Note if you're reading a watch review: Note that over the past few months new Garmin, Timex and Polar watches have been released. If you're stopping by to read one of my many watch reviews, you'll definitely want to check out the new Garmin FR910XT In Depth Review, the Garmin FR610 In Depth Review, Timex Run Trainer and Polar RCX5 In Depth Review. Always best to know all your options out there. Enjoy!

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Nike+ Sportwatch GPS In Depth Review

There was no doubt when the Nike+ GPS Sportwatch was announced back at CES 2011 in January it caused many heads to turn.  After all, it triggered a bit of a departure from Nike’s traditional role with Apple via the iPod/iPhone and the Nike+ experience based on those devices.  More importantly however, it sounded a bit of a warning call to the rest of the industry that they better wake up in the GPS fitness watch category.  But how would this new entrant compare to some of the existing powerhouses?  And would it meet all the fanfare associated with it?

Like all my reviews, they tend to be pretty in depth (perhaps overly so) – but that’s just my trademark DC Rainmaker way of doing things.  Think of them more like reference guides than quick and easy summaries.  I try and cover every conceivable thing you might do with the device and then poke at it a bit more.  My goal is to leave no stone unturned – both the good and the bad.

Because I want to be transparent about my reviews, I want to be clear that I paid for the Nike+ Sportwatch GPS myself.  Though, after my initial paid unit arrived, another trial unit from Nike/Tom-Tom PR arrived.  However, that PR trial unit will be heading back shortly.  Simple as that.  Sorta like hiking in wilderness trails – leave only footprints.  If you find my review useful, you can use any of the Amazon links from this page to help support future reviews.

Lastly, at the end of the day keep in mind I’m just like any other regular triathlete out there.  I write these reviews because I’m inherently a curious person with a technology background (my day job), and thus I try and be as complete as I can.  But, if I’ve missed something or if you spot something that doesn’t quite jive – just let me know and I’ll be happy to get it all sorted out.  Also, because the technology world constantly changes, I try and go back and update these reviews as new features and functionality are added – or if bugs are fixed.

While Nike+ Sportwatch GPS is the new kid on the GPS athletic device block, how does it stand up to real world pounding and day to day use? For that…onto the review…

Unboxing:

When you first get ahold of the Nike+ Sportwatch GPS box, you’ll find a very compact design cleverly packs everything inside like levels in an apartment. 

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch BoxNike+ GPS Sportwatch Unboxed

In many ways you see Nike taking some cues from Apple on device packaging, with everything neatly organized and without layers upon layers of useless plastic:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Unboxed

Once you’ve unboxed the unit the watch itself will be standing on a small platform, with the included footpod sitting snugly behind it:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Side Profile

Below that level sits the USB extension cable:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch USB Extender

As I’ll discuss later in more detail, the watch band itself is actually the USB plug, so the cable is merely for extension purposes.

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch USB Wrist Strap

Next we have the small paper manual.  It’s offered in approximately 925 different languages…and includes exactly four pages per language.

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch ManualNike+ GPS Sportwatch Manual

Finally, we have the watch itself:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Newly OpenedNike+ GPS Sportwatch Newly Opened Back

Now that we’ve got it all unpacked, let’s see how it sizes up.

Size comparison to other watch sizes:

The Nike+ Sportwatch is interesting size-wise in that it has a thinner width than most GPS watches today, but it makes up for it in its depth (thicker).  I’ve put together my trademark kitchen rolling pin comparison between a number of the most popular watches on the market today, to help you get a better view of them side by side:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Size Comparisons to Garmins

(Left to right: Garmin FR60, FR110/210, FR610, Nike+ Sportwatch, FR310XT)

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Size Comparisons to GarminsNike+ GPS Sportwatch Size Comparisons to Garmins

One area of concern for many is how it fits on ones wrist.  For me as a guy with relatively small wrists (skinny runner dude), it actually fits pretty good:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch on Wrist

But for my fiancĂ©e, a 5’2” petite runner, she found it simply too big and uncomfortable.  It had to be on its very last setting to fit, and yet still had some room to float around:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch on Small Female WristNike+ GPS Sportwatch on Small Female WristNike+ GPS Sportwatch on Small Female Wrist

That said, unlike many of the other watches out there, this one is quite functional as a day to day watch – and some might even say a bit more stylish than others.  Though I have found that it doesn’t quite mesh with a business suit.  And yes, I tried.

Running:

Now that we’ve got it all unboxed, it’s time to get it out for a run! Once you head outside you’ll select to start a run…by pressing the run menu option:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Start Run

After thats complete it’ll bring you to the run options page, which allows you to choose which sensors you’ll be using for the run.  This includes GPS, Footpod and Heart Rate strap.  You simply tap to enable/disable each sensor for that run.  It’ll remember these settings for next time:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Sensor Options

Additionally, if it’s your first run with those sensors, you can select to ‘Add sensors’ and add a new footpod or heart rate strap:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Looking for Sensor

Once that’s done you’ll select to start searching for satellites.

This is sometimes pretty quick, but in general I found it takes 1-2 minutes to complete after its started searching.  This is a bit longer than most other watches take.

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Looking for Sensor

Once it has completed satellite acquisition (or linking, as it calls it), then you’re ready to run!  So, off we go!

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Ready to Run

As you’re running the main display will show the overall distance of the run. The upper display rotates through a list of data fields that include heart rate, distance, calories, clock, elapsed time and clock.  You can see this below during my run:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch while running

Depending on how you’ve configured the watch you can tap (or slap) to create a split/lap.  To do this, you simply tap/whack the top of the watch and it’ll automatically demark a lap:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Tap to LapNike+ GPS Sportwatch Tap to Lap

While in theory this is very cool, I’ve found that it’s not quite perfected.  On the first Nike+ GPS Sportwatch I had it worked flawlessly.  However the second unit I have it’s super-sensitive and often triggers while I’m running along and hit a bump – such as stepping down from a sidewalk to the road to cross a street. I’m optimistic this can be tweaked with a bit of firmware work, given it seems to work well on some units and not so well on others (though they are currently running the same firmware version).

If you want to pause, you can do so at any time by pressing the little neon green button, which temporarily stops the counter:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Paused

Once you’re complete, you just tap ‘end’ to finish up the run.  At this point, it’ll give you a bit of encouragement about the run – including if you hit a new record:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Encouragement Notes

Following which, you’ll get a summary page regarding the run:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Run Summary

Accuracy

This is a good time to discuss accuracy.  Based on my testing, after the first firmware update accuracy of the device is on par with the Garmin units I’ve tested, and on par with measured routes that I have.  Here’s a few snippets of runs where I ran with the Nike+ Sportwatch and Garmin GPS unit to compare distances.  Due to the nature of GPS accuracy (usually allotted about 2.5%), I’d never expect them to exactly align – so I was happy that they were ‘close enough’:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Run Distance ComparisonNike+ GPS Sportwatch Run Distance Comparison

I did find that my one longer run saw a bit more differential than I expected, but not beyond the 2.5% per mile:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Run Distance Comparison

I’ve done running both in the trees and on the road, and it didn’t seem to affect GPS accuracy compared to other devices that are considered ‘known goods’.

If you’re interested in some of the past GPS accuracy tests I’ve done, check out my two part series here.  I’ll be testing the Nike+ Sportwatch GPS unit more in depth later this spring as part of a roundup of other new GPS devices on the market.

Breakage:

As you may have previously read around these parts – I had a bit of bad luck initially (Day 3) when the watch fell out of my bag and onto the floor.  Upon impact, the glass immediately cracked.

