JUMP TO:

BUY NOW:

  • Clever Training

The Favero bePRO Power Meter In-Depth Review

IMG_5618

In many ways, the bePRO power meter is the little unknown underdog that snuck onto the scene earlier this summer with a very simple declaration: We’re here, we’re new, we’re cheap, and we’ve already started shipping. How ‘bout them apples?

The unit retails for €749EUR globally, with the local price simply based on the current exchange rate.  So for US folks, that’s approximately $835USD, for those in Australia it’s $1,196AUD, and for those in Uzbekistan it’s 2,185UZS.  Note that this is for the dual-leg system (two pedals).  Whereas they also make the bePRO S version, which is a single pedal for 499EUR.  For this review, I’m reviewing the dual-system.  The single leg system simply doubles the left-leg power, but otherwise works identically.

These prices are notable because this is the cheapest dual-sided system on the market today actually shipping.  Sure, there are others that have promised shipping soon or planned to ship in the recent past – but nobody else is actually shipping a product in this price range today.

Favero, the manufacturer of the bePRO, sent me a unit back in July to try out, and I’ve had it on my bike now for about 45 days through a wide assortment of weather and conditions.  As is always the case, once I wrap-up with the product review here shortly, I’ll box it back up and send it back to them.  Just the way I roll.

With that – let’s get into the unit.

Unboxing:

IMG_4360

To start, we’ve got a fairly large box, sorta like a skinny shoe box, but longer.

Inside facing upwards towards you, you’ll find the two pedals.  As you can see, the pods are permanently affixed to the units.

IMG_4362

IMG_4369

Next, we’ll remove the upper layer of the box, where you’ll find the second elevated tier.  This includes tools that’ll be used to attach the pedals to your bike.

IMG_4371

If we work our way down to the bottom of the box, we’ve got a slew of parts.  So I’ve taken them all out and laid them on the table.  Here’s what we’ve got inside (roughly from top to bottom):

A) Two pedals
B) One alignment tool (long skinny/flat black tool)
C) One pedal wrench (black, looks like a wrench)
D) Long hex wrench
E) Two cleats and shoe installation screws
F) Two pedal alignment tools (silver, round and long)
G) USB charger with two micro-USB cables, crapton of adapters for different countries
H) Manual and other paper stuff
I) Table not included
J) Small sticker/card with ANT+ ID numbers, serial numbers (sitting atop left manual page)
K) Four alignment stickers (on photo just below cleats)

IMG_4378

Phew – lots of stuff!

Grouping things together for a better look, here’s the installation pieces in one pile:

IMG_4396

Then we’ve got the power adapter (universal), plugs, and extra long micro-USB cords:

IMG_4382

Then the cleats:

IMG_4393

Finally, the pedals themselves.  Each pedal is identical.  Note that there are two different bePRO product options though.  One that has a single pedal, and one that has two pedals (sorta like Garmin Vector & Vector S).  I’m only testing the dual-pedal system.

IMG_4399

While the pedals can screw into virtually any crank arm out there, it does take a special tool to do so correctly.

IMG_4410

With everything unboxed, let’s briefly look at how it compares.

Weights & Sizes:

IMG_4407

Perhaps the most common question is whether or not the bePRO pedals change your ‘q-factor’.  No (in case you were wondering).  The above is an example of the bePRO sitting atop a standard Look KEO pedal; they’re identical (the photo skews things slightly).

Never mind the fact that your q-factor actually changes if you go from road to mountain bike, or that somehow some imply that as humans we’re all destined to have the same q-factor despite varying sizes (or the fact that we tweak every other aspect of the bike down to the last millimeter, but almost never q-factor).  Yes, I’m highly cynical of q-factor concerns since there are actually no real published scientific studies on the topic (that cover longer timeframes than just a single point in time snapshot).

Pedal-PowWow

But of course, none of that matters (and my tangent can be saved for another day) – since the q-factor here is identical.

As for weight, here’s a few common competitors.  In a nutshell, the 156g of the bePRO pedal is the lightest of the ones here. I didn’t weigh the Polar/Look KEO pedal, but officially it comes in at 199g per pedal.  Obviously, I’m only showing one pedal – simply use those advanced calculus skills to double the number seen for total weight.

bePRO-Weight-OnePedal

Keo-Pedal-Weight

Garmin-Vector2-WEight

PowerTapP1-Weight-LeftPedal

Note that all of the images above include all mounting hardware required for a base installation; it’s possible some bikes may require an extra washer or two per crank arm (less than a gram).  If that concerns you, don’t eat that next potato chip.  It’ll work out.

Installation/Configuration:

Now, I’ve gotta be a bit more blunt than usual here.  When I first opened up the box and looked at all the installation parts, I basically muttered a string of expletives.  I wanted something that’d be quick and simple to get going – and in looking at the box or parts, it looked like a complete cluster-duck.

But here’s the thing I found out – in reality, it’s actually not that bad.  The first time you’ll probably be a bit confused, but once you do it once it makes total sense.  And now I’ve moved it between numerous bikes without issue and can do it easily in less than 5 minutes.  Here, let’s start.

In my case I was using an updated PDF copy of the manual, hence the laptop:

IMG_5519

First, you’re going to grab one of your long silver tubes.  These are used as braces for applying the alignment stickers to the cranks.  You can see I’ve screwed it into the crank arm.  However, I forgot to put in the thin (flexible) black tool you’ll see in the next photo.

