JUMP TO:

BUY NOW:

  • Amazon.com
  • Clever Training

Garmin Instinct GPS Watch In-Depth Review

Garmin-Instinct-Main-Overview

When it comes to looks, you’re either going to love or hate the new Garmin Instinct watch. There’s not likely to be much middle ground. If you like the looks of Casio watches, you’ll probably be pretty excited about this unit. Whereas if you prefer less 1980’s style, you’ll probably end up skipping this unit.  In which case you can return to your regularly scheduled programming.

If however this style is for you – then we can get into the details of it.  The Instinct watch comes from Garmin’s Outdoor division, which is the same group that owns the Fenix lineup as well as other hiking/mountain focused wearables/devices. Still, no matter the mother, this unit from a features standpoint is essentially the blend between a Vivoactive 3 with that of a pile of Fenix features. Oh, and of course: The looks of a Casio.

But, as you’ll see – it’s not quite as simple as that. While the $299 Instinct has a huge flotilla of navigation-specific features not found in the $249 Vivoactive 3, it’s also lacking a pile the Vivoactive 3 has. The devil’s in the details, though, for most outdoor/hiking focused folks – I suspect this might actually hit the sweet spot.  If you’re looking for all the details in one consolidated video, then dig no further than the YouTube goodness that follows:

I’ve been using the Instinct for a bit over a month now on rides/runs/hikes (including in the mountains), plus just general wanderings. As usual, once I’m done with this media loaner I’ll ship it on back to Garmin and go out and get my own.  Just the way I roll. You can hit up the links at the end of the post if you want to help support the site.

With that, let’s get it unboxed.

What’s in the box:

The Garmin Instinct box is pretty minimalist, despite its size. It also looks like most other Garmin boxes these days.  Note that there are a few different colors of Garmin Instinct units, which you’ll see in this review. The vast majority of the time I was wearing the grey one.

Garmin-Instinct-Box

The watch itself is nestled in cardboard, while the cable has protection on it so that it doesn’t get too frisky during any prolonged cold winter nights alone.

Garmin-Instinct-Box-Opened Garmin-Instinct-Box-Conents

Here’s all three bits inside the box once dumped out onto a table:

Garmin-Instinct-Box-Watch-Manual

You’ve got the watch itself, alongside the charger. It’s the same charger as used by most other Garmin wearables these days.

Garmin-Instinct-Box-Charging-Cable

And then you’ve also got the manual/paper bits in there, though realistically you probably won’t read that after this post, since that basically just covers safety stuff and that if you kill yourself using the watch it’s likely your fault (which honestly, it probably is).

The watch comes in at a weight of 52g:

Garmin-Instinct-Weight

And that’s it, that’s all I’ve got in the box.

The Basics:

Garmin-Instinct-Main-Display-Overview

As I alluded to in the intro section, the Instinct is a blend of a Vivoactive 3 and a Fenix watch. One could call it a budget Fenix if they wanted I suppose.  It’s more Fenix than Vivoactive 3 in many ways.  And to help you understand all those ways, I’ve consolidated this into basically two chunks of bulleted text. The first is features that are different from the Vivoactive 3 series, and the second is some of the bigger features in comparison to the Fenix 5 series.

Starting off first with the Vivoactive 3, here’s how it differs from that unit (if it says it has something, that means the Vivoactive 3 doesn’t have it):

– Has course navigation: Ability to navigate downloaded courses (breadcrumb trail)
– Has compass mode: Ability to enable a compass mode
– Has ABC functions: Ability to access Altimeter/Barometer/Compass features/pages
– Has Elevation Profiles: Ability to see upcoming elevation on courses
– Has Storm Alert: Utilizes barometric altimeter to provide incoming storm alerts
– Has UltraTrack: Gives up to 40 hours of GPS-battery life at reduced recording rates
– Has AutoClimb: Primarily a trail running/hiking option to auto-enabled ascent pages
– Has Sight N’Go: Basically the compass in a simplified mode
– Has Sun/Moon Phase/Times: Self-explanatory
– Has Area Calculation: A feature you’ll never use
– Has Saved Waypoints: To save specific spots you can navigate to later
– Has TrackBack: Allows you to follow course in reverse (different than Back to Start)
– Has Hot Keys: Allows you to assign long-hold presses to specific keys
– Has Garmin inReach support: Can connect to Garmin inReach devices
– Has Garmin Xero support: Can connect to Garmin Xero devices
– Has 3D Distance/3D Speed: Slightly more accurate in steep climbs/descents
– Has openwater swimming: For swimming outdoors in oceans/lakes/etc..
– Has Virtual Partner: So you can compete against a specific pace/time goal
– Has Ability to Race Past Activities: Compete against your past runs
– Doesn’t have VO2Max metrics
– Doesn’t have Connect IQ support: No data fields, apps, or widgets
– Doesn’t have Garmin Pay support: No contactless payment support
– Doesn’t have onboard music support: No local music storage like Vivoactive 3 Music
– Doesn’t have golf mode
– Doesn’t have WiFi: Used by Vivoactive 3 Music for music access

Phew!

But wait, we aren’t done. To very briefly cover a few things this doesn’t have compared to the higher end Fenix 5 series, I’ve put together the below list. Note, because the Fenix 5 series has so many features, I’m just covering some of the ones below that I suspect will be FAQ’s. I wouldn’t consider this list exhaustive by any means.  Again, this is comparing the Instinct to the Fenix 5 series (for features that it doesn’t have above already, I haven’t re-duplicated them below).

– Doesn’t have PulseOx SpO2 measurements: Both the Fenix 5X Plus and Vivosmart 4 have this
– Doesn’t have Body Battery metrics
– Doesn’t support power meters, bike lights, bike radar
– Doesn’t have onboard maps like Fenix 5X and Fenix 5 Plus series
– Doesn’t cost $1 million dollars

Ok, now you can breathe a sigh of relief. And depending on what you’re looking for, you can either keep reading or close this tab and go off and look at cat videos on YouTube. Your choice.

So let’s get into the basics of the watch. And the most obvious thing you’ll notice right away is that display – it’s quite different from any past Garmin wearable.

Garmin-Instinct-Main-WatchFace

Thus, it’s probably best to talk about the watch face first, which is configurable to a degree. There are in fact twelve watch faces you can choose from, which is notable since there are zero you can download from Garmin Connect IQ – as somehow it doesn’t support that. Yes, I’m going to beat that hammer a lot in this review.  Here’s a nifty gallery of all the watch faces:

What’s cool is that every element on many watch faces is customizable. Take the default one for example (which is actually my favorite). Every bit of data on it you can tweak, including what’s shown in the mini-display.  So if you want to show steps instead of heart rate on the little graph on the left, you can.  If you want to show the battery in the bubble, you can. The world’s your oyster, as long as that oyster isn’t on Connect IQ.

Oh, before we go too much further, let me show you what it looks like on my wrist:

Garmin-Instinct-On-Wrist

As you’ve probably guessed, this isn’t a touch-screen device, and so instead you’ll use the buttons like most Garmin devices.  The button layout is identical there to the Fenix series, though the menus might feel a bit different at times. There’s some slight tweaks there, some good and bad. For example, you’ll see little icons in some menu choices now – kinda like the browser tab icon on favorited websites. This is also used within sport mode too, for example below, to show that the watch is paused. It’s actually a nice touch.

Garmin-Instinct-Watch-Paused

Meanwhile, flipping it over you’ve got Garmin’s ELEVATE optical HR sensor along with their mostly-used standard charging port. This is the same port used on the Fenix 5 series, the Vivoactive 3 watches, and a slew of other units over the last 2 years.  It does support charging mid-activity, if you need extra juice to complete your workout.  Just use any USB battery pack and you’re good to go.

Garmin-Instinct-BackUnit

It’s also ‘Mil-spec’ rated as MIL-STD-810G, which in consulting with Wikipedia actually has a mind-bogglingly long list of tests they do. In my video I give it a few good tosses against some Canadian boulders to see what happens. Spoiler: It survives just fine.

Looking at that heart rate sensor, it’ll constantly monitor and record your heart rate, 24×7 at 1-second intervals. All of that information is then transmitted to the Garmin Connect mobile app, and from there you can view daily trends.  This same sensor is used during workouts as well, but more on that later.

2018-10-06 06.00.55 2018-10-06 06.00.28

Below you can see a plot from last week.  At the mid-point of the day you can see the two-hour bike ride, showing the elevated heart rate. You’ll also see automatically detected sports on here (like walks), if applicable, as well as any manually triggered workouts.

2018-10-06 06.00.48

The heart rate data feeds into Garmin’s stress tracking modules as well, which are shown on both the watch itself as well as the Garmin Connect mobile app. It’s fun to see how the stress matches up to heart rate over the course of the day. Usually I find it matches fairly well compared to how stressful I actually am.

2018-10-06 06.05.30 2018-10-06 06.05.21

Of course, like virtually every Garmin device except their car GPS units, it’ll track steps, sleep, and stairs as well. The stairs and steps bits can be seen on the watch itself in a number of ways.  You can see it on the watch face itself, placed into a ‘My Day’ summary widget, or even individually as widgets.

DSC_1374

And of course you can see it online on the Garmin Connect mobile app too:

2018-10-06 06.05.00 2018-10-06 11.53.04

And the same goes for sleep, which is also available online with Garmin Connect mobile app. Note that there’s nothing to do on the device itself in terms of sleep. It’s all auto-detected, and at this point Garmin doesn’t support naps either – so if you take a nap that just goes into nowhere land.  Overall though, from a sleep detection accuracy standpoint, things are pretty good for me.

2018-10-06 06.00.14 2018-10-06 11.53.59

The unit also includes smartphone notifications, though sometimes on the small screen they can be a bit harder to get the full message at a glance because there’s not a ton of character space to work with. But you can tap them to look at historical ones as well as get the full details.

Garmin-Instinct-Smartphone-Notifications Garmin-Instinct-Smartphone-NotificationsPreview

Additionally, the unit will display weather as pulled from nearby weather stations. This is using your phone’s cellular connectivity, via Bluetooth Smart to the watch.  For things like barometric pressure, altitude, and temperature, that’s displayed natively from the watch on other data pages that I touch on a bit later.

Garmin-Instinct-Weather

Finally, from a basics standpoint the battery life of the unit is claimed at 14 days in regular watch mode (no GPS enabled), and 16 hours in GPS-on mode. It claims 40 hours in GPS-on mode with UltraTrac enabled.  I’d say these claims are in the ballpark based on my usage.  Of course, like most people I don’t tend to do 16hr hikes every day, nor do I just use my watch sans-GPS either for 14 days.  But the battery seems to easily last me a week with about an hour of GPS activity each day (on average).

Sport Usage:

Garmin-Instinct-TrailRunning-SportModes

When it comes to sport use, the Instinct is pretty similar to that of the Vivoactive 3, and carries with it the vast majority of the sport modes (except golf).  It’ll utilize the optical HR sensor on the back of it to measure your heart rate during workouts, though it can connect to external heart rate sensors as well as cycling speed/cadence sensors. It can also connect to Garmin inReach devices and Garmin Tempe temperature sensors.

From a sport mode standpoint, you’ll select your favorites for quick access, which are then accessible by tapping the upper right button.  That takes you to the sport selection menu:

Garmin-Instinct-Select-Sport

Note that unlike Garmin’s Vivoactive series watches, it does support openwater swimming (to match the Fenix series).  It also supports pool swimming though and just about every other sport you can think of (in the video I scroll through all the sports).

