Update June 2016: My in-depth review of the Vivoactive HR is now available. Swing on over to that post for all the details!
On Friday Garmin announced their new Vivoactive HR & Vivofit 3. As you’ll remember, my post was rather short and pretty limited in terms of content (just one pic!). I promised that come around Sunday, I’d get some hands-on time with the units and then post back on my thoughts.
And sure enough, that happened. I spent a few hours this afternoon with the new devices, including a 10K run. And overall, I came away impressed – in particular with the new Vivoactive HR. Let’s dive into things.
Oh, but first – the unit here is a beta unit. As such, there are both items in software and hardware that may and will differ from the final units. For example on the exterior there are finishes & labeling that aren’t yet on these units, and on the software side there are things not yet implemented. Release isn’t expected until the April or so timeframe.
The Basics:
There are two things that you’ll notice right away, one from the name, and the other just by looking at it. This isn’t your grandfather’s Vivoactive. Or even the one still on your wrist. First off as the name (HR) implies, it has an optical HR sensor built into the back of it. This uses Garmin’s internally developed ELEVATE sensor, the same sensor seen on the Forerunner 235, Fenix3 HR, and the Vivosmart HR.
Next, and most obvious is that the unit looks quite a bit different from the first Vivoactive. That first unit was all about making it small. Literally – that was the goal – to make the smallest GPS watch ever. And, they succeeded there. But size doesn’t always matter. And in this case, they tweaked the form factor a bit and I think the end result is actually a cleaner feeling unit.
Of course, it is bigger, there’s no doubt about that. And for some folks that will undoubtedly be a downside. It’s thicker than the previous Vivoactive, but it is less wide.
In a lot of ways, it kinda feels like the Fitbit Surge from a form factor standpoint. Sorta skinny-ish, but not quite as thick as the Surge (which gets thicker at one end). Like the Surge, it also feels quite comfortable to wear. Garmin has designed the watch band with pins to rotate inwards, allowing smaller wrists to wear it without that hard-plastic feel that some watch bands have.
Many have wondered about the display, and I’ve chatted with Garmin a bit more about that since Sunday. Technically speaking, the underlying display is actually the same as the Vivoactive. It’s simply just rotated sideways.
However, while it’s the same underlying display, they have tweaked some aspects to improve contrast. Also remember that while the display may be the same, factors like the touch screen which sits atop the display have changed – and that actually does impact visual qualities of the display below it. In this case, they changed the touch screen to a component that’s faster and more responsive, as well as improving the look of the display below it. Additionally, they added an ambient light sensor, so that the display’s brightness will change dynamically based on lighting conditions.
Said differently: It just seems more crisp than the original Vivoactive.
Whether that’s due to the actual hardware changes, or instead simply a much cleaner user interface (UI), is somewhat hard to tell. The new UI design of the Vivoactive HR makes it feel more like a FR920XT/Fenix3 (but simplified), and as such, it is visually cleaner than the original Vivoactive layout. For example, here’s the unit next to a Fenix3 HR. They look virtually identical from a contrast/crispness standpoint.
Of course, you’ll see plenty of shots of it on my wrist. But what about a smaller wrist? I present you The Girl (aka, my lovely wife). She’s 5’2″ tall with wrists that are 14cm (or 5.5 inches).. Here’s a few shots on her wrists. Note that the little clasp thing is the wrong clasp for this unit (beta, is oversized). Also note that this is the larger unit and not the smaller one. It’s all they had on-hand, but I know many of you wanted some shots nonetheless. The white watch you see is the older Vivoactive (original).
Now like the Vivoactive it contains all the Connect IQ app & daily activity tracking goodness of the past. Except now you get the 24×7 HR tracking functionality, as well as tracking of intensity minutes.
Furthermore, they’ve added in the ability to count flights of stairs with a new internal barometric altimeter. The stairs will show up right below the steps on the activity page:
And of course, they’ll show up in the Garmin Connect mobile app as well.
What’s that? You want a walk-through of all the features and how the touch screen works? Ok. Ask and you shall receive:
As you can see, the touch screen is pretty re-active, and the new user interface makes it a bit easier to navigate the watch and thus feels more reactive.
More Details:
Ok, so now that we’ve talked about some of the high-level changes, let’s dive into my list from Friday of what’s different at a more detailed level:
– Added Garmin Elevate optical HR sensor for workouts & 24/7 HR monitoring
– Added ability to re-broadcast the optical HR over ANT+ (so a Garmin Edge can see it)
– Added in floors climbed metric
– Added in Intensity Minutes
– Added in skiing/snowboard, paddle-board, and rowing apps
– Added in Auto Activity Detection (Running, Swimming, Cycling, Elliptical)
– Added support for basic swim HR recording via HRM-SWIM & HRM-TRI straps (or not apparently)
– Added ambient light sensor, allowing display to change brightness automatically
– Added support for wrist-turn detection to turn on backlight
– Added dedicated physical lap button, versus touch-button in original Vivoactive
– Slight increases to processor and RAM, making it faster
– Does NOT support HR using internal optical sensor while swimming (with no plans to enable)
– Increases GPS battery life up to 13hrs from 8hrs in original Vivoactive
– But decreased to 8 days always-on 24×7 mode battery (with HR though) from 3 weeks (no HR previously)
– Support of Varia Radar & Varia lights (does actually support Varia Vision after all)
Now to dig into some of these more deeply. First is that Garmin Elevate optical HR sensor. That’s the same sensor found in previous units, and as such, expect performance to roughly be the same. However, Garmin has seemingly made improvements since the FR235 & Vivosmart HR came out. For example I’m seeing better performance now with the Elevate sensor on the Fenix3 HR than I did back in November/December with the other units. I suspect some of those tweaks have also been ported into firmware updates for the FR235/Vivosmart HR already.
Like the Vivosmart HR/FR235/Fenix3HR, you can re-broadcast the signal from the Vivoactive HR to other devices. This allows you to then pick it up on another ANT+ device, such as a Garmin Edge computer. Note that it doesn’t re-broadcast over Bluetooth Smart, just ANT+.
However, unlike the Vivosmart HR, you aren’t forced to use the optical HR sensor. You can easily pair an ANT+ heart rate strap to the unit, or any other ANT+ sensor.
At present it supports the ANT+ Heart Rate straps, ANT+ Cycling Speed/Cadence sensors, ANT+ Running Footpod, and the ANT+ Tempe temperature sensor. It does NOT support ANT+ power meters, however you can get ANT+ power meter support through some Connect IQ apps already (but you can’t record that data quite yet until the next Connect IQ software update is released).
When it comes to additional in-box activity modes/apps, you can choose from a huge listing of apps. Pretty much everything you’d find on a Garmin FR920XT, except for openwater swimming. You can also add activity modes at the bottom too (as long it isn’t openwater swimming).
Note that on the Vivoactive HR, the recording rate is set at 1-second during workouts (but variable in 24×7 mode) – this being an upgrade from the original Vivoactive. Also note that while the Vivoactive HR does have a pool swimming mode, you can’t use the optical HR sensor during swimming to capture your heart rate. Garmin has no plans to enable that either in the Vivoactive HR (it’s not currently enabled on the Fenix3 HR either). While you can use the HRM-TRI and HRM-SWIM to capture HR data above water, it won’t do it below water.
Note that while using those straps though with the Vivoactive HR for running, you will NOT get Running Dynamics data. The unit does not capture Running Dynamics, even if using an HRM-RUN or HRM-TRI strap.
The main reason is that it’s a simpler running watch. The unit has three data pages, each of which can be customized with two or three pieces of information (but not one).
You can dive into the menus and select all assortment of metrics, which at a quick glance seem to be on par with those found on the FR230/235 watches.
Like many of the other newer Garmin running/multisport watches, you’ve now got new widgets related to your last workouts. There is both a last workout widget, as well as a ‘My Day’ widget.
Meanwhile, unlike the other Garmin running watches – the Vivoactive HR is the first wearable to connect to Garmin’s Varia lineup. This includes the Varia radar and Varia lights. And (and this is a change from Friday), it WILL include the ability to connect to Varia Vision (that’s the heads up display). I’ve asked for clarification on whether or not the Fenix3 or FR920XT will get such an update, given they are 2-3 times the price of the Vivoactive HR.
Finally, a few other random things that didn’t fit anywhere else:
– You can invert the color scheme from white on black, to black on white text (plus the dabs of color here and there)
– It can read from HRM-TRI/HRM-RUN straps, but does NOT recording Running Dynamics, just the baseline heart rate
– The barometric altimeter in the unit is used for both floor counting, as well as during sport/activity
– For starting/stopping, you’ll use the lower right button. For laps, you can enable the manual lap function (auto laps are the default). That then allows the left button to become your lap button (as seen below).
– You can do basic navigation, such as saving a point to the navigation menu, and then using simple electronic compass navigation to get back to it.
If I think of more random things, I’ll plop them in this section.
A Run With It:
Ok – so how about a quick run with it? I got a chance to go for a 10K run with the unit along the waterfront later in the afternoon. It’d be a simple out and back route, at a relatively constant pace. The pace being constant because my running handler just got off a flight from the US about 2 hours prior, and I had run 13 miles just 2 hours prior. Thus, neither of us were looking for an interval workout.
In any case, off we set out. I was mostly interested in how the watch handled on pace and heart rate, as well as just general use like the touch screen and distance accuracy.
Now, there was only one itty bitty problem: As I was wearing a chest strap to visually compare readings to, the unit quietly paired itself to said strap. A ‘feature’ I only noticed about 5 minute after our run ended. To be fair, this feature has actually been on other units like the FR235 as well (but not the Fenix3 HR) – it’s just that normally on my test units I remember to pair and then disable the HR straps first so this doesn’t happen.
On the flip side, since it was a beta unit that’s likely 1-2 months away from release, I’m not going to fret too much. And further, we already know what the Garmin Elevate optical HR sensor acts like (and you’ll see much more of that recent data in a few days as part of my Garmin Fenix3 HR In-Depth Review).
So, as for pace accuracy – things seemed very stable there. You can see that in this short running clip I put together. Pace is on the bottom on two of the screens:
And the same goes for the touch screen, it worked well. Each time it reacted without issue. Granted, it was not raining out (thus not wet), so that’s always still a factor. But Garmin has a pretty stable track record there of touch screens and wetness, so I’d be surprised if something changed. But that’d be something I’d cover in my in-depth review (Which, is a good time to remind, this isn’t a review. It’s simply a preview of just one run).
Afterwards, I got the usual post-run PR’s. Since this was a ‘new’ unit, everything was a PR. And then following that I got summary information about my run:
Overall, the unit felt pretty nice on the wrist, and easy to read. It feels like an improvement over the Vivoactive – simply because of the new user interface. But also because of the integrated optical HR sensor.