IMG_5520

So, in my case I un-screwed it and put in that piece first, and then simply twisted in the other side. Captain Obvious notes that if you do this correctly, you shouldn’t be able to turn your crank arm very far.

IMG_5522

Next you’ll grab your four-pack of stickers.  These are simply used to allow you to align the pedals later on.  After you finish installation, these stickers serve no purpose on your bike.

IMG_5524

Now, here’s something I’ve learned in re-installing the stickers multiple times: You’ve only got four of them.  Thus if you have two bikes and want to install it somewhere else (a weekend getaway onto a rental bike), you’re hosed.  Instead, you can simply not push the sticker on very hard, and once installation is done, just peel it gently off and put it back on the sticky paper.  Forever stickers!

See, you just stick it in the little rectangular window:

IMG_5525

Now, do the whole thing on the other side again:

IMG_5527

IMG_5530

With your stickers set, remove all of the tools you just had and throw them back in the box.  You won’t need them again.  Next, grab your pedals, the lock nut (usually on pedals already, but just in case), and a spare washer.

IMG_5532

IMG_5535

Then, somewhat gently screw it into your crank arm.  The manual implies doing this by hand, but realistically that’s a pain in the ass.  Instead just use the hex wrench to do it quickly, but don’t tighten it.

IMG_5540

At this point in the manual, Favero would like to remind you that if you screw this up – it’s totally your fault:

image

Next, you’ll take your pedal and loosen it (yes, loosen) until the line on the pod lines up with the line on the sticker.  Roughly like this (minus the wrench, didn’t have the right photo on the plane):

IMG_5546

Finally, you’re going to do a two-handed maneuver.  This involves both the pedal wrench and the hex wrench.  You’ll simply pull them in the directions that the arrows on the pedal wrench tell you to.

IMG_5545

There is no need for a torque wrench here, just screw it down until it feels tight.  Pedals will automatically self-tighten and settle out over the next few rides.

Repeat for the other side:

IMG_5548

And done.

You’ll simply go ahead and pair your head unit to your bePRO using either the search function (for a power meter), or by entering in the ANT+ ID manually if you want:

IMG_5551

With everything physically installed, we’ll move onto using the system.

General Use Overview:

IMG_5594

By and large the bePRO system is pretty easy to use and pretty straightforward.  They recommend that prior to each ride you do a simple ‘calibration’ procedure (aka Zero Offset), from your head unit.  This is simply just waking up the cranks and then pressing the calibrate button on your head unit.

IMG_7683

The process only takes a few seconds to complete, in which case you’ll get a calibration value (0 hopefully) returned.

IMG_7691

In addition to this they also offer a ‘Dynamic calibration’ option.  This is sorta similar to what Garmin does with Garmin Vector, but just with a little less finesse than Garmin does (in large part because Garmin owns the head unit and can thus make this process neat and tidy for their own power meters).  This process actually just changed slightly in the latest firmware update.  Previously you used the calibrate menu to trigger it, but now you backwards pedal 10 times.  Beyond that the steps are the same.

With the dynamic calibration option you’re aiming to correct for any tiny little shifts to how well the pods fit against the crank arm.  As some of you know, certain power meters require a bit of settling in, and bePRO is one of those.  That means that you want to get in a few rides, with some varied efforts (i.e. short hard sprints) to try and get things all settled.

What the dynamic calibration does is to recalibrate the pedals based on that.  To do a dynamic calibration after backwards pedaling 10 times you’ll start forwards pedaling at an 80RPM cadence.

You’ll need to continue pedaling at 80RPM (+/- 5RPM) for another 30 seconds, where the bePRO units will continue transmitting your cadence values.  Previously you received a calibration value, however now you do not.  That value was actually kinda useful in figuring out if things were still shifting a bit.

IMG_5605

What I’ve found in changing the pedals to/from different bikes four times now, is that it takes on average 2-4 rides until things settle with the bePRO power meter.  That’s roughly in the ball park of some other power meters, such as Vector and Quarq.  As noted above, I’d highly recommend doing some short sprints (i.e. 15-20 seconds) at whatever max power level you can spit out.  Ideally if you’ve just installed the pedals inside, just do these on a trainer.

(Tip: As a general rule anytime I make pedal/bottom bracket/crank changes on a bike, I do a few short sprints on a trainer to validate everything is good and sound.  My reasoning being if I’ve totally screwed something up, at worst that part would break and I just semi-harmlessly fall to the ground inside going 0MPH, versus in a sprint going 30MPH on asphalt with traffic/etc.)

Note that you can do this process both inside and outside.  I’ve done it both places.  Do note however that if you do it outside, during the time period where you’re doing the dynamic calibration, it will not transmit ANY ANT+ power stream to your head unit, so you’ll get a little time gap like this:

image

No big deal of course (and kinda logical), but just to be aware of later when analyzing your files (it’s also been noted in the latest edition of the manual).

Next, we’ve got battery usage and consumption.  The unit has rechargeable batteries within each of the small pods.  Those pods are charged via micro-USB port, just like most cell phones (non-iOS).  The bike comes with a dual USB port charging cable setup, which works well:

IMG_7665

It has nice long cables for each one, making it super easy to get to the right spots on your bike.

IMG_7662

IMG_7658

Now in theory the system is rated for 30 hours per pedal.  And at first I was on-target for that, no problem.  In fact, I didn’t charge it once from the end of July till almost the end of August.  Great!  But then I found a snag: Movement.