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Cracked Screen

While the watch continued to work just fine, it did get a bit of fogging during some runs in the rain, but each time cleared out.

The good news here is that the Nike support folks were great and offered to let me return it, including the prepaid postage.  They had no idea who I was, as I just called the generic support line.  They were super friendly and apologetic as well.

Ideally a slightly raised rubber bezel would resolve the issue, which also affects the Garmin FR310XT as well, as it has a glass screen that’s directly exposed to impact.

Cycling:

Like virtually any GPS unit, it can almost always be used for uses not originally intended.  And in the case of the Nike+ Sportwatch GPS, cycling is one of those activities.  While I’ve taken it out for some pretty long rides (50+ miles), you’ll start to run into some issues in the first few hundred feet.

First up is that as of this writing the Sportwatch doesn’t contain any cycling mode, which means it can’t show you speed in MPH/KPH, but rather instead shows it in Minutes/Mile (or Minutes/Kilometer) – as if you were running.  I see this as an area that could be easily modified in a future firmware update, and doing so would make quite a bit of sense without taking significant effort.

The second area that’s problematic is the lap function for creating splits.  As I’ve noted elsewhere, within the software you have two basic options for creating splits.  One is to have it automatically create laps/splits every X miles (such as every 1 mile).  The second is to allow you to manually create laps/splits by simply taping/whacking the unit.

The problem is that the second option is easily triggered by cracks and bumps in the road.  I found on a typical road ride that it was triggering as often as every few hundred feet – making the splits/laps essentially useless.  While I could certainly look to go back to auto-lap splits, that doesn’t meet my typical objective - which is to demark parts of the ride.  I often use splits to later analyze a given portion of the ride such as the warm-up, main sets, or cool-down.

As the Sportwatch wasn’t specifically marketed for cycling, it’s hard to fully blame them for these oversights.  But at the same time, looking at competitive offerings in the market, all of them offer the ability to switch to a basic cycling mode that shows MPH/KPH.

Swimming/Waterproofing:

While the Nike+ Sportwatch wasn’t designed with swimming in mind, it has no issues playing around in the water.  The unit itself is fully waterproofed to 5 ATM’s.  Wait, you don’t know what ATM’s are?  No worries, neither does the rest of the world.

ATM’s are simply Atmospheres, and it’s one method of stating a specific waterproofing level.  Typically speaking 5ATM’s is equivalent to about 50 meters, or about 165 feet (though I’ve found slightly varying calculations – but this puts it in the general ballpark).  Of course, they could have just simply stated that depth in feet or meters on the back of the unit, instead of stating ‘5 ATM’s’.  No worries though, it just means its simply well waterproofed (and better than the IPX7 level typical of most Garmin units).

I’ve taken it swimming a few times doing a few thousands yards of laps each time without any issues at all in the waterproofing department.

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch in the pool

The only challenge to using it while swimming is that you can’t engage any simple timer mode – like a normal stopwatch.  So you’d have to get it started in either GPS, Footpod or Heart Rate mode (with those accessories) before you used it as a standard stopwatch.

As for day to day water, I’ve got more than my fair share of wet runs in lately.  In fact, I think every time I wear it out for a run…it rains.

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch in the rain

The good news is the unit performs without issue in the rain – no matter how light or hard the rain is.  And even better is that even if you do manage to crack the glass, I found that it still works just fine in the rain and didn’t die despite being soaked.

Accessories:

The Nike+ Sportwatch offers two accessories that are compatible with it, both of which have previously been on the market and are compatible with existing Nike and Apple products.

Footpod

First up is the Nike+ footpod.  Within every Nike+ Sportwatch box is one footpod (you only need one per pair of shoes). The footpod enables you to track speed and distance indoors on a treadmill, or outdoors if you choose to turn GPS off.

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Footpod

The footpod is easily paired by selecting to add a sensor through the menu on the watch.  Once you’ve linked the footpod it’ll remember that particular sensor for future use.  You can choose to enable/disable a sensor prior to any given run, as it’s the last display screen before starting the run.  This makes it easy to switch back and forth should you need to.

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Footpod on shoe

Additionally, if you’re in a situation where you don’t have time for the unit to locate the required satellites, you can utilize the footpod to start running in ‘Quickstart’ mode, which will use the speed from the footpod to determine distance.

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Quickstart Mode

Once satellite reception is acquired, it’ll switch back over to GPS speed/distance.

It should be noted that the footpod does not record or display foot cadence (turnover) in any user consumable method.

Heart Rate Strap

Nike has partnered with Polar to offer a heart rate strap that’s compatible with the Nike+ Sportwatch.  The strap is dual-frequency, which is pretty cool.  On one channel they support standard 5kHz, for use with existing Polar watches and exercise equipment, and the other channel is for the Nike+ using Nike's proprietary 2.4gHz frequency.

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch with Polar Wearlink+ Strap

The strap itself is made out of a soft fabric, and contains a small plastic transmitter that you snap into place:

Nike+ Polar Wearlink+ Strap UnboxedNike+ Polar Wearlink+ Strap Back of Strap

To pair the strap with the watch you simply go into the options menu and choose to add a new sensor. 

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch looking for heart rate strap

At this point it’ll search for your heart rate strap and a few seconds later it’ll find it and add it.  Like the footpod, you can choose to enable/disable it on a per run basis.

Once the strap is enabled and used on a run you’ll have both heart rate data during the run on the display, as well as after the run on the site.  After you’ve uploaded the run you’ll see heart rate graph depicting your heart rate during that activity:

Nike+ website heart rate detail

The only problem with the heart rate graph and data provided by the Sportwatch is that it heavily generalizes your heart rate data.  Most heart rate monitors will give you feedback in data blocks as frequent as one-second.  In the case of the Sportwatch, that data is averaged over longer time periods such as laps or entire runs.  As you can see, there isn’t really that much detail offered compared to most heart rate monitors.

When the Polar Heart Rate strap is attached, the unit will utilize heart rate based calorie calculations to generate calorie numbers.  Otherwise, it will utilize weight/height/age based calorie calculations with simple distance/time formulas.

Downloading to your computer:

The Nike+ Sportwatch turns the typical athletic watch downloading experience upside-down on its head.  Normally most devices have a cradle or dock, something that sits in between it and the computer.  In the case of the Sportwatch though, the watch band itself is the connection straight into the computer.  Yup, the band is actually a USB plug.  Check it out:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch USB wristband

From there you literally just plug it into your computers USB port:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch USB wristband charging

Of course, it’s possible that your computer doesn’t have an easily accessible port (such as behind a desktop computer deep under your desk), so in this case they’ve included a handy dandy little USB extender cable that you can plug the Sportwatch into instead:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch USB wristband charging

Once the watch is plugged in, the Nike+ Connect software will automatically launch.  This software will immediately begin downloading your data from the watch to the computer, and then from the computer to the Nike+ site:

Nike+ Connect for Nike+ GPS Sportwatch

The whole process takes about 30-60 seconds for a typical run.  After it’s done uploading your workout/run, it’ll automatically check for any updates on the watch itself.  This is great, as it helps to ensure that your watch stays current:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Firmware Update

In the event an update is available, it will only take a minute or two to download and install.  This includes both firmware updates as well as simple updates to device data such as satellite updates:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Firmware Update for satellites

I’ve already seen that the firmware updates do indeed make a difference.  When the device was first made available I saw some initial issues with satellite accuracy in distance measurement, however the first firmware update fixed that up right away.

Changing Configuration Settings:

Now that you’ve got the watch plugged in, you can take this opportunity to modify a few of the devices configuration settings.  You do this directly within the Nike+ Connect desktop software, and the changes are made immediately on the watch.