Comparison Charts:
I’ve added the Vivoactive HR to the DCR Comparison Tool/Database, allowing you to quickly compare it to other products – most notably the FR230/FR235 and original Vivoactive. As for how you might choose between the FR230/235 and the Vivoactive HR?
Well, here’s a simplified primer:
You’d get the FR230 ($249) if: You didn’t care about optical HR (or 24×7 HR), but wanted more advanced running features like the custom workout creator, recovery time, downloading training plans, and four data fields (and more data pages). Same goes for the Virtual Partner type features, which the Vivoactive HR lacks.
You’d get the FR235 ($329) if: You did care about optical HR (and 24×7 HR), and wanted all of the things I just listed for the FR230 section. Remember that the FR235 is identical to the FR230, it just also has the optical HR sensor.
You’d get the Vivoactive HR ($249) if: You also wanted other sports –especially pool swimming, but also stand up paddle boarding, skiing or golf (all of which the FR230/235 lack). If you don’t need more advanced run metrics as seen above on the FR230/235, or if you just want a simpler user interface. You want the ‘Floors climbed’ metric really bad.
Obviously, there are lots of little quirks as to why someone might one one versus the other – but those are the main reasons.
Here’s the table. Remember, you can create your own comparison table using the product comparison tool here.
| Function/Feature | Garmin Vivoactive HR | Garmin Vivoactive | Garmin Forerunner 230 | Garmin Forerunner 235 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copyright DC Rainmaker - Updated May 14th, 2021 @ 3:16 pm New Window | ||||
| Price | $249 | $169 (on sale) | $249 | $249 |
| Product Announcement Date | Feb 19th, 2016 | January 5th, 2015 | Oct 21st, 2015 | Oct 21st, 2015 |
| Actual Availability/Shipping Date | Q2 2016 | March 2015 | November 2015 | November 2015 |
| GPS Recording Functionality | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Data Transfer | USB, BLUETOOTH SMART | USB, BLUETOOTH SMART | USB, Bluetooth Smart | USB, Bluetooth Smart |
| Waterproofing | 50 meters | 50 meters | 50 Meters | 50 Meters |
| Battery Life (GPS) | 13 hours GPS on | 10 hours GPS on | 16 hours | Up to 16 hours |
| Recording Interval | Smart Recording | Smart Recording (Variable) | 1-second & Smart | 1-second & Smart |
| Alerts | Vibrate/Visual | Vibrate/Visual | VIBRATE/SOUND/VISUAL | VIBRATE/SOUND/VISUAL |
| Backlight Greatness | Good | Good | Good | Good |
| Ability to download custom apps to unit/device | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Acts as daily activity monitor (steps, etc...) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Music | Garmin Vivoactive HR | Garmin Vivoactive | Garmin Forerunner 230 | Garmin Forerunner 235 |
| Can control phone music | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Has music storage and playback | No | No | No | No | Connectivity | Garmin Vivoactive HR | Garmin Vivoactive | Garmin Forerunner 230 | Garmin Forerunner 235 |
| Bluetooth Smart to Phone Uploading | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Notifications to unit (i.e. texts/calls/etc...) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Live Tracking (streaming location to website) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Group tracking | No | |||
| Emergency/SOS Message Notification (from watch to contacts) | No | No | No | No |
| Built-in cellular chip (no phone required) | No | No | No | No | Cycling | Garmin Vivoactive HR | Garmin Vivoactive | Garmin Forerunner 230 | Garmin Forerunner 235 |
| Designed for cycling | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Power Meter Capable | With some Connect IQ apps (but cannot record data) | With some Connect IQ apps (but cannot record data) | WITH SOME CONNECT IQ APPS (BUT CANNOT RECORD DATA) | WITH SOME CONNECT IQ APPS (BUT CANNOT RECORD DATA) |
| Speed/Cadence Sensor Capable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Strava segments live on device | No | No | No | No |
| Crash detection | No | Running | Garmin Vivoactive HR | Garmin Vivoactive | Garmin Forerunner 230 | Garmin Forerunner 235 |
| Designed for running | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Footpod Capable (For treadmills) | YES (Also has INTERNAL ACCELEROMETER) | YES (Also has INTERNAL ACCELEROMETER) | YES (Also has INTERNAL ACCELEROMETER) | YES (Also has INTERNAL ACCELEROMETER) |
| Running Dynamics (vertical oscillation, ground contact time, etc...) | No | No | No | No |
| VO2Max Estimation | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Race Predictor | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Recovery Advisor | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Run/Walk Mode | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Swimming | Garmin Vivoactive HR | Garmin Vivoactive | Garmin Forerunner 230 | Garmin Forerunner 235 |
| Designed for swimming | Yes | Yes | No (protected though just fine) | No (protected though just fine) |
| Openwater swimming mode | No | No | N/A | N/A |
| Lap/Indoor Distance Tracking | Yes | Yes | N/A | N/A |
| Record HR underwater | No | No | N/A | N/A |
| Openwater Metrics (Stroke/etc.) | No | No | N/A | N/A |
| Indoor Metrics (Stroke/etc.) | Yes | Yes | N/A | N/A |
| Indoor Drill Mode | No | No | N/A | N/A |
| Indoor auto-pause feature | No | No | N/A | N/A |
| Change pool size | Yes | Yes | N/A | N/A |
| Indoor Min/Max Pool Lengths | 17M/18Y TO 150Y/M | 17M/18Y TO 150Y/M | N/A | N/A |
| Ability to customize data fields | Yes | Yes | N/A | N/A |
| Captures per length data - indoors | Yes | Yes | N/A | N/A |
| Indoor Alerts | Yes | Yes | N/A | N/A | Triathlon | Garmin Vivoactive HR | Garmin Vivoactive | Garmin Forerunner 230 | Garmin Forerunner 235 |
| Designed for triathlon | No | No | No | No |
| Multisport mode | No | No | No | No | Workouts | Garmin Vivoactive HR | Garmin Vivoactive | Garmin Forerunner 230 | Garmin Forerunner 235 |
| Create/Follow custom workouts | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| On-unit interval Feature | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Training Calendar Functionality | No | No | Yes | Yes | Functions | Garmin Vivoactive HR | Garmin Vivoactive | Garmin Forerunner 230 | Garmin Forerunner 235 |
| Auto Start/Stop | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Virtual Partner Feature | No | No | No | No |
| Virtual Racer Feature | No | No | No | No |
| Records PR's - Personal Records (diff than history) | Yes | Only on Garmin Connect | Yes | Yes |
| Tidal Tables (Tide Information) | No | No | No | No |
| Weather Display (live data) | Yes | Via Connect IQ app | Yes | YEs | Navigate | Garmin Vivoactive HR | Garmin Vivoactive | Garmin Forerunner 230 | Garmin Forerunner 235 |
| Follow GPS Track (Courses/Waypoints) | No | No | No | No |
| Markers/Waypoint Direction | Yes (to pre-saved spots) | No | No | No |
| Routable/Visual Maps (like car GPS) | No | No | No | No |
| Back to start | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Impromptu Round Trip Route Creation | No | No | No | No |
| Download courses/routes from phone to unit | No | No | No | No | Sensors | Garmin Vivoactive HR | Garmin Vivoactive | Garmin Forerunner 230 | Garmin Forerunner 235 |
| Altimeter Type | Barometric | GPS | GPS | GPS |
| Compass Type | Magnetic | GPS | N/A | N/A |
| Optical Heart Rate Sensor internally | Yes | No | No | YEs |
| Heart Rate Strap Compatible | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| ANT+ Heart Rate Strap Capable | Yes (Can also broadcast ANT+ HR) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| ANT+ Speed/Cadence Capable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| ANT+ Footpod Capable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| ANT+ Power Meter Capable | No | No | No | No |
| ANT+ Lighting Control | Yes | No | No | NO |
| ANT+ Bike Radar Integration | Yes | No | No | NO |
| ANT+ Trainer Control (FE-C) | No | No | No | NO |
| ANT+ Remote Control | YES FOR GARMIN VIRB | Yes for Garmin VIRB | YES FOR GARMIN VIRB | YES FOR GARMIN VIRB |
| ANT+ eBike Compatibility | No | No | No | NO |
| ANT+ Gear Shifting (i.e. SRAM ETAP) | No | No | No | |
| Shimano Di2 Shifting | No | No | No | NO |
| Bluetooth Smart HR Strap Capable | No | No | No | NO |
| Bluetooth Smart Speed/Cadence Capable | nO | no | No | NO |
| Bluetooth Smart Footpod Capable | No | No | No | NO |
| Bluetooth Smart Power Meter Capable | No | No | No | NO |
| Temp Recording (internal sensor) | Sorta (Available only in Skiing/SUP) | No | No | NO |
| Temp Recording (external sensor) | Yes | Yes (Tempe) | YES (TEMPE) | YES (TEMPE) | Software | Garmin Vivoactive HR | Garmin Vivoactive | Garmin Forerunner 230 | Garmin Forerunner 235 |
| PC Application | Garmin Express - Windows/Mac | Garmin Express | Garmin Express | Garmin Express |
| Web Application | Garmin Connect | Garmin Connect | Garmin Connect | Garmin Connect |
| Phone App | iOS/Android/Windows Phone | iOS/Android/Windows Phone | iOS/Android/Windows Phone | iOS/Android/Windows Phone |
| Ability to Export Settings | No | No | No | No | Purchase | Garmin Vivoactive HR | Garmin Vivoactive | Garmin Forerunner 230 | Garmin Forerunner 235 |
| Amazon | Link | Link | Link | Link |
| Backcountry.com | Link | Link | Link | Link |
| Chain Reaction Cycles | Link | Link | Link | Link |
| Competitive Cyclist | Link | Link | Link | Link |
| REI | Link | Link | Link | Link |
| Wiggle | Link | Link | Link | Link | DCRainmaker | Garmin Vivoactive HR | Garmin Vivoactive | Garmin Forerunner 230 | Garmin Forerunner 235 |
| Review Link | Link | Link | Link | Link |
Trying to compare other watches? Just swing over to the product comparison tool and create your own comparison charts there.
And the Vivofit 3:
Now it’s not that I’m trying to ignore the Vivofit 3, but rather, it’s just a much simpler device. The functionality ultimately isn’t terribly different than the previous Vivofit 2, it’s just that it looks different. As a recap, here’s what’s different from the Vivofit 2:
– Added in Auto Activity Detection (Running, Swimming, Cycling, Elliptical)
– Added in Intensity Minutes metric
– New square screen, includes new analog clock face, different UI designs
– New styled Vivofit 3 bands
And, here’s what stayed the same:
– Can still connect to ANT+ HR strap for non-swim activities
– Can still manually create a standalone workout activity
And here’s what went away:
– Not compatible with Vivofit1/Vivofit2 accessory bands
So, as you can see – it’s fairly straightforward. To look at some of these screens, we’ll just iterate through and press the button a few times. For example, here’s the steps:
Then remaining (or overage in this case) for your step goal:
Followed by step distance:
And then calories:
No doubt the main difference here aside from the addition of intensity minutes, was the now-square screen, and the new band options. Here’s what a few of those newer and more stylish band options look like:
The nice piece being that the unit keeps the same fairly low price of $99, making it pretty competitive in the marketplace today.