See, during that one month period I didn’t travel with my bike, rather, it left the DCR Cave/Studio and went for a ride and returned to the same spot and then waited for me to ride it again.  But then I went on a roadtrip, and with that there was the train ride down, lots of driving, etc… Before I knew it, I was re-charging my batteries again.

And then a mere 4-5 days later, I was doing it again.  It appears that there might be some bug in the unit not properly falling asleep when moving.  Though, even then it doesn’t really account for the massive gap in battery performance in doing it again just a few days later (i.e. that’d be way more travel than I did).  Since I’ve stopped travelling with the bike, I haven’t seen any battery issues since.  Perhaps it was just a one-off, I’ve noted it to Favero and they’re digging into it a bit, though it may be tougher to replicate.

Compatibility with head units:

IMG_7681

The bePRO power meter is compatible with any ANT+ head unit that supports power meters.  This would be most of the Garmin Edge units above $200, as well as the PowerTap (Joule), Sigma and O-Synce head units.  Along with many other devices and apps out there.

It should be noted that it does not support Bluetooth Smart at this time, which is a bit odd in that many sensors and power meters are now shifting towards dual (concurrent) ANT+/Bluetooth Smart.  So the bePRO would not work with the Suunto Ambit 3 or the Polar M450/V800/V650 units.

Still, for those devices that it does support, the pairing process is pretty simple.  I’m using a Garmin Edge 810 here for simplicity’s sake, but you can use any device you’d like.  First up, you’ll search for the unit:

IMG_7682

Then, once you find it you’ll want to set the crank length on that bike/sensor.  To do so you’ll go into either sensor or bike settings (depends on the bike computer).

IMG_7687

With that set up, you’ll want to do at least one calibration here per the earlier section.  After that, the unit is ready to roll.

While riding you’ll get metrics such as power, cadence, torque efficiency, and pedal smoothness.  Because this is a crank region based power meter, you will not get speed (that will instead come from GPS or a speed sensor).  Within the settings, the unit will also transmit current status:

IMG_7685

IMG_7686

Note that the bePRO units do NOT support Garmin Cycling Dynamics.  Garmin makes that fully private and is only available to Garmin Vector & Vector 2 devices, not 3rd party devices.

Below is a compatibility table.  There are essentially a few key items that are required in order for the bePRO unit to be fully supported.  They are:

A) Ability to set crank length
B) Ability to display left/right power
C) Ability to display Torque Effectiveness and Pedal Smoothness (optional)

This is actually the exact same listing of requirements for the recent PowerTap P1’s.  And in general I find that the P1 and bePRO units act exactly the same with respect to behaviors on different head units.  Below, the compatibility table for the bePRO:

bePRO Compatibility

Display UnitCompatibility Status
Garmin Edge 500Fully functional, can set crank length via bike profile
Garmin Edge 510Fully functional, can set crank length via bike profile
Garmin Edge 520Fully functional can set crank length via bike profile in FW 3.00 and higher"
Garmin Edge 800Fully functional, can set crank length via bike profile
Garmin Edge 810Fully functional, can set crank length via bike profile
Garmin Edge 1000Fully functional, can set crank length via bike profile in FW 5.10 and higher
Garmin FR910XTFully functional, can set crank length via bike profile
Garmin FR920XTFully functional, can set crank length via bike profile (Beta Firmware 5.28 now available)
Garmin Fenix2TBD
Garmin Fenix3Fully functional, can set crank length via sensor settings
Garmin EpixFully functional, can set crank length via sensor settings
Garmin VIRB XEFully functional, can set crank length via sensor settings
Polar V800Not supported, BLE-only device - bePRO is ANT+ only
Polar M450Not supported, BLE-only device - bePRO is ANT+ only
Polar V650Not supported, BLE-only device - bePRO is ANT+ only
PowerTap Joule 2Not compatible.
PowerTap Joule 3Not compatible
PowerTap Joule GPSFully functional, can set crank length via sensor settings
PowerTap Joule GPS+Fully functional, can set crank length via sensor settings
Suunto Ambit2TBD
Suunto Ambit3Not supported, BLE-only device - bePRO is ANT+ only

Again, I’ll update this from time to time, but it’s also worthwhile searching the comments section, as oftentimes readers will update compatibility items from time to time there.

Power Meter Accuracy Test Results:

IMG_5614

The bePRO pedals actually found their way back and forth on two different bikes.  First was my triathlon bike – a Cervelo P3C, and the second was my primary road bike – a Giant Defy.  Both of these bikes are setup fairly similar in terms of power meter counts.  Each has a rear PowerTap G3 wheel on it.  And each has a different crank based power meter in test on it (the PowerTap C1 on the Cervelo, and the Verve InfoCrank on the Giant).  For the purposes of these tests, I’m mostly going to use the road bike data, since the PowerTap C1 unit was an earlier prototype and I try not to mix prototype units within production reviews.  Don’t worry, a PowerTap C1 production hardware/software unit should hit posts soon.

From a data collection standpoint, virtually all of the data used in the analysis was collected using product Garmin Edge 520/810/1000 units.  In all cases the bePRO was using the Edge 810’s, since the Edge 520/1000’s don’t yet support crank length for non-Vector power meters (firmware update coming shortly).  Meanwhile the PowerTap G3 and PowerTap C1, as well as the Verve InfoCrank were captured using the Edge 520/1000 (since crank length was irrelevant there).