The configuration options are divided into four pages.  The first page covers your profile, which allows you to modify things such as weight and height:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Connect Software Setting Changes

The second page covers time and date.  This enables you to either set a given time zone, or simply have the watch sync with your PC.  I love this second option as I travel constantly and can just update the time zone on my PC and the watch follows suit.  Very cool.

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Connect Workout Upload

The third page covers display customization.  This controls the data displayed on the unit while you’re running, sounds, as well as whether to enable run reminders.

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Connect Software Customize

In addition to the display stats shown below (Pace, Distance, Time Elapsed, Calories and Clock), The Nike+ team tell me that Average Pace is on its way in a firmware update shortly – perhaps within a week or so.

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Connect Software Customize

What are run reminders you ask?  Well, if you don’t run for a few days the watch will remind you that it’s time you start running.  Since I have a few of the Nike+ Sportwatch’s around my place right now, I left the broken one off to the side for a few days and noticed it displaying a message telling me to ‘Run again soon’!.

As for the fourth configuration page, it covers lap and interval configuration options.  This includes whether to use automatic laps on a pre-set mileage, or to instead use the automatic tap-to-lap capability (aka: Smack to lap).

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch Connect Lap and Interval Configuration

Additionally, you can setup a basic interval workout here with simple work (run) and rest (walk/lie on the ground) intervals.  You’re unable however to configure a warm-up or cool down, should you want to include that.

Nike+ Website:

Once you’ve uploaded your run the software will automatically open up your Internet browser and display the run you’ve just completed:

Nike+ GPS Website Run Review

From here you can start to dig into the run by clicking on ‘See GPS route’, which will show you the below map of your run:

Nike+ GPS Website Run Review GPS Route

While it’s showing your run route played back as a small animation, it’ll show your instant pace, duration and distance on the right hand side, corresponding with the dot on the map at that point.

Down along the bottom you can choose to display more stats about the route, including splits for each mile – even if you didn’t manually create them during the run:

Nike+ GPS Website Run Review Lap/Splits

You may have noticed above that you can select to go into Nike+ Beta mode, which will launch a separate site that offers a bit more information about your run.  I’ve found the beta mode pretty cool, though it seems to still be a work in progress as it was occasionally unavailable (hence, the beta part).

Nike+ GPS Website Run GPS Hot Zones

Once this releases I’ll swing back to this section and update it accordingly.

The bigger draw of the Nike+ website for many though is the community features.  This includes everything from goal setting of run paces to calorie burn, allowing a way to motivate you to reach your goals:

Nike+ GPS Website Goals

Meanwhile, the Challenges section gives you ways to encourage you to complete a given run or workout.  You can also create your own Challenge.

Nike+ GPS Website Challenges

Additionally, there are built-in coaching plans to different events and distances  This part is really pretty cool, and unlike anything that any other sports device is including out of the box.  The below plan would take me from today until the New York Marathon in 15 weeks.  I also like that you can download the PDF for easy reference offline.

Nike+ GPS Website Featured Challenges

Finally, as you go along you reach different ‘levels’ within the Nike+ site, based on how much you run. 

Nike+ Website Nike+ Levels

Each level has a different meaning, and as you cross levels you get small video messages of encouragement from various celebs:

Nike+ Website New Level Achieved

Now much of the websites infrastructure has been in place for quite some time supporting the various Apple driven Nike+ components such as those involving the footpod and the running app that’s previously been so popular.  So it’s important to keep in mind that they’ve been doing this for quite a while on the web front – and thus they do it really well.

The only complaint I have with the site is around data, and it’s two fold.  Firstly is that the data displayed is very high level, and doesn’t allow you to really zoom in to any detail.  It’s pretty much at the mile-split data height.  Anything under that gets lost in the graphing.  So you can’t zoom in and see minute by minute changes in pace or heart rate.  What’s interesting here though is that Nike+ team has confirmed to me that the data is actually recorded at 1-second intervals – so the data’s there at a deeper level, it’s just not visible at at that level.  Nor do they have any plans to change that level of granularity shown.

The second is the lack of ability to export out the data.  There’s no way to get my data out of the site and into either another program, or even a simple Excel sheet.  At the end of the day, it’s my run and my data – and no matter how much I may love the site, I get fairly annoyed if my training log is completely locked up into Nike’s site forever.  I’d highly encourage them to consider an export function, after all – every single other GPS sports device vendor out there - allows their users to export their run data.  Nike+ should too.

Feature Comparison Chart:

The Nike+ Sportwatch GPS is more comparable to the Garmin FR110 from a feature set standpoint, so I’ve decided to stack rank the two side by side to allow you to get a feel for how the two differ:

Nike+ GPS Sportwatch to Garmin FR110 Comparison

As you can see – both are very similar.  The areas they tend to differ are in the software components and the flexibility pieces.  Both offer heart rate, yet only the Nike+ watch offers footpod compatibility – and actually includes it in the box (the more expensive Garmin FR210 offers footpod compatibility).  On the flip side, the FR210 offers a cycling mode, whereas the Nike+ watch does not.  Both are $199.

Summary:

I think the Nike+ Sportwatch represents a great addition to the GPS-based runners watch market.  It differentiates itself by including some accessories that are usually extra (the footpod for treadmill use) and brings with it new ways of doing old tasks (the slap to lap feature).  The watch also steps up the game when it comes to style, offering a bit of edginess that many may find appealing.

At the same time, I felt like the watch is limiting when it comes to software options.  By restricting users to only using the Nike+ website, they are significantly limiting how we can use our own data.  After all, it is my run.  Like most new watches, it has some minor software bugs – but that’s no different than most other devices out there in the first few firmware releases (Garmin and Timex units most definitely included here), so I’m not as worried about that as I feel these will be resolved pretty quickly.

I also see the potential for new features to be added as the product team gathers feedback from users, and understands better the direction of the product that the community wants it to go in.  As of today though, the Sportwatch GPS is primarily aimed at the runner wanting a very basic data experience in running – whereas over time I could see the watch broadening its reach to different market segments.

Pro’s/Con’s:

Finally, last but not least – here’s the list of pro’s and con’s as I see them today.  If and when things change, I’ll update this section accordingly.

Pro’s:

- Easy to use GPS sports watch
- Fairly fashionable design
- Completely waterproof
- Tap to lap is pretty cool
- Nike+ website is great for new runners, and to keep you motivated with running
- Watch is very easy to configure, ‘just works’
- Software is simply to install and allows configuration of the watch from the computer

Con’s:

- Glass susceptible to breakage
- Limited data field display/selection
- Tap to lap occasionally misfires
- No cycling mode (MPH)
- Unable to export your own data from website in supported way
- Data views/graphing are very high level compared to most watches

Found this review useful?  Here’s how you you can help support future reviews with just a single click!  Read on…

Hopefully you found this review useful.  At the end of the day, I’m an athlete just like you looking for the most detail possible on a new purchase – so my review is written from the standpoint of how I used the device.

The reviews generally take a lot of hours to put together, so it’s a fair bit of work (and labor of love).  As you probably noticed by looking below, I also take time to answer all the questions posted in the comments – and there’s quite a bit of detail in there as well.  If you found this review helpful in your purchasing decision, you can support future reviews like this by using any of the Amazon links (accessories above), or for the actual Nike+ GPS Sportwatch unit.

Thanks for reading!  And as always, feel free to post comments or questions in the comments section below, I’ll be happy to try and answer them as quickly as possible.  Further, you can always e-mail me at the address on the sidebar.  And lastly, if you felt this review was useful – I always appreciate feedback in the comments below.  Thanks!

