JUMP TO:

Pixel Watch 4 Launches with Satellite SOS: Hands-on!

Google has announced its newest Pixel Watches, the Pixel Watch 4 (in both 41mm and 45mm sizes). These watches may look relatively similar from the outside, but there’s a host of new features inside, including the first in a mainstream wearable/smartwatch: Satellite communication & messaging. This new feature allows you to reach emergency services, even when outside cellular range, using a direct connection from the watch to satellites. It’s relatively similar to features launched on phones (Apple/Google/Samsung) over the past few years, which allow for Satellite SOS functions. Except, now, directly in the watch – no phone required. More on that down below.

Beyond that, Google has continued to focus on sports and fitness with a dozen new sports profiles, added dual-frequency GNSS/GPS, increased battery life, and more. Plus, this is the first major wearable to allow you, as the user, to swap out the battery and display, if something goes wrong. There’s a lot going on here.

Note, though, that this is not an in-depth review. It’s merely a brief hands-on look at the hardware and software after spending about 4-5 hours with it, and the Google Pixel engineering/product team answering my 2,378 questions. As such (and as always), part of my in-depth review will be testing all these features/claims to see if they do as the company says, or, if they fall short.

With that, let’s get into it.

What’s New:

There’s a pretty solid swath of new features on the Pixel Watch 4, both internal hardware changes as well as software feature changes, including a pile of new sports profiles too:

– Added satellite SOS emergency assistance feature (no cellular coverage required)
– Increased display brightness by 50%, now at 3,000 nit display
– Display is 10% larger, with a 16% smaller bezel
– Display panel is now domed underneath (previously, it was just the top curved glass piece)
– Vibration/Haptic motor increased strength by 15%
– Speaker volume increased slightly, but more specifically tuned better for voice (e.g., Gemini responses)
– New chipsets (still dual-chipset architecture), but now operating 25% faster, but only drawing 50% of the power as before
– Battery specs are 25% longer than before
– Battery charging is faster, now 0 to 50% in 15 minutes
– Switched to (another) new magnetic charging dock
– Added user-serviceable battery and display (user can swap it out themselves with just a simple T2 Torx screwdriver)
– Added dual-frequency GNSS/GPS
– Updated skin temperature sensor to increase accuracy
– Added about a dozen new sports profiles (see list below), bringing total to 50 sports profiles
– Added watch to phone screen mirroring of data metrics during cycling (called ‘Bike Realtime Streaming’)
– Added new AI-powered workout/activity recognition algorithm to substantially increase hyper-specific types (more details below)
– Added new sleep tracking algorithms, which Google says increase sleep phase/stage detection by 18%
– Revamping the Fitbit app (coming later this year)
– Revamped Fitbit app will feature new Fitbit Premium Personal Health Coach, with substantial AI features (see below)
– Watch now uses Wear OS 6.0, including Material 3 UI
– Wear OS 6.0 now has AI smart replies to texts via Gemini, among other Gemini integration features
– Still uses Corning Gorilla Glass as before, still 50-meter waterproof spec
– Still offered in two sizes – 41mm & 45mm
– Still offered in both WiFi-only, and LTE+WiFi models

When it comes to the new software features, Google says the majority of them will go back to existing Pixel watches. They don’t quite yet have a full list of which watches are getting which things, but expect that soon. For the new Fitbit app, that’ll start in public beta from October for US Fitbit Premium users, and then expand from there. I detail that a bit more down below.

Pricing-wise, things remain the same as last year:

41mm: $349 for Wi-Fi and $449 for LTE
45mm: $399 for Wi-Fi and $499 for LTE

You can order the Pixel Watch 4 models from today, though they won’t ship till October 9th, 2025 (a Thursday). Expect my in-depth review closer to that date, based on final hardware/software.

Hardware Changes:

So let’s take a quick look at the hardware changes. As I noted above, from the outside it looks pretty darn similar. However, there are some differences. First is that slightly larger display (10% larger),  which decreases the bezel size by 16% given the same case sizes. You can barely see it, if you look hard enough.

Vlcsnap 2025 08 20 11h31m03s500. Vlcsnap 2025 08 20 11h30m55s733.