With that, let’s dive into things.  I’m going to pick a few random rides that talk to specific conditions (i.e. temperature changes), sprints, stable power, cobbles, etc…  The goal being to ferret out any oddities that I might see.  You can download all the ride data at the end of this section.

I’m going to first start with my 2nd ride, to show a little bit of the settling period.  Favero recommends that you re-do a dynamic calibration after a high intensity ride.  This is because of slight shifts in the attachment of the pedal to the crank.  These aren’t usually visible to the human eye, but they are there (just like Vector and others).  What this means is that you may see a slight offset, such as below:

image

You can see that all three power meters agree very well, it’s just that the bePRO is running a few percent higher.  Now some could argue that’d be normal – and, a portion of that would be true.  After all, the bePRO is closest to your foot and thus would have the least amount of ‘loss’.  Below, I’ve zoomed in on a section (which changes the scale), note that we’re only talking about 13w on 260w here.

image

If we look at the Mean/Max data, which helps to visualize max power outputs over a time graph, you’ll see they align spot-on perfectly. Again, a tiny pre-settling offset – but really, very impressive.

image

Next, we’ve got a ride I did with the Verve InfoCrank in the mix.  So now we’re on a different bike, and I left things settle a couple rides on that bike.  Nonetheless, you can see things are basically exactly on top of each other – there’s virtually no appreciable disagreement there.

image

If we zoom in, we see the same – especially true on some of the sprints that I did.  For example, here’s zoomed in on a sprint.  This is with a 10s smoothing factor to make it a bit easier to see.  You’ll notice that all three units do almost exactly the same thing.  You see itty-bitty variations, which is normal because of the 1-second recording rates and transmission differences.

image

Here, I’ll pick another sprint.  In this case, I’ve reduced again the smoothing rate down to just 3-seconds, and all three still look stunningly close.  I specifically choose one point at the top where they were wider apart (standard delays), yet the next second they’re all within 18w (at 650w – or 2.7%).  That’s totally normal variance for three power meters measuring in dramatically different places on the bike.

image

And the cadence data here? Just as good.  You’ll always see slight difference in cadence data on stop and go activities like this, because of the way power meters differ in updating cadence when you go from 0RPM to 90RPM.  But you can see that once I’m pedaling all three of them completely agree.  The only exception being that sometimes coming down from sprints you’ll see the PowerTap G3 be a bit wobbly, but that’s because it has more of an estimated cadence than truly measured.

image

And again, here’s the Mean/Max graph for that ride too:

image

Lastly, we’re going to look at a mountain ride I did.  I want to include this because the temperature drops as I climb.  For this ride I ascend about 3,000ft over the course of a fairly short time period (35mins):

image

And thus the temperature drops about 20 degrees:

image

Yet still, everything aligns right on top of each other:

image

Let’s zoom in on the climb as well (I never stopped during it):

image

The key item above is that you don’t see any drifting on the bePRO.  You’ll see that in general, the bePRO records the highest power track, but that’s mostly consistent throughout the climb.  You see a few bumps of more variance in the last 2-3 minutes of the climb, but I’d be guessing that’s probably to do with me being on steep gravelly and potholed roads and I believe I was only clipped in one pedal just in case I had to bail (so my contact with the power sensor in the pedal wasn’t clean).  Thus I’m not really concerned there as I haven’t seen any issues with cobbles or the like in and around Paris.

And finally, if we look at cadence on that climb, it looks pretty darn good.  Though there are two brief seconds for a few seconds where there’s some variance.  It’s not clear to me if I did something different in those moments that might have triggered that (i.e. being unclipped briefly for one-legged or what).  So it might be a bug that’s since been fixed in the latest firmware.

image

Overall, I’m not seeing anything on the accuracy front that’s of any concern.  It’s consistently been spot-on with other power meters that I’ve thrown at it.

Now one interesting item I saw on my very last ride before publishing was a condition where one-legged pedaling on the right side caused the power for both units to drop.  However, Favero confirms they also saw this bug and have already fixed it in a firmware update that was just released.

Here’s a Dropbox link with all raw ride data.

Power Meter Durability:

IMG_7669

I’ve noted numerous times in responses to comments since receiving the units that my primary concern has been with the durability of the unit, in terms of how well it’d stand up to wear and tear.  Not so much the pedals themselves, but rather the pods that sit in between the pedals and the crank arm.

To begin, we’ll start with the micro-USB port covers.  These are kinda crappy.

IMG_7654

IMG_7656

They easily fall off when poked, and Favero seems to even implicitly acknowledge that.  After all, they included a spare set of the doors/caps within the box.  I’ve never had them pop off out on the road, but did have one pop off/out while on a trainer when I clipped in just the wrong way.  They also readily fall out when trying to open/close them for charging.

When I asked Favero about this, they noted that the battery covers aren’t needed to protect the port itself.  Rather, the port is internally waterproofed to IPX7 standards (so 30 minutes at 1-meter deep).  Thus the port cover mostly serves to keep dirt/sand/etc out of there to keep a good connection.  Still, it’s not ideal.

My next concern was around the plastic siding on the pods.  It doesn’t seem crisp and I found it easily got damaged over the course of my time using them due to clipping in/out.  My concern here being that this could lead to water leakage inside the unit should cracks develop (a seemingly likely scenario after months of usage based on the trend I see).