After choosing a sport, it’ll start searching for sensors, as well as GPS (if applicable):

Garmin-Instinct-GPS-Search

It’s here via the menus that you can go ahead and change settings for a given sport, including data pages and the metrics shown on those pages.  In fact, the Instinct offers a number of unique data page layouts, mainly due to its mini-display bubble. There’s about half a dozen different layouts that are possible with varying numbers of data fields per layout.

Garmin-Instinct-Display-Pages Garmin-Instinct-Display-Layouts

You can customize each and every one of those spots to create some pretty unique data page layouts with up to five pieces of unique information per page.  Additionally, you can add in pages like the map, compass, elevation, music controls (from your phone), and virtual partner.

Garmin-Instinct-Virtual-Parter-CustomData DSC_1374

Note that since this watch doesn’t (inexplicably) support Garmin Connect IQ, that means you can’t use 3rd party data fields like those from Stryd or others. It also means you can’t use Garmin’s own running power either, since that depends on Connect IQ too.

You can race past activities (such as my bike ride below) or downloaded activities, which leverages the Virtual Partner function. Of course, you can also use the Virtual Partner function in a standalone setup to race against a specific goal time.  Instinct also supports custom workouts (that you can create/download/etc online), as well as an onboard interval function.

Garmin-Instinct-Race-Activity Garmin-Instinct-Race-Activity-Bike

Sport modes like running and hiking (among others), also include the usual options like auto lap (based on distance), auto pause, auto scroll, and auto climb. It’s auto-climb that’s a carryover from the Fenix side of the house and leverages the barometric altimeter to automatically add ascent related climbing pages when you start going up a hill. Those pages disappear when you’re on flat land.

Further, like most of Garmin’s 2018 lineup, you’ve now got access to Galileo satellites if you so choose. That’s in addition to regular GPS and GPS+GLONASS. Related to that, you’ve got access to UltraTrac, which reduces the GPS recording rate significantly but saves battery life. Garmin claims 40 hours of GPS-on time in that mode. I’d have no issues using that for ultra-hikes, but I wouldn’t use it for day to day runs/rides/etc, as it truncates too much of the track. Note that for the regular GPS modes you can configure either smart or 1-second recording.

Garmin-Instinct-UltraTrac

In any case, once you’ve picked your sport and acquired satellites (if applicable), you can press the upper right button to start recording.  Also, if you wanted to navigate, you can add that at any time via a long-hold of the middle-left button. But I cover that in the next section.

While running/riding/hiking/etc, you can iterate through the data pages by pressing the up/down buttons (or, use auto-scroll to have it do it constantly).  If you want to create a lap marker, you’ll press the lower right button. However, you do need to turn that on, as by default the lower right button takes you to the watch face. To turn it on simply go into the sport mode option and set ‘Lap key’ to enabled.

The unit includes both audible and vibration alerts, both of which can be individually enabled/configured in the settings. For the most part, the buttons mirror that of other Garmin wearables, including the Fenix lineup. That’s probably why you see the hot key support in here, which allows you to customize what happens when you long-hold a given button. Basically, they’re like shortcuts:

DSC_1403

After you’re done with your workout/activity your data will be saved to the watch as well as then synced to Garmin Connect Mobile. If you’ve got 3rd party apps connected/authorized like Strava, MyFitnessPal, or others it’ll also get sent to them too.

On the Garmin Connect Mobile app you can view your workout and a crapton of stats from it.

These are also accessible from the main website as well, here’s an activity from yesterday for example.

screencapture-connect-garmin-modern-activity-3079296918-2018-10-10-12_46_06

Finally, note that you can change settings like statute/metric display, as well as position formats in the settings menu for the watch as a whole.  For example, you can set a preference that you show altitude in metric but pace in statute, and then even distance back in metric. Whatever floats your boat.

Garmin-Instinct-Navigation

If there’s any portion of the Instinct that makes you realize it’s no Vivoactive, it’ll be all the navigation features. Effectively, it’s a mini-Fenix. Sure, it doesn’t have fancy maps like the Fenix 5 Plus series does, but neither did almost every other Garmin wearable until that point.  To quickly bulletize the navigation-specific features it does have, here’s a handy list:

– Magnetic Compass (and thus, ‘Sight N’Go’ mode)
– GPS Coordinate Display/Navigation
– Course Navigation (breadcrumb style)
– Sun/Moon times/phases
– Area Calculation
– Storm Alert leveraging Barometric Altimeter
– TracBack (as well as Back to Start)
– Elevation Profile display (within a course)
– Hot keys (a Fenix-specific feature)
– 3D Distance/Speed, Vertical Ascent/Descent data fields

That’s the quick version, but in this section I’ll dive through some of these in more detail.  The biggie in here is support for courses. Of course, courses are hardly new to Garmin devices, and if you’re familiar with the functionality on other Garmin wearables – then it’s almost identical here. The only minor difference here is that when navigating a course you get the compass shown in the mini-display. Beyond that, same-same.

But for those unfamiliar, courses allow you to follow a pre-planned route.  You can make that on Garmin Connect (online or via mobile app), as well as even create courses on the unit itself with saved points. Here’s a relatively convoluted course I made on some trail running routes near where I was last week. I created this one online, though you can also use Basecamp too offline.

image

Once that’s done, I used the Garmin Connect Mobile smartphone app to push it to the watch via Bluetooth Smart:

2018-10-06 06.01.10 2018-10-06 06.01.15

After which I dive into the courses menu within navigation. When it comes to following a course, that’s generally considered detached from a specific activity. So I can choose run/hike/trail run/cycling, etc.. and then go ahead and choose the course.  You can technically navigate just a course without an activity, but the vast majority of the time you’ll do it as part of a session you’re recording.

Garmin-Instinct-Navigate-Courses Garmin-Instinct-Navigate-Courses-Past-Activities

Garmin-Instinct-Course-Selection Garmin-Instinct-Course-Options

Once a course is loaded up you’ll see a breadcrumb trail of where you’re going, and as well as details about remaining time on the course. You can zoom and pan within the course as well by holding the menu key for a moment and opening up the pan/zoom menu.

Garmin-Instinct-Course-Time-Remaining Garmin-Instinct-Map-View Garmin-Instinct-Map-Options.

You can also get your current position on the course elevation profile, and if you’re off-course you can use the little mini-compass to get yourself back on-course. Since it’s magnetic based, it’ll correct instantly as you rotate the watch (check out the video where I show this in-action).

Garmin-Instinct-Elevation-Profile

Of course, since this has no awareness of things like lakes/streams/mountains/roads/railroads/etc, if you get yourself significantly off-course where one of those objects comes between you and the course, it’s up to you to figure that out yourself. That’s different than something like the Fenix lineup where you can see the objects on the detailed map.  Also, this unit doesn’t support features like local points of interesting (restaurants/shops/monuments/etc…).

However, like the Fenix lineup, you can also save your current position, as well as navigate via GPS coordinates. From a GPS coordinates standpoint it supports display of GPS coordinates in either Degrees or Mils.

Garmin-Instinct-GPS-Coordinates

Additionally, it will leverage the barometric altimeter to trigger storm alert warnings, should your luck be low. In my case, I didn’t manage to trigger one.  You can change the storm alert settings within the barometric altimeter sensor settings, including calibration.  This is the same spot you can also recalibrate the compass as well.

DSC_1378 DSC_1375DSC_1376 DSC_1377

By default, the unit will auto-calibrate the altimeter leveraging the GPS data as a starting point, however, you can disable that. And of course you can switch between meters and feet for just elevation if you want (handy for Americans like myself that often prefer using meters for elevation when hiking in meter-driven countries, but want to leverage miles for distance).  Finally, like the Fenix series you can add the compass, barometer, or altimeter as individual quick access widgets to the watch.

Or, you can also add the blended ABC widget as well too.  The widgets are handy because you can access them outside a sport mode, so you don’t have to tie yourself to a recorded activity or GPS if you don’t want it.

Also note that the Instinct includes Garmin’s ‘Sight-N-Go’ functionality, which is just a fancy name for real-time magnetic ‘compass’.  You can see below how when I rotate it in my hands, the heading changes. This may sound/be obvious, but for non-magnetic compass watches, it won’t change until you actually move forward.

Garmin-Instinct-Sight-N-Go-Forward Garmin-Instinct-Sight-N-Go-Forward-Tilted

Ultimately, I was fairly impressed with how much functionality they took from the Fenix lineup. Perhaps even too much functionality, but I also suspect that the majority of purchasers of the Fenix lineup are specifically selecting that watch over equally capable watches (like the FR935 that has identical sport/hiking features), mainly because of the looks.

GPS and Elevation Accuracy:

Garmin-Instinct-GPS-Accuracy

There’s likely no topic that stirs as much discussion and passion as GPS accuracy.  A watch could fall apart and give you dire electrical shocks while doing so, but if it shows you on the wrong side of the road?  Oh hell no, bring on the fury of the internet!

GPS accuracy can be looked at in a number of different ways, but I prefer to look at it using a number of devices in real-world scenarios across a vast number of activities.  I use 2-6 other devices at once, trying to get a clear picture of how a given set of devices handles conditions on a certain day.  Conditions include everything from tree/building cover to weather.

Over the years, I’ve continued to tweak my GPS testing methodology.  For example, I try to not place two units next to each other on my wrists, as that can impact signal. If I do so, I’ll put a thin fabric spacer of about 1”/3cm between them (I didn’t do that on any of my Instinct activities however, all workouts only had a single device per wrist).  But often I’ll simply carry other units by the straps, or attach them to the shoulder straps of my hydration backpack.  Plus, wearing multiple watches on the same wrist is well known to impact optical HR accuracy.

Next, as noted, I use just my daily training routes.  Using a single route over and over again isn’t really indicative of real-world conditions, it’s just indicative of one trail.  The workouts you see here are just my normal daily workouts.

I’ve had quite a bit of variety of terrain within the time period of Garmin Instinct testing.  This has included runs in: Amsterdam, San Francisco, Reno, Tahoe, Banff, and Cancun.  Cities and mountains, trees and open-air. It’s been everywhere!

First up we’ll start with something relatively easy, my run yesterday. I say easy because basically it’s just along a running path. While there were actually plenty of tall palm trees above me, they were mostly to one side. So, pretty straightforward (here’s the set link, which you can click on and dig into any of the items in more interactive detail.)

image

So at a high level things look pretty good. Which honestly at this far zoomed out you’d hope they’d all match. In this case it’s compared against an Apple Watch Series 4 on the other wrist, and then a Suunto Trainer Wrist HR being hand-held pointed upwards.

Now for the below zoomed in GPS plot I changed the Instinct’s GPS track to bright red so it’s easier to see.  You can see that in one direction it’s basically the same as the others, whereas going the other direction it’s off in the woods a bit. Not massively so – but my guess is 3-8 meters away, here and there. There’s no real logical reason for it. In this particular test I actually changed back to GPS+GLONASS (from Galileo GPS) as I was curious to see the differences.

image

As I scroll along the road, I can continue to see these imperfections. Hardly massive deals, but also not spot-on either.

image

For example at the turn-around it appeared the watch wanted to go play with the dolphins instead:

image

So how’d this impact distance? Well, that’s what is somewhat funny here – is that it somehow undercut distance. A fact I noticed when I was doing intervals and my pace was slower than expected (since it was undercounting distance).  For virtually every set the other watches (plus The Girl’s Fenix 5s Plus) were recording more accurate paces/distances.  Odd.

image

So, let’s look at another run, this one from a few days ago along roughly the same path, but in a different direction towards the taller hotels.  Don’t worry, we’ll get to the mountains in a moment. Just stepping it up, one notch harder per set.  At a very high level, it looks mostly fine.

image

But let’s zoom in on a section (it really doesn’t matter what section you zoom in on, they’re all about the same):

image

And another for good measure:

image

As you can see, more of the same wobble. Generally, it’s just not as clean as the others.  There are exceptions to that, for example this section here:

image

And then this section here when we’re next to tall buildings and a large wall in a resort area, the watches are all about the same, each with their own occasional hiccup:

image

Still, despite these good sections – it’s clear that in the grand scheme of things this watch didn’t perform as well as the other two. Note that in this case the watch was on GPS+Galileo, at one-second recording rates.