Finally, I’ve written up a ton of helpful guides around using most of the major fitness devices, which you may find useful.  These guides are all listed on this page here.

93 comments:

Toni April 27, 2011 4:50 AM  

Thanks for the great review - as in-depth as always! We in the southern hemisphere are heading into winter and so most of our runs are now going to be at night. Does the Nike+ have a backlight? Can you read it in the dark?

Thanks
Toni

Matt Fisher April 27, 2011 9:31 AM  

This website allows you to download GPX files of your Nike+ GPS runs: http://eagerfeet.org/ I've done this a few times and uploaded to RunKeeper.com and Garmin Connect for comparison of times and features. The times were actually different for the same run on the different sites after uploading.

Zina April 27, 2011 9:55 AM  

Any word on when these will be available again?

No one seems to have them in stock. Nike is sold out and you can't even put in a placeholder order for when they come in again :(

Maddocks April 27, 2011 9:57 AM  

Thorough and great review. If possible it would be great to see the FR210 added to the comparison chart. Given that the Nike + and 210 are compatible in pricing I'd like to see a side by side comparison how they stack up.

For that matter I'd love to see a review that reposts the table in the 2010 GPS summary updated to include the Nike + and newer Garmin watches.

yaagTRI April 27, 2011 9:59 AM  

all i can see is a broken usb connection in front of my eyes...and tears...many tears.. some nice ideas though.

Colin April 27, 2011 11:43 AM  

You can also sync your Nike+ data with dailymile.com. Not sure how well it works, but you can.

Anonymous April 27, 2011 11:48 AM  

I didn't know the 110 had the courses feature (follow waypoint).

I own the 210 and i haven't seen this feature?

So maybe it's a typo?

BTW regarding the Nike watch: Competition is of course always good, but I have to say that this new watch is ugly. Guess they can improve it in future versions.

Tim K April 27, 2011 12:25 PM  

A co-worker is using the Nike website coaching feature, specifically the walk to run training plan. It tells her to walk for X minutes, run for Y minutes and repeat Z times. Will the training plan download to the watch and alert her when to do what? When she uses her iPod with the Nike+ foot pod, there is currently no alert when to do what. If the watch would alert her/interact with the training plan, she'd buy one tomorrow.

Ohio Triathlete April 27, 2011 1:05 PM  

I also read there is no stopwatch feature. Pretty important in a watch designed for running.

Time2Change April 27, 2011 3:31 PM  

If you like the Nike+ website, you can get the best of both worlds and use it with a garmin watch and heartrate monitor using this upload tool...

http://www.awsmithson.com/tcx2nikeplus/

J April 27, 2011 4:04 PM  

RubiTrack can import all of Your Nike+ data and let You have a closer look. Mac only though (http://www.rubitrack.com/).

You can also get all Your data in wonderful XML format like so:

http://nikerunning.nike.com/nikeplus/v1/services/app/run_list.jsp?userID=

This website provides more detail:
http://labs.interfacedigital.co.uk/2010/03/11/hacking-nike-plus-part-1/

Not sure if other software can make use of the XML file, but it's probably not too hard to convert it into some Garmin format and then import it into your software of choice.

Thank You for the review.

Anonymous April 27, 2011 5:33 PM  

What about changing the battery?
Do you have to send it in to Nike?

Armcaret April 27, 2011 8:08 PM  

Thxs for the review. Do you know how many different fields can be shown at the same time?

Thxs

Jon April 27, 2011 8:36 PM  

Ugh, so torn between this and one of the Garmins. (maybe 405/410?) I'm really thinking that being a newer runner maybe the basics of the Nike would better suit me.

Any advice?

Pablo April 27, 2011 11:47 PM  

I use the nike+ site (logging runs from my ipod touch with the nike + gps app, but no gps data...). This watch seems cheaper than the other "similar" options (like the garmin 210, or 610). But it does much less. As i want to be able to improve my running, wouldn't it be better to go for the 210 with pod and heart rate monitor? It would be about 100$ more, but seems to be worth it, as the 210 seems to deliver more data than the nike watch. Do you agree??

Rainmaker April 28, 2011 12:57 AM  

Hi Toni-
RE: Backlight

Yes, it does include a very nice backlight. I'll snap some photos tomorrow and include them in the review.

Hi Matt, Colin, Time2Change, J
RE: 3rd party ways to pull data

These are all great options where developers of sites have come up with creative hacks to gather data. And as a bit of a geek - I think these are really cool (especially the last link that J posted). But at the same time - it's hard for other companies to invest in supporting the Nike+ watch based on an undocumented and unsupported trick that Nike could change at a moments notice.

I asked specifically whether there were any plans to support API's into Nike+ and the official response was: "We do not have any plans for this option, at this time."

That said, I will be poking around at the XML options a bit more and seeing what can be done with sites like TP, etc...

Hi Maddocks-
RE: FR210 adding to chart

Sure, I can do that. I'll knock it out tomorrow. And indeed, the FR110 with courses was a small typo, I've corrected.

Hi Tim-
RE: Training Plan download to watch

No, you cannot download a training plan to the watch at this time.

Hi Ohio-
RE: Stopwatch (none)

Correct. I did slip that up above in the section regarding pool use, but agree I should make it bolder. I aked about this as well as part of a question around swimming (just using it as a stopwatch since it was fully waterproof) and was told: "Since either GPS or the footpod is required swimming is not an option."

You can use it with the HR strap though as a stop watch.

Hi Armcaret-
RE: Data fields

Two data fields at any one point in time on the Nike+ unit.

Hi John & Pablo-
RE: FR405 or FR410

I'd highly recommend looking at the FR610 over the FR405 or FR410 - a far better watch. Check out my sidebar review for more details. For a more basic watch, I love the FR210, as it includes footpod support (the FR110 does not).

I agree that the FR210 does indeed deliver more data than the Nike+, both in data screens, as well as data recorded (cadence, cycling, etc...)

Martin April 29, 2011 2:35 PM  

Interesting that you mention how a raised rubber bezel would have prevented your screen breakage, as this is a feature of Nike's Mettle range, of which I have both a Chisel and and Anvil Super and both of which have just the kind of built-in screen protection that's lacking on the Sportwatch.

Also, do you know if they'll be available in languages other than English?

Steve April 30, 2011 4:25 AM  

Hi good reviews
I've narrowed things down to either the 210 or the Nike and as new runner from the start of the year which watch of these two would you go for?
410 looks a better option but might be out of my price range. If i get the watch on it's own would the hrm from my Edge305 (plastic strap) work with the 410.

Anonymous April 30, 2011 8:21 AM  

Very nice, in depth review. With regards to the breakage - is there not something like a raised rubber bezel that one can glue to screen, perhaps? Just thinking out loud...

Song Chuah April 30, 2011 12:33 PM  

Hi Ray,

Thanks for another great review.

I have read almost all your reviews and have a suggestion to make which may help those looking to buy a GPS watch to help track their training.

This is quite dear to me but is it possible to include how well a GPS equipment acquire and hold the GPS signal in a city environment (skyscrapers, etc)

Background to this: One of my colleagues and myself wanted to train for our 1/2 marathon later part of the year and we started to go for runs after work (in the city with lots of skyscrapers). My buddy has a Timex Global Trainer and I have a Garmin 305.

What we experienced was quite unexpected, the TGT took a really really long time to acquire a signal and mostly lose it less than 1 km into the run while the 305 had no problems for the entire run (about 12 km).

