Strava’s New Instant Workouts Feature: Does it actually work?

YouTube video

Last week Strava launched their new ‘Instant Workouts’ feature, which leans on Strava’s acquisition of Runna (and probably also their acquisition of The Breakaway, too). The app is for subscribers only, but aims to give the user a weekly set of five workouts, in each of four categories. But more than that, it also will automatically give the user a suggested route for each workout.

In concept, this sounds super interesting, and would be the first logical steps towards true Runna integration (the company has repeatedly stated though that they plan to keep Runna separate). Still, at the end of the day, the overwhelming majority of their users are within the Strava platform, not the Runna platform. And with this feature being subscriber only, the goal is clearly to keep users signed up, or convert them.

Except, the problem is, the feature as currently implemented is proper dumpster fire level. Sadly, I didn’t have my Dumpser Fire t-shirt when I filmed this. It’s in a moving box somewhere, and I’m not surely sure where. Probably time for a new one, the previous one was perhaps a bit to subtle anyway.

In any case, in the video I walk through it all properly, but I want to highlight some of the aspects here. First up, it’ll show up at the top of your app when logged in, and the recommendations get refreshed each Monday. Within this, there’s a set of four core areas: Maintain, Build, Explore, Recover.

The categories are relatively self-explanatory, except that ‘Explore’ is meant to be more than just exploring routes, but rather other sport types too. Each of these four areas gets five workouts, mostly a mix of run and ride (at least for me). Perhaps if someone didn’t run/ride, they’d get a more skewed selection of other types.

The very first workout I got offered was this 500m madness one. Which, was pure madness. It was telling me to go throw-down 500m intervals at “my 5K pace”, which it somehow identified at a 16-minute 5K time. These intervals are bonkers fast, at 3:21/km (5:24/mi). And we’ll set aside all the nomenclature wonkiness in how this was written in the instructions.

I tried to figure out where the heck it was pulling a 16-minute 5KM time from, and after some digging, it seems like a run with the Oura ring in late October might be the culprit. That run had some pretty wonky GPS tracks, which heavily increased the distance, making it look like I ran faster than I did.

But critically, removing that run (and waiting a few days), hasn’t caused the algorithm to adjust (as other platforms do). And more notably, that single run happened nearly 3 months ago, with no other runs to support that time standard. Surely all my other recent run data (putting me probably in the 19-minute 5KM range), would have fixed things by now anyway, right?

But honestly, that’s not the biggest issue here – we’ll get to that. First, we’ve got the route suggestions included with all outdoor workouts. These are downright horrific. For these VO2Max 500m efforts, it recommended a fairly technical trail run as my route (including ravines). For some of the 2hr+ rides, it recommended literally doing loops around the block. Like, not kidding, simply doing loops of my street.

Now, before we talk about the true single biggest issue, let’s briefly touch on cycling. From a workout suggestion standpoint, these aren’t too bad. Mostly. For the Build ones, these seemed on the upper end of spicy, but most of them probably doable (though, the routes, still horrific neighborhood loops – ironic given I literally live in a cycling mecca with amazing routes).

Vlcsnap 2026 01 13 16h33m12s588. Vlcsnap 2026 01 13 16h33m38s878.

The one route that seemed most side-eye-worthy was a ‘Recovery Ride’ that was 2.5hrs long (one titled “Steady Endurance Ride”), and included “tempo” sections, seen above. Those seem to be at odds with each other.

What’s most baffling to me here is that I’d argue Strava is the king of making generally quite good routes. Really good routes in most cases. I use it near-daily for route generation, and is the core reason I pay for Strava. Sure, every once in a while on longer routes you get a bit of random Uncle Strava Spice mixed in, but that’s (usually) part of the fun.

However, the biggest problem is that you can’t actually push the workout to any GPS watch. Or for that matter, can’t even see the darn workout in the app once you start the workout. I’m not kidding. It gives you an immensely complex workout (with wonky non-standard wording), but the only way to see it once in the workout is if you screenshotted it. Or, perhaps printed it out, old-school style.

The company said in a Reddit post that pushing workout integration to Garmin & Apple devices is upcoming soon, though I question how realistic that “soon” piece is. After all, everything I’ve heard indicates the relationship between Garmin & Strava remains icy at best right now, following this past fall’s lawsuit fiasco. There’s no reason Garmin would need to move fast on implementing this, merely to make Strava’s investors happier.

Look, I actually think this type of feature could be a game-changer for the Strava subscription longer term, but how they’ve implemented it here is nothing more than media fodder to try and boost interest ahead of their IPO. This feature should have absolutely launched with ‘push workout to device’ included, as well as workouts that actually made sense, with wording that actually makes sense. Right now, none of those things appear to be present in most cases.

Strava has the potential here to lean heavily on their routing portions. Something virtually none of the upstairs AI competitors can do, since they lack the literal billions of historical route/activity data that Strava has. And, as I’ve said – it’s one of the most valuable and best pieces of the Strava platform. Hopefully, at some point they can combine those elements together correctly, and I’ll be the first to give them kudos for it.

With that – thanks for reading (or watching!).

FOUND THIS POST USEFUL? SUPPORT THE SITE!

Hopefully, you found this post useful. The website is really a labor of love, so please consider becoming a DC RAINMAKER Supporter. This gets you an ad-free experience, and access to our (mostly) bi-monthly behind-the-scenes video series of “Shed Talkin’”.

Support DCRainMaker - Shop on Amazon

Otherwise, perhaps consider using the below link if shopping on Amazon. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. It doesn’t cost you anything extra, but your purchases help support this website a lot. It could simply be buying toilet paper, or this pizza oven we use and love.

Tags:

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
If you would like a profile picture, simply register at Gravatar, which works here on DCR and across the web.

Click here to Subscribe without commenting

Add a picture

*

2 Comments

  1. Alex

    In my case, the workouts Strava suggests are ok both in terms of running pace and biking power. Even the routes Strava selected are fine for executing those workouts. And the bike workouts even have proper distances :)

    But unless they push these workouts to my Garmin or TrainingPeaks, I won’t be using the feature.

  2. Johan

    Something that makes everything even more complicated is that Strava only has 1 HR profile. If you are a triathlete you must chose tom use your running HR zones or your cycling HR zones. For serious training you need other parties like TrainingPeaks that does both.