Still, let’s leave the warm weather behind and head up into the cold as crap mountains. This time up in Banff, Canada with snow and ice-covered roads with tall trees and mountains around us.  In fact, the reason you see that random line between two points on the course is when we fell, and the timer got paused on the Suunto Trainer (thus, it’ll impact the total distance there).  No worries, it’s still easy enough to compare tracks.

image

Let’s zoom in a bit here on some sections.  In this case you can see here for this upper portion that things were spot-on. All the units were aligned to the road (where we were), save the moment the other watch got stopped. Very solid.

image

And if we go down towards the bottom of the loop – it also looks pretty good. A little bit of difference between the three watches at the very bottom with the Suunto a bit more off-track, and then the Apple Watch probably holding the most correct line.  But again, all very very close there.

image

Finally, if we look at the starting/ending point, the units are close – but we do see a tiny bit of wobble by the Instinct in one direction once or twice, again by my guess of about 5-10 meters outbound for a few seconds.  The one blip where all watches go off the road isn’t us falling again, but rather going to get pictures of elk.

image

Next, we’ll head to some warmer mountains – this time for a two-hour hike I did.  In this case it’s compared against the Garmin Fenix 5 Plus and the Suunto Trainer Wrist HR. Here’s the data set.

image

Obviously with switchbacks and such it’s a bit harder to see, so I’ll dive into a few chunks:

image

At this level you can see there aren’t any major variations. Figuring out exactly where the trail is versus where the paths are is tough, even if you zoom all the way in and turn on satellite view:

image

The key thing you’re looking for in this kind of scenario (which is all tall trees initially, and then it gets thinner up higher elevation), is that nobody is totally out in left field.  And for the most part, that seems to be the case:

image

Since this was largely a hike upwards, let’s take a quick look at elevation gain:

image

In this case the two Garmin units matched very closely. This specific Suunto unit doesn’t have a barometric altimeter (unlike these two Garmin’s), so it’s using GPS elevation for these points. Still, all three track very closely to each other. I don’t have a specific reference elevation however to validate one way or the other unfortunately. Sometimes you’ll pass such signposts, but I didn’t see any on this trail to compare against.

Still, what I tend to focus on in most elevation tests (when I lack a signpost), is that we don’t see drift in the altimeter where the separation closes.  So all good here.

For those that want to dig into another set, this time biking in the snow in the mountains, you can check out this link here. It shows the elevation differences a bit, but the tracks are very similar. Both wrist watches were under my heavier winter layers too.

Finally, here’s a more flat setting, this one a multi-hour bike ride along the canals of Amsterdam. Obviously, at a high level it looks great.

image

And frankly, no matter where I zoom in – it’s boring. It’s all perfect. Which is almost always the case for road cycling GPS tests:

image

The only point that anyone flinches is when we stop for coffee and I go inside, and it’s only the Apple Watch that struggles.

image

And here again:

image

So, wrapping things up a bit. In general the GPS accuracy is OK, but definitely not the best I’ve seen from Garmin.  The ‘wobble’ that you see in the runs in more open conditions is quirky, though, it doesn’t seem to happen in harder conditions (like mountains or forested areas). It’s unclear to me why this is.  It doesn’t seem to happen on hikes or bike rides either.

Perhaps it’s something in the specific area I’m at right now, or perhaps it’s a bug Garmin can sort out. I don’t think it dramatically impacts most people’s distance, but certainly it does have an impact to a small degree.

(Note: All of the charts in these accuracy sections were created using the DCR Analyzer tool.  It allows you to compare power meters/trainers, heart rate, cadence, speed/pace, GPS tracks and plenty more. You can use it as well for your own gadget comparisons, more details here.)

Heart Rate Accuracy:

Garmin-Instinct-Optical-HR-Sensor

Next up we’ve got heart rate accuracy.  This roughly falls into two buckets: 24×7 HR, and workout HR.  As is usually the case with most devices these days, I see no tangible issues with 24×7 HR.  It works well across both normal daily routines as well as things like sleep.  Speaking of which, I talk about RHR values and 24×7 monitoring here and why it’s interesting.

2018-10-10 12.38.41 2018-10-10 12.38.52

Before we move on to the test results, note that optical HR sensor accuracy is rather varied from individual to individual.  Aspects such as skin color, hair density, and position can impact accuracy.  Position, and how the band is worn, are *the most important* pieces.  A unit with an optical HR sensor should be snug.  It doesn’t need to leave marks, but you shouldn’t be able to slide a finger under the band (at least during workouts).  You can wear it a tiny bit looser the rest of the day.

Ok, so in my testing, I simply use the watch throughout my normal workouts.  Those workouts include a wide variety of intensities and conditions, making them great for accuracy testing.  I’ve got steady runs, interval workouts on both bike and running, as well as tempo runs and rides – and even running up and down a mountain.

For each test, I’m wearing additional devices, usually 3-4 in total, which capture data from other sensors.  Typically I’d wear a chest strap (usually the HRM-TRI or Wahoo TICKR X, but also the Polar H7), as well as another optical HR sensor watch on the other wrist (and usually also a Scosche Rhythm 24).  Note that the numbers you see in the upper right corner are *not* the averages, but rather just the exact point my mouse is sitting over.  Note all this data is analyzed using the DCR Analyzer, details here.

Note that while I’ve been using the Instinct for about a month, I’m mostly going to use recent data in this review – since that’s the firmware that it’s currently on and the production firmware that real world people are using.

First up from a heart rate standpoint is a relatively simple run in Mexico. I say simple in that there wasn’t any intervals or other complexities from a pace standpoint. Just straightforward slight ups and downs. It’s compared against an Apple Watch Series 4 on the other wrist, and then a TICKR-X heart rate strap via a Suunto Trainer Wrist HR. Here’s the data set:

image

As you can see above, things are honestly pretty darn similar between the three. I see some slight nuances to the TICKR-X HR (wobbles), but that’s not of concern with respect to the Garmin Instinct’s HR. All of them are super close. There’s one minor blip of a second or two early on at about the 2-minute marker, but then it clears ups.  Even later on when we pause to walk for a few seconds around the 30-minute and 41-minute markers, the HR drops quite nicely:

image

Of course, you can see the wonkiness in that TICKR strap a bit more here. Seriously, I need to figure out if that’s an issue with the TICKR or perhaps the recording unit, or perhaps me. I’ve seen it repeatedly for a while.  Or I just go and grab another HR strap from the bin (it’s gotta be dual ANT+/BLE though).

In any case, let’s switch to another run, this time a bit of an interval run.  This one has a 10-minute build, followed by about 5 minutes of warm-up, and then we do 400m repeats for a while. A long while. Here’s that set.  The Instinct is in red.

image

This actually isn’t too bad. The TICKR-X is definitely struggling a bit here, perhaps because I’m pouring with sweat outside in the humidity (a common issue with HR straps when you get too sweaty and the sweat pools a bit). Still, if you look at the Apple Watch and Instinct, they are actually pretty close to each other. During some of the intervals the Instinct seems to be a bit delayed during the recovery, but then catches up again:

image

In general, if a watch has to screw-up either the ramp into the interval or the recovery, I’d prefer it to screw-up the recovery (as it did here). It seemed to get better though.  If there’s any takeaway of note here is that the Apple Watch Series 4 did really good. Perhaps that new sensor design is paying off.

Note that the build portion here was pretty good though for Garmin, and in fact the one area where again the Apple Watch does a delayed acquisition of heart rate. It’s so painfully obvious in all these charts with that flat-line to begin.

image

Next, let’s switch to a cold-weather run. This time sub-zero (Celsius) temps up in Canada. The watch was under my long-sleeve shirt/gloves, but still, cold weather is the arch nemesis of optical heart rate sensors. I often joke that companies that release watches mid-winter are at a fundamental disadvantage when it comes to accuracy testing due to this (Pro Tip: Don’t release an optical HR sensor watch mid-winter).  Here’s that set.

Note that we fell at one point on the ice, and as part of that the Suunto watch got paused for a few minutes before I noticed (that has with it the TICKR-X HR data).  You can see that around the 9-minute marker where it flat-lines.

image

So I’d categorize the first minute of this run as a general cluster-fudge from a HR standpoint between the three units. However, process of elimination actually makes this relatively easy. Clearly my HR didn’t start at 170bpm, so the TICKR is wrong there. And clearly it didn’t start and stay perfectly flat-line at 145bpm like the Apple Watch says. Instead, it likely did what the Garmin Instinct says, which is a nice slow build from 110bpm upwards.  Given what I know about our pace and effort, that’s an entirely logical climb in HR.

In any case, it then continues to be a general mess until about the 6-minute marker when all three agree:

image

Interestingly, my hand-drawn ‘M’ looks like the golden arches from McDonald’s. Also of note is that it’s actually fairly likely that the Instinct was most correct throughout this entire bit.  The only questionable part is where it jumped up around the 5:29 marker, simply because typically optical HR sensors don’t detect increases in intensity before chest straps, but this did. Still, it certainly does happen.

After that point, we go over some rolling terrain. And by rolling, I mean we slid down an icy hill together like two bowling pins, knocking each other out. It was a generally non-ideal situation. One of us broke our phone in the process. But no limbs were broken, nor even ego’s bruised. So we continued on.

Fast forwarding past the part where the chest strap watch had gotten paused in the fall, you can see the remainder of the run the units are very close. While the HR isn’t going through major swings, the range of HR’s here is upwards of 170bpm and then back to 150bpm, so some good change in intensity. And towards the end where we stopped to check out some elk, the HR’s dropped nicely, and when we started running there was zero delay from any of the sensors.

image

All in all, a pretty good effort actually.

So let’s switch over to some cycling. We’ll start first with this 30×30 set indoors. By 30×30 I mean 30-seconds hard followed by 30-seconds of recovery. I use this for cycling power meter testing, but it’s actually really interesting for optical HR testing as well. Here’s the data set:

image

Hmm. Not such a good start.  Keep in mind this is technically only showing it against the TICKR-X, but that heart rate strap more or less nails it from an intensity standpoint.  You can clearly see the 8 sets of 30-seconds on and off within it.  Whereas the Instinct is pondering life for the first half of the ride (it’s only a 12-minute test).  What’s interesting is especially the first minute or two where the Instinct actually mirrors the ups/downs of the HR, but is heavily offset (low).

It’s around the 4th set of the 30×30’s that the Instinct seems to realize the error of its ways and gets onboard the right boat. At that point it’s pretty much spot-on the entire remainder of the ride, save for the last few seconds.

image

Typically I see less than awesome performance on a bike, but it’s actually somewhat unusual to see sucky performance indoors. And while sometimes I see poorer performance if I’m doing something else with my hands at that time, that didn’t happen here because in these 30×30 tests I don’t have the brain-power to do anything other than pedal for my life (it’s 430w for each 30-second on period).