Summary:
Phew – lots of details!
I think Garmin likely has a bit of a winner on their hands with respect to the Vivoactive HR. Obviously, it’s too soon to know if there are any hidden bugs that cause issues that would be more apparent in a longer term review (which is probably a few months away). But they seemed to have really cleaned up the Vivoactive HR compared to the original Vivoactive (which was still pretty good). This feels like a more rounded watch that navigates easier with the front-facing buttons.
The price point is very strong at $249, especially compared to the Fitbit Surge in the same ballpark, or even the Fitbit Blaze that’s a bit cheaper at $199. Additionally, I expect we’ll see the Apple Watch (Sport) back at $249 again soon – and for the athlete, this will likely be a far better option that’s more accurate and more well rounded given it has GPS on-board where the Apple Watch doesn’t.
Stay tuned for an in-depth review around the time the unit starts shipping. As always, since this was just a few hours with the unit, it may very well suck when it comes to shipping. Or, it may be even better. That’s just the way first looks work with pre-production devices.
With that – thanks for reading!
April 25th 2016 Update with new video added!
I’ve now got a final production unit, here’s a quick un-boxing video along with some more on size comparisons between the Vivoactive (original) and the Fitbit Surge:
Finally! You can now order the new Vivoactive HR and Vivofit3 units from Clever Training. In doing so you support the site here, I appreciate it!
REI is stating that they should receive and ship out the Vivoactive HR on April 13th. Looks like everywhere else is later April or May. Hoping to have it by the end of next week!
On Amazon.es they say they will ship within 2 or 3 weeks
Have ordered via Amazon.es for €269, says delivery in 2-3 weeks
Let us know when you get it!
Amazon UK allowing pre-orders and saying due to be released 14th April (subject to change).
link to amazon.co.uk
Fingers crossed
Thank you so much for the info, I was try to find the release date.
Hi can you please post pics of watch faces?
Are there different settings for one’s wothba second hand? Also does it stay on all the time? Thanks
Hi Ray, just wondering if you still have to set the time on the vivoactive HR via phone connection? Or can it be set via GPS? That is one function that is painfully missed on the vivoactive and my wife hates it especially when traveling!
I found this interesting page on the Garmin website. This has to be confirmation the new Vivoactive HR has started shipping to dealers. The link is to a firmware update for the HR.
link to www8.garmin.com
I love my Vivoactive but I have a hard thing me reading the display at times. The cleaner looking display and addition of the HR it’s a no brainier for me to upgrade. The only question I have is why they are up to version 2.2 of the firmware and why there is an update when the watch hasn’t officially been released?
Garmin often does this as they get close, but it definitely doesn’t mean any units have shipped yet.
This allows them to validate with beta testers that the production update mechanisms are functioning properly for the product (versus just manual updates which are normally used). Typically this is done a few weeks in advance of shipping, though there have been cases of it being far longer.
But yes, all signs are pointing to units starting to ship over the next 2-3 weeks.
I preordered in a shop in Belgium, called them to ask for an estimation on arrival date. They contacted Garmin, and shipping to shops might be on the 22nd, with arrival in the week after, and home deliveries probably 1st week of may.
Erik in which store have you ordered ?
I broke down and made a pre-order at clevertraining.com I’ll post my thoughts when I receive it.
When do you think you will receive your unit for the in-depth review and how long after will you be posting it?
Thanks for the info. On one hand I’m hesitating on ordering the HR until after it comes out so I can try it on. The only downside I can see is the size compared to the original Vivoactive. I wear mine 24hrs a day. On the other hand the advantage of what appears to be a crisp and easier to read display has me tempted to make a preorder.
I feel l same way. On the one hand this watch appears to be everything I want in a sports/running/activity watch but on the other hand I wonder would it be too bulky to wear 24/7?
Question:
Though I pre-ordered the watch, I’m wondering if it’s overkill for my needs. I’m mainly interested in this watch due to HR accuracy (vs FitBit, Microsoft Band, etc) and auto-tracking. Because I don’t need the GPS, I’m wondering if the FitBit Blaze – which is appx $80 cheaper is a better watch for my needs. Here’s he question…
Do you find Garmin products to be more accurate/quality than the competition? What about the Garmin Connect ecosystem… better than Polar Flow ecosystem (I recently purchased/returned the a360 due to clasp issues), etc. etc.
Love to hear your thoughts.
Ray,
Excellent site, been quietly following your RSS for a few months now! Any news on that UK / EU based online store? Eager to pre-order the VA HR!
Cheers.
Hi Rob-
Ask and you shall receive! Decided to just whip up this page to explain the state of things as they stand tonight (at 11:37PM CET time):
link to dcrainmaker.com
Cheers!
Excellent – thanks for that!
Ray,
Another question – is the ELEVATE HR Sensor relatively robust? I.e. could you happily use the Garmin Bike Mount Kit without worrying about damaging the HR sensor on the underside? Same goes for the Fenix 3 HR.
Thanks,
Rob
I wouldn’t have any concerns about using it with the rubber bike mount, it’s got a fairly hard protective plastic layer on the outside.
Cool – cheers!
Are the prices on clevertraining.co.uk going to remain mainly RRP? Really doesn’t make them competitive even taking the 10% discount into account.
Hi Ray,
For the downhill ski function does it count total vertical feet skied for the day?
Thanks!
Yup! I love using it on my Fenix3, works so well.
Is the ski function of Vivoactive HR the same as the one in Fenix 3 HR?
Thanks for the reply!
Pre-ordered my one today. Shop is supposed to have them on 13.04 and I’ll get it on 14.04 (if lucky) or 15.04. Unless there will be a delivery delay of course.
Thanks Ray for all the great advice!
Ha, just read about Clever Training.
They do not list Vivoactive HR yet – shame 🙁 although I did order my one already it is still not paid and I can cancel at any time.
Do you know when will EU part of CT have it?
It’s been on there for quite a while: link to clevertraining.com
Sorry, I was not clear – I had CT EU in mind.
OH, sorry, duh!
I’m thinking I’m going to wait until it’s out. I’m concerned that it’s too big for my wrist (I’m about the size of The Girl and also since the Fenix 3 HR has an antenna issue in the hardware (shockingly) but from all I’ve read it seems that’s the case. So, once it’s out, I’ll see how the reviews go. Certainly has everything I’d want though!
I was wondering if the hr functions like the hr on the vivoactive or more like the basis which is terrific and literally runs unattended and always.
Is there any more memory on the HR so that you can add more apps than on the 1st vivoactive?
Is the vibration on the HR the same, or hopefully stronger, than on the 1st vivoactive?
in depht review … WHEN?!
😀
Usually after final production unit is in Rays hands. Its not out yet
Just got message from the shop that Garmin has delayed deliveries to the shops.
It was supposed to be 13.04 now it is said 06.05 although it might happen sooner (Polish market).
Any news from Clever Training EU – when will they have I and what will be the prace and delivery charge to Poland?
In the Netherlands the same, pre-ordered this morning, expected delivery date changed this afternoon from 15-04 to 10-05.
REI is now saying the 29th for the preorders 🙁
BestBuy.ca hasn’t changed (yet) and still shows April 29.
Amazon UK still shows 14.04
Will I be able to use this watch to rollerblade (roller-skate)?
My order with Amazon Spain still shows delivery 19-25 April, but if you go directly to the product (as if ordering from scratch) it now says “Product not available.” Not looking good, seems like a worldwide issue. Although Amazon UK not caught up yet.
REI had mine shipping to store by April 19th, now they cancelled my order and said the product is no longer available.
Kurt, that’s strange. I have mine ordered through Clever Training but you had me concerned. I called REI and inquired about availability. The Lady I was speaking with pulled up my REI account and built a dummy order. Her system showed an original arrival date of mid March revised to 4/29. There was no indication the product wasn’t coming in. I’d giv them a call if I were you.
REI has an interesting policy that after about 30 days, if the product still isn’t available, they’ll send you an e-mail notifying that they will cancel the order if you don’t respond. You can simply respond to that e-mail stating you want to continue waiting on back-order. Did you miss that first e-mail maybe?
I suspect they have had too many issues where items that have been on back order longer end up getting returned more often. Regardless, it can be annoying.
You know there is a lot interest in the upcoming Vivoactive… Release date rumours flying about every which way. Wouldn’t it be nice if Garmin were to give their customers and potential customers some sort of an update as to when this product is expected out? Just saying.
To be fair, they have: Q2 2016 (so anytime between April and June). Within that spec, they’re on time and that guidance hasn’t changed.
It’s just that it gets messy when retailers try and play the date game (sometimes with Garmin’s guidance, and sometimes not). Ideally, Garmin would stop giving retailers different dates from official dates. That’d kinda solve everything.
My Amazon order did say arriving today. It just changed to 3rd of May
That confirms the date I was given when I called REI this week. They had the ETA as 4/29.
That was a UK Amazon order. Interesting that the original date I was given matched up exactly to the Connect app update rolling out which gives support for Move IQ for vivoactive HR
Interesting. My Amazon order still says “Delivery date pending”.
Ray
You note on the apps list there is a “Cardio” setting, I have not seen this setting during my research, will it appear on the final model?
Also if it does, what does the Cardio app do ?
Regards
Steve
The app got updated with Vivoactive HR Support. Sounds promising.
Just had a response back from clevertraining.co.uk and they are saying the vivoactive HR wont be available to order until July(approx and subject to change)
With regards to android notifications does anyone know how well these work on Garmins?
Does it have the functionality to read messages/whatsapp/emails etc?
My Amazon preorder for April 14th has just been changed to May 2nd.. could well slip further when it gets to May 1st but here’s hoping!
I have an interesting question; interesting to me anyways 🙂
I wonder if Garmin will someday accept pre-orders on “their” websites? Reason I ask is that when FitBit announced the Blaze.. FitBit took pre-orders on their corporate website a couple months before actual release.
Steve
They already do. 😉
It’s just that Garmin fulfills them seemingly last most times.
I just spoke with garmin CS and they said the new vivoactive HR will be compatible with the varia vision. I saw an icon in the vivoactive HR manual for the vision and assumed it would be eventually. CS double checked with tech support and they confirmed the watch will ship with the software to connect and provide data to the display. He said it would be the first device outside of the Edge computer family to work. He said it is not on the compatibility list for the web site because it is not shipping yet. FYI for anyone interested in that functionality.
Hi
Just wondering if you are going to do a review of the accuracy of the HR in the Garmin Vivoactive HR.