Also on the ‘if you look hard enough’ wagon, is the change to a domed display internally. Previously, the display was flat, but the exterior glass was curved. Now, both are curved. Google says this is more apparent in some of the Material 3 UI elements in how they appear to expand as you scroll through.

Vlcsnap 2025 08 20 11h31m27s571.

Next, is the louder speaker volume. In this case, Google doesn’t give an exact difference level, but said it’s really more about the speaker tuning than anything else. Specifically, tuned to be more optimized for the Gemini AI responses (voices), making them easier to hear. You can hear these in my video up above. Likewise, the haptic motor (for vibrations) is 15% more powerful than before, but again, that’s pretty hard to feel side-by-side.

Now, while I could include the Gemini assistant responses down below in the software section, I’ll mention it briefly here. Using the microphone, you can ask your watch anything, and Gemini (Google’s AI platform) goes off and finds the answer, and then speaks it back. One of the Google product managers asked it what I (DC Rainmaker), thought about the heart rate accuracy of the Pixel Watch 3. It was a pretty fascinating demo (full exchange in the video above).

Vlcsnap 2025 08 20 11h36m49s644.

As I’ve said before, I’m not really a ‘talk to your wrist’ kinda guy when it comes to smartwatches, mostly because I rarely have found the experience very good. But this seems to be shifting my thinking.

Next up is the new charging connector and dock. This is now moved to the side of the watch. Google says there are some sensor benefits there, compared to the charging contacts previously being built-in to the bottom sensor package, but mostly, this is about a faster charging dock and one that is more user-friendly and stays put. You can see the connector points here:

Vlcsnap 2025 08 20 11h35m00s874.

And then the charging dock here:

That charging dock can go from 0 to 50% in 15 minutes, which most of the Google Pixel team members I chatted with said makes it ideal to charge during morning shower/coffee/etc… and then be good to go for the day.

//// 41mm size ////
– 30 hours always-on display
– 48 hours battery saver mode

Charging speeds:
0 to 50% in 15 minutes
0 to 80% in 25 minutes
0 to 100% in 45 minutes

//// 45mm size ////
– 40 hours always-on display
– 72 hours battery saver mode

Charging speeds:
0 to 50% in 15 minutes
0 to 80% in 30 minutes
0 to 100% in 60 minutes

Also, that charging dock is pretty strong from a magnetic connection standpoint. In the video, you can see me holding it upside-down and swinging it around a bit. It stays put.

Vlcsnap 2025 08 20 11h34m16s846.

In addition to this, Google becomes the first mainstream wearable to allow user-serviceable parts, specifically in this case, the display and battery. You, as the end user, can swap these out yourself now (if something breaks), with nothing more than a simple T2 Torx screwdriver. You’ll remove the bands like normal, and below that, you’ll see one screw per side:

Vlcsnap 2025 08 20 11h36m02s679.

Then, below that, there are two more screws per side to take apart the case and access the components in question. Google says they’ll still do the repairs themselves if you want, but that you can also do it yourself, or take it to a repair center.

Serviceability on Watch.

They acknowledged that pending EU regulations around user serviceability may have played a role in their launching this for the Pixel Watch 4.

Finally, there’s the new dual-frequency GNSS/GPS chipset and antenna (actually, if I remember correctly from conversations a year ago, the chipset may have previously been there, but not the associated antenna design). In any case, this will likely increase accuracy in more challenging GPS scenarios (e.g., tall buildings, some cliff scenarios, etc…). I haven’t had a chance to really test that, so stay tuned in that realm.

Software Changes:

Next up is a quick run-through on the software side. First up, the unit is running WearOS 6.0 (just like the recent Samsung watches). Thus, most of this is pretty well known. This includes the new Material 3 UI, which tweaks the interface a bit as I outlined here a few months ago.

However, more interesting for sports stuff is the addition of about a dozen new sports profiles, specifically adding:

Badminton
Baseball
Basketball
Cricket
Field Hockey
Football (American)
Football/Soccer
Outdoor Swim
Padel
Pickleball
Pool swim
Sport
Rugby

Bringing things to approximately 50 sports profiles.