Still, let’s head outside. Here’s a two-hour ride on relatively smooth ground with virtually no stops, except for coffee of course. Because we’re in Europe, and that’s how we do things in Europe (and Australia). Here’s that data set.

image

You’ll notice where things go all-different is the coffee stop. I actually purposefully don’t stop the watches for stops during testing, because there are often nuanced differences to how different GPS devices record stopped time. If those differences don’t match between different devices, then the overlays go to crap. So just ignore the coffee stop.

Like most of the others here; this was compared against the Apple Watch Series 4, a TICKR-X connected to a pile of bike computers, and then the Garmin Instinct’s optical HR sensor of course.

And honestly, all in all, this actually isn’t too bad. I’ve put smoothing at 10-seconds for this chart to make it easier to see over the duration of the ride, but frankly this might actually take the cake as the best optical HR performance I’ve ever seen from a Garmin device on a bike. Keeping in mind that historically speaking that’s been a pretty low bar.  And as you can see, it’s hardly without some solid errors.  Zooming in on the first portion, you can easily see some of these.

image

Above are two and a half tell-tale Garmin optical HR sensor errors while cycling. The first is the delayed reaction – in this case, almost 30-seconds late.  The second is just entirely missing stops/pauses. In this case, stops at a stoplight whereby the Garmin simply just keeps on trucking as if nothing ever happened. The chest strap and Apple Watch match perfectly, whereas the Garmin…well, doesn’t appear to want to stop riding.

That said, after the coffee stop things mostly settled out. A bit of toughness immediately following the stop, but mostly good. And it’s not to say the Apple Watch is perfect either. Around the 1:56 marker you can see (right below the word ‘Heart’ below), where the Apple watch mirrors the same thing as the Garmin did earlier, albeit for only a handful of seconds.

image

In general my guidance remains mostly unchanged for wrist optical HR sensors while cycling: If doing any sort of interval work, fast changes of pace, or rougher terrain – I’d stick with a chest strap or other upper-arm based optical HR sensor (Scosche, Polar OH-1, TICKR FIT), which tend to handle cycling better. But in a pinch, you can use the optical HR sensor on the Instinct devices for cycling and it’ll get the general gist of things correct most of the time.

Ultimately the optical HR sensor on the Garmin Instinct is basically the same as I’ve seen on other recent Garmin wearable products. It’s mostly good for activities like running or hiking for me, but it tends to be a bit rougher for cycling and intervals or fast changes of pace within cycling.  As usual with optical HR sensors, your mileage will vary.

Product Comparison:

I’ve added the Garmin Instinct into the product comparison database, allowing you to compare it against other products that I’ve reviewed in the past. For the purposes of the below tables I’ve compared it against the Vivoactive 3 (non-music), the Fenix 5 Plus, and the Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR. I added the Spartan because from a navigation standpoint it’s somewhat in-line, though note the lack of barometric altimeter on that lower-end Spartan unit. I might consider adding in the most recent Casio unit into here as well.

Function/FeatureGarmin InstinctGarmin Fenix 5 Plus (5/5S/5X)Garmin Vivoactive 3Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR
Copyright DC Rainmaker - Updated October 15th, 2018 @ 5:33 pmNew Window
Price$299$699/699EUR$249$279/279EUR ($329/EUR for metal bezels)
Product Announcement DateOct 11th, 2018June 17th, 2018Aug 31st, 2017August 10th, 2017
Actual Availability/Shipping DateOctober 2018June 17th, 2018September 2017August 30th, 2017
GPS Recording FunctionalityYesYes (with Galileo too)YesYes
Data TransferUSB, BLUETOOTH SMARTUSB/Bluetooth Smart/WiFiUSB, BLUETOOTH SMARTUSB & Bluetooth Smart
Waterproofing100 metersYes - 100m50 metersYes - 50 meters
Battery Life (GPS)Up to 16 hours GPS (40hrs in UltraTrac)Up to 32hrs in GPS-on, up to 85hrs in UltraTrac GPS (varies by model)Up to 13 hours GPSUp to 30 hours
Recording Interval1s or Smart Recording1S or Smart1s or Smart RecordingVariable
Satellite Pre-Loading via ComputerYesYesYesYes
Quick Satellite ReceptionGreatGreatGreatGreat
AlertsVibrate/Visual/AudioVibrate/Sound/VisualVibrate/VisualVisual/Vibrate
Backlight GreatnessGreatGreatGreatGreat
Ability to download custom apps to unit/deviceNoYEsYesNo
Acts as daily activity monitor (steps, etc...)YesYesYesYes
MusicGarmin InstinctGarmin Fenix 5 Plus (5/5S/5X)Garmin Vivoactive 3Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR
Can control phone musicYesYesYesNo
Has music storage and playbackNoYesNoNo
Streaming ServicesN/AiHeartRadio, Deeezer (soon)
PaymentsGarmin InstinctGarmin Fenix 5 Plus (5/5S/5X)Garmin Vivoactive 3Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR
Contactless-NFC PaymentsNoYes
ConnectivityGarmin InstinctGarmin Fenix 5 Plus (5/5S/5X)Garmin Vivoactive 3Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR
Bluetooth Legacy (pre-4.0) to PhoneNoNoNoNo
Bluetooth Smart (4.0+) to Phone UploadingYesYesYesYes
Phone Notifications to unit (i.e. texts/calls/etc...)YesYesYesYes
Live Tracking (streaming location to website)YesYesYesNo
Group trackingNoYesNoNo
Emergency/SOS Message Notification (from watch to contacts)NoNoNoNo
Built-in cellular chip (no phone required)NoNoNoNo
CyclingGarmin InstinctGarmin Fenix 5 Plus (5/5S/5X)Garmin Vivoactive 3Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR
Designed for cyclingYesYesYesYes
Power Meter CapableNoYesWith some Connect IQ appsYes
Power Meter Configuration/Calibration OptionsN/AYesN/AYes
Power Meter TSS/NP/IFN/AYesN/ANo
Speed/Cadence Sensor CapableYesYesYesYes
Strava segments live on deviceNoYesNoNo
Crash detectionNoNoNoNo
RunningGarmin InstinctGarmin Fenix 5 Plus (5/5S/5X)Garmin Vivoactive 3Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR
Designed for runningYesYesYesYes
Footpod Capable (For treadmills)YesYesYesYes
Running Dynamics (vertical oscillation, ground contact time, etc...)NoWITH RD POD, HRM-TRI OR HRM-RUN (NOT VIA OPTICAL HR)NoNo
Running PowerNoWith extra sensor
VO2Max EstimationNoYEsYesYes
Race PredictorNoYesNoNo
Recovery AdvisorNoYesNoYes
Run/Walk ModeYesYesYesNo
SwimmingGarmin InstinctGarmin Fenix 5 Plus (5/5S/5X)Garmin Vivoactive 3Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR
Designed for swimmingYesYesYesYes
Openwater swimming modeYesYEsNoYes
Lap/Indoor Distance TrackingYesYesYesYes
Record HR underwaterNoWITH HRM-TRI/HRM-SWIM (Not with optical HR)NoYes
Openwater Metrics (Stroke/etc.)YesYesNoYes
Indoor Metrics (Stroke/etc.)YesYEsYesYes
Indoor Drill ModeNoYesNoNo
Indoor auto-pause featureNoNo (it'll show rest time afterwards though)NoNo
Change pool sizeYesYEsYesYEs
Indoor Min/Max Pool Lengths14M/15Y TO 150Y/M17M/18Y TO 150Y/M17M/18Y TO 150Y/M15m/y to 1,200m/y
Ability to customize data fieldsYesYesYesYes
Can change yards to metersYesYesYesYes
Captures per length data - indoorsYesYesYesYes
Indoor AlertsYesYesYesNo
TriathlonGarmin InstinctGarmin Fenix 5 Plus (5/5S/5X)Garmin Vivoactive 3Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR
Designed for triathlonNoYesNoYes
Multisport modeNoYesNoYes
WorkoutsGarmin InstinctGarmin Fenix 5 Plus (5/5S/5X)Garmin Vivoactive 3Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR
Create/Follow custom workoutsYesYesYesNo
On-unit interval FeatureYesYEsSorta (2 preloaded ones, but no customization)Yes
Training Calendar FunctionalityYesYesYesYes
FunctionsGarmin InstinctGarmin Fenix 5 Plus (5/5S/5X)Garmin Vivoactive 3Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR
Auto Start/StopYesYesYesYes
Virtual Partner FeatureYesYEsNoNo
Virtual Racer FeatureNoYesNoNo
Records PR's - Personal Records (diff than history)YesYesYesNo
Day to day watch abilityYesYesYesYes
Hunting/Fishing/Ocean DataNoYesNoNo
Tidal Tables (Tide Information)NoNoNoNo
Jumpmaster mode (Parachuting)NoYesNoNo
GeocachingNoVia GPS coordinatesNoNo
Weather Display (live data)YesYesYesNo
NavigateGarmin InstinctGarmin Fenix 5 Plus (5/5S/5X)Garmin Vivoactive 3Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR
Follow GPS Track (Courses/Waypoints)YesYesNo (but some 3rd party apps can)Yes
Markers/Waypoint DirectionYesYesYes (to pre-saved spots)Yes
Routable/Visual Maps (like car GPS)NoYesNoNo
Back to startYEsYesYEsYes
Impromptu Round Trip Route CreationNoYesNoNo
Download courses/routes from phone to unitYesYesNOYes
SensorsGarmin InstinctGarmin Fenix 5 Plus (5/5S/5X)Garmin Vivoactive 3Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR
Altimeter TypeBarometricBarometricBarometricGPS
Compass TypeMagneticMagneticMagneticN/A
Optical Heart Rate Sensor internallyYesYesYesYes
Pulse Oximetry (aka Pulse Ox)NoFenix 5X Plus only
Heart Rate Strap CompatibleYesYesYesYes
ANT+ Heart Rate Strap CapableYEsYesYEsNo
ANT+ Speed/Cadence CapableYesYesYesNo
ANT+ Footpod CapableYesYesYesNo
ANT+ Power Meter CapableNoYesNoNo
ANT+ Weight Scale CapableNoNoNoNo
ANT+ Fitness Equipment (Gym)NoNoNoNo
ANT+ Lighting ControlNoYesYesNo
ANT+ Bike Radar IntegrationNoYesNoNo
ANT+ Trainer Control (FE-C)NoNoNoNo
ANT+ Remote ControlNo (Yes for VIRB camera control)No (can control VIRB though)No (Yes for VIRB camera control)No
ANT+ eBike CompatibilityNoNoNoNo
ANT+ Muscle Oxygen (i.e. Moxy/BSX)noYesnoNo
ANT+ Gear Shifting (i.e. SRAM ETAP)NoYesNoNo
Shimano Di2 ShiftingNoYesNoNo
Bluetooth Smart HR Strap CapableYEsYesYEsYes
Bluetooth Smart Speed/Cadence CapableYesYesYesYes
Bluetooth Smart Footpod CapableYesYesYesYes (+ Stryd Running Power Meter)
Bluetooth Smart Power Meter CapableNoYEsNoYes
Temp Recording (internal sensor)YesYesNoNo
Temp Recording (external sensor)YesYesYesNo
Compatible with Firstbeat HR tools-Yes--
SoftwareGarmin InstinctGarmin Fenix 5 Plus (5/5S/5X)Garmin Vivoactive 3Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR
PC ApplicationGarmin ExpressGarmin ExpressGarmin ExpressPC/Mac
Web ApplicationGarmin ConnectGarmin ConnectGarmin ConnectSuunto Movescount
Phone AppiOS/Android/WindowsiOS/Android/Windows PhoneiOS/Android/WindowsiOS/Android
Ability to Export SettingsNoNoNoNo
PurchaseGarmin InstinctGarmin Fenix 5 Plus (5/5S/5X)Garmin Vivoactive 3Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR
Amazon LinkLinkLinkLinkLink
Clever Training - Save a bunch with Clever Training VIP programLinkLinkLinkLink
Clever Training - Save a bunch with Clever Training VIP programLinkLinkLink
DCRainmakerGarmin InstinctGarmin Fenix 5 Plus (5/5S/5X)Garmin Vivoactive 3Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR
Review LinkLinkLinkLinkLink

Don’t forget you can make your own product comparison chart over at the product comparison database here, allowing you to mix and match whatever units you see fit.