I am looking for a RELIABLE wrist-based hr monitor and haven’t found one yet, but the Vivoactive does look promising.
Once the unit starts shipping and there’s a final production unit to judge accuracy results on.
Are you able to turn Bluetooth and WIFI off?
I would also be interested to know if Bluetooth can be turned off on the Vivofit 3.
Great post. I’m actually new to fitness trackers/smart watches. The look and aesthetic of the Vivoactive HR really caught my eye when I began doing reading and research. I’m curious if this would be a good choice for me to track my running time/pace during a soccer match? I’m also thinking a GPS tracker would help me record where I’m most active on the pitch/field.
Or do you think another, cheaper alternative could do those things too?
Thanks in advance for any advice you could provide!
Here’s a little more information while we wait (im)patiently for our pre-orders. Garmin has posted the manual for the vívoactive HR: link to support.garmin.com
Hello Ray:
Great write up. I currently have a Fitbit Charge but I am looking to upgrade my device to something with HR monitoring. Is there a way to disable move alerts on Garmin products? I feel like that might be a nuisance especially in my office setting where it’s very unpredictable and I can’t always move when I’d like.
How accurate is Vivoactive HR for measuring distance on an indoor track or TM? Sorry if you already answered this but I couldn’t find it. Thanks Ray !!
What bothers me is the rather extensive list “Maximizing Battery Life” in the manual with such feature-killing tips like “turn of wirst-based HR monitoring” and “turn off Bluetooth”. This does not bode well.
My guess is that many users will soon miss the “old” Vivoactive battery-wise.
Ray,
I didn’t see anything about “Auto Activity Detection” in the manual. You mentioned this feature above, which is one the main reasons why I pre-purchased the unit.
However the feature isn’t mentioned in the instructions (perhaps I missed it). Coupled with the ongoing problematic HR stats and intensity minutes, I might cancel my pre-order.
Please advise. Thanks.
HR and intensity min issues, see link/discussion here: link to forums.garmin.com
I know it’s a different unit, but I’d imagine the sensors are the same. Somewhat troubling, no?
Auto Activity Detection is technically a serverside/app thing, and not on-unit. Typically speaking Garmin doesn’t include those in the manual. As of my discussion with them a few days ago, it was still in.
Looking at the link there for intensity minutes, I suspect you’ll see them continue to tweak sampling rates, solving that. Or, one could just leave it a few extra seconds and get the same result.
Questions after reading the manual, anyone know the answers?
1-Can GPS coordinates be added manually to be used for navigation (either on the watch or in the app) or do you have to be at the location to save a location?
2-How much storage space is available in “USB Mode”?
3-Can auto lap be 1k when device is set to record in miles?
4-Awesome it has an alarm clock. Is it beep only or can it be vibration?
Thanks
Strange the manual says “Avoid pressing the keys under water.”, but also says push the “-” to pause when swimming.
I was beginning to think I was a bit sad to be reading the manual back to back before even getting my hands on the kit. Glad to see I´m not the only one!
Hey, Ray!
Any updates regarding the date Vivoactive HR coming to stores?
Thanks.
No, it continues to sound like that late April/early May timeframe.
The estimated delivery date for my preorder changed from the 15th of april to the 10th of may. But now changed to the 26th of april 🙂
Hi!
Did you get your device already?
The golf apps on the previous version of Vivoactive is virtually useless. You have to download the course data before every round. More frustrating, when you switch to watch and read the time, you have to download the course data again when teturning to the golf apps. Wonder the new Vivoactive HR has eliminate this defect. Does Fennix 3 HR has the same problem?
This is very disappointing, was hoping to eliminate having to use a Garmin golf watch S4 which has all the courses on it already. You just pick the one your standing on when you get ready to tee off.
Any idea what the mAh of the battery is in the Vivoactive HR compared to the Forerunner 235? Since it has the same GPS and same heart rate monitor, plus an altimeter, I don’t have much hope for decent battery life if it’s any smaller from what I’m reading in the Forerunner 235 forums.
I haven’t seen it listed anywhere. But keep in mind the mAh value isn’t useful by itself, because different devices burn at different rates.
What is notable when I talked to them though is that they said they had more battery flexibility in the VAHR. One key area this immediately manifests itself in is the ability to keep broadcasting mode on, even while also in regular sport mode (unlike all other units).
Sorry for my English)) Say for different cyclist forerunner 230 (235) from vivoactive, it is better for fitness and bike for a beginner. They say that the optical sensor is worse for the bike?
For a beginner cyclist, go for something from the edge range instead of a watch in my opinion. Maybe the edge 520?
If you want a do it all device, this will be fine but use a HR strap when cycyling
And further, recovery and VO2 max.how important they are? Swimming, golf, etc. not important. Biking and fitness are important. What’s in this case, better vívoactive Hr ог Forerunner 230 (235)
Hi Ray
I have the original Vivoactive. It is working fine just it has some different (not accurate)protocol to count calories.
It counts nearly 40% less calories than my Edge 500 via HR and my Edge 510 via watts.
I read on the forum that other people see the same not corect results with Vivoactive, but Garmins response is that it should be more accurate. No way because my 2 Edges count very close given HR or Power.
We know Kj is pretty real…
Do you know if they solve that with HR model?
Matevz
The Edge 500 uses a Firstbeat calorie algorithm, whereas the Vivoactive uses a Garmin algorithm.
I don’t know offhand which algorithm the VAHR will use, but since it doesn’t do VO2Max, I suspect it’ll be internal Garmin.
Keep in mind that power of course is the most realistic way to measure it, but that requires a power meter.
Yes, I know that power is the most realistic. But in the winter I do lots of trail running/uphill walking and I made some trainings with all 3 my Garmins, for comparison. When Edges show 1000Kcal, Vivoactive is hardly at 600,….that’s bullshit.
I also made comparison on the bike ride, with Quarq connected to Edge and Vivoactive connected to HR.
2000Kj on 510 vs 1150Kcal on VA
Too big difference,…activity tracker should be more accurate or it is fancy junk. Ok it measures TSS right, when uploaded to Training Peaks.
Got an email from the company where I pre-ordered in Belgium. Garmin Belux postponed the release AGAIN, until the end of may/begin june. Disappointed!
That is very disappointing. I was originally supposed to have mine delivered by today. Now I have no idea when.
Hi – I have been researching and researching to try and find out if the Vivoactive HR supports other workouts like a kickboxing class or HIIT training or a Barre class. I want something that will work for all of that and also GPS for running. I tried the Tom Tom Spark but returned it because I mistakenly believed it would work in “free workout” mode but it turns out you need a sensor for that, a sensor for spin class, etc. I am trying to decide between the Vivoactive HR and the Fitbit Surge right now.
Any thoughts?
Like the Tomtom Spark, you would probably just use a gym mode or “other” type of workout mode. I think the gym mode on the Tomtom watch is designed not just for weights, but to capture most indoor workouts. I imagine it would be a struggle to have a specific workout program for every type of exercise that people will engage in. If all you are trying to do is capture your HR data and calories etc during the workout, the Garmin should be fine (but the Tomtom unit did that as well). I use the gym mode on the Tomtom unit all the time and use the freestyle mode for sports such as tennis. The new Garmin certainly looks pretty cool and luckily my wife has pre-ordered one for me, as she is a legend! It looks a little more “all-in-one” than the Tomtom, with the addition of golf etc. I like the Tomtom watches (have the Spark and the Golfer), but I am often wearing two watches. I have an Apple Watch as well, which complicates things!
The problem is the TomTom required separate sensors for the free gym mode…. something I didn’t realize beforehand. It doesn’t have a HRM so I guess that’s why.
The Tomtom unit has built-in accelerometer for the gym mode….. Does not require any external sensors?
didn’t work for me. When you get to the “go” screen, I would hit the right button and it would pop up and say “HRM Required” same for spinning class, it would say “cadence sensor required” and wouldn’t let me use the unit.
Did you have the unit with the internal HRM? mine (on gym mode) does not ask for any external sensors. The modes on my watch are: outdoor run, cycle, swim, treadmill, gym, indoor cycling (this may require additional sensors), freestyle (basically an outdoor “general” workout with GPS and HRM) and stopwatch mode. I assume the spinning class is the indoor cycle mode, which would require an extra sensor on basically any watch, if you are to capture your foot movement on the bike. It would not require an external HRM, if you are using a Tomtom watch with built-in HRM. You could just use “gym” mode, if you don’t care about capturing your cycling motion, but if you do want to capture your cycling rate you will need to get a sensor for any watch you use.
HI – no I guess that was my problem – mine did not have the internal HRM.
Ahhh – that makes a big difference. The internal HRM on the Tomtom is quite good. The only reason I got excited about my wife buying the new Garmin for me was the addition of golf and the phone notifications etc. While it will not replace all of the functions of my Apple Watch, it is far better as a fitness watch (built in GPS etc) and the Tomtom unit does not have golf. I really like my Apple Watch and the Tomtom devices, but switching between three devices is frustrating, especially when you are using activity tracking. It confuses the issue a bit! Apart from missing some of the Siri functions (I really like just pressing the watch to set reminders, alarms etc) and the call features. The Tomtom watch is good as a fitness watch, but misses golf and notifications etc. It is also not great as an activity tracker.
Right, it was totally my fault. I bought the wrong unit. All the research and reading I did and I missed a big detail lol I’m excited to get a new device that will track everything I want!
Guys, while reading these comments, I just – af few minutes ago – received a mail from my shop (Coolblue) my unit has been sent today…it wil be there tomorrow. (received tracking number). I preordered it begin april, first date mentioned was April 14th, then changed to May 10th, and now on the site it is mentioned April 24th, but mine is on it’s way ! Just found the link to the manual, so still time to study that before trying out my unit tomorrow !!
Wow thats great news! Now you´ll need to write the first beginners review and post photos of unpacking the unit 🙂
Which country are you in? My Amazon Spain order still says expected delivery (sending) today 21st April, to be received in a few days.
I am in Belgium. Will do so, but I will only be home from work @ 8pm tomorrow. So I hope the wife is there when de delivery arrives, if not I’ll only have it saturdaymorning.
I can’t find the Vivoactive Hr on Amazon Spain, could you provide a link, lease?
hi Karen
Here is the link but it probably won´t be of any use to you because it says product unavailable.
link to amazon.es
In fact, today I contacted Amazon Spain directly because my order was supposed to have been dispatched yesterday. They told me it hasn´t been sent because they don´t have it yet. I told them to cancel the order in that case and that they shouldn´t have been showing a dispatch date for the last month or so since I placed my order, which turned out to be false.
I´ve preordered it now through AMazon UK which, even with the delivery to Spain, works out about the same price as if I bought it from Amazon Spain.