IMG_7677

I also went back to Favero on this as well.  They noted that in actuality the plastic is pretty much just cosmetic.  The pods themselves are fully sealed in a hardened resin.  They provided a photograph (below) of what one looked like prior to the pod casing being added (below shows it sanded down a bit as part of a test they were doing).  They noted that this fully waterproofs the entire pod itself, and also makes it completely enclosed.  In fact, once the resin is added the unit’s electronics are actually unreachable.  Then entire pod is then laminated as well.

inside_bePRO

So I’d say that mostly solves my concern about water getting into the pod (though it doesn’t solve the aspect around how pretty it might look after many months of usage).

Lastly, for lack of another spot to stick it – a few readers had purchased bePRO units earlier this summer and expressed concerns around the lack of support in August (Favero essentially went on vacation for two weeks, leaving customers with no support mechanism).  I enquired about this as well, and the company straight-up admitted it was a screw-up and that they’ve learned from it.  Here’s what they had to say:

“It’s true, we had not sufficient time to organize a proper support during these 2 weeks of August.  Actually, [employee name] respond to many emails and phone call even [on] vacation. When we went back to work, we saw so many requests (bePRO reservations for next production batches, information requests, some support on installation, …), for sure we will keep support active even during holiday.”

So it sounds like they’re putting in place the required staffing to ensure continuous support year-round.

Power Meter Recommendations:

As a general rule of thumb, when purchasing a power meter you should focus on your specific requirements.  Meaning that if you ask a bike shop “Which power meter is best?” and they give you XYZ brand, then you must fire them as your power meter consultant.  Rather, they should be asking you about things such as do you swap bikes?  Do you swap wheels?  What type of pedals/cleats do you use?  What type of chainrings do you use?  And so on.  That allows them to identify a specific power meter type that might be best, and then from there a specific product.

Now, within the context of pedal based power meters, the bePRO ranks fairly highly on my list.  The pedal based power meter world as of today consists of the following players:

– Garmin Vector/Vector 2
– PowerTap P1
– Polar/Look KEO Power
– Favero bePRO

There are no doubt products announced by other companies for products in the pedal or pedal connectivity region (i.e. Brim Brothers, Watteam, Limits, Look-specific offering), but only the above four companies have actually shipped something to consumers today as of the date of this publishing.  That’s an incredibly important distinction in a segment of the industry where delays are often years in the making.

So given those four players, I think it’s fair to say the best value for the money in a pedal based power meter at present is the bePRO.  Whereas my favorite in terms of portability, durability and general ease of use is the PowerTap P1.  And then the most metrics comes from the Vector/Vector2.  But I still think at this juncture the Vector/Vector2 and the Polar offerings are overpriced.  If perhaps Garmin or Polar did some form of rebate or price drop down to $999, then things might change.

Note I don’t believe it’s worthwhile to look at single-pedal offerings (i.e. Polar Power Essential or Garmin Vector S), given the prices those companies are charging for single-pedal.  There are far better deals from Power2Max, Quarq, and PowerTap for crank/chainring based systems.

Finally, as usual I’ll be doing my Annual Power Meter Buyers Guide the week after Interbike (so that’s two weeks from now).  This will encompass a bit of a ‘state of the industry’, futures, and thoughts on power meter purchasing.

Summary:

IMG_5612

Overall I think the bePRO power meter is a great value today.  It might not be the prettiest power meter out there, but it’s the best priced pedal based power meter on the market.  It’s reasonably easy to install after you do it once and understand what’s going on.  Further, from an accuracy standpoint, metrics look very strong.  I haven’t had any issues in shifting temperatures (mountain climbs), nor rain (or shine).  The pedal body itself hasn’t posed any problems and performed well, and I’ve been able to use it successfully without any incidents.

While I do have concerns about long term exterior durability, bePRO seems to have architected the internals of the product to stand up, even if the outside shows more wear than I’d like.  Further, their 2-year warranty (required in the EU) should help ease any concerns there.  However, the unit today only supports ANT+, which could be a deterrent for some that are using Bluetooth Smart head units.  But I suspect that won’t be a blocker for most.

Of course, the power meter market is moving very quickly with new entrants announcing products frequently.  While Interbike is next week, I don’t expect to see any earth shattering news there at this point – most of the major power meter players have made their announcements.  But of course, ya never know.

With that – thanks for reading!

Found this review useful?  Or just wanna save 10%?  Read on!

Hopefully you found this review useful.  At the end of the day, I’m an athlete just like you looking for the most detail possible on a new purchase – so my review is written from the standpoint of how I used the device.  The reviews generally take a lot of hours to put together, so it’s a fair bit of work (and labor of love).  As you probably noticed by looking below, I also take time to answer all the questions posted in the comments – and there’s quite a bit of detail in there as well.

I’ve partnered with Clever Training to offer all DC Rainmaker readers an exclusive 10% discount across the board on all products (except clearance items).  You can pickup the bePRO pedals from Clever Training. Then receive 10% off of everything in your cart by adding code DCR10MHD at checkout.  By doing so, you not only support the site (and all the work I do here) – but you also get a sweet discount. And, since this item is more than $75, you get free US shipping as well.

bePRO single-sided pedal (left power pedal, right empty pedal)
bePRO dual-sided pedals (both left & right power pedals)

Thanks for reading!  And as always, feel free to post comments or questions in the comments section below, I’ll be happy to try and answer them as quickly as possible.  And lastly, if you felt this review was useful – I always appreciate feedback in the comments below.  Thanks!