Next, in the cycling mode, your watch will now mirror its stats to your phone. We’ve seen other companies add this feature (Apple, COROS, Garmin in Connect+), and it effectively allows you to see those same stats on your handlebars. Google is officially calling this ‘Bike Realtime Streaming’. As you can see, it’s pretty straightforward (whereas the creative phone mount I made on the Citibike was anything but straightforward):

That said, one obvious gap is that it’s lacking an integrated map screen. Given Google’s dominance of the mapping space, this seems like a bizarre omission. Especially in city-type scenarios that this might actually be most used for, having integrated mapping as a page you can easily swipe between seems an obvious integration. Hopefully, that happens sooner, rather than later.

Next, Google has added a new AI-driven automatic exercise/activity feature. They say this feature is using a blend of on-hardware sensor data, combined with cloud & phone processing to more accurately categorize activities after the fact. More specifically, they say this gets much more accurate on the exact type of activity – for example, being able to distinguish walking from nordic walking. Or American football from rest-of-planet football.

The way it works is that afterwards, in the Fitbit app, you’ll see what it assumes is the correct categorization. You can correct it if you’d like:

Vlcsnap 2025 08 20 11h38m05s427.

Then, from there, it learns your patterns based on your data. They gave an example that if you had a soccer game every Sunday afternoon, it’d learn that, and be more likely to stick the landing on it being soccer as the sport that you were doing.

The reason this matters is that as Fitbit transitions to the new Fitbit app, it leans very heavily on the correct categorization of all your activities. So, let’s briefly dive into that.

New Fitbit App With Personal Coach:

Vlcsnap 2025 08 20 11h38m42s025.

Google is completely revamping their Fitbit app coming this fall. At launch of the Pixel Watch 4, it’ll still be the same app. However, a few days or weeks later, in October 2025, they’ll open up a public preview period for the new Fitbit App, seen below. That public preview will start for US-based Fitbit Premium subscribers, and then expand from there.

In getting multiple hands-on demos of this new app, Fitbit stressed how it was built from the ground up, centered around AI insights and Gemini. They said this wasn’t a typical bolt-on AI chat like we see with most of their competitors. And, in looking at things, that seems to be true. Virtually every component/tile in the app you can choose to select and then have an AI discussion about your data. You can see the ‘chat’ component below it:

Vlcsnap 2025 08 20 11h39m15s895. Vlcsnap 2025 08 20 11h39m28s553.

While the revamped app interface will be going to all users, the AI coaching pieces will only be going to Fitbit Premium users.

One of the things they stressed here is that this isn’t just them randomly recommending things on a template. They want the AI responses to be driven by what your specific circumstances are. They noted that “No matter how much data we have about you, context is key. A real coach would talk to you”, even if they had all your training data. They noted that a real coach would ask things like what your goals are, what your constraints are, etc…

To that end, there’s an onboarding process as part of this, but likewise, you can simply tell the Fitbit Coach things to remember. For example, you can just open the chat window and tell it that you’re traveling this week. Or, that the hotel has a Peloton Bike, and to integrate that into some workouts for you. And it’ll create those workouts appropriately, based on not just your tidbits, but the data it has (for example, if you got poor or good sleep).

Vlcsnap 2025 08 20 11h40m03s935.

It was super impressive, by far one of the most impressive AI-driven sports/fitness things I’ve seen to date (and I’ve seen a lot of crappy implementations thus far). Of course, it also wasn’t perfect. In the beta that I saw, there were clearly still some bugs to be worked out, but again, it doesn’t even launch to public beta till October.

Satellite SOS Hands-On:

Vlcsnap 2025 08 20 11h40m27s703.

Next, we’ve got the satellite SOS pieces. This allows you to use your Pixel Watch 4 LTE edition to directly communicate with satellites in an emergency scenario. A couple of notable limitations first:

1) It requires you have the LTE edition, because it leverages some of the antenna and chipset hardware there
2) For launch, this is limited to the US lower-48 (not including Alaska/Hawaii)
3) This is specifically for emergency situations, not regular texting…at least for now.

So, let’s dive into how it works. In my case, I got a hands-on demo where the watch was forced into a satellite connectivity mode, and wouldn’t leverage LTE connections anymore. For my full in-depth review, I’ll be traveling to a spot without cellular connectivity at all, to illustrate things a bit more clearly. In that case, we’ll coordinate timeframes with the emergency response center to ensure I don’t get helicopters sent to me.