Summary:

Garmin-Instinct-Watch-Black-on-Red

I’ll be honest, when I first got the run-down of these units back in August I was skeptical. Partially because I’m not exactly a huge fan of the exterior design of the Casio watches (just my personal style preferences), and partially because I wasn’t really sure how this would turn out. Would it be a crippled wannabe Fenix that didn’t really suit anyone?  And even going into last week I wasn’t quite convinced.  Sure, it was a fine watch in terms of general GPS tracking and such – but I wasn’t sure if it was an odd ugly duckling.

However, last week I spent some time in the Canadian Rockies and started putting the various ABC (Altimeter/Barometer/Compass) as well as related navigation features to more of a test. And it’s at that point it becomes clear that this isn’t a dorked up Fenix, but actually a very solid ABC watch that doesn’t cost as much as a transatlantic airline ticket. The vast majority of outdoor/navigation features that most folks want are in this watch, and done in a way that is easy to understand.

Of course, there are still some weird quirks – almost entirely software decisions that they made.  I can kinda understand why they skipped on music and Garmin Pay support, and perhaps even lack of Pulse Ox.  However, I fail to understand why at least some elements of Garmin Connect IQ aren’t included here.  Additionally, I don’t get the same weird sport oddities like the lack of VO2Max metric or Body Battery seen on much lower-end wearables from Garmin at half the price or lower.  Sometimes I feel like Garmin doesn’t have a cohesive strategy for what features should be available at what price points. I just haven’t decided if it’s because they’ve overthought it or underthought it.  And then there’s the slight GPS oddities I saw on a handful of runs in less-difficult places.

Still, if you like the exterior styling of this watch – I suspect you’ll be pretty happy with the interior features of it. It packs in a punch – and I don’t believe we’ve seen any Garmin wearable with this many navigation/outdoor features at this low of a price point ever before. It even has more sport-focused features than the Vivoactive 3.  Heck, if I think about it I don’t think we’ve ever seen any wearable with this many software features at $300 before. Given the Vivoactive 3 was previously $300 and this has a boatload more than that, the feature/function math seems pretty clearly in this unit’s favor.

With that – thanks for reading!

Found this review useful? Or just want a good deal? Here’s how:

Hopefully you found this review useful. At the end of the day, I’m an athlete just like you looking for the most detail possible on a new purchase – so my review is written from the standpoint of how I used the device. The reviews generally take a lot of hours to put together, so it’s a fair bit of work (and labor of love). As you probably noticed by looking below, I also take time to answer all the questions posted in the comments – and there’s quite a bit of detail in there as well. 

I’ve partnered with Clever Training to offer all DC Rainmaker readers exclusive benefits on all products purchased.  By joining the Clever Training VIP Program, you will earn 10% points on this item and 10% off (instantly) on thousands of other fitness products and accessories.  Points can be used on your very next purchase at Clever Training for anything site-wide.  You can read more about the details here.  By joining, you not only support the site (and all the work I do here) – but you also get to enjoy the significant partnership benefits that are just for DC Rainmaker readers.  And, since this item is more than $49, you get free 3-day (or less) US shipping as well.

Garmin Instinct (select drop-down for different colors)

Additionally, you can also use Amazon to purchase the Garmin Instinct. Or, anything else you pick up on Amazon helps support the site as well (socks, laundry detergent, cowbells). If you’re outside the US, I’ve got links to all of the major individual country Amazon stores on the sidebar towards the top.

Thanks for reading! And as always, feel free to post comments or questions in the comments section below, I’ll be happy to try and answer them as quickly as possible.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
If you would like a profile picture, simply register at Gravatar, which works here on DCR and across the web.

 Notify me of followup comments via e-mail.

You can click here to Subscribe without commenting

Add a picture

*

159 Comments

  1. The comparison chart skips the instinct.

  2. Greg

    Ugly…that round screen is hellla annoying…the garmin notch game reinvented

  3. Sander

    Does it support course points (turnbyturn instructions during navigation) and how many course points can it handle?

  4. wil

    I don´t really get it. Is it just the look of that thing?
    You could get a fenix 3 HR for less money. And it has all the features except galileo support, but adds connect IQ support, open water swimming and a lot more…

    • Matthew B.

      Also, a size/weight thing. It’s thinner and almost half the weight (well, like 40% less). I think it may actually have more navigation features than the F3 though. But you are right about everything else (this does have a newer elevate sensor though).

    • fiatlux

      Well, it is not unusual for discounted 2-generations old devices to be good deals.

      I guess from an outdoors/hiking point of view, this would make some sense as a cheaper alternative to a fenix 5 Plus, but I’d like (much) better battery life in that case.

      But there are plenty of other Forerunners on the market that make much more sense for sport IMO.

    • Alberto

      It is comparable to the Forerunner 935 in specs, but at like half of the price.

      Also it is designed for outdoors. The only reason I have Connect IQ on my FR 235 is for breadcrumb routes, but is also rough.

      And, it is beautiful. It just looks like you are heading for the mountains.

    • Hector

      From the pictures it also seems to be not color?
      luckily for me it was not around when i bought the 935 because it would make the decision harder.

  5. Matthew B.

    According to Garmin’s official specs, it does do Open Water Swimming: link to buy.garmin.com

    (I know, I know — their “specs” are notoriously inaccurate. Just wanted to confirm.)

    • Tomasz

      The manual also mentions open water swimming.

    • Indeed. Initially i was told that option was actually going to be removed in the final firmware, so I simply presumed it wasn’t removed yet somehow. Turns out they decided to keep it in there (just got an e-mail on that). Sweet!

    • JR

      We all know that Garmin intentionally cripples lower end devices, but there’s something a bit off-putting about an email that so candidly says, “yeah, that’s a nice feature that it cost us nothing to include, but we decided to take it out so this wouldn’t be too good of a value.”

    • erockem

      Agreed, this makes me sad. We did the same thing when I worked at a computer store a few decades ago. We sold custom PC’s with 120MB or 80MB drives. There was a big cost difference but everyone got a 120MB drive partitioned to 120MB or 80MB. Every one I built that bought the 80MB option, I partitioned it to 120MB and fomatted as such.

      However, a class act company at the same time was SoundBlaster who would sell 4x CDROM ($500 back then), when their 4x CDROM stock ran out they put 6x ROMS in the 4x packaging. It was a nice surprise to get a $700 CDROM for $500.

  6. Adam M.

    If I was in the market for a $300 watch, I’d much prefer the looks of this watch than the Vivoactive 3. That said, the lack of VO2 max or Connect IQ support would give me second thoughts. I don’t get Garmin’s thinking here, since the Instinct is clearly more sport watch than lifestyle watch.

    • Matthew B.

      Are there any other B/W display CIQ devices? I was wondering if that might be why.

    • Adam M.

      Screen compatibility is likely the reason for no Connect IQ support, which is at least plausible.

      Why a optical HR-enabled device at this price point wouldn’t track VO2 max estimates, though? Screams like Garmin deciding, “this is an outdoors watch, we don’t want to pack it with sports analytics, lest people buy this before a hypothetical Forerunner 245.”

    • Michael Coyne

      Could’ve sworn there are, but maybe that’s it.

      Either way – the solution isn’t to not have Connect IQ on it, but to open up a B&W mode for Connect IQ devs. Not only for this one, but also for future watches/devices.

    • Michael Coyne

      Adam – agreed. Seems like Garmin is trying so hard to avoid cannibalizing their own sales that they’re just confusing and frustrating people a lot and instead of having products where people know for sure they want it, they’re just gonna get super stuck on the opportunity cost of if they’d gotten another watch.

      Even their most high end watches are still missing some features (Fenix 5/5+ series doesn’t have quick release for triathlon, and there are many other little examples), so even if you don’t care about money AT ALL you STILL can’t have it all in one package.

      They keep straying farther from Ray’s Ant+ Symposium mantra of “just make cool shit” imo by making cool features and then deliberately muddying things up. It’s one thing to differentiate products, but with this massive confusing lineup of products it’s getting to be too much to keep track of, especially with how little consistency there is between features/price points/product line names. Just a mess.

      Fitbit and Apple may not have all the features, but at least it’s a lot easier to figure out what you’re actually getting.

    • Matthew B.

      It’s likely they didn’t want to pay the FirstBeat licensing on the device.

      And honestly, those metrics are “neat”, but even as an ultra runner who trains 4-5 times per week, they aren’t really important to my training. I can see how at this price point it was a relative non-factor. Although, I’m sure cannibalization avoidance is also a factor.

    • Adam M.

      On one hand, Garmin shouldn’t be expected to stuff every feature under the sun into all of their devices; but it also should know better than to arbitrarily dummy out what should be a standard feature, just to prevent overlaps in their product lineup.

    • Frank-enstein

      I understand both sides of this argument.

      I’m guessing Garmin concluded the target market is the serious hiker, not the recreational runner. The serious hiker that also does 10Ks may be disappointed for a second, though they probably would have already decided a fenix every few years is the choice for them anyway.

    • Michael Coyne

      I think the best way to describe it is that their product lineup doesn’t… well, line up.

      It zig-zags and scribbles all over the place.

    • Adam M.

      More than anything, Garmin’s timing is off in releasing the Instinct now.

      The Fenix series is more than a little bloated in price and features. There is an opening in the market for a midrange GPS watch aimed at hikers and outdoorsmen, but that market is tiny compared to the sport market, so the device needs to have crossover appeal. The problem: Garmin’s midrange sport watch is the Forerunner 235, which is at the end of its lifecycle and overdue for a replacement.

      If a Forerunner 245 was launched now, the Instinct could hit the market six months from now with the same feature set as the 245, and not steal market share from the flagship model. Instead, the Instinct is out now, missing features you’d expect it to have.

    • Dan G

      It makes sense to me that there’s no IQ — that screen, with a small size and complex shape, is not compatible.

      It also makes sense to me that there’s not VO2max — this is an outdoors watch with some fitness features, not vice versa. The 645 doesn’t have maps but loads of FirstBeat metrics, for example. If you want everything, you’ll have to pony up for the Fenix.

    • TR

      To be honest, the routes feature seems much more useful then VO2max and lack of Connect IQ makes sense because it would cripple sales of their top range.

      Also how much value does CIQ bring to the table if connecting external sensors isn’t possible? They really packed a lot of extra stuff in the Insight.

    • Adam M.