Mark
Coolblue is a webshop in the netherlands, mine still says 26th (also coolblue) but ordered 12th of April
I ordered mine April 7th. So I guess yours will be on its way soon too…
Just noticed that the expected day of arrival is next tuesday 26th…normally when they ship it is always the next day delivery…dunno why it takes a few days more now…but hey, I will survive the wait.
Bother… BestBuy.ca has changed their website to show available June 10…BUT my order still shows delivery April 29. I have asked for an update…
Coolblue doesn’t know why you already got a send confirmation 😉
Christel doesn’t know :-). But anyway, as I mentioned just before : delivery date is April 26th, so it makes sense…I’ll check the tracking code tomorrow to see if something has changed.
Did your delivery date change again? Mine now says 13th of may.
Nope, it didn’t change. I followed the tracking link today, the postman tried to deliver it, but nobody home. It will be available tomorrow morning in my local Post pickup point. So delivery date was today 22nd of April. But I’ll have to sleep one more night without…
Looks like those of us in the US and A have a long, unknown wait ahead of us.
Andrea .. I see you are likely Canadian. Me too .. can you let me know if you get your VAHR ? I noticed Best Buy is in June .. I hope I do not have to wait that long and i do not want to order it from overseas due to return / warranty issues. I already have my watch face design all done in preparation.
Ugh .. I see it posted my comment in the wrong place. Maybe Ray can move it for me to below 631.
Will do! I have a pre order in with GPScentral as well. They have mid May listed.
Thank you .. I will bookmark GPS Centrals site as that is closest to me and I have bought from them before.
Sadness… BestBuy.ca has just informed me that they won’t receive the Vivoactive HR until June 🙁 I hope GPScentral is still on track for mid May.
Does anyone have other Canadian retailers?
I am still very committed to the VIvoactive HR .. and well I will wait but it would be nice to get it soon. I am willing to go to $329 as that seems to be the normal rate. Myself .. I may look at Sport Chek as they have a 60 day return policy but it would have to be pretty bad for me to do that. I am not willing to buy on the internet due to the return issues involved. But I am confident that Garmin has done their homework and even my Vivosmart HR I do not use probably 60% of the features. I expect the Vivoactive HR to be much the same case. Andrea if I find any other retailers .. I will let you know.
You could try your local bike store or running store or whatever. I talked to the local guy the other day and he’s a Garmin reseller. Most of these people probably get their Garmin stock from the same importer/distributor, so at that point it’s up to allocation. Plus it’s nice to support a local business.
I made the mistake of suggesting to my wife that she could get this for my birthday present in June, so now I can’t buy it even when it does become available. However, the guy at the LBS said he’d likely be able to sell it to me for the same price as Best Buy or any other retailer, assuming he can actually get it.
My LBS is happy to bring the VivoactiveHR in for me, but it is a special order so I wouldn’t be able to return it if I find it too large. Have any Canadians found a brick and mortar store that expects to have them in any time soon so people can get a hands on before ordering?
Hi Ray,
I would be using a lot of its cycling functions. Would like to know if HR and cadence would show up on the data fields, ala FR 910xt? thanks
HR as well as other HR fields like Avg. HR, HR Zone, HR %Max, etc., etc. It will show cadence and it’s related fields if you have an Ant+ cadence sensor. By the way, I like your user name ;>)
Sorry late reply. Thanks! Was looking for a device to help with cycling training short of a powermeter have edge 200 already. Thinking the VAHR would work then.
The Australian Garmin site has a posing from a couple days ago for the vivoactice hr, it say’s it is dropping into stores this month. I’m not sure how this fairs for the rest of us but at least they’re giving us something.
According to Johnny Appleseed (Brisbane), they are likely to get the units late this month or early next month. Their website states due into store on 26/4. If they do arrive around that time, they are less than a kilometre from work, so I can collect the pre-order my wife has placed for me. They are big Garmin resellers (really good service), so they would most likely know what they are talking about.
This is great!
I’ve been using my Basis Peak for everyday HR and steps and combining that with the Fenix 3 for running and some biking for the GPS mode. The Fenix 3 is a little unwieldy though imo and I don’t particularly like running with it every day, but chose it specifically because of the battery life and “charge on the go” ability for long 20+ hour ultramarathons, hikes, super long bike rides like the Total 200 or Dirty Kanza. I’ve avoided buying a more comfortable everyday running watch like a Forerunner because I don’t want to have that many devices to worry about (Peak for everyday, Fenix for longer stuff, Forerunner for regular runs).
What I’ve really been looking for is a *watch* (not a band) that I can wear every day for heart rate and general health monitoring that has with decent battery life, doesn’t look/feel cheap/ugly (looking at you, Fitbit Surge), and has built-in GPS functionality for shorter every-day runs and impromptu casual bike rides where I don’t want to pull out my Fenix or Edge. Being in the Garmin ecosystem and having the flights of stairs climbed are huge bonuses.
Anyways, that’s just a roundabout way of saying I just ordered one from Clever Training! Thanks for the awesome review, as always.
Ray, do you have any info on the Garmin Approach X40 golf watch that was just announced? Looks like hardware wise it is identical to this except has extra memory built in to store data for 40,000 courses. It’s been hard to find details on whether the golf app in the VA HR will do everything the X40 does and whether the X40 has all the fitness features of the VA HR. It’s hard to tell how they compare if the only things you care about are running, golfing, and a general activity tracker.
Yes, I played with it a bit recently and have some photos I took around here somewhere. But yes, it’s basically a VSHR with GPS.
The size is virtually identical to that of a VSHR, though a tiny tweak to the outer shell of the screen (but not the inner screen size). Purely cosmetic.
Keep in mind that’s different than the VAHR, which is much more akin to a Fitbit Surge in style/size/etc.. Meaning that the VSHR & X40 are ‘bands’, whereas I’d classify the VAHR as a ‘watch’.
Oh, and just to clarify, I didn’t actually play with the watch features much on the X40, my curiosity was more around just the form factor/size/etc… It was more of an aside to a larger meeting we were having.
Thanks for the quick response and setting me straight. I was having a morning brainfart as I was thinking it was the same form factor as the Vivoactive HR, not the Vivosmart HR.
In a sense, this gets even more interesting that they put a GPS and HR in a tracker the size of a Vivosmart HR. That’s pretty cool. If it can be used as a full running watch, this could be a game changer.
Do you have any further info on what the running capabilities are? I assume it doesn’t have CIQ.
I’m sure I won’t be the only one to report this. I just received an email from clever training. They should receive their first Vivoactive HR shipment later next week with more to come later in May. Sure hope I make the first shipment.
Ed P – that’s great news. Unfortunately I did not receive an email from them. Do you recall when you placed the order? I placed mine on 4/10/2016 after returning a Fenix 3 HR I ordered from them (the OHR was DOA, and the size is simply too bulk to wear everyday with a cuffed shirt).
Ray – I would also be very interested to hear about the running capabilities of X40. I have provided numerous feedback to Garmin hoping they would do a full featured golfing/running watch, since those are two of the activities I enjoy frequently.
I made my order on 4/6.
I’ll try and get a bit more detail on the modes of the X40.
On the bright side, VAHR does have the golf mode, so that’s likely the better option.
Also of note for those curious – a final production unit has arrived in my US forwarding box, which in turn is being processed for shipment today to me. In theory it means arrival on Tuesday here in Paris. But that assumes that A) The Houston flooding doesn’t further delay local shipping B) French customs doesn’t hose something up (as usual).
Assuming I get it next week, I’d likely be 2-3 weeks till an in-depth review from that point.
Have a good weekend all!
Yay – I got my notification. Hopefully my pre-order of 4/10 made the cut for the first batch of Clevertraining’s VAHR allotment!
Ray – Thank you for the quick response. I think one of the features that intrigued me is the X40’s “AutoShot” (ability to sense you hitting each shot and record it automatically) and “TrueSwing” (telling you your swing impact angle, allowing you to analyze your golf swing when you are in the driving range training).
Clearly both of those features are using the accelerometer to detect the motion. So it’s simply matter of them willing to put it into their watch as a feature.
I really wish Garmin is able to create a watch and give people the ability to add “SaaS” or one-time purchase option to the watches, so each user can utilize the specific watch to its fullest potential. This would also save us the hassle of carrying around a USB charging port brick and fewer devices around.
Interesting. I ordered way back on Feb 22 and didn’t I receive that e-mail either. I did receive an e-mail from them yesterday offering to ship my other items from the same order, however.
Albert – the golf apps on Vivoactive is clumsy. You have to download course data everytime you start a new round. Moreover, you can’t switch to other apps nor even read the time while you’re in the golf apps. Otherwise you have to download the course data again.
Ray – do you know whether the golf apps on Vivoactive HR and Fenix 3 HR has the similar problem as above?
Have you tried it on the VA HR? According to the manual, you only need to download it the first time you play the course.
Vivoactive HR seems in stock on amazon.fr !
I preordered it and should be mine on monday 🙂
Hi, I keep searching around but to no avail. I am really wondering what functions the Vivoactive HR can control or monitor with the Varia Radar Tail Light? I would imagine that turning it on and off would be the minimum. But does it also provide the same feedback as the head control or the various Edge devices, that show relative distance and number of “targets”? Or maybe just a simple bleep (and vibration?) that there is oncoming traffic behind you? Thanks!
Well guys, I received mine…as I said, it did arrive yesterday, but as there was nobody home I had to pick it up at the post office today. Some pics of the unboxing, although there is not much to see, just the box, the watch, a charging cable and abag with a quick start manual (which I didn’t open).
It looks good, fits good, connecting with Garmin connect on my OnePlus 2 was easy (already had an account for my Edge 500 and used a Vivosmart HR before which I didn’t like – not enough sports possibilities).
So, first impression is really good, but the real use will show if it beats the expectations or not…
Back of the box.
Box with the VAHR in it.
The charging cable.
The watch on my wrist. As you see, I have pretty thin wrists. It is always hard to find a watch which suits them. I used a Vivosmart HR before, but prefer this one because it is wider. The Vivosmart HR looked too thick on my wrist, the Vivoactive HR is a bit more in proportion although it is bigger (IMHO). I used a 42mm Motorola 360 2nd gen too, and that was (sizewise) perfect for me. But unfortunately, that’s not a sportswatch…
Great for you Yves that you received your VIHR today. Have fun with it.
May I ask to take a sample shot showing the thickness on your wrist? Somehow I think I will not like it because it seems much thicker than the current Vivoactive.
And please advise us of battery life after a day of heavy usage. I’m very interested about hearing that, too.
Many thanks.
Two more remarks :
– someone in these comments asked if it is possible to wear the watch with the charger attached. Well, it is possible, but not very comfortable (just tried it). The HR-sensor doesn’t make contact with the skin, so that one you cannot use. If really necessary, is is possible though.
– I just attached a screen protector, had it already here, bought on Ebay in a German shop (about €2,50 for 4 pieces).