In any case, first up, is contacting 911. I say specifically 911, because Google wants the user to mirror what they’d normally do in an emergency. Further, they want to at least try cellular networks first. If those cellular networks don’t exist, then it offers to escalate to satellite.

When it does so, the first thing it’s going to do is a short set of questions to understand what the emergency is, and what you need. The goal here being if only one message ever gets out before your battery dies or the bear eats you, it has everything it needs in that first message:

Next, you’ll get a very quick 2-page tutorial on how to position your wrist for satellite connectivity. Just like with phones doing this same thing, you kinda have to aim it toward the satellites. In Google’s case, they’re using Skylo as their launch partner, which uses geo satellites. Skylo is kinda an umbrella company for satellite services.

Once you’ve completed the tutorial, you’ll position your wrist to match what the watch wants. It’s silly-easy, and is vaguely like the directions you might sometimes see when calibrating a compass on some GPS watches. Within a few seconds of proper placement, the message is immediately sent.

Vlcsnap 2025 08 20 11h42m38s378.

And then a moment later, an automatic confirmation from the emergency response center came back.

But here’s the fascinating part: That response center is Garmin.

Yup, Garmin’s Response Center that typically handles Garmin inReach devices (among others) is what’s handling Google’s emergency response pieces. That’s great news for consumers, because Garmin’s response center is a well-seasoned entity when it comes to these sorts of things. It’s literally all they do. According to a video about a year ago, they had handled some 20,000 SOS incidents since inception. I wrote up a whole thing about how that works here. Google says they worked with Garmin to specifically tune the questions and response flow to fit best on the limitations of a wearable. In fact, you may remember two years ago the agreement that Garmin signed with Qualcomm in this arena.

Ultimately, all of this ends up with Garmin contacting those people on your emergency contacts list (which you set up), as well as contacting actual emergency responders to your location (GPS data is included in the messages). You can see the message it sends to your emergency contacts concurrently:

You can communicate back and forth via text as the situation unfolds.

Now, what’s also notable is that when in this satellite SOS mode, they drop the watch down into the lower power battery saver mode, which lasts up to 48 hours of battery life for the 41mm and 72 hours for the 45mm. You can exit this mode (and return back to SOS too), if you need to.

Note that while fall detection and other emergency features can trigger this flow, it requires human interaction in order to contact the Emergency Response center. So, merely falling down a cliff and being unconscious won’t trigger a helicopter. A bear or something has to press some buttons for that to happen.

Keep in mind, though, when it comes to comparisons with something like Garmin inReach devices/platform, the Google solution here is purely about emergencies. Whereas inReach is far wider ranging, including live tracking, general texting, audio and photo messages, etc… Meaning, for most people who own an inReach for scenarios beyond just emergencies, they’ll probably continue that inReach usage.

Finally, when it comes to pricing, it’s free for the first two years. After that…shrug. Google sounds like they’re following Apple’s model here, which was also free for the first two years. Except, we’re now almost 3 years into things, and Apple isn’t charging for the feature yet either. Given Apple doesn’t seem to be in a rush to charge people, it doesn’t sound like Google is either. I suspect the number of incidents here is so low, that the PR/publicity benefit of saving people far outweighs any monetary costs of the platform.

Wrap-Up:

Vlcsnap 2025 08 20 11h45m36s793.

Overall, I’m pretty darn happy with the direction Google is going here, especially around the Satellite SOS features. This is something I’ve been hoping for, for years, and now it’s here. The other changes in the Pixel Watch 4 are definitely appreciated, though aside from the Gemini-focused components, most of them are already found in competitors. Whereas the Gemini-focused pieces are definitely industry-leading when it comes to smartwatches and how you interact with AI assistants.

As always, stay tuned for the full in-depth review down the road, where I’ll dive into all of these features, including eventually the new Fitbit App with all the new coaching features, to see how well it handles remembering all my fitness preferences.

With that, thanks for reading!

FOUND THIS POST USEFUL? SUPPORT THE SITE!

Hopefully, you found this post useful. The website is really a labor of love, so please consider becoming a DC RAINMAKER Supporter. This gets you an ad-free experience, and access to our (mostly) bi-monthly behind-the-scenes video series of “Shed Talkin’”.