I'm not sure why an older GPS chip in the 305 can out-perform the new GPS chip in the TGT but I realised that this will be an important feature to consider when buying any GPS watch.

Anyway, your reviews are already great so this is just me sharing my experience.

Thanks

Anonymous May 1, 2011 8:22 AM  

I recently received my Nike sportwatch and I had one possible problem. During the run every time I looked at my pace it showed mid 7 to low 8 minutes. When I finished my avg pace was 8:55. Now honestly I thought the 8:55 was actually what I was running but I dont like the fact that during the run it said I was running about a minute faster. I did not stop for a significant amount of time either. Any thoughts?

Conrad May 3, 2011 8:03 PM  

Good in depth review but I think you are wrong to say it is on a par with a Garmin for accuracy.

I've had mine for about a month and it consistently shows a shorterer distance than it should. Not a huge amount in percentage terms but enough to significantly worsen your time.

For these reasons I'm going to be changing to the 610 when it is available.

Nicole May 4, 2011 4:31 PM  

Great review! Can you set a timer to beep at you during your run? I like my garmin to remind me to eat during my long runs and is wondering if the Nike watch has that feature.

Anonymous May 6, 2011 11:00 AM  

I share the same experience as the post above. The pace shows a minute or so faster then the actual average pace once the information is synced to Nike+.

Any resolution? thoughts?

Richard May 8, 2011 3:43 PM  

I tried mine today in my long run, and the accuracy was very poor. I did run a few short runs (5-10k) during the last weeks, and I got the feeling that the Nike+ was not considering every meter I run. Last Thursday, I went to the track, and after 16 laps (ie 6.4 Km), I got only 6.1 Km.

So today, I took my Blackberry 9700, using Adidas app, and my Nike+ (using also the foot pod). The course was open (no big buildings around), and so was the sky. The results are:

Nike+: 16.68 km
Blackberry (miCoach): 17.45 km
Google Maps: 17.84 km

Difference between Google maps BB: -2.2%, Nike -6.5%;

I also took a split on a measured distance of 3 km (the KM markers of a race that happened earlier today), and the Nike+ reported:

1st Km: 950 m
2nd Km: 870 m
3rd Km: 1020 m

Average difference is -5.6%.

I understand that GPS accuracy is not perfect, and I also undestand this is a matter of adjusting the firmware (mine was updated, but I can´t find the version - the PC SW version is v3.0.6). I hope Nike fix this quickly,because it is a terrific product. On the funny side, now I have to run a little further to keep my weekly mileage ...

Mr. Mom May 9, 2011 4:13 PM  

After doing 3 runs with my sport watch, I have the same issue as the two anonymous posters with the pace times being horribly inaccurate. Easily a minute faster than what I'm actually running. I proved this by running along with my wifes Garmin 210. Also, when you review your run on the website (just like in your pic above) it shows a sudden dropoff where it has to compensate for the actual time/distance run compared to the tracked pace.

It really sucks. I was willing to get over the lack of an average pace because the design of the watch is so awesome....but if I can't even get an accurate current pace, what's the point of keeping it. I plan on calling Nike, and if I get no fix for it, it's going back to the store.

Felix Alicea May 10, 2011 7:20 PM  

Great review. Where did you get the pod attachment you have pictured in the review?

Thanks,
Felix Alicea

Rainmaker May 11, 2011 12:39 AM  

Hi Steve-
RE: FR210 vs FR410 VS Nike+

I'd look at the FR210 as being most competitive to the Nike+, from a feature standpoint. Though, it (FR210) has more features than Nike+ does at the present.

Hi Anon:
RE: Rubber Bezel

Yes, that would indeed solve it...though with a loss of 'sexy' on the watch design. ;)

Hi Song-
RE: Skyscrapers and TGT

There's numerous issues with the Timex Global Trainer and the satellite acquisition and tracking pieces, as evidenced in my Accuracy Tests (on the sidebar).

Hi Anon & Mr. Mom
RE: Different paces

One of the challenges with instant pace is the inability to easily pace on it. I'm looking forward to the addition of an averaged pace - or at least a more stable instant pace.

Hi Conrad & Anon-
RE: Accuracy

I can only base it on my runs - which after the initial update, have been very close to the Garmin (both slightly long and slightly short).

Hi Nicole-
RE: Timer to beep

No, you cannot set additional alarms.

Hi Richard-
RE: Comparison to BB

I'd be highly hesitant to use cell-phone GPS technology with software apps, as it's one of the most inaccurate methods of measurement today - depending on how each app handles GPS interference and issues. It's an area I intend on detailing in some upcoming spring accuracy tests.

That said - I'd agree that the numbers your seeing aren't ideal.

Hi Felix-
RE: Pod Attachment

The footpod comes with the Nike+. The cheap little footpod holder I have can be found here: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001EZ402O/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=dcr07-20&linkCode=as2&camp=217145&creative=399349&creativeASIN=B001EZ402O

Thanks all!

wes May 14, 2011 11:07 PM  

I'm a new reader to your blog and really appreciate these in-depth reviews. Even with its flaws I think you've actually convinced me to go with the Nike+ I have run a marathon but will not be a major competitor. My goal is to run a little faster and a little farther each time for my own benefit so it sounds like this might be the watch for me (not to mention it won't break the bank so I don't earn a scolding from my wife :) ) Thank you again for your in depth reviews.

Anonymous May 16, 2011 2:06 AM  

Brilliant review. love your site.

I have a garmin forerunner 310xt, and notice 'on-line' inaccuracies with pace as well, so don't think that is exclusive to NIke.

Before i used the forerunner, i had a nike+sportband - and became very attached tot he nike software. so easy to use, and was thinking this might get me back to it.

after reading the review, i am sure i will just use the nike site with the sportband, and just stick with the garmin 310 for functionality until i upgrade to the 610 - can't live without the distance and heart rate alarms, particularly for interval training.

Anonymous May 16, 2011 3:43 PM  

FYI - I believe the chipset in this watch is the SiRF GSD4e. (The latest Garmin Forerunners utilize the SiRF GSD4t.)

Arturo Pardo Gonzalez May 19, 2011 1:46 PM  

Hello my name is Arthur and I bought a nike gps watch sportwatch last week and the truth is that I like a lot, but I have a question deleted as careers in the history menu?

Thanks

Sarah B. May 19, 2011 4:15 PM  

Hi DC Rainmaker!

Your posts are great and just what I needed, I have a question for you. Have you tried any of the Garmin forerunners in the gym? Not on the treadmill but to test HR and calorie burn levels on weights, aerobic classes etc.? I'm an aerobics instructor and this information would be of great interest to me, I also regularly run half marathons. I currently track with the Nike+ system (no gps watch, just the footpod) it's decent but I would like something with GPS for more accuracy. Have you or any other readers tested any of the Garmins in this manner? Any input would be greatly appreciated! Also, I've looked at the polar fitness watches, and although I love their capabilities I do not love the giant GPS or footpod units. Thanks!

P.S. I've been looking at the Garmin Forerunner 210 and 405cx...

Ruben May 23, 2011 5:53 PM  

I have seen that you use the sensor in other brand of shoes(new balance) it is posible to get same benefits/information without specific nike+ shoes?

Rainmaker May 24, 2011 12:40 AM  

Hi Wes-
Thanks, enjoy!

Hi Anon-
RE: Plans

Sounds like a solid plan to me.

Hi Anon-
RE: Exact GPS chip

Thanks for the heads up, appreciate it!

Hi Arturo-
RE: Question on careers

I think I may be misunderstanding. Can you clarify? In history, you're seeing your previous runs. Do you mean online?