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
If you would like a profile picture, simply register at Gravatar, which works here on DCR and across the web.

*

 Notify me of followup comments via e-mail.

You can click here to Subscribe without commenting

Add a picture

296 Comments

  1. Nikki Metcalfe

    I’ve just installed the BePro which I found easy to do, completed the Dynamic Calibration whist on the Turbo, I then did warm up which seemed fine power was L/R 49/51 which is what I would expect to see, however my first ride on the road after a successful normal calibration 0 showed my power as L/R 95/5 , I don’t know where to start to correct this, any help gratefully appreciated

    Reply
  2. Ben

    2 thinks

    Did you check that the pedal is again in the correct alignment ?
    Did you change the clips under your shoes ?

    Reply
    • Nikki Metcalfe

      Yes, checked both pedals are aligned correct and yes I changed the cleats to the ones that came in the box.

      Will re calibrate tonight and try again

      Reply
    • nikki metcalfe

      So when I double checked everything it turns out the right was not aligned properly, so i have adjusted it and its all working fine now

      Reply
  3. wojtek

    Guys, and what you did with cadence sensor? Have you had any? I have GSC-10 installed and I would like to leave it on the bike for speed and distance purposes (especially for the trainer during winter) It has however also cadence sensor. bePRO suggest to remove it or disable it. But it seems not to be possible to disable just cadence from GSC-10 on a 920xt…

    Reply
    • Chris

      Havnt bought my Bepros yet, in fact im not even sure if want the one or two sided set yet, but I was wondering the exact same thing….

      Reply
    • You can simply leave it on. It’s better that way, as there are oddities sometimes if you have a combo sensor and one of the values is zero.

      Reply
  4. Mark B

    Hi Ray,

    Bit of a specific question. I’ve been using my BeProS for some while now just fine – ant+ dongle to computer and with a Mio Cyclo 505. The latter has just had a software update and now won’t display power from the BePro although it does show the cadence (which is accurate). Power stays at 0. The BePro works with a mates Garmin 520 and still with my computer. The5kruneners dual BePros work with his updated Mio 505.

    Does this sort of thing happen with this tech? (sadly I suspect the answer is yes!). Any ideas given your wealth of experience? If I end up having to replace the Mio I think I’d have to go to the Wahoo Elemnt as it balances cost/features/mapping…

    Reply
  5. Jochen M.

    I’m using the bePros with an Edge 1000 and a Suunto Ambit2. The crank length (180 mm) is set via the Edge, and it is visible in the Favero-Windows-tool. The power values in the watch are much higher (about factor 1.5) than the ones in the Edge – is there any possibility to make something wrong or even to make a setting in the Suunto?

    Btw, I tinkered a bit to protect the electronics – if I succeed adding two pictures you can see my tube guard and my shoes.

    Reply
    • Jochen M.

      … and the shoe

      Reply
    • Colin Smith

      The shoe in the image posted by Jochen M. looks like it has a big chunk missing out of it?

      Reply
    • Jochen got hungry mid-way through the ride…just took a bit for a snack.

      Reply
    • Jochen M.

      It’s difficult to see – sorry for the bad photo: I just removed 2 mm in depth to improve the clearence between shoe and electronics on my old training shoes (no problems with my racing shoes: there is enough space).

      I didn’t like to follow Favero’s instructions with the shim as this costs money, I had no time (holiday trip “ante portas”) and to enlarge the distance between foot and shaft is also not perfect (seat post alignment for every shoe change).

      Ray – I fear my teeth are not strong enough for that work. With a Dremel it’s a piece of cake – and I prefer chocolate for myself…

      Reply
    • Colin Smith

      Thanks for the feedback. I did not fancy taking chunks out of my S-Works shoes, but a bit more research reveals I should be OK. And will press the Buy It Now button on Friday.

      Reply
    • Geoff Watson

      My S-Works shoes could touch the ‘pod’ of the pedals when pushing hard. I had to fit a spacer. Favero confirmed to me the S-Works are not compatible otherwise.

      Reply
    • Colin Smith

      Thanks Geoff. I completely misread your earlier post. So that is a pair of Bepros, one pair of 2mm spacers and170mm cranks. (I was buying a new chainset anyway)
      .

      Reply
  6. Geoff Watson

    I actually used 3mm spacers but 2mm would be enough with S-Works shoes (2015 version)

    Reply
  7. Mark

    So I had been having difficulty getting my BeProS to talk to my computer (Mio 505). I used to get cadence and power then both units had upgrades and I got cadence only.
    After much faffing I found that the powermeter was sending data fine but the computer wasn’t able to read it despinte reading other powermeter data. I contacted Favero…

    ..THEY WROTE SPECIFIC SOFTWARE TO MAKE MY UNITS TALK. AMAZING.

    Seriously their customer service totally rocks. They said they will tweak the software for the next release but just made me a custom firmware in the interim. Anyway, that’s the sort of thing that people reading this thread and considering buying one of these needs to know.

    #superhappy

    Reply
    • Colin Smith

      Cleats issue solved. Looking forward to using these pedals in place of my Quarq Riken. I have an issue with my Quarq which Quarq UK don’t accept, so going to send it back with a do not return until you tell me it is fixed or they send me a new unit.

      Reply
  8. Simon

    The bePRO looks like a good alternative for a pedal based power meter, is it available in USA?