Support DCRainMaker - Shop on Amazon

Otherwise, perhaps consider using the below link if shopping on Amazon. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. It doesn’t cost you anything extra, but your purchases help support this website a lot. It could simply be buying toilet paper, or this pizza oven we use and love.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
If you would like a profile picture, simply register at Gravatar, which works here on DCR and across the web.

Click here to Subscribe without commenting

Add a picture

*

42 Comments

  1. Joe H

    Not just maps, but it’s also weird that they would add phone mirroring for cycling without any support for power or cadence from a Bluetooth sensor. As far as I’m aware that’s still not possible… unless the 3 or 4 added it but my Watch 2 was left out.

  2. RobertB

    Hi Ray. Have they finally added manual laps to running?

  3. Pierre

    Didn’t know it’s possible to use Garmin extended display for cycling in the Connect+ app? Trying to find out more but can’t find it.

  4. Paul S.

    So the bear just has to wait until you’re done contacting emergency services. Then it eats you and waits until more food is delivered by air. Sounds sweet for the bears!

  5. I think the Garmin angle is really interesting. That Google (money is no object) seems to be comfortable off-loading the responsibility and services to Garmin is a big story. There are a number of videos discussing how Garmin has survived the wearable market (versus Apple) and one recently showing firmware and product references to this capability coming in their own stable of wearables.

  6. Benedikt

    Didn’t get any further yet:
    „Just a simple T2 Torx screwdriver“
    I would bet that half the customers would think T2 is a toothpick 😬

  7. Delta

    Hi Ray, thank you for this hands-on!
    I suppose it’s more an OS limitation than a hardware one, but is it finally possible to use external sensors on the Pixel Watch, at least a chest strap? Or perhaps via a third-party app? So far this is a show stopper for me to try the PW.
    Thank you!

  8. Cecil

    Thanks for the quick review. Be looking forward to the full hands-on as I am a Pixel and a Garmin user. If the Pixel Watch had a better battery, I would consider it more. I just love the durability and battery life of my Fenix.

  9. Matt Orabella

    Any support for pairing with external power meters/accesories via ANT+ or Bluetooth?

    I believe this has been omitted on previous versions of the Google watch

  10. Pavel Vishniakov

    I wonder if with all the companies (Apple, Google, Samsung etc) slowly eating into satellite SOS space Garmin would be forced to reconsider InReach pricing in general.

    • Denny

      You should look further into the limitations of geostationary satellite communication. Very helpful as long as you have direct line of sight where those satellites set down on the equator. For those that are in dense canopy of trees or the north side of a mountain, you are going to need a full fledged inreach device to be able to reach someone.

  11. Volker

    Very interessting to read about the SOS via satellite capability. Doesn´t Skylo only uses 8 satellites worldwide? I assume max. 2 for the US? If they will perhaps add in a further step messaging via satellite, can the system do/handle that? Do you have to perform this dance to catch the satellite, like with the iPhone (Apple dance)? I’m surprised this is being handled through the Garmin Response Center. Isn’t this Garmin competing with its IR devices?

    • Volker

      Btw: the use of Skylo satellites and the Garmin Response Center is not free for Google (I strongly assume). So if they offer it for free for 2 years, what is the intention? To be on par with Apple, to entice customers and then strike/charge (heavily?) later?

    • Volker

      Another question: To be able to send an SOS via satellite quickly, or even at all, you need a clear view of the sky. It’s just a shame if you break a leg in dense forest, etc. How does the watch behave then? Do you get a message: “Please move to a place with a clear view to the sky”! Isn’t this more of a fake safety feature for walks in the open air? Don´t get my wrong: I like this feature (I would even more like the possibility to send messages via satellite).

      But I won´t buy this watch: the great Garmin Fenix flashlight is missing!:)

    • Pavel Vishniakov

      I assume it would stay free for the end users as long as there aren’t too many uses. Apple still keeps the emergency SOS free despite the fact that it’s been four years for the initial customers (iPhone 12).

    • “Btw: the use of Skylo satellites and the Garmin Response Center is not free for Google (I strongly assume). So if they offer it for free for 2 years, what is the intention? To be on par with Apple, to entice customers and then strike/charge (heavily?) later?”