      No other Garmin wearable in production with wrist-based heart rate lacks VO2 max tracking. The budget Forerunner 35 has it; the Vivosmart 4 and Vivosport fitness trackers have it. For all intents and purposes, it’s a standard feature; why is it left off the Instinct, which costs twice as much as those devices? Why not take away the heart rate sensor altogether, and sell the Instinct for $50-100 less? (Because there isn’t a viable market for a $250 watch that’s only good for hiking.)

    • TR

      @Adam: yeah, the argument that even the FR35 has it (which I currently own) they could really implement it easily via a future software update (as they did with FR35).

      My argument about VO2max is that it’s an interesting piece of information, but Garmin doesn’t build anything on it (which Ray mentioned over the years about these statistics). They only started mentioning steps and sleep as a metric and what it actually means last year with Garmin Insight. That’s why I don’t find it that “useful” comparing to route guidance.

      Maybe a prominent figure in the business could kindly nudge them toward that change in a future firmware update *cough* Ray *cough*.

    • Adam M.

      @TR: I’d say the Firstbeat training effect features available on Garmin’s premium devices builds on the VO2 max metrics. If that’s where they want to draw the line between a $200-300 and a $400+ watch, fair game.

      But that scenario is the obvious endgame for the Instinct, right? Sometime in 2019, Garmin releases an new mid-range Forerunner, and whatever features on that watch that are absent on the Instinct (including VO2 max and whatever else) will be fixed by a firmware update.

    • Frank-enstein

      I think it’s this simple:

      Garmin is delineating between Outdoor/adventure watches, and running watches. VO2 max is a running (and for a much smaller market, cycling) feature.

      If you want them both, plus attractive looks, they offer the fenix option.

  7. Jeremy

    Who is Garmin’s target audience for this thing? I’m struggling with understanding its purpose.

    • Joel

      Backpackers and trail runners who don’t want to spend $500+ on a watch. Autoclimb and 3D speed/ascent are key features and the battery life is pretty perfect for a 50-100 mile trail run or weekend hiking trip.

    • Jeremy

      I was also thinking budget trail runners and hikers, but the battery life is just ok and it has an odd blend of features. I don’t know, it’s an odd device. I’ll be curious to see how it does. I’m not knocking it at all.

    • Hikers would/could use UltraTrac though (since it’s viable there), which gets battery life into the 40hr range if they were multi-day hikes.

    • TR

      >Backpackers and trail runners who don’t want to spend $500+ on a watch.

      I’d also add cyclists who don’t want to buy an extra bike device to get route guidance, specially on mountain roads.

    • Pavel

      For hiking it definitely misses mapping. For hiking I’d like to see something they made a couple of years ago with Epix – a watch with ABC functionality, probably optical HR and maps. Skip cycling support, skip swimming support… actually skip even running support, but leave ConnectIQ and ANT+ for external sensors. Bluetooth is nice for maps, courses and the rest, phone notifications are optional (since hiking is usually off the grid), Wi-Fi is optional.

    • Paul S.

      The Fenix 5 plus series don’t do that? They’re the direct descendent of the Epix, and tick all of your boxes except excluding things you don’t personally want. (Personally I don’t want optical HR, but that’s never going to happen.) I may be on of the last Epix users around (mine’s currently charging on the table next to me). If it dies, I’ll replace it with a 5 plus of some sort, even though they’re overpriced, because I want on board maps.

    • Dan

      These days many of us who go backpacking already bring an external battery for other reasons, so as long as a watch lasts a full day we are likely glad to carry further Wh for the rest of the week on our backs rather than on our wrists.

      I don’t own any devices that use the newer charging cord, but I know for my older device I wish Garmin had supplied an extra-short cord. I felt ridiculous carrying a dangly 3ft cord over Sierra Nevada passes this summer even if the weight isn’t all that significant. Some watches have 3rd party aftermarket solutions but not enough.

      Given that companies seem to want to be able to say their watches are good for ultrarunning, it’s interesting how little thought has been given to charging on the go; people end up with awkward solutions e.g. link to fellrnr.com .

    • At this point really none of the current generation watches have great charge on the go scenarios.

      Garmin Fenix series: The funky plug seen here.
      Suunto 9/Spartan Series: A magnetic adapter that’ll easily get out of position if you try and use it on the wrist at the same time.
      Polar Vantage: A small plate that’s kinda the same

      Realistically, I think what’s probably best for more Ultra folks is just taking a lipstick battery charger and sticking it in a hydration vest pocket along with the cable/watch for an hour, most watches will charge in under an hour these days.

  8. Rob

    Which Firstbeat features, if any does it support? Also, I’d love to see these called out in the comparison table as recovery features are really important to me but rarely get much attention in the write-up. (I know Firstbeat have documents on which consumer devices support what, but I just asked them about the Garmin Instinct and they had no information.)

  9. fiatlux

    How is the build and finish, by the way? It looks awfully plasticky on some shots, especially the white one.

  10. Randy

    Hi,

    Thanks for this review;, I wanted to buy a garmin forerunner 645 this weekend but just noticed that this watch was released today.
    If you could buy the instrinct or the 645, what would you buy?
    Just to have an opinion by others.

    Thanks

    • RTellis

      Depends on your use case. Are you a runner who sometimes hikes, or a hiker who sometimes runs?

      If the former then the 645, if the latter then the Instinct. But then that’s only the case if those are your only 2 choices.

  11. Theo

    Is the display LCD or some kind of paperwhite tech? Should be much more readable than the new colour displays like on the Fenix3,5,5+.

    I don’t care much for ConnectIQ, but a pity that running dynamics from the HRM Run strap is not available

  12. BartMan

    Ray – thanks for great post, as always.

    Anyway – I see one pretty important omission. Instinct Watches seems to be the only watches which are currently supported by Garmin Explore app (here is link to Google Play: link to play.google.com, I guess there is equivalent app for IOS) which enables off-line route planning, etc. Being Fenix 5+ user I cannot test it, but you should be able to have a look.

    I’m truly hoping that Garmin Explore will support will be extended to Fenix line, as currently having this available on 300$ watch and not supported on 800$ watch is pretty strange.

  13. Mateo

    Garmin sure charges a lot for software. It costs them nothing to add support for things like VO2max to these new watches. I really don’t like how they market and price these products. You buy an Android phone for example and pretty much everything works. They differentiate their products solely with hardware.

    • usr

      Quite the opposite, the VO2max estimation uses algorithms licenced from Firstbeat, surely on a volume-based pricing model. Those are probably patented to hell and back, with a few trademarks as the cherry on top.

      In addition to that, the extreme diversity model of Garmin has some practical sales advantages over the singular kitchen-sink model as exemplified by the Apple watch: in a typical salesperson/customer situation, the customer demands to be presented with choices. Given the large zoo of devices offered by Garmin, there is a realistic chance that all the choices will be Garmin. With a streamlined portfolio, the salesperson would inevitably present a competitor’s device to give the customer the feeling of being in control of their buying.

  14. Matro

    Sorry Garnin. This one is ugly. The 935 is way more attractive. This new one is up there with the 735xt on the looks scale.

  15. Raymond Wright

    This one hits the sweet spot for me. I am looking for a replacement for my FR235 (it keeps disconnecting from my phone for some reason) and don’t really need the features of the FR935/Fenix. I have a Edge 520 for my bike and don’t swim. I am focusing more on trail running so this is a winner.

    As for looks, I wore a Casio G-Shocks during my 14 years on submarines (tough ass watches), so I have no problems with the Instinct.

  16. Alberto

    I am so happy I didn’t buy the VivoActive 3 yesterday because this is what I was waiting for (I bought an eTrex though)

  17. Antonio

    26mm strap? Compatible with F5x Plus?

  18. Nedim

    I think it’s a cool device!

    That said, the price seems out-of-whack, but that’s just me. Apparently Garmin can sell for these prices.

    What I note is that this is yet another Garmin device with poor GPS. Apparently Garmin decided good enough is good enough. Why bother. Just sad.

  19. Kevin Neberman

    Any possible photos of the watch on a womans wrist? My wife is very interested but just wondered how it might look on a slimmer wrist. Thanks!

  20. Peter Newhook

    Is there anything additional Garmin would need to include to make these watches work with a power meter, or is it just a feature that’s turned off to avoid cannibalizing sales of higher end watches?

    • Everything is just software. But ultimately, products have different target markets/etc.

      I’d love to get to the day where you as a consumer could unlock a feature, just like you do on apps in the app store today. It sounds like those days are still a way off for wearables though.

    • Michael Coyne

      That… actually sounds like a great compromise between customers’ confusion/frustration that it has neutered hardware and Garmin’s desire to differentiate their products.

      Great solution! Now hopefully Garmin listens/thinks of that and is able to implement soon…

      Any particular reason you say it sounds like it’s a ways off? Just dev time to make the payment/locking systems?

    • Dan G

      That would be amazing; imagine a range of ‘base’ watches in styles like 235, 645, Instinct, Fenix around $150-250. Then: want IQ? That’s $100. Want Firstbeat? $50. Maps: another $50. Tri mode? $10. And so on. Sell razor handles cheap and make money on the blades.

      However I wouldn’t be too surprised if Garmin has does some analysis and has found that people buy a high-spec watch but then don’t use half the features. That’s got to be more profitable for Garmin than letting people buy only what they want.

      Also, developers would walk away from IQ if it were a paid extra. Stryd users would hate Garmin. On the other hand, if IQ were standard but everything else was a purchasable option, people would develop cheap IQ apps and undercut Garmin…

      So maybe it wouldn’t work.

  21. Darren Spicknell

    I hope you had your bear spray at the Nordic Centre.

  22. Brian

    No Ant+ light support? Safety is overrated I guess….

  23. Kevin Kelly

    Site says it does Open Water swim but your video says it does not. Can you clarify?

    • It does have it. Initially i was told that option was actually going to be removed in the final firmware, so I simply presumed it wasn’t removed yet somehow. Turns out they decided to keep it in there (just got an e-mail on that). Sweet!

      The video should reflect that soonish, YouTube edit processing takes some time to do its thing.

  24. nalc

    Is there a technical reason why so many Garmin devices lack power meter support? I could understand not having ANT+ functionality, but my watch works fine with ANT+ speed/cadence sensors, just not power meters. Is it just Garmin intentionally neutering the features to force you to get a fancier model?

    I have a Vivoactive HR and some of the lack of features perplex me. It can broadcast ANT+ HR data and receive HR strap / speed / cadence via ANT+, but it can’t do any BTLE even though it has Bluetooth. So it can talk to my phone and I can look at my HR in the Connect app, but if I wanted to run Strava on my phone and broadcast HR from the watch to it, it doesn’t support that. Why?!

    • There’s no technical reason.

      Though, on the flip-side I’m not aware of any current-gen (meaning, not discounted from years ago) GPS watches under $250 (which is where the VAHR started) that support power meters.

      The closest we see is the Suunto Trainer Wrist HR and Polar Vantage M at $279, but, the don’t have ANT+ support.

    • nalc

      I think the Lezyne watches do, but they don’t have optical HR. It’s kind of a niche use case since generally people who ride power meters want to always be looking at them, but I’ve jumped on the bike for a quick ride and thought “Hey, I’ll just record it on my watch” and then realized that it didn’t pick up my PM.

  25. Trent Kloppenburg

    Does the Instinct have the ability to measure depth underwater? It pretty much ticks all of the boxes but I would love to know if I could use it freediving.

    • Don

      Haha, same question.

    • No, not that I can see. And honestly for good reason – it’s not really supposed to be a diving device (and isn’t held to the same safety/QA standards/practices as their diving device – which is on a much slower update schedule). So if something were to happen, I don’t think they want the risk there.