    Reply
    • Peter

      I had the same question. I didn’t want to buy directly in Italy and deal with international shipping fees and customs. I only found very few shops in the US that have bePro. I got mine here: http://www.wattattack.com. Seems to be a fairly new shop, but everything went smooth and the customer service was pretty good. To find all the shops in the US, just google it.

      Reply
    • Well, I’d argue the best option for getting the bePro unit in the US is using Clever Training. 😉 – link to clevertraining.com

      The link on the sidebar gets you straight in, plus you’ll save 10% using the DCR coupon code DCR10MHD. And there’s free shipping, not to mention (most importantly), that it supports the site here. The downside is that it’s currently backordered. I’ll try and find out how long.

      Reply
    • Simon

      Thanks for all the info. Too bad they are out of stock. I didn’t want to wait so I ended up buying at Wattattack. They have both, the bePRO and bePRO S in stock and when I told them about the discount you mentioned, they matched the price. Shipping was free also. For the first installation I had to rely on the manual, but the bePRO seem to work good so far. I am pretty happy overall

      Reply
  9. Can I ask if anyone has tried validating against a well known lab based ergometers when in hyperbolic mode (i.e. power independent of cadence). I tried the Vector S and found it completely unreliable at different power outputs and cadences in the range of 100-300W. I cycled for 2mins in each interval @ 100,150,200,250,300 @ 75-95rpm. I found % error to vary from around 50% @ low powers to around 15% @ higher powers. The problem was that I couldnt apply a correction or bias to the readings because they were so variable.
    Pedals were connected via a torque wrench (35nm) and a crowfoot adapter also to make sure no slipping.
    Has anyone tried this before and think of a very good reason this method is not a good one? Also have you done anything similar with the bePRO? Often manufacturers will say it doesnt have to be accurate just reproducible – but it you have your numbers set from a lab test and use other power meters on stationary trainers such as the wattbike you kinda need to have excellent accuracy – especially when they quote +/- 2% accuracy.
    I feel manufacturers should release devices to independent labs for verification and also publish the methods they used to test accuracy? What do you think?

    thanks

    alan

    Reply
    • I think you’re mixing up accuracy testing using standard usage with trying to use in a specialized mode on a specialized lab machine.

      Companies don’t test against hyperbolic modes, because honestly nobody uses them with other power meters (since those units already have PM’s built into them). To put a finer point on that, you’re the first person ever to ask about it (on any unit I’ve ever tested).

      That said, I do (as do many companies) agree that general accuracy testing should be more formalized among companies.

      Reply
    • I can see your point of view but the lab based m/c had already being calibrated via gold standard in the lab – so we knew power data was valid and reliable. The problem lies when you have a lab based test to set power zones and then your power meter is no where near these readings – 30-40W out is too much even if your FTP is 400W and especially if your FTP is around 250W. I am still investigating the issue and will post more information and data on your forum at a later date.

      Reply
    • Power is power no matter what mode is being used. When ergometer says it is XXX watts and PM says it is YYY watts and the difference is 50% something is wrong. Assuming it is not an ergometer (I think they are called ergometewrs for a reason) It seems to me that you are implying that accuracy of PM (pedal based in particular) is dependent on pedaling/usage pattern and that should not be the case.

      Reply
    • Totally agree – equally if the bias changes over different usage it renders the PM useless. I was hoping to hear from manufacturers of ergometers (i.e. Lode for example) that may come up with a logical reason why my methods were flawed – so will be contacting both garmin and Lode over the next few weeks. The only issue I see is it was a vector S but im sure my left/right balance is not that bad.
      If I get hold of a pair of bePRO’s I would like to run the same test procedure.
      Recently James Hopker replaced the cranks on a Wattbike with SRM cranks and did a reliability study – it came out quite favourable overall. These are the sort of studies that should be done to validate manufacturers PM’s. They used a calibrater and used well trained and moderately trained cyclists in the study to check for differences in power depending on pedal stroke fluency.

      Reply
  10. Mal James

    I ordered Bepro dual pedals back in January, got to say the delivery was very slow. After 3-4 emails and a request to cancel my order they arrived the beginning of May.
    Am I happy with them? Yes I am. I have never cycled with power and still learning, however, they were relatively easy to install/calibrate etc. I read that shoes could rub on the pods, I checked this on installation and yes they do. I have Specilized Comp shoes and because I was keen to use them straight away I made a set of shims out of an old number plate, using the Bepro cleats as a stencil. Seems to be ok with no known issues.
    Performance, like I said its all new to be, but the information is fantastic, I can monitor my balance, cycle to a % of my FTP effectively making improvements instead of HR and blowing out of my arse! I can see how effective my workouts are and see improvements in my fitness and power. Overall, these are a good product and a fantastic price compared to others on the market, read all the reviews and this will assist in your installation and limit any known issues.
    Negative side, just the time it took for me to receive my order, they said 6-8weeks and it took just over 12! But by complaining and requesting to cancel they also sent me a set of cleats, plus 10% off my order price.

    Reply
  11. Robert

    Great review. I have been looking for pedal based PM for months now, and still have not decides. bePRO is my favourite, due to the lower price.

    But I have a problem regarding future pedal based PM. Is there any PM announced that would be for SPD Pedals / MTB shoes/cleats?

    I have all my shoes an SPD cleats, and on both road bikes MTB pedals (for road bike), so when I am not on my bike, I can walk like a human being :) (when I stop for a coffee, or water supply).

    If I buy this pedal based PM, I also have to buy new road shoes. And not just one, but three (winter, summer, and between).