      Definitely goal’d to be on par with Apple, but even now, they’re ahead of Apple (unless Apple does something similiar in a few weeks).

      I don’t know how the deal is structured with Garmin. My guess is there’s some small base fee for each device sold that has the capability, and then a (much much much larger) chargeback for an actual incident routed to Garmin.

      I get the impression that Garmin probably wants to position itself as the defacto response provider going forward for companies. If satellite SOS and GEO/LOW connectivity is the future (and, let’s be honest, it probably is), then there’s a heck of a lot of wearable and other device companies that’ll want to use Garmin’s platform.

      It’s a super smart move by Garmin.

      As for inbound messages, yeah, it tells you to keep it pointed that way. Realistically speaking, it’s not too hard. My assumpion is if you’re there with a broken leg, you’d just put the watch on the ground next to you, oriented towards the right spot. Use a pebble or such if need be. Not really any different than phones today with SOS.

      Ultimately, it’s largely a one-sided conversation, from the individual, with a lot of waiting in between for responders to respond. Most of these rescues aren’t super quick, especially if they’re in a hard to get place – even with helicopters (and assuming the weather is acceptable, especially in mountains).

  12. Ray,

    Do they have anything like the AF History (Atrial Fibrillation Burden) that the Apple Watch has?

    I can see they have ECG and will alert if an AF episode is spotted.

    regards,

    Greg

  13. King Bradley

    As an Apple (and also Garmin) user, I have to say:
    Google is getting better and better.

    This looks really interesting.
    Their focus on sports (Fitbit takeover at the time) and Google’s AI also make the devices interesting.
    Apple has really fallen behind.

    I wonder about the new Fitbit Coach etc. How will small companies like Polar and Suunto keep up in the long term?
    Especially when I compare Google’s preview of the new Fitbit app with the current Polar app.

    Thanks to the EU and its regulation, I hope that I will be able to use a Pixel Watch with an iPhone in the future.

  14. Jayden

    Do podcast apps and/or Spotify on WearOS allow dynamically changing the playback speed (e.g. switching to 1.2x or 1.5x, etc. at any time during the audio playback)?

    I’ve been frustrated that that’s not possible on Garmin watches (please correct me if I’m wrong – only thing I’ve seen is a hack to set the speed ahead of time and download the whole podcast file at that modified speed, which is inconvenient and way more limited) – I think it is possible on WearOS, but would appreciate confirmation (especially on the Pixel Watch). Thank you to anyone who can confirm!

  15. dan

    I wish there was comprehensive testing in real conditions. I tried my watch in a area that is literally forest and no joy at all. Since 98% of my ride was in forest and the chances I’m going to fall and need assistance are in forest I guess I need a drone also to get my watch above the trees where is can actually get a satellite signal. Anything works on top of mountains with nothing but the sky above. I just picture this watch the exact same.

    • Robert

      I think that will be the same with all watches using this NTN sat technologie (?). It is by design. It looks in theory really great on the paper (and guaranteed 100 percent more in companies advertising) to have SOS via satellite, but in real life… If you have an emergency in a dense forrest (etc.)…, I think there will pop up a message on the screen: “you need to have a clear view to the sky. Please move your position and try again later.” (or something like that).

    • I’ll be testing the forests for this feature, fear not. In the demo scenario, we had light tree cover blocking us a bit.

      That said, as we saw with Apple’s implementation of this on their phones, tree cover really wasn’t a problem. Heck, in my demo I put it up against the side of a log facing the satellite, and it still managed to work.

  16. David Wohl

    I wish they’d figure out a way for the Pixel watch to work with Garmin – broadcast HR, etc. It must be technically feasible since my Pixel 3 communicates to Wahoo devices, including Zwift Ride and Elemnt Bolt.

  17. Ben

    Do you think Google will ever get topographical map features as well as downloadable offline mapping for their smart watches? I would love to stop regularly carrying my phone around and just have the pixel watch 4, but I also am an avid trail runner and cyclist that relies on the mapping features of my Garmin multiple times a week.