Hi Sarah-
RE: Forerunners in the Gym and HR

The Forerunners that support heart rate based calorie calcuations would do fine, but those that don't would trouble. Here's a pretty detailed post I put together on all the models:

http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2010/11/how-calorie-measurement-works-on-garmin.html

Hi Ruben-
RE: Footpod sensor

No ties to the Nike+ shoes. They just have a nice little spot for them. Otherwise, you can use it with any shoe you please. Enjoy!

Francisco May 27, 2011 9:43 AM  

Hi !
This is the best review that I saw. Congrats !!

let me ask you a question:

As per I understood the sync with Polar heart rate strap is specific for one kind of Polar heart strap ? I mean...there's nike logo in the polar sensor... If I use another Polar heart rate strap probably will don't be sync !?!? I've one Polar heart rate strap of the same model..but without this nike logo stamped and I'm guessing that will not work. Have you tried sync another Polar heart rate strap with the watch?

Felix May 27, 2011 3:49 PM  

Hi DCRainmaker:

I downloaded a firmware update today from Nike for the Nike Sport Watch GPS and it included the average mileage that you mentioned would be out soon. Just to let you know. You might want to check it out when you get a chance. All the best.

Felix

Darren May 28, 2011 6:53 AM  

Wonderful review!

Just one question: can the Sportwatch do zone alarms with the heart rate monitor, i.e. can you make it beep if you exceed, say, 140bpm or go under 160bpm?

Steve May 30, 2011 11:35 AM  

awesome blog. This is a fantastic review. I just started doing triathlons and I'm starting to look for stuff to help me train. For running I think the Nike would be great for me but I also want something that I could use for cycling. I do already have a speed sensor on my bike, so I'm wondering if the Nike+ will be a better fit for me or the Garmin 405cx. I'd love to have you pro opinion as a triathlete and as a tech guru! Thanks so much! Steve

Anonymous June 1, 2011 8:59 PM  

Thanks for a great review. I have 2 questions

1) the calorie counter, is that based on the heart rate strap and the info it deals with, or simply the persons weight, speed, distance?

2) can the heart rate strap and watch be used while not running to log the heart rate during a weightlifting session or sprint work when milage does not matter?

Thanks!

Allison June 5, 2011 12:01 PM  

Thanks for such a brilliant review. I have now bookmarked your page. I have only recently taken up jogging after spending most of the last 15 years doing classes at the gym. I have been using an app on my android phone to measure my distance when jogging. However, sometimes it hasn't picked up a GPS signal and due to time constraints I have to set off. This is why the nike GPS appeals due to the quick run feature. In your opinion would the nike GPS be better than my phone? Cheers Allison

Emily June 5, 2011 10:50 PM  

Hello
Does the watch measure km/h as well as miles?

Evan June 16, 2011 4:04 AM  

Hey, cool review!


One thing I'm curious about… does this watch have any alarms? Like any decent digital watch would have?

Anonymous June 29, 2011 9:02 AM  

great review,

I was wondering if the nike watch can show actual pace per km instead of an average over the entire run?

thnx

Sander

More than just a verb. July 1, 2011 11:53 AM  

Amazing blog! I just signed up for my second Half Marathon, so I have minor timing goals in mind. I trained with the Nike+ Sport Band and am curious to know if the GPS will sync to the same account? Starting over would be a kink in the chain for me. Any idea?

Tyler July 14, 2011 11:44 PM  

I just bought the watch and updated it. The only problem I'm having so far is logging onto nike plus website! I made 2 new accounts and even tried linking a fb account and could not log on using three different browsers.

I'll be doing some 400 - 800m runs tomorrow so I'll test the accuracy of the watch (just GPS until the pod cases come in---- I don't own nike running shoes). I'm hoping it to be accurate since I really wanted to utilize the pace feature... ESPECIALLY when this watch LACKS a stopwatch/timer feature! I really hope they implement a stopwatch/timer/alarm feature so I can use the watch every day and not just for running.

Anonymous July 16, 2011 12:34 PM  

I purchased one earlier in the week, and I had issues getting the nike connect software to detect the watch. This was an issue with their firmware/software because the computer was detecting the watch. Nike support couldn't resolve the issue, and I found forum complaints about this from 2+ months ago. Disappointing. I returned it for a garmin 210.

Ricardo MartĂ­nez Abril July 19, 2011 1:14 PM  

Great review!!

I am an open water swimmer. My question is if this model records the route in the water, or lose the signal to put the arm in the water?

Thanks
Ricardo from Spain.

Anonymous July 26, 2011 10:33 AM  

I bought this watch and really wanted to like it. Great look, comfortable, stunning display, but that's it. Features are very basic for the price. There are plenty of feature rich watches out there for far less. A Garmin 410 blows this watch away. You are better off buying a $40.00 Timex Ironman and using Google Maps then to buy this watch. Like some have already said, its all flash, no substance. I cant check my heart rate unless a run is initiated. So if I want to keep track of my hr in a weight lifting session or a cool down, I must start a run. The plastic usb connector with a flimsy clasp that snaps over it is likely to break the day after the warranty expires. This watch is for the house league runner that wants a gadget. I returned this for a Timex Global Trainer at the same price and couldn't be happier. Typical Nike flash.

Jeney July 26, 2011 2:38 PM  

Great review! I was considering this watch until I saw it on your fiance's wrist. I'm 5'3 110 and cannot stand it if my watch isn't tight on my wrist. The Nike+ watch doesn't appear to be a good fit for those with smaller frames/wrists. THANK YOU FOR THAT COMPARISON! Can you give an idea of how the Garmin watches match up on the wrist? in terms of size? I obviously don't want something that's super big and heavy either...

Thanks again! Bookmarked your review page!

Rainmaker August 7, 2011 2:08 AM  

Hi Francisco-
RE: Polar Straps

Correct, it's specifically the Polar strap with the Nike+ Symbol

Hi Felix-
RE: New firmware update

Yup, they've added a few new data fields - which is great!

Hi Darren-
RE: Zone alarms

No, not at this time.

Hi Steve-
RE: Speed sensor

It depends, if the speed sensor is ANT+, then the Garmin is the way to go. If not, then it probably won't matter. From a triathletes standpoint I'd go the route of the FR305 or FR310XT.

Hi Anon-
RE: Calorie Counter

It uses the HR strap

RE: Using it while in gym

Yup, see the section in the review on that.

Hi Allison-
RE: GPS Quality better than phone

Yes, it's better than most phone GPS's, and scored fairly well in the GPS accuracy tests.

Hi Emily/Sander/Anon-
RE: KM/H

Yes, it has this option.

Hi Evan-
RE: Alarms

Yes, you can setup basic alarms

Hi More than just a verb-
RE: Nike+ account

Yup, all to the same account

Hi Anon-
RE: Swapping for FR210

Hope it's working out for you!

Hi Ricardo-
RE: Openwater swimmer

It would model the water route if you use the swimcap method (see sidebar), otherwise no, it won't work in the water on your wrist from a mapping standpoint.

Hi Anon-
RE: Thoughts on which watch

Generally agree with what you've said on watch options.

Hi Jeney-
RE: Watches for smaller wrists

She uses the FR310XT generally speaking, but she also has a FR60 that's smaller for her. The FR110, 210, 610 all work fine for her. The FR405/FR410 are a bit bulky though. For smaller watches, I'd recommend either the FR210 or FR610.


Thanks all, and sorry for the delay here - been a bit of a crazy few months with wedding and honeymoon, just getting a chance to catchup on all the past comments.