    Although there are different sorts of PM (crank, body, …) I still prefer to have pedal based PM, so I can easily change between bikes, and they can be both sided measurements.

    Any ideas, suggestion?

    Reply
    • Márcio Coragem

      the only solution for your case is to use an Look to SPD adapter.
      Google it and you will find some info.

      Reply
    • Robert

      Thanks. I did not even know that is possible.

      But anywhere I look, I only see reverse option, from SPD-SL (Look) to SPD.
      Does SPD to SPD-SL (or Look) even exist?
      And in that case I supose the saddle must go up a bit, right?

      Reply
  12. Lukman Nurhakim Noordin

    I am speculating that Bepro will come out with a spindle adapter that can be used on Ultegra pedals… Just like what Garmin did with their Vector2

    Reply
    • Colin Smith

      Fitted and set up pedals on Sunday. Short ride Monday to work. Power seemed low against RPE. first thing I noticed was left leg % was around 5% less than right, or at least when I looked at my Garmin. not unconcerned. Get home, no internet connection. So unable to analyse. Next evening, club 10. Battery low light comes on. Mmmm.., I charged the units for 6 hours and checked fully charged by unplugging and plugging in charger lead on Sunday evening.

      So, rode the 10, power down by 25-30w @ HR FTP. A bad day at the office? My time was 30s less than the last 10 I rode. Looking at the data at home,and spot checking the right leg, this was roughly around 160W, left leg 260W. But L-R was showing as an extreme L-45% R-55%.

      Something not right, ‘weak’ left leg, shows up on TP as right leg to add to what appears to be inconsistent data. I have now sent a couple of FIT files to the shop I purchased from, for them to consider and awaiting a reply. To add to the fun, this morning on start up I could not get Garmin to find the sensors. I gave up, and rode for 10 minutes, then; up popped: Do you want to calibrate? YES/NO.

      All does not seen well in the camp at the moment.

      Reply
  13. wojtek

    Battery life – 1 month since purchase, thereof 17h of training – still no recharge needed. Seems fair for me.

    Reply
  14. David

    Hi

    Ray notes a bedding in period; in my experience this is correct and will manifest poor power balance results , as you describe. Mine began at 60/40 and now I am 49/50 or 50/50 average over a ride.

    Have you updated the firmware?

    My low battery came on my garmin last night after a dozen rides I think.

    I have some reservations with mine (spindle length into crank pedal threat) but I am v pleased generally. I have no issues with the pod being damaged. I think version 2 could be amazing (if say they could remove need for lock nut and iron out bedding in period)

    David

    Reply
  15. Shane

    Hi got new set of bepro in useing a garmin edge 500 cal abating is done and power meater is found but still no power figures coming up on screen ??

    Reply
    • Colin Smith

      Shane, I assume from your post you have done the static calibration and got a reading of zero. (if using the Edge 500 and you use a HR monitor either turn it off on Garmin or simply put your HR on). I then assume you jumped on the rollers / turbo and yet you are not seeing any power? Are you seeing cadence? Have you tried pedalling backwards to start the dynamic calibration? Checked you’ve got the correct flashing LEDs? Plugged your pedals in your laptop and set up crank length?

      Beyond that, sorry I haven’t a clue.

      Meanwhile….

      Reply
    • Colin Smith

      My pedals need to go back. Right power seriously lagging behind my left. Done all the re-installs, calibrations etc. Disappointed to say the least.

      Reply
    • Shane

      Hi Colin got sorted had to plug peddles into laptop never new about that seems to be working now thanks for your help

      Reply
    • Colin Smith

      User Error!! It transpires that the left pink W box is the total power and the right pink box is the right pedal power. So all is well. Though I am still a bit concerned about power at endurance and recovery zones, as the numbers just seem a bit low. And secondly, getting the pedals to wake up in the morning. It took 5 minutes yesterday before my Garmin ‘found’ the pedals. Yet this morning, within seconds of the Garmin turning on.

      Reply
  16. Shane

    Hi fitted my bepro pedals few days ago and noticed that after a few rides the pods were after moving from the aliment sticker is this normal ??

    Reply
    • Yes and no. It’s normal in that you’ll normally see a very tiny bit of movement, but if it’s a fair bit, then that means they weren’t cranked down tight enough earlier on.

      In either case, definitely re-calibrate.

      Reply
  17. Chris

    So this is how I save up for any and all cycling related expenses…
    I put 10c away for any and every km I do on my bike. I have now saved €632 for my Bepro pedals. Tonight my wife said that I can order them and she will give me the rest. Only thing is after all those Km’s and hard earned 10c’s I still can’t decide if I should go for the single or double sided meter….. €751 is still a lot of money’s not my book… Now the question is this… How much will I really be losing out on if I just got the single sided as apposed to the double sided meters…. Any serious insight welcomed…
    And thanks in advance :)

    Reply
    • David

      There’s quite a few articles about two-sided PM’s on the web – reading them may help. For me, the one metric of left/right balance has been really important, to the extent that it’s made me realise all my niggles and injuries over the past two years have been on my left side [after seeing a L/R imbalance, then lower torque efficiency on my left side], and have now booked a bike-fit conducted by a physiotherapist. Hoping it will be better than the heavily data-focused Retul fit, which I didn’t rate.

      Reply
    • wojtek

      Read Ray’s comment #35 in link to dcrainmaker.com
      I asked almost the same question and got precise answer. I bought the double sided version.

      Reply