Just made 2 pics of the thickness vs the wrist – hope this answers your question.
About the battery life, I think I’ll need a few days for that. Today I put it on around 10:30, installed it, installed a few watch faces, mowed the lawn :-), but no sportive activities planned. Tomorrow I go running, monday & tuesday cycling.
When I took the watch out of the box, battery was charged about 80%. I’ll post when it is around 10%.
And the second pic (sorry, put the first one in a reply to my own post, must be a few posts lower).
Thanks for your photos Yves!
It really is considerably thicker than the 1st gen Vivoactive. A shame really.
Might make it more uncomfortable to wear together with a long sleeve shirt, I guess.
You’re welcome. It feels really comfortable at the moment. Tomorrow I’ll do a run (long sleeves – pretty cold here), and for my rides on monday and tuesday it will be long sleeved too. I’ll post about that later. The watch is pretty rounded at the edges so I think it’ll be OK.
Damn, I think it’s way to big for my wrist. All the garmin watches are too large for a girls small write (at least for me)…I was hoping this one would work due to the shape but now am thinking maybe not. I’ll wait to see how DC’s in depth review looks and when I can see it in a store to try it on. Really loved all the functions – exactly what I was looking for (especially HR and GPS). Like the Mio Fuse but no GPS in the Mio products.
The product descriptions say 1.3 cm thickness for the VAHR, 0.8 cm for the old VA, so the VAHR is notably thicker. My Forerunner 235 is 1.3 cm as well, though – no problems with long sleeves on my side.
Hi Karen, I had the FR225 for a while but ended up returning it. That was pretty big on my wrist too. I was looking at the FR235 too. You don’t feel it’s too huge on your wrist?
Thanks Yves for posting these, very useful! And congrats on being the first on this site on getting your hands on one!
Hi, no, I like it and never get any negative comments. But I’m not a very petite woman (wrist 17.5 cm) and I like big watches. AFAIK Ray’s wife who is more slender has a FR 630 which is the same size as the 235, on the Fotos I remember it looked good on her in my opinion. It simply depends on your taste, I think.
I checked out The Girl’s preference gadgets too. My wrist may be like her size wrist. I like the look of the FR235. I was just reading the in depth review from DC and on Amazon – great reviews. I think I’d prefer a watch face rather than the VRHR look. I really want GPS and HR accuracy at the end of the day. It’s $319 on Amazon and $329 on CleverTraining…both have great customer service. I may just do it!
Great pics Yves! Glad you like it so far.
How is the vibration in the VAHR? I currently use the VSHR for morning alarms and it’s quite jarring. Do you think the VAHR has a nicer buzz?
KB, the FR 235 is a great watch. At first I found it too dim, but after playing around with different watch faces and a white background I’m quite happy with it now. I like the round design a lot – not sure yet if the VAHR Is the better choice for me. I ordered it from Amazon France now, we’ll see.
I found that the 235 in red and black looked smaller on the wrist than the black only version, maybe because of the outer red ring. You might check that out, too.
About the buzz, I only have it buzzing for smart stuff, like emails and text messages coming in. It surely buzzes enough for that. But I doubt it would wake me up…If I think about it tonight, I’ll set the alarm to test, tomorrow I have to get up early for one of my sons who has a soccer match. But I’ll set my phone as a backup 5 minutes later !
About the screen : it is readable, but it remains relatively dark, even in the highest backlight setting. Sure this is a choice to keep the battery life as long as possible. My Moto360 was way clearer, but I had to charge it everyday. So…it is a matter of choices. Will experiment with some watchfaces an colours for that. Not really an issue though.
Just as a minor aside, The Girl actually still uses a FR620 as her running watch. But it’s basically the same size of course.
For her day to day watch she’s been using a Pebble Time Round.
I was hesitating between the vivoactive hr and forerunner 235. I am a woman, i have decided not to buy the vivoactive hr and have bought the forerunner 235 for the reasons:
1) the size of the vivoactive Hr : 30,2 mm x 57 mm x 11,4 mm and forerunner 45 mm x 45 mm x 11,7 mm.
I have the impression that vvhr is too big for my wrist and forerunner is just looking great on my wrist in the blue green color!
2) the application for running is much more extended
3) you can select to have only 1 field to show the info while for the vvhr you always have minimum 2fields.
As my vision is not super, for me it is important for not to be obliged to wear glasses to see the screen
4) I have downloaded the hike application which provides me info like altitude, way points. Really super.
5) I love how we can visualize the heart rate zone on the fr235
Regarding the heart rate accuracy , there is a delay on intensive exercises of more than 3minutes which is too important for spinning , to avoid this problem I have bought a Geonaute heart rate chest that I have paired with the fr235.
I will use this for specific cases.
Finally I have put a vikuiti film adqc27 to protect and reduce glare
So all depends on what we are looking for what matters and what not.
Please tell me if the same functions for cyclists in Forerunner 235 (230) and vívoactive. And yet, what do you think about vivofit?
Isaline, thank you so much for your post and picture. I love it and am going on to clever training now to order it!
I did buy the FR235 and LOVE IT! I bought the one with the light blue band (same as Isaline, as I liked the look on her wrist) and love the different watch faces. So far so good on the HR and GPS – great decision. I’m someone that gets bored and end up not liking the devices I buy and I haven’t had a single “I want to return it” thought!
Any idea if the VAHR bands are compatible with the FR920xt?
Can anyone who already has this watch confirm that the only auto lap option is by distance? I’m looking to replace my 310XT, but I really love the auto lap by GPS position option for races with multiple laps along a track. I find it really helpful to get average lap times of a whole lap. I don’t need any of the other fancy functions of the more expensive watches, so the VAHR looks perfect otherwise, but this is one feature I would really miss.
I just was checking on my pre-order and noticed Best Buy US has dropped the price on the VAHR to $229.99 on the pre-order. They still have an expected in stock date of 4/30/16 and delivery of 5/2/16.
link to bestbuy.com
I called customer service and they already credited me the difference on my pre-order.
Does anyone have a recommendation for a screen protector for the Vivoactive HR? Something that does not impede functionality of the watch or reduce visibility, but still protects the face from damage? Any advice is appreciated! My watch should be here within a couple of days (if they arrive into Johnny Appleseed on time), so I will cut a protector from a phone to fit at the moment. I can then order something better.
Yes you can find this on
Protectionfilms24.com
Enter what you are looking for for instance “anti glare”
Than you will find 3 tabs on the left side to select
The product
The brand
The reference
Thanks for the response. Any suggestions on the type of film please? Are the matte anti-glare better than the standard films? Not sure what works best on a watch….
I decided to cancel my preorder and wait for the reviews. No need to be in such a hurry, just got excited. Great to see some getting their units and looking forward to their comments.
My Amazon.com order in the US was just updated to “preparing for shipment” and my card was charged. Usually this means it will ship today. I placed my order on February 21. I’m getting excited!
Congrats! I’m waiting on my Best Buy order, I was debating them or Amazon, but went with BBY since they were both showing the same date and BBY dropped the price to $230 yesterday. Hopefully I get a notification from them soon that it will be on it’s way!
Great! My order was 4/18 on amazon, but the order wasn’t updated yet. Race Sunday, fingers crossed.
Shipped! My Amazon order shipped today and will arrive tomorrow. I just re-read Ray’s excellent preview above. Time to study up on the manual.
Where do you live??
My order with Amazon France has just shipped, expected delivery here in Spain is Wednesday this week!!
The price was $230 on BB this morning but now it’s already back to regular price.
That went up pretty quick, maybe it was a mistake but they price matched the web yesterday for me and lowered my pre-order. Hopefully they get their stock in soon, but either way I got in for the $230 price.
I live in northern Ohio. The order shipped from Kenosha, Wisconsin. In a logistical leap of logic only Amazon could understand, my Vivosmart shipped with three jars of Teddy’s peanut butter.
Thanks for the heads up on this on. I ordered mine on Best Buy last night for the $230 price.
Oooh! I assumed you were referring to the Vivoactive HR, not the Vivosmart.
My bad. I did mean Vivoactive HR. I typed Vivosmart by mistake but the device I’m getting tomorrow is the Vivoactive HR.
For those curious, I’ve just uploaded an unboxing video here:
link to youtube.com
Also include a bit more on size comparisons between existing Vivoactive as well as the Fitbit Surge. Enjoy!
Does the Garmin Vivoactive GPS Multisport Heart Rate Monitor Watch track your elevation gain and current altitude in the same way it tracks distance and number of steps?
Has anyone heard anything about their REI preorder? Their customer service told me last week that I should receive the Vivoactive HR on April 29.
I spoke to REI customer service only a few minutes ago and was told they still had no timetable at all in the system! Frustrated to say the least. Would jump to Amazon, but using a gift card for purchase and don’t have any other big ticket items I would need from REI in the near future.
You may want to try to talk to someone else (or maybe I’ve gotten bad information), but I was told that REI was going to receive/send out their shipment tomorrow (4/26). Maybe that’s changed since Thursday or Friday last week though.
I called REI this morning since I was told a few weeks ago that it would ship on 4/26. She told me that they aren’t expecting to ship until 5/5 now ?
That’s bad news. 🙁
REI has now moved the date on my preorder to the end of May. Thinking of canceling.
REI has cancelled all preorders. Ugh!
Amazon, Best Buy, or Clever Training? Which one would be the fastest if I order now?
Best Buy just charged my card today and my order is now “Preparing for Shipping”! Looks like Monday will be the day for me barring something happening over the weekend.
Hi Aaron,
Curious. Is that the BestBuy in US?
Thanks,
Steve
Steve,
Yes, I forgot to mention that. It is Best Buy US. I placed my order on 4/20/16. Looks like they changed delivery times today though. If you order today with 2 day shipping you will get it on Tuesday, or expedited to get it on Monday. When I ordered mine it said Monday delivery.
Aaron
My BestBuy Canada order was updated this morning to June 10…I cancelled the order… I now have my LBS checking into when they can get it.
Best Buy US just sent me a confirmation my VAHR has shipped! Tracking # has been received but still too new to show up in the system. At least it’s on the way!
looking forward to first impressions!
Hi Guys and girls
Usually – living down under here in Australia, we are months behind the rest of the world getting things from O/S, such as fitness watches, etc.
Now, however, miracle of miracles, I just got an email from Johhny Appleseed here in Australia saying they have received the Vivoactive HR and are ready to sell them here.
I am about to jump in and buy one, but was really hoping to hear that Garmin might have just amped up the HR sensors a bit more for greater accuracy. There seems to be a bit of variability in the Forerunner 235 – which I believe runs the same HR as the Vivoactive, and was hoping someone might have some more recent info on this following Garmin’s recent firmware updates.