  26. John.M

    I know a whole lot of people who would go nuts over the “tactical” look of this watch if it would of come in OD Green, or Coyote Brown. Maybe including a couple of the features from the tactix Charle.

  27. Ray: Notice that this unit does not have Power Meter support, as I am a cyclist, a deal breaker…Too bad, I liked some of the navigation stuff for gravel and off road riding. Maybe a gravel cyclist focused watch in the future…Maybe.
    Now, I am looking of a Garmin Wearable for cycling that cost in the 300 dollar range with power meter support and dual ant+ and BLE support. What if any would you recommend?

    • There’s unfortunately no Garmin/Suunto/Polar watch on the market with dual ANT+/BLE sensor support below $300 that supports power meters. Even the COROS pace doesn’t pair to BLE power meters, only ANT+ ones.

      The cheapest option that’s dual ANT/BLE support with power meters is the FR935 at $499 (though, I’d expect we’ll see Black Friday sales there).

      Alternatively, there’s Suunto Trainer Wrist HR at $279 that pairs to BLE power meters, and the upcoming Polar Vantage M at the same price also with BLE power meters. Neither do ANT+ though.

      Ultimately, I’d probably look at an older model that’s sup-$300 instead if you need ANT+ support. You could do an older Fenix unit (Fenix 3HR), or the FR920XT. I think the FR735XT is also floating in that price range these days sometimes too. :-/

    • Mike Richie

      I must say that I don’t really understand the big concern with power meters on a watch. There are lots of inexpensive head units that connect to PMs and are generally much more capable on a bike. I used to use a watch on my bike mounted on the handlebar, but now I would lose my optical heart rate if I did that. Trying to look at your watch while riding (particularly, I imagine, with power) is a PITA. You can get any number of less expensive watches and head units that do it all, including navigation for less then a Fenix 5.

    • Thanks Ray! I am checking out the Fenix 3HR, and it looks doable at 345 refurb on Amazon.

  28. Steve W

    Ok.. You got me…I looked up area calculation…”area of perimeter that you’ve walked”…I guess if I wanted to know how many hectares I (er..the bank) owns…weird🤔

    • Matt T

      This would be a useful tool for farmers or game plot managers who need to calculate seed or fertilizer applications based on area. Seeing how this watch may be popular with the hunting crowd, I could see it getting some use.

  29. runner-33

    Nifty to see wind speed supported in the weather widget. I guess this is a first for Garmin?

    I don’t quite understand why Garmin didn’t integrate CIQ support for data fields like on their only other current black and white unit, the Edge 130. On the other hand, the Garmin Instinct should be more stable than other units that support CIQ.

  30. Dennis

    I use the Vivoactive 3 and the 820 edge both with touchscreens. I can’t go back to buttons.
    I also own the 935 garmin watch but rarely use it favoring the touchscreens. (I do not own a powermeter)
    Dennis

    • Alberto

      And can you use it in cold with thick gloves? Or in the rain?

      I haven’t bought a touch screen device because using my phone on the mountain takes like 2 minutes just to change the song it is playing… (pausing it, volume up, down or photos I can do it all with just the buttons, so it is instantaneous)

    • Mike Richie

      Wow, Dennis. I have a similar setup with the VAHR and an 820, but the touch screen on the 820 is possibly the worst touch screen I have ever used! (Going back to even my old Palm devices). I got the Edge Remote so I don’t need to use the touchscreen at least while cycling. The use of buttons on the Instinct is a plus for me. Too bad it doesn’t have CIQ.

  31. Any support for the Varia Radar? This looks like a great unit for people who don’t need power meters or on-board navigation. The ABC features put it well above the Edge Explore, for instance, and the watch form factor and milspec means you could give it to a kid who’s managed to destroy a Vivoactive without knowing how he did it.

  32. Tom L

    This watch is interesting to me because of its supposed Inreach support. Garmin lists it as compatible with an Inreach Mini, but I have an Inreach Explorer+ and am curious whether or not it actually works with the Explorer+. Also, is the Inreach compatibility just gimmicky, or does it meaningfully integrate the two? Currently I use a Forerunner 230 for all my running, and my Inreach Explorer+ for paddling, hiking, etc. Do you have anything to say about the Inreach integration?

    • Jonathan Burchmore

      The inReach support on the fenix line only works with the Mini, so I would assume this is the same. As for the functionality, you can do just about everything from the watch that you can do from the menu on the Mini, and you get notifications of incoming messages like you would from a phone.

      I’ve found myself far more likely to just pull out my phone and use the Earthmate app than to interact with the Mini from my watch. I also find it annoying that when a Mini is paired with the watch every activity gets an inReach data screen whether the device is connected or not.

  33. Typo:

    less-difficult place.s

  34. Scott Deroscher

    Excellent review, thank you! My only disappointment is that you provided no information about the display. What about the pixel resolution, clarity, usability in sunlight, specs, scratch-resistance, etc. Also, it would be helpful to see this addressed in the comparative illustration between units (Garmin Fenix, Vivoactive and Suunto).

  35. Matthew B.

    Is the Instinct able to used while charging?

  36. Allan

    I wonder if the lack of Connect IQ is just Garmin’s way of making a capable and cost-effective GPS watch that they can target to the government and military market. One imagines there is more sensitivity around these devices given recent press of soldiers inadvertently mapping military bases by uploading workouts from their fitness watches.

    The Tactix Charlie has Connect IQ, but it’s also $749. A watch without Connect IQ eliminates any fears of rogue third-party applications tracking things they aren’t supposed to track.

  37. Donnie Barnes

    Here’s what I don’t get:

    When it comes to PURELY SOFTWARE DIFFERENCES, why not just charge for them? Ie. you release the Instinct with the current set of features at $299. And then you can pay extra if you want “extended cycling features” (ie. power meters, radar, Varia Vision, etc). And you can pay extra if you want ConnectIQ features. Etc. Price is sanely such that you never end up approaching Fenix5 prices, since that watch looks better, has sapphire, and has more hardware (SpO2, wifi, etc).

    Garmin, you’re missing the boat here. Bad. Also, give us a damned charge connector that has a snowballs chance in hell of working while STILL ON YOUR WRIST. *sigh*

    –Donnie

    • Thijs

      Please no! Microtransactions on a sports watch.. That’d be awful.

    • Pavel

      No, this, actually would be perfect.
      You could still have “Fenix-like” watch for $700 with all software tricks included, but you could also build it up from the base model by just adding paid software upgrades.
      There’re lots of nice features in Garmin high-end watches, but they also have lots of features that I’ll use once / won’t use at all. Obviously I don’t want to pay for them

    • Will

      It wouldn’t be perfect, because you would probably end up subscribing to features instead of paying one time, just like how Firstbeat costs $50/year for Apple Watch.

      It won’t be microtransactions like cosmetic items in a video game, it’ll be yearly subscriptions like Strava Summit.

      You can bet whatever business model they end up switching to would cost customers more on average, otherwise why would they switch? It won’t be like Netflix or Spotify which arose out of competition with “free” downloads. Garmin doesn’t have to deal with piracy and has no incentive to give customers an amazing deal compared to what we pay today.

      The only way this is a win for customers is if some are overpaying today — they’ll pay less while others subsidize their gains with subscription fees. IMO.

  38. Vladimir Gorbunov

    Great review, thanks! This watch has settled into my wishlist for New Year holiday.

  39. Niklas

    Hi Ray and thanks for the review. I do think there is a need of a cheaper Garmin out door watch, compare to the exclusive “super watch series” like, Fenix 5/+/, D2-Delta, Tactix Charlie, Descent MK-1, Quatix 5…

    I wonder how is the outdoor capatibillities on the instinct, compared to i.e. Suunto 9 ans Spartan Ultra? From your reviews, Instict should be in the same ball park as the Suunto 9 and Spartan Ultra.

    I also wonder how many waypoints and coordinate systems that the Instinct supports, compare to the Fenix 5-series (which do support quite a few).

    Finaly, could Garmin get support for CIQ down on the road?

  40. Monkswhiskers

    Apple Watch Series 4 review coming soon?

    • Frank-enstein

      Synopsis: it’s good if you don’t mind a fragile body (crack! chip!), daily charging (!), basic sensor support, and can live with limited data fields and no sleep tracking.

      Beyond fitness though, you can view your checking account balance, Snapchat, and thermostat temp!

      Snarky, but it’s just not a true fitness device. I’m always somewhat surprised Ray reviews it. S’pose it generates nice traffic.

    • Actual Apple Watch Series 4 synopsis: It’s beating Garmin on GPS accuracy easily here (in fact, all week), it’s beating Garmin on optical HR accuracy (except the first 60 seconds), it’s beating Polar on GPS accuracy, and the battery lasts two days of regular usage.

      I’ve dropped it a number of times, whacked on things, and it hasn’t broken yet. I’ve broken none of my Apple Watches over the years.

      Whether or not it meets everyone’s needs (like lack of native sleep tracking), that’s up to them. But it’s gotten a heck of a lot better this go-around, and is at the point it’s worthwhile considering for sport/fitness from an accuracy standpoint.

      In-Depth Review late next week.

  41. Tim

    Interesting. I’ve been saying Casio should make a G-Shock / Garmin hybrid for ages now. I don’t get why they haven’t explored the fitness market at all so far. Their Pro-Treks are cool for outdoorsy stuff, but have no fitness/sport features and aren’t as indestructible as G-Shocks. The G-Shock “activity trackers” so far have just been simple step trackers and interval timers. While Garmin’s build quality is ok, this is the first thing I’ve seen them make that looks like it would be fairly hard to break.

    I am on the verge of buying a Fenix 5s+ and probably still will, but this is definitely making me think about whether I want to spend the extra cash. As usual, thanks for the great review!

  42. Gary

    Love it. LOVE it. Love everything about it.

    But I just knew it wasn’t going to have multisport. And it doesn’t. And that makes me sad.

  43. Andres Stell

    Can the heart rate sensor connect to my Wahoo Edge Bolt to be able to see the heart-rate readout on the Bolt itself?

  44. Ian Lee

    Hi, does this watch have a function to record snow-ski runs?

  45. JR

    That had nothing to do with connect iq. People were uploading their activities to Strava with no privacy setting enabled. It was 100% the fault of the users.

  46. Volker

    I don’t know, if the lack of IQ functionality is a big deal for Garmin. There are some useful things like Sendpoints, Komoot, Tides which would be useful for this watch. Is the little memory really big enough/up to date, even for this watch? I would prefer my old Fenix 2, if I had the choice.

  47. nick dew

    Why is it impossible to find a cheapish watch that does ow swimming and can handle a power meter… I hate the buttons on a spartan trainer and mostly I have ant+ sensors…. 735xt also is missing the altimeter :(.

  48. John Hill

    Hello Ray,
    A great review on what, in my eyes, looks to be a great ultra runners GPS watch without having to pay the high price for a Fenix 5. From a device perspective I have a Garmin swim for the pool, and Edge 500 for the bike and still rocking the Garmin 310XT for my ultras, ok so it dies after 16 hours but it lasts for most of my 50 – 60 miles races which are circa 9 – 10 hours.

    Regarding looks, I wear a Timex Expedition every day so the watch looks fine to me ?

    I have been thinking of replacing the 310XT with something newer but a deal breaker is the ability to display UK / GB Ordnance Survey Grid Reference numbers of your current position , which the 310XT does, does / will the Garmin Instinct have that ability or is it just Lat and Long ?