JBurkhardt August 13, 2011 10:57 AM  

Thank you for your review. I tried the sports watch out when first released and found it to be very inaccurate. I just purchased it again for another try and the firmware update has fixed the accuracy problems and I NOW really enjoy using this watch. My wife uses the Nike iPhone GPS app and we are very, very close after every run. I realize that maybe the accuracy is not the greatest compared to others on the market but it gives us a decent idea how far we have ran. We have only been running now just under 1 year and enjoy doing this together. We have even entered a couple races already. :-) Keep up the good work loving your reviews!

dreetn66 August 16, 2011 11:47 AM  

this watch shouldn't have been released. after 3 months my watch is no longer recognized via usb
http://forums.nike.com/thread.jspa?threadID=37255

mdjenni August 17, 2011 4:25 AM  

Hi. I just went to the Nike store yesteday to have a look at the Nike GPS watch myself. They told me they have stopped to sell it as they had many returns as the watch does not link with the Polar transmitter. Any experience on that?

Pepijn August 22, 2011 8:29 AM  

Great review, just found your site because a coworker has this watch and referred me to this review as I was interested in it... I'm tempted mainly by the nike site behind it and the social features, to help me stay motivated, as I'm a very new runner.

One thing I did notice though, you say 5 atm is about 50 meters under water. Not that it really matters that much, but it's actually about 40 meters. Every 10 meters you dive the pressure level increases by 1 ATM, but since at sealevel you already start with 1 ATM (pressure from the air around you) you end up at 5 ATM at 40 meters depth. Not that anyone that doesn't know that would ever dive to 40 meters (I'm only certified to dive to 18 meters myself, and that's pretty deep already imho), but figured I'd leave a note anyway. It's a very widespread misconception actually, my own (normal) watch says both 5 bar (roughly the same as 5 atm) and 50 meters on the back as well.

Anonymous August 23, 2011 11:41 AM  

hey dc rainmaker
i just have a few questions i need answered in relation to this watch, any help is appreciated

is it possible to lap split without using the tap function ie can you set it as a button instead?

is it possible to view lap splits (non-automatic splits) after completing a run?

also can you view the cumulative time of the run and the elapsed time of the split during the run (like a traditional lap watch)

thank you so much for your feedback

T.O.guy August 25, 2011 11:58 AM  

thanks for a great in-depth review, DC. I wish I read this before purchasing the watch!

To answer questions from the previous poster:

1) The watch records laps either automatically, or via tap function depending on the settings. There is no other way to record laps.

2) Yes, lap stats are viewable on the watch after a run and when uploaded to the Nike+ website. It does not matter if the laps were recorded automatically or by tapping, if that was your question.

3) Yes and yes. Elapsed run time is one of the scrollable options that you get to by pressing up or down button, and elapsed lap time is set as the main display when you select auto laps.

My biggest beef with the watch (actually two):

- No fixed backlight. Come on Nike, do you think people only run during the day?

- No average lap pace DURING THE RUN. This is completely retarded and needs to be fixed ASAP. Every Garmin watch has this, and every GPS watch must have it as a bare minimum.

Anonymous September 5, 2011 6:44 PM  

Hi DC Rainmaker:

I just wanted to congratulate you and your newlywed wife. All the best!

Regards,
Felix

Ismael September 6, 2011 8:09 AM  

Hello, do you know if the band polar nike + is compatible with Garmin watches?. It is assumed that the two work on the same frequency 2.4 Gz.
Thanks for the product reviews you do.
Greetings.

Rainmaker September 19, 2011 3:05 PM  

Hi Ismael-

No, the two companies use different and non-compatible technology. Sorry!

Ivan September 26, 2011 6:33 PM  

Im planning on getting a new sport watch, so the question here is (after reading all the comments and the review) with the new nike firmware, which one would you recommend? the Garmin 210, 410 or the Nike Sport Watch?

Anonymous October 4, 2011 8:47 PM  

Just a warning on the 5 ATM depth rating. This can be very misleading. The actual depth a 5 ATM watch is good for is not going to be anywhere near 50m. This is due to the test being conducted in a pressurised canister of water with no movement. Introduce movement (currents etc) and the depth drops dramatically. Also, using buttons/functions at ANY depth is not tested unless there is an ISO6425 (created for diving watches) certification along with the 5 ATM rating.
5 ATM (ISO2281) basically means you can get it wet but swim at your own risk.
Just want to save someone from wasting their $200.
:)

Anonymous October 9, 2011 10:19 PM  

Excellent review!
Similar to the poster before me, i'm in between NIKE GPS WATCH ($200) - GARMIN 405CX Refurb ($170) - GARMIN 210 ($200) at the moment..
Running mostly but would be nice if i can track my heart rate while cycling..already have a speedometer..THanksssss guys

Anonymous October 9, 2011 10:20 PM  

Excellent review!
Similar to the poster before me, i'm in between NIKE GPS WATCH ($200) - GARMIN 405CX Refurb ($170) - GARMIN 210 ($200) at the moment..
Running mostly but would be nice if i can track my heart rate while cycling..already have a speedometer..THanksssss guys

Rizal October 15, 2011 1:03 PM  

wow great review,

i'm interested about ur nike service, i owned a nike + watch remote, and it broke down less than 1 year,
i've been googling and send tons of emails to nike, never had any satisfactory answer, and until now i can not find any way to contact nike on how to repair the watch,

could you give me the emails/phone number on how to contact nike customer service?

thanks a million

Stevie October 17, 2011 4:31 PM  

DC have you heard about the widespread problems people are having with the watch not interacting with their computers? The nike forum is a buzz with it. I'm on my 3rd watch. Nike don't know what's going on either.

Rob October 25, 2011 8:32 PM  

Rainmaker,

Your reviews are really awesome. I am the captain of my XC team (high school) and as part of our end of the year banquet I have managed to raise enough money to buy each of our two coaches a new GPS watch. Obviously you have great experience with just about every watch on the planet, so your opinion is greatly appreciated in helping me make the right decision. I've got about $200 for each watch, and the coaches are both teachers who would wear the watches all day, not only on the run. They both run about an hour a day and both do trail runs in the mountains (we live in colorado) every weekend. The FR405 was my original choice, but the bezzel has really turned me off. What would you suggest? Thank you so much

-Rob

Anonymous October 27, 2011 6:46 PM  

Hello Mr. Rainmaker,
some questions.

I would like to know if it's possible to see the "Speed" (in Km/H) instead of the Pace (in Min/Km) on this watch.

And, when there is, can you please tell me how to change this in the settings so I can see this ???

Is there also a "Average-speed" to be seen on the screen ???

And can we trust on this "Average-speed"-value ???

Thanks !!!
Iwan,

Holland.

Anonymous October 27, 2011 7:10 PM  

Another question,

is the "Average-speed" during the run to be seen or just after when you have finished your run ???

Thanks again !!!

Great site with good information,

Iwan,
Holland.

TEETS October 28, 2011 10:41 AM  

Wondering how good the watch would be for walkers and not runners?

Would it work the same?

eqipo.es October 29, 2011 6:00 PM  

Great review!

Just one question, can I use the ipod charger? I am now abroad and I do not have a PC...

Thanks!!

José luis

eqipo.es October 29, 2011 6:02 PM  

Great review!

Just one question, can I use the ipod charger? I am now abroad and I do not have a PC...

Thanks!!