Hi Noel
Picked mine up from Johnny Appleseed in Rocklea today (excellent service from them, as always). Apparently they are selling fast. I will try the unit tonight and test the accuracy of the HRM against my current devices. My Tomtom unit and Apple Watch are both quite accurate, although the sampling rate sometimes means there is a lag between the two, with consistent average heart rates recorded over the length of a run or workout. I will try the Garmin on a rowing machine, as the constant movement will give a good test of how well it holds the heart rate under adverse conditions.
Hi Roastman
That’s great – will wait with bated breath to hear back how you get on.
Cheers
After some quick tests this afternoon, I am not sure what to think. Being a new unit, there will undoubtedly be some firmware glitches initially. Operation was simple, but I found some odd heart rate issues. When jogging on the treadmill, the Garmin closely matched my Tomtom Spark and Apple Watch (those two were worn on the same arm for the purpose of testing). When my heart rate got lower as I moved over to the rowing machine, the Garmin dramatically diverged from the other two watches. It would barely show above 100 beats per minute, while the other watches were moving up to around 125-130 beats. This seemed to be a consistent issue on the rower, but strangely even when working at low intensity on the treadmill, the heart rate reading on the Garmin was much lower than the other two units. I made an error on the rowing machine (used the outdoor rowing app, instead of the indoor rowing app), but that should not affect HRM accuracy. I will try this again tomorrow, perhaps with an outdoor run, to see how it works. The screen on the watch is not great. Contrast is quite poor, so I can only imagine how it will work in bright sunlight. The menu operations seem to be quite intuitive.
This is not good new as far as I’m concerned. The two issues you reported are the main reason I pre-ordered the Vivoactive HR.
1. for a better screen, the original Vivoactive is almost unreadable to me in anything less than bright lighting. It also looked like the new screen layout allows for slightly larger text for workout stats. If the contrast is still an issue this may not be much of a gain.
2. The addition of HRM. As a supplement to my chest strap so I could have the option of working out without the strap and monitor my HR during the day. I just turned 60 and after not running for many years I feel the need for accurate HR readings is important.
I’m tempted to cancel my pre-order and wait until I can find one in a local store to check it out.
(I’m still TBD on the accuracy piece, so putting that aside for a moment)
But when it comes to screen, I’m surprised you’re saying it’s low contrast. Mine seems pretty solid. Both indoors and outdoors, especially once in sport mode. Note that typically with screens like these they actually get better in sunlight, not worse.
Are you talking about the original or the new version. Not sure if it’s a contrast issue but I have trouble reading some of the screens at times on my Vivoactive. Especially if the watch face is at a slight angle. I’ve heard they have changed the film over the watch face and maybe the viewing angle has improved. The photos of the HR look much brighter, maybe contrast wasn’t the correct term.
As far as the HR accuracy, I’m hoping the initial evaluation is either an anomaly or can be improved by a firmware update.
“As far as the HR accuracy, I’m hoping the initial evaluation is either an anomaly… ”
A major concern of mine – curious to see if others report similar results.
For those curious on optical accuracy while cycling, here’s my ride from yesterday: link to analyze.dcrainmaker.com
Basically, it’s about the same as I saw with the Fenix3 HR. See notes at the bottom of the analyze page.
I have found the screen easier to view with a white background, rather than the standard black finish. Please be aware I have not had much time with the watch, so I may be missing a setting somewhere…. My next step will be to rear the manual! In regard to the heart rate monitor, it seems to be fine when checking the heart rate manually (a swipe down starts the manual HRM screen), so this is not consistent with what happened during my workout. I suspect the incorrect readings at lower heart rate levels are either an abhorration, or just a temporary firmware glitch. The fact that it picked up the heart rate accurately while I was going a lot faster on the treadmill is a good sign and supports the fact the hardware itself is OK. I am quite confident that it is firmware related, but more tests will give a better idea. About to go for another run, so will be able to report back after that.
Is there any chance that people having difficulty with the screen are wearing polarized sunglasses?
Another run and some more feedback. To really test the Optical HRM, I did a series of walk/run intervals up and down hills. The performance was mixed:
* When exerting myself, the HRM was accurate
* When in the recovery phases, the HRM seemed to be wildly inaccurate. At one stage during a walk period, my heart rate went from 120 (had just come off a run) and jumped over 160 for a long period. This is either a firmware issue, or the optical HRM is too weak and really needs your blood flowing to function. This will be a killer for me, if a firmware update does not fix it
* The screen outside is fantastic. Judging it indoors was not fair, as it reallyt comes to life outside in the sunlight. Inside, I am finding the black-on-white to be my preference and I have increased the backlight strength
* GPS acquisition was fast. I deliberately stopped and started a new workout three times, to see how fast. Much faster than Tomtom. However, accuracy will be determined later, once I have compared the maps. The Tomtom device is very good with GPS and I have checked it against known distances. The Garmin unit got 100 mtrs behind veryt early in my longest run and stayed 100 mtrs behind for the whole run. I assume that even though the GPS symbol was green and locked, it may pay to pause a few seconds before starting the run. Once again, this may be a firmware glitch (or the Tomtom watch may have been out)
For me, the biggest issue seems to be the optical HRM at lower BPM. If this is to be an all-round fitness watch, that needs to work well. I know serious athletes will use chest straps, but serious athletes are more likely to be buying far more expensive watches. I am hopeful firmware updates will smooth the heart rate issues, as it is very inaccurate at the moment. If Garmin made it easy to join a beta test program, I would be happy to do this while they improve the software, as I have other devices to test it against.
Any idea why the elevations are off by 10 meters?
Hi Roastman
If what you have found to date with the hr is how it is, then that is a great disappointment. Unfortunately your findings (so far) seem to echo those of a couple of other reviews I have read on other posts. I am really hoping that more extended testing by yourself will show that this is not the issue it might appear to be, and I – and many others – are waiting anxiously for Ray to do a comprehensive review/evaluation of the Vivoactive Hr, and with particular attention to the accuracy of the HR. In the meantime, I will wait and see what else you find.
Cheers.
I actually didn’t notice any issue with the elevations, but I will check. I think the GPS issue was purely as on my third run I needed to wait a little longer for it to have a perfect lock. As it came up green immediately, I assumed it had a perfect lock. It was identical to the Tomtom unit for the other runs and for the rest of that run
RE: Elevation offset by 10m
Not sure. I didn’t set/specify elevations of either unit before hand, so it’s hard to know which one is absolutely correct without digging into a bit more (which I’ll do later).
I am pleased top report a dramatically improved result with the optical heart rate monitor today. One of my issues is the narrower width of this watch versus my other devices. I am accustomed to wearing the watch further up my arm than a normal watch, to ensure the HRM works. However, as this device is narrower than my Tomtom and Apple Watch, it needs to move further up the arm. It is a matter of millimetres, but it is critical. I tested it this morning against a chest strap and it was near perfect. Also, the treadmill calibration (I assume it automatically calibrated from my outdoor run) was also perfect. Apart from the barely detectable vibration for the basis interval function (which yoiu can lengthen, but not increase the strength), this is now my ideal device.
Please excuse my typing errors – I was so happy this improved that I hit “post” before proof reading!
That is great news and what I found as well with the Vivosmart HR (same Elevate sensor). I had no issues with the HR on that model and look forward to getting my VivoactiveHR in a few weeks.
FYI – The watch is available in various outlets now in the UK. You can collect it from the majority of Argos stores, or request same-day delivery, plus it can be ordered for delivery on Very.
Enjoy.
Can the unit be worn on the underside of the wrist as well and still accurately measure HR? I assume so since microsoft band is designed to be worn that way
I like this watch but I plan to use it for running how easy is it to stop the watch without a physical button?
As when I sprint past that finish line I want to be able to easily stop the time!
Yes, it can be worn on the underside.
Also, the lower right button is physical, and is used for start/stop. 🙂
Curious about the stop button. On my original Vivoactive I have to press the stop button multiple times before it stops. Sometimes it takes up to 45 seconds to actually stop & this greatly affects my time & pace for my run numbers.
Also, I don’t use my Vivoactive anymore unless it’s for running outside on a bright sunny day which is the only time I can read the screen. It’s useless to me indoors. If only i could read it as well as the Apple Watch which is so clear & crisp. But I don’t use the Apple wTch for anything sport/health fitness related.
Curious about the stop button. On my original Vivoactive I have to press the stop button multiple times before it stops. Sometimes it takes up to 45 seconds to actually stop & this greatly affects my time & pace for my run numbers.
I can’t speak to the original VA but I haven’t had any issues stopping activities with the VAHR. Just press the right button and within a few seconds it will give you the opportunity to save and show your summary data.
No issues with stop on the VAHR. Keep in mind it’s a physical button here (lower right). Zero problems thus far in that area for me.
How does the navigation work? I heard you can save coordinates and navigate back to them later…
amazon in US just charged my cc and changed to “preparing for shipment”. I ordered on 2/22. Hopefully will ship today.
What happened to all of the comments from today? As soon as someone posted something negative they disappeared
My mistake. The comments show up on my PC, but only show through April 20th on my phone. There goes my conspiracy theory.
Does anyone know how long Clever Training’s queue is / how long they usually take to fulfill preorders? I preordered mine on 4/21 but if it’s going to take too long I might be better off buying elsewhere…
Andrew,
Not sure how valuable this is, but I ordered on 2/23, and I was not in the very first batch (Someone posted on the Garmin Forum that he ordered on 4/19 – the day it was announced – and he received a shipping notice yesterday.) An e-mail communication I received from Clever Training this morning said, “Unfortunately until the shipment arrives from Garmin, I am unable to confirm whether your order will be fulfilled with this shipment or a subsequent shipment.”
So they’re either unsure of how many they’ll be getting, where I am in the queue, or mostly likely, just keeping it all close to the vest, so as not to make promises they can’t keep.
A correction – the person on the Garmin Forum ordered from Clever Training on February 19, not April 19.
Thanks Julian. I’ll probably end up giving them a week or two before buying locally elsewhere, as I have an upcoming race on May 21st that I’d want the VAHR for.
If anybody else has experience with CT pre-orders/wait times, would love to hear your feedback!
I asked CT about VAHR orders and they basically said the first units come in this week and they’ll begin shipping soon afterwards. They will not be able to fulfill all the orders since there will be a limited supply but they expect more units to arrive later in May. They also said they’ll send out weekly email updates if orders cannot be fulfilled after the first round of shipments.
So, a first impression about battery capacity, for what it’s worth. (Just for info for who’s interested)
I unpacked the unit, turned it on an put it on my wrist on saturday, 10:30 AM. The battery was charged for 78%.
Started using it right away, without further charging. Today, wednesday, at 10:30 AM the battery was at 3%. The use the last 4 days was 24/7 heart rate tracking, constant bluetooth connection and smart notifications for mail, sms, agenda, and some other apps, some more tweaking and playing with the settings as normal (seems normal with a new device), backlight on highest setting (5 out of 5).