    Thanks,

    John

  49. Mike Richie

    So Ray, I need to ask. Do you think there is any possibility that this watch might get Connect IQ in a future firmware update? My VAHR is getting a bit long in the tooth and this watch really ticks all the boxes for me, particularly having Open Water swim, as most of my swimming during the warm weather is outdoors, the buttons instead of touchscreen is a plus, and most of my running is on trails. Also, Garmin just can’t really compete in the smart watch category, the Apple Watch is so much better, so what I want from Garmin is the sports capabilities. However, without CIQ I just can’t get this watch.

    Do you think it is possible that the complexities of their unique screen format caused them to drop support, but that in later additions this might be added? Or as you sort of suggested in your post, at least add data fields?

    • That’s a tough one. I could perhaps see something like data fields being added, but that depends heavily on whether there’s memory in the unit to pull that off.

      I think regular apps/widgets are likely a no-go, but maybe watch faces are a grey area.

    • Mike Richie

      I would think resources (memory, etc.) would not be a problem since they a probably using similar chipsets to VA3. And although it would require a new version of CIQ to support the screen, it is far closer to other watch screens then edge devices were. I don’t think it’s a HW limitation, but I could be wrong. They may not want to invest the software resources, I guess, but I would buy this watch if it had CIQ – don’t know how representative I am, though.

  50. Katherine

    Dangit! I just got a Vivoactive 3 for my birthday in July – if this had been out then, I would have gotten it instead.

    I’m guessing that the navigate to GPS coordinates would allow geocaching with the watch? Grumble.

  51. Matt

    Does it give lactate threshold, training status, or any of the other running metrics that the forerunner and fenix series provide?

  52. Brian

    Great review, as always.

    This is really close to the perfect watch I’ve been looking for. I’m in Colorado and want something for hiking. I’m not sure if I want or need anything other than breadcrumb trails (basically the ability to set waypoints prior to hiking), running data, and some smartwatch functionality. I run 3-4 times a week and try to hike at least each weekend, plus am starting a little bit of a gym routine.

    I’m enticed by the new Apple Watch Series 4 (with cellular) and this, as well as the Fenix 5…but the Fenix 5 is too much money for me. How does this new Instinct compare with the Series 4 (or 3 even) for what I’m looking for? Any newer Suunto options that stand out as a potential pickup instead of either of these?

    • Paul S.

      It’s really hard to answer that question about the Apple Watch (I have a 3LTE) because it all depends on what apps you have on your iPhone/Watch. For example, right now on my iPhone XS in addition to Maps and Google Maps I have Komoot, Topo Maps+,, Guthook, and Trailforks, and the Watch apps for Komoot and Topo Maps+ are on my Watch. (Trailforks is on my iPhone because of a Connect IQ app). There may be more available at the App Store. In other words, your experience will depend on what apps you have installed on your Watch. The AW is far closer to a general purpose computing device than any Garmin watch I’m aware of, so the ability of 3rd parties to extend the experience is much greater. On the other hand, the Fenix and Garmin watches in general (I’ve owned an original Fenix and an Epix) are purpose built for outdoors activities, and have an always on screen which are easier to see in the sun, longer battery life, and are in general just physically better for hiking than the AW.

    • Brian

      Thanks for the reply! I’ve been curious about what apps would be really helpful on the Apple Watch. I’ve only owned a Forerunner 10 for the past few years, so I’m ready to pick up something that does a little more; specifically hiking functionality. I reckon breadcrumb stuff is good enough for me, and am curious if the apps in could install on the Apple Watch would get me there and tick a few more of the smartwatch boxes I have a feeling would be nice.

      It seems like Ray’s impending review of the Series 4 is promising for what I need/want. If not, maybe I can just find a used Fenix 5 or something and be pretty happy.

      I’ll look into the apps you mentioned!

  53. Interesting timepiece and fun to read, thank you!

    What kind of backlight does the watch have? Can it be dimmed and/or changed in color to preserve nightvision?

    Compared to my Suunto Alpha Traverse I suppose the Instinct is not as robust (saphire glass versus “chemical hardend plastic)…

    • Mike Richie

      You know, I think the design of the screen with the raised rugged bezel does more to protect it then the material it is made out of.

    • You can change the backlight brightness in 10% levels from 0 to 100%. The default is 20%, which I find more than enough. You have separate settings for activity via non-activity.

      I suspect the screen aspect is actually more robust here simply because of the inset. It’s virtually unheard of to see breakage or Garmin ‘plastic screens’ compared to their sapphire glass ones. Sapphire glass tends to be more about scratches, but even then I think it’s mostly overrated.

    • Ok, thanks for the reply. The traverse allows also red backlight which I find best used in dark environments (at 25% this is almost invisible in daylight).

      I do notice some blank (not-quite black anymore) spots on the outer ring but that’s it. The glass itself is spotless and I use the watch for two years now…

  54. Jim

    It’s all subjective but I’m not too fond of the screen – I think the cutouts would drive me mad. I love the idea of the smaller data screen though.

  55. Justus

    Picked this up and selling my Fenix 5. This thing is perfect for me. Who needs all the extra stuff in the Fenix like the metrics from first beat that are only accurate if you wear a hr strap for every run. Plus it is so light and surprisingly snappy. No slow lag like the Fenix to switch between screens. Don’t care about cIQ bunch of stuff I don’t need and that slows the watch down and kills the battery.

    If you have any questions ask on here. I have had garmin and sunntos since the old 205 305 were new.

  56. I’m looking to upgrade my vivosport (which works perfectly fine for me), because my girlfriend’s watch died. I mostly run but starting to enjoy hiking as well. I’m training to run longer runs and trails so run 4 times a week + 2x strength a week (Training for the new alpinism plans). Would this watch be a good upgrade from a perfectly fine vivosport? Of course I’ve been looking at the fenix 5s+ (Small wrists), but they are expensive. If I can find all I need on something a little cheaper that would be great.

  57. Rob

    I’ve used Polar for the past 3 years however I’m considering switching over to Garmin as I’m a little disappointed by what the Vantage has to offer. I have all my training stored in Polar Flow, does anybody know if there is a way to transfer all of my Polar workouts into Garmin Connect? Does Garmin Connect have a migration wizard of some sort that allows users to switch platforms easily? I’d also be interested in peoples thoughts on which is best Polar Flow or Garmin Connect. Thanks!

  58. I was gobsmacked when I saw this device appear. If they had added in ConnectIQ you would have nearly all features of the Fenix 5 Plus attendre much less than half the price. What are Garmin thinking? Any Fenix 3 / 3HR upgraders are more likely to go Instinct than 5 Plus imho. Although it is pretty ugly!
    Great and thorough review as always. Thanks

  59. Jared S

    I’m primarily a hiker & backpacker currently using the Ambit2 and this watch checks every box I can think of and doesn’t add too many features I don’t need. It’s hard to envision a watch better suited to my needs. CIQ would be the only exception as I have created a few apps with Suunto Movescount that I like to use. I’ve been waiting for a reliable replacement to my Ambit2 and I think this will be it.

  60. KK

    From what I read and see I really like the Instinct and am eager to try it out.
    For me it ticks some important boxes at a decent price (compared to the indecent Fenix 5+ overprice):

    – I was hoping Casio would make a ProTrek with GPS and HR. Now Garmin does that in a Casio-style case – even better.

    – The B/W display seems to have better visibility than the existing FR935/Fenix color displays. This comparison here is promising: link to pocketnavigation.de
    link to pocketnavigation.de
    link to pocketnavigation.de
    link to pocketnavigation.de

    – The so-so visibility of the FR935 display and the so-so look/feel of the watch was what kept me from wearing it as an all day watch, using it only for my runs. The Instinct’s Casio like form factor together with hopefully a better visible display might make it my daily beater that I also take on my trail runs and hikes. I much prefer a low-res B/W but better visible display than a high res color display with low contrast… heck, this is a numbers display, not for photos.

    – I don’t need CIQ (always ended up uninstalling all that I tried out) and I not having the FirstBeat metrics is not a deal breaker for me.

    – Having route navigation in my running watch is essential for me to explore new trails for running. I’d love the full maps on Fenix 5+ but less so the price of these watches. Btw, a shout-out to the WorkOutDoors app on Apple Watch that offers offline OpenStreetMap with real time run metrics on the display next to the maps as a “low cost” but very very capable contender to Garmin’s Fenix 5+ at less than half the price.

  61. super6uno

    Hi DC!
    The comparison table has an error.
    According to the Garmin website and other screenshots from other reviews, the Garmin Instinct has an internal temperature sensor.

    Excellent review and thanks for your work.

  62. Nicolò

    Hi, thank you for the great review!
    Can I ask if this Garmin shows the “average ascent speed” or “mean ascent velocity”, or something like that?

    Thank you,

    Nicolò

  63. Gus de Geus

    Hey! Great review!
    When you say it doesn’t register HR under the water, its even if I use a 3rd party HR monitor?
    You said it supports integrations with other devices via ANT+ so I’m wondering that.

    Thanks!!

  64. Bud

    Nice review, thank you! Does Instinct show barometric pressure in mm Hg?

  65. Jason Johnson

    Your review sold me 100%, now to pick a color: The “Flame Red” is clearly orange, no? Like bright orange or more like burnt orange? What about Tundra? Is it more military desert taupe or more white?

    • Flaming Red is definitely orange by normal peoples standards (which is my standard). Tundra is like a dirty white.

      The first photo in this review (that I took) is about as color-science perfect to the actual units as my eyes see them. I really tried to get the colors spot-on on that one. 🙂

    • Jason Johnson

      Excellent, thank you! I will definitely buy through your link. Long time fan if your site. Thanks for your work!

  66. David

    Great review, as always, thank you.

    Just a quick question if I may. Is it possible to get pace and distance from a footpod (Stryd) and let the watch record the GPS track only?

    Thank you..

    • Justus

      Yes. I have my Stryd configured as a footpod for pace and speed. There is a setting in the screen for pairing the footpod. You do not get power. I think you can upload power straight to the stryd app from the footpod but have not yet tried this. Unfortunately I lost my stryd last night so will not be able to confirm it works for offline power upload.

    • David

      Thank you, that’s great. I think I’ve found a perfect watch then 😉

  67. Djilan B

    What an extensive testing and review! Thanks 🙂

    I currently still have my Garmin Forerunner 310XT and am in the market for a good replacement. I use it mostly for my trainingrides with my horse for endurance or my trailrunning. So I want to know the distance, speed, altitude/elevation and HRM. And sometimes for following a track. I prefer a long batterylife and/or easy charging.
    For extensive navigating I now use my GPSMap 60CSx (looking forward to the GPSMap 66 😉 ) so simply following a line is just fine for a watch.

    I think it’s very difficult to find the best option for my purpose with all the options Garmin has, but this Instinct sounds very good! And around horses I rather be wearing this simple looking watch than the very much more expensive Fenix5..

    Question is, is this Instinct the best replacement for my 310XT? It does sounds really good.

  68. Brian

    Great review, as always! Two things missing: 1) an in-depth description of the screen. What’s the resolution, how does it perform, what’s with those corners? 2) a rolling pin size comparison of the Instinct with other watches like the Vivoactive 3, 645, Fenix 5S, Fenix 5X, … I want to see how the Instinct looks next to the alternatives. Thanks!

  69. Hello Ray, There seems to be some disagreement over the capabilities of moon-phases or even moonrise/moonset. The manual doesn’t mention those, but your review states it has those. Care to clarify?