José luis

Tonny November 14, 2011 8:26 AM  

Hi!
Thank you for your review.
5ATM is 40 meters. At least it is what PADI tells you if you take diving course. Normally you don't dive that deep, so watch will work for any water activities.
Still, Nike+ is really great comunity to find motivation and make me go out and run. But - it's childish level. If you consider real training, then you need some real GPS-clock with detailed information about your runs.
If your still want to have Nike+ information, there is a web-page that can help you to transfer your Garmini data to Nike+: http://www.awsmithson.com/tcx2nikeplus/

I'm using Nike+SportBand at the moment (had it for almost 3 years) but I think it's time to move on. Thanks to your review it will probably be FR210.

Anonymous November 20, 2011 11:27 AM  

Hello.
Is possible to get more then 2 parameters on screen. If we have 4 or 5 parameters on screen, will be briliant.

Marco November 25, 2011 8:16 AM  

Hello ,its time to made a new review after the big changes in the FW of Sportwatch +GPS...

Dale December 5, 2011 10:58 PM  

Thanks for a great review. Any update with the latest firmware? I am debating to get this one or the Garmin 305. The305 for it's price point or the Nike for the sleekness.

Thanks

Martin December 25, 2011 8:54 AM  

Like the review, very usefull.

The new firmware seems to be better, I do Agree with your view on the data , not being detailed enough.

I have been looking around a bit and found a exellent piece of software called trail runner (Sorry mac only).
check http://trailrunnerx.com/.

I have also been looking for a windows version, could not find one so far, I'll let you know once i will find it.

tenata December 29, 2011 10:18 AM  

Hello together

I have this watch but till now I can't connect to my PC. I tried a lot of times without succes. Can anyone tell me how to adjust the time.

Greetings

Scott We Go January 5, 2012 2:59 PM  

Can you toggle the display while running? My dad complains he can't see his time or pace as he's running because it's too small in the upper corner. Any way to get that to show on the larger numbers?

Anonymous January 5, 2012 4:11 PM  

It looks like the new update DOES have a "mph" option in the setup section. If you update the review you might want to include that.

Thanks for the great reviews!

Phil January 6, 2012 9:06 PM  

Outstanding review of the product. I have had the Nike GPS for about 3 weeks, and I love that it is so easy to use. I have one issue if anyone can help me. I just went for a run and forgot to turn off the unit. When I drove home to upload the data I realized that I had 'run' 38 miles at a pace of 3 minutes a mile. Obviously the GPS picked up info from my drive. The run did not upload to the site and I can not figure out how to delete it from my watch. Any help or suggestions on this?

-Phil

Elizabeth January 19, 2012 11:19 AM  

Hi Ray!

I have the Nike+ Sportswatch from when it first came out last year. For Christmas, I received the Nike+ Polar heart rate monitor. It wouldn't like. I called Nike, they had me do a few resets and the like. Still no go. I called Polar and they had me ship it back. Received new monitor and still not working! Called Nike again who tried a few things and ended with "well R&D is looking into and we have had a few lemons where they won't like - it isn't you". They said they'll keep me posted but offered nothing to resolve.

Any thoughts or suggestions on how to continue to follow up with them? It seems absurd that they can't do anything about it and I just have to live with it!

Anonymous January 23, 2012 3:38 AM  

Thx for another great review.

IMO this watch will be a real "garmin killer" if they release a firmware update which allows a you to see speed (km/h and mph) AND altitude. Shouldn't take much effort!

Ole January 25, 2012 12:40 AM  

For intervals, does the watch beep? Or can you also make it vibrate? I'd like to wear headphones, and just have the watch vibrate when the interval/rest period is over. Any watches to this? thanks

dale.seiler February 2, 2012 6:56 PM  

As other posters have asked, would you mind adding an addendum addressing the changes made to the firmware this past...October, I think. At present, I am on the fence between the Nike+ GPS Sportwatch and something from Garmin. Updated comments on the FW would help in the decision making process.

Roger February 10, 2012 3:48 AM  

Hi, great review of the product. Unfortunately, my experience after using it for about 1.5 months (I got it for Christmas 2011, it's now mid Feb 2012) is less positive. My watch started getting the dreaded USB Device Not Recognised error that is all over the Nike facebook support app intermittently about 2 weeks after receiving it and I´ve now not been able to get the watch to sych for about 2 weeks of runs. I found this review while doing web searches to try and fix it (Nike tech support not very helpful to fix, they just say return). Nike´s advice on face book and after trying to troubleshoot it is to return the product to the store, which I guess I´m going to do. When working, the product is ok, but it´s incredibly frustrating not being able to upload runs. Web search turns up this is pretty common. I´m going to return it to the store, exchange it for some nice Nike running clothes and then get either a Suunto or a Garmin...as well as try and come up with a good `story` for the person that gave it to me. Honest advice from someone that used it - if you want Nike+, get the Nike+ band instead, if you want GPS and heart rate monitoring, get one of the aforementioned brands.

Dan February 11, 2012 4:59 PM  

If you could have just one GPS watch, would you buy? I'm torn between the Nike+ Sportwatch or the Garmin 210. Thank you.

TT February 15, 2012 10:07 AM  

Great review! The only thing i have to mention is about altutude recording. The Device records altitude data from gps. You can have a look at that in the details of a run on the nikeplus site. When using Eagerfeet.org or nike-plus-php to get the gps data there is also elevation in it.

- TT

Billy C. February 17, 2012 2:32 AM  

Just want to warn those interested in the Nike+ Sportwatch GPS to strongly consider another alternative. The watch seemed to work well, but I suffered the same fate as many other users have with the watch not being recognized by the Nike+ software on several computers (multiple Mac and PCs). In fact, I returned my watch once and then had the same problem with another watch. Extremely frustrating, especially since I am a long standing user of the Nike+ platform. Look elsewhere for a watch with GPS and heart rate monitoring. Total fail by Nike in my book.

Anonymous February 21, 2012 3:07 AM  

First off, I just wanted to say I love your reviews. I'm going to be starting highscho cross country next year, and due to me not wanting my watch to get stolen, I plan on wearing it for the duration of the scho day. This means aesthetics are a big deal to me, so I was looking at the Nike sport watch. I wouldbt say that I'm a novice runner, but I don't need all of the features the carmine offer. Would you say that this would be a good watch for my situation? Thanks for any reply

Anonymous February 21, 2012 3:08 AM  

And sorry for all the typos, when I put carmine I meant garmin

mavpk February 23, 2012 1:28 AM  

What a great review! Today on one of my runs, my watch cracked. I just got off the phone with Nike and they said they cant do anything about it, what support line did you call? Do you have any other suggestions?

milerxc February 23, 2012 5:25 PM  

Im a serious highschool runner who logs roughly 65 miles a week. In the past, I have run with the nike sportband. It served my purposes well, but as my training became more intense, I began to consider higher end gps watches- something that had more features that would help me track what I was doing. The sportwatch caught my eye and after some research, I ended up buying one. Best decision of my running career! It rises to any possible expectations and surpasses them. While in a run, you can keep track of distance, elapsed time, instant pace, avg pace, calories, and the actual time. It has features for lap counting and lap splits, and you can even program interval workouts. Additionally, its backlight makes night runs a non-issue. In a recent software update, a very detailed stopwatach feature has been added that can run even when a run is not in progress. Some concern has also been raised over the expediency of the gps locator. From my experience, it has taken no longer than 10 seconds to locate a satellite in a suburban to rural setting.
The menues and software are very user friendly and effortless. Through the nike website, you can see your running routes mapped out. It allows you to find all the stats for any given point during your run, including the elevation. Some cyclists have shown concern over the display of speed in mph. This is one of the many customizable settings that can be choosen. Overall, the watch has been an extremely satisfying purchase. So I recommend it with the highest regards.

  © Blogger template 'Isolation' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP