wife has Vivoactive HR-first unit failed just after a year-the display was full of lines. Doing a little digging on their website it turned out that they knew of this and she got a free replacement. 2 friends who bike have had no issues with their Edges (not sure of model numbers) except for declining battery life.

  303. Brett

    Was thinking of replacing my Edge 520 with a 530 because of the new mountain bike features. Took a look at the Garmin 530 forums and I’ve now reconsidered. Bad units, bugs. I’ll let the pioneers take the arrows until they can actually ship a stable piece.

    And it’s been this way for years. I couldn’t use the final firmware revision on my Edge 705 because it would crash, finally ended up just using the last “stable” version that generally worked for me.

  304. Zach

    FYI – Garmin is now locking forum threads that refer to this page. (two so far)
    Reminds me of when Hammerhead deleted negative facebook posts.
    Garmin states the reason is that the forums are for specific problems. I’ve never read a forum rule stating to only discuss problems there. IMO they’re going way to far in doing that.

    • Hmm. I do think there’s a different between locking threads and flat-out deleting them. I agree that I don’t ever remember a specific rule staying problems only, though, I do remember some variants of that in the past around more general discussion.

      I guess for me, I’d rather focus any ‘feedback energy’ there towards getting the historical data restored.

    • Fredrik

      Garmin is chasing down and locking every thread that mentions or links to DCRainmakers critique.

    • Will

      Well, they used to have threads directly under the Running, Cycling, and Swimming categories which were used for somewhat general discussion, but tellingly, all of those topics are gone now, and you can’t post threads there anymore. While this may be a limitation of the current platform (where a category can’t have both subcategories and topics), there was nothing to stop them from making new “General Discussion” subforums under Running, Cycling and Swimming and migrating the old threads there. Instead they just threw them all out.

      Seems to me that they don’t want general discussion anymore, just discussion of product-specific problems.

    • Boris

      Holy moly – is that a bad move (from Garmin). They know it exactly.

    • JD

      @Will – “Seems to me that they don’t want general discussion anymore, just discussion of product-specific problems.”

      I don’t have a problem with that. As you mention they could add back General Discussions IF they want to. As DCR points out they haven’t deleted the posts, just locked them since they don’t address a specific issue. I suppose “corporate culture” could be considered a specific problem. :->

      I don’t think they can address all reported issues without a new codebase. One that includes audit logs and feedback sent direct from the device to a behind-the-scenes development center help desk with tickets tied to the device’s SN.
      There are just too many variables and functions between the hardware and software to determine which issues are legit (and reproducible) versus one-ups or operator related.

      If they can’t stabilize the current codebase perhaps they should gamify crashes and meltdowns and include animations with sound effects. Lose a sensor — “whut-rah!” Drop a ride recording — “evil laugh” System crash — countdown timer with kaboom GIF.

      I for one have had minimal issues with my E1030 and RTL510 — in use for almost a year now. I just wish Live Track with a BT connection to Android (Pixel) was solid.
      Yes there are other quirks (like battery-save screen countdown fails), but nothing that would cause me to look elsewhere — so far.

    • Will

      @JD As I mentioned in another comment, I have a specific problem because I wrote a detailed guide in the “Running” forum on how to set a bike wheel size of less than 100 mm by hacking watch settings, in response to several requests from people who needed that for their trainer. I spent my free time figuring out how to do that and writing up a guide for people, as well as hacking settings files for anyone who asked.

      Garmin didn’t have a problem with that when I originally posted it. The only reason the thread is gone now is because it was in the general Running forum and not a product-specific forum, and they’ve deleted all their general forums.

      There were also a lot of great threads on VO2Max (as relating to Garmin devices) and training advice (which admittedly is not directly related to Garmin), which are all gone now.

      It’s fine, but that kind of thing just makes me not want to participate in the community. They don’t really want a community, they just want free user-to-user support for current devices, to lower their own costs. Which is fine, I totally get it. I’d be curious to see what the numbers are like for their new forums. As far as I can tell, some of the most-viewed threads are the ones which complain about the new forum platform.

    • Kris Neirinckx

      it is sad Garmin don’t react on this dicussion because they can learn about it and make more clients happy.

  305. James

    I had a Garmin fail due to crappy watchband, they honoured the warranty but the same defect was on the warranty watch. That one failed after 6months.

    Bought a suunto. Wore the battery out so was getting a new one when their courier stole the watch and I got an empty box. The sent me a new one. I’m sticking with suunto.

    • Jonas Vesterlund

      This has happened to me with every Garmin watch strap i have owned, both the original strap and the replacements has cracked. The band always cracks because of the oils on the skin is killing the sub-par rubber material. This could easily be fixed with a better strap material but they just don’t care about it.

    • Paul S.

      Which watch are you talking about? The recent ones have a quick release type attachment (I forget their marketing term for it) and there are any number of third party bands available. I bought a band for my 5+ on Amazon for about $15. You’re not stuck with Garmin bands.

    • Jonas Vesterlund

      FR210, FR620, Fenix3 and now FR645. All of the straps broke on the inside (skinside) within a year and so did the replacement straps they sent me.
      I expect the strap to last at least more than a year when i pay this much for a watch. Especially when it’s not that much more expensive to change to a skin safe silicon strap.

    • Jonas Vesterlund

      Also, I have worn wrist watches 24/7 almost my whole life (40y) and the Garmins are the only one that gets broken straps if not counting unusual circumstances like accidents.

    • Paul S.

      A quick search at Amazon for “Garmin Forerunner 645 bands” turns up any number of non-Garmin options. (I’m surprised the FR645 doesn’t have the QR bands.) I’ve had Garmin bands break as well (Fenix 1, Epix). My main problem with Garmin bands is that they’re not long enough to go over my winter gear securely, and that’s why I immediately got a new band for my 5+.

    • I wasn’t even thinking about the bands! They’re really weak and the colors have issues. I had a yellow OEM band on my F5 that was discolored black from the retainer loop things after 1 month. Garmin gave me a hard time about it and finally relented, but made it clear they’d never do that again.

    • Jonas Vesterlund

      I don’t really care how many replacements you can buy, we shouldn’t be forced to buy a better replacement band for watches this expensive so soon. They know it’s a problem but they just don’t care about it just to save a few cents.

    • One of the random interesting tidbits I’ve learned over the years in covering this segments is that most people don’t realize how different peoples sweat has different impacts on watch bands/materials. For some individuals they can workout with a given watch band every day for years, and never have an issue.

      Whereas other people can manage to kill a watch band in a few months. Same activities, different results. A fun example of a random study showing the variation of sweat contents: link to core.ac.uk

      This same reality of sweat-killing is true of HR straps as well. Some people can go years with a strap before it dies, whereas other people working out at the same levels goes at most 6-9 months.

      Generally speaking you’ll find that Garmin straps are slightly thinner than Suunto or Polar straps. They’re also more flexible. No doubt this reduces strength – but the reality is that it also significantly increases comfort. Comparing the Suunto 5 strap with the Garmin FR245 strap for example, at the point where it meets the watch it’s nearly twice as thick. Seriously. And while it’s not often discussed, it’s often a driver for people who try on watches in stores and then immediately discard the thicker watch band. Especially because that’s at the point they never get to even use the watch.

      Anyway…food for thought.

    • Jonas Vesterlund

      Yes but there are silicon materials that are completely sweat safe. If I buy a watch for $500+ I would think that they would use top class materials that reflect the pricing.

  306. Sue