    Have you caught wind of Google making a deal or purchasing Onx, or Ride with GPS, or one of the other major mapping apps? Just curious, as this would be the only way I’d move away from Garmin and towards this platform of smartwatch.

    Love all the work you do to keep us informed – thanks!

  18. James

    BTW: why is google offering it first only for the USA? Test ballon? According to the Skylo coverage page, Skylo coverage includes expansive areas within North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. And why only SOS? Skylo writes on the homepage: “ On a single charge, a smartwatch could send or receive more than 800 SOS messages or about 400 short text messages or notifications (usage rates that are much higher than typical daily use).” Seems that they have tested this with a smartwatch. Perhaps a matter of costs for google, because they won’t charge customers first?

    link to skylo.tech

    link to skylo.tech

  19. BigMO

    Enjoy your walk through, however, there is only one thing no one is covering yet and I am hoping you will post something about it.
    customer Interval Work outs. I see a lot of talk about AI coach and all that – great don’t care. I have a Garmin Epix Gen 2 and use to have Fitbit Ionic and it had “better” interval training than on my current pixel watch 3. I do like my PIxel Watch 3 for other reasons, especially being a PIxel phone and Premium Gemini user.

    can you show a detailed walk through of setting up interveral training?

  20. Steve Harrop

    I *really* hoped you would have covered whether the Pixel 4 captures heart rate during swimming. All previous editions do not, nor does my Fitbit Sense-2 (Apple Watch, some Garmins do). It is my main sport and I came here thinking “you’ll get this”, but you spent 5 of the 13 review minutes on satellite SOS :-(

    • Jayden

      Thank you Ray!

      Do podcast apps and/or Spotify on WearOS allow dynamically changing the playback speed (e.g. switching to 1.2x or 1.5x, etc. at any time during the audio playback)?

    • Steve

      Thanks – I noticed “Pool Swim” as one of the “new” Sports, so I hoped they would follow through.

      Thanks again for answering!

    • Jacopo

      Have you verified this personally? For me this is the difference between buy and not buy 🙏

    • Here’s the exact quote from the product lead via e-mail:

      “Pixel Watch 4 brings heart rate and lap tracking on your device for pool swims. The swimming experience for open water swim added heart rate tracking but otherwise remains the same as on previous Pixel Watch devices.”

      (That last sentence means there isn’t an openwater swim algorithm, but will track HR)

    • Jacopo

      Thank you Ray for the reply. It would be interesting to know if heart rate will come also to the watch 3 via software update or if it’s hardware… I guess only Google knows for sure…

  21. Marcos

    Hey were you able to check if they finally record vo2 max with the new watch, it was something I missed in the previous versions where they would just give a cardio load score or something like that

  22. Judy Bawks

    Hi Ray, I’ve researched every corner of the internet without getting a clear answer, so I’m coming to you because you are an expert I can trust.
    I am a minority in the fitness watch shoppers, a somewhat active senior who wouldn’t mind measuring my activity, but am really hoping for a watch who can also monitor my heart health and help me in the case of a bad fall when alone in the house or out walking the dog. I am an android user and understand that I will probably not use a tenth of the capabilities of any watch, just like i don’t with my Galaxy 25 Ultra, but i enjoy having all the knowledge my phone offers me, and would like a watch that could give me the same connectivity.
    I would like a watch that is independent of my phone (LTE), with fall detection and heart monitoring, GPS. as well as the fitness and communcation standards found on most watches. I feel like this new Google Pixel watch 4 is the match for my needs, but would very much respect any thoughts you could offer. I would be willing to pay extra for the right watch, but I also would prefer a watch that wasn’t super heavy or large.
    On behalf of all of the casual exercisers 65 and over, I thank you!!

    • fourthdose

      Google Pixel Watch & Fall detection. Works only in some countries. Doesn’t work in Finland for example.

      If you need it to work nearly everywhere, Apple Watch and Samsung Galaxy Watch are your options.

      You own a Galaxy 25 Ultra, so Galaxy Watch 8 may be your best choice.

      I wish someone would actually TEST with a simulated fall, how well fall detection works!

      Unfortunately, iPhone doesn’t have fall detection, one has to buy Apple Watch, for example Apple Watch Ultra 3. But iPhone has a car crash detection from iPhone 14.