GPS tracking for two runs, (55′ and 1h20′), and some short rides (commuting), for a total of 1h51′. So total GPS tracking was a bit more than 4 hours during those 4 days.
This makes me think that 8 days in watch mode is possible with full charge and no GPS use.
I charged it today, after 30 minutes it went from 3% to 56%, after 60 minutes it was at 90%, and to charge the last 10% it needed 25 minutes more. But that is more to get the last 2 % in, after one hour and 15 minutes it got to 98%. So charging times are acceptable imo.
For all the rest…I am still happy with it. Looking forward to the in-depth review for some comparisons, but for me it does what I need.
Great. Thanks Yves for the detailed info.
Seems pretty consistent again with what we know from the 1st gen Vivoactive.
Well after Amazon UK still not having any stock until next week, i ordered it from Amazon France and it arrived as promised by UPS yesterday. I then found out that Argos already had it in stock , just 5 minutes walk from where i work!
After unpacking it paired with Connect on my phone first time, quickly and easily. I found it very comfortable to sleep in and wear – the strap is softer than the VA. Good to see resting heart rate in the morning
Anyway i went for an early morning 9 miler today with the VAHR on my left wrist and my VA connected to by HRM strap on my right wrist because i wanted to compare HR accuracy.
First thing that i noticed when i started running was how clear the screen is. I usually wear reading glasses and sometimes struggled to read the VA and my older 910XT. This screen is crystal clear and is really responsive to scroll through.
Then i noticed that my heart rate on the VAHR was about 10 to 15 beats less than the VA connected to my strap. I thought oh oh, its not picking up every beat. Then after a mile both readings were identical. I then realised that i was not getting those high incorrect readings that you often get with the HRM strap until it settles down. It is still early days but my initial conclusion after one run is that i think that the VAHR is actually more accurate than using the strap.
I also like (as with the VA) that not having to use a foot pod for cadence is great as it gives you the actual cadence as opposed to the foot pod on one foot only showing half the number – its quite difficult multiplying a number by 2 ….
At the end of the run, uploading to Connect was simple and gave the extra fields showing Heart rates, training effect, stairs and intensity.
The one thing that i think that is down on the VA is the ease of charging. I found that the magnetic cradle of the VA was very easy. You have to clip the VAHR into its cradle
However after less than 24 hours i am very pleased with the VAHR and if the other sports / activities recording are as as good as running its going to be the best wrist mounted device out there.
Initially i th
Hi Onemanandtwodogs,
You got me excited. I’m going to London Friday/Saturday but Argos says they can’t deliver for 4 days. Do you know if anyone else in the UK is carrying it? If not i’ll have to wait for the amazon france order. I ordered it on Sunday and won’t get it until the end of next week. 🙁 Thanks for your information on the heart rate as I think a lot of us are reading here to see how accurate it is.
Hi Andy
the very.com website shows it available and delivering in 2 days – it doesn’t appear on argos website any more?
hope this helps
Ray, could you confirm that the VAHR does not have a built-in compass? Your comparison charts show it at the moment as “GPS” but the manual (unlike FR235’s which you show as “N/A”) states there is a built-in 3-axis compass. Also, is the “Temp Recording (internal sensor)” still “TBD” for the VAHR?
thank you.
First impressions of the VAHR:
– Form factor is great — very interesting in that’s like the Fitbit Surge, but it’s watch band is fully articulating (and replaceable
– Compared with the Fitbit Blaze, the screen is atrocious. A plus, though, is it’s on 24/7 — so sort of a wash?
– Setup was super clunky — kept failing to pair, but then did actually pair
– Compared with F3, UI seems a bit “newer” — like it asked if I wanted to add more widgets when going through the widget menu
Only had it for a few minutes, will update as I use it more.
I received my unit from Amazon in the US yesterday. It paired with my Nexus 6 on the first try without issue. My first impression is that it looks like I strapped a phone to my wrist but it’s comfortable to wear and fits under a dress shirt sleeve without issue. My wife tried it on and it looked silly big on her wrist. She’s going to switch from her Vivosmart to the VSHR instead. The GPS got a fix in seconds indoors which I was very impressed with. It has a complicated series of menus and settings that only Garmin could love but it’s hard to deny the impressive features. I’m headed out for my first run with it and will report back later!
Dan, what really matters to me is did you receive your jars of Teddy’s peanut butter and if so is it better than Skippy?
I meant to ask you earlier, when did you order your watch from Amazon? Sorry to read that it’s too big for your wife’s wrist… that is one of my concerns.
Also, hilarious comment about the peanut butter!! Ha!
Ha! Yes, Steve, everything arrived intact and thankfully I didn’t have to dig my new fitness tracker out of a sticky mess of peanut butter. I won’t claim Teddy’s is better than Skippy but it seems healthier and my kids will eat it so that’s what passes for a win in my life these days.
Amy, I ordered it on February 21 so I was probably one of the first. Obviously opinions will vary on the size but the ends of the VAHR stuck out a bit beyond the sides of my wife’s wrist so it was an easy call for her.
Any chance you can take a photo of it on your wife’s wrist? The photo Ray has of ‘The Girl’ wearing it, I don’t think it looks too big. However, I am concerned about size and everyday wear. Other Garmin running watches are so large on my wrist and I would really like to wear this thing every day to replace my FitBit. I appreciate the great feedback so far! Thanks!!
I got my unit today (from Amazon France, ordered on 4/23), and my first impression is really good. The features and the handling are great, and pairing went seamlessly. I’m not quite sure if I’m going to keep it, though – I find it a tad bulky. It’s not too big on my wrist actually (I’m 5′ 7” and not very slender), but it’s thicker than my FR 235. Similar to a Fitbit Surge, actually. Yes, according to the specs the thickness is the sameas in the FR 235, but the VAHR looks thicker. I’ll have to wait if I’m going to get used to it (I found the FR 235 quite big as well when I first bought it).
Glad to help, Mel. Here’s a picture on my wife’s wrist. She’s 5’6″ and about 125 lbs.
I was really happy with how the device worked on my run this afternoon. The display that seemed a bit washed out indoors is beautiful in sunlight. I could read it through my sunglasses with no problem. It got a GPS fix right away, the optical HR seemed right in line with my expectations and the resulting stats looked good. The battery has dropped by 21% in 24 hours with one 30 minute GPS run which is especially good considering I spent a lot of time messing with it today including lots of forced pairing and syncing as I tried (and eventually succeeded by dumb luck) to get Android Smart Lock to work.
Can you tell us something about the GPS accuracy? Thanks in advance!
Thanks for the picture! Just curious if this is the regular size band or the XL?
GPS seems to be quite good so far. Only had one issue, but I think I may have started moving off a little too soon and GPS lock was not quite confirmed. Otherwise, absolutely perfect after three external runs.
Thanks for reply!
It’s the regular size. I think Ray said the only difference in the XL size is the length of the strap, not the size of the watch body. I’m 6’4″, 230 lbs and it looks big on me but it’s comfortable and I wear a long sleeve shirt at work so appearances are low on my priority list.
Thank you so much! I think the watch looks great on her, but I can see how it is certainly a little bulky. I am not as petite as your wife, so hopefully it will work better for me, but I do have fairly small wrists. At this point, I think I may need to hold off on any pre-order and wait for the device in stores to try on. Again, great info!!!!
Today my watch arrived, but the screen was pale. No bright colors. The text was hard to read. I’ve put it on brightness 5 and still pale. Very dissapointed. A great watch with alot of functions but the screen was but. Just send it back. Hope the new one is oke…
Received mine from Amazon France today, having ordered it on Saturday (delivered to Spain). Will get unpacked tonight but only when kids have gone to bed – no sticky fingers all over it!
How does the accuracy of the VAHR’s accelerometer compare with that of Garmin’s footpod in measuring distance and pace?
Thanks all for the observations. If any of you play soccer, interested in how the watch tracks movement with GPS on, and other metrics during a game.
I must say the accelerometer is amazing. After my first run outside, I did an interval run on my treadmill. The distance matched perfectly with my treadmill! I know the treadmill is accurate, as I originally checked it against my footpod on a previous watch. I am not sure how it would go during a sport like soccer (lots of moving sideways etc), but even a footpod will not accurately measure distance when you are side-stepping. I used it at tennis, but mainly to get an idea of calorie burn and exertion, rather than distance.
I presume those of you who have received their VAHR’s have been purchasing “Regular” strap sized devices ?
I’ve been waiting (impatiently) for the XL devices to become available. My wrist size is circa 19cm which means the Regular probably isn’t going to fit me.
Good to see mostly positive feedback on the device thus far.
link to youtu.be in comments he said he has 19cm wrist
Can someone tell me how to get email and text message notifications on the VAHR configured? I can’t find it.
Got it finally. I had to allow garmin connect notification through my phone settings.
Hi,
does anyone know if all Smart/Connected features will work with Windows10 mobile or do I need iOS/Android device?
What smart features are on the watch and is it useful at all in anyway?
I noticed something on my original Vivoactive yesterday. Pardon me if this feature has always been available. I was changing the screens and noticed there are choices for 3 , 2 or even 1 line display. I don’t recal this option prior to my last watch update. Is it possible the firmware of the Vivoactive HR now allows for 1 line display? This option makes it much easier to read my display without my glasses and was one of the reasons I pre-ordered the Vivoactive HR.
A Question to the lucky VAHR receivers.
I own a Fitbit Blaze and I think it does a tremendous job at estimating Calories burned. I am currently running a daily 1000 calorie deficit in order to drop approx. 2 lbs. per week for next 10 weeks and so far so good. I use MyFitnessPal to input calories in, and MyFitnessPal synchs.over to FitBit. FitBit then estimates how many calories I can consume to remain my calorie usage range to drop weight.
My question is does any VAHR owner have an opinion on how well the watch tracks calories?
Thanks,
Steve
So far, I believe it is under-estimating a fraction, but that is compared to my Tomtom and Apple Watch. Apparently it is not a precise science, so the Garmin device may use different factors to determine actual burn. It is close enough to the other two.
So I picked up my VAHR and I’ve used it in the gym, running, indoor 5-aside football – all seems to be working fine, BUT…
The heart rate widget is displaying the ‘wrong’ RHR… after sycing and everything being fully up to date Garmin Connect shows my RHR as 44 but the VAHR is saying 54 (even though it says the lowest recorded was 44)? The same happened yesterday (45 GC / 61 VAHR), and the day before (51 GC / 60 VAHR).
Is this something to do with the fact it only displays the last 4 hours? If you tap on the widget it shows the last 7 days (only had it 3) with the ‘wrong’ RHRs plotted on the graph so I guess it isn’t. Also, not sure on Garmins stance on RHR but the lower RHRs were not recorded during sleep so I’ve ruled that out.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
…
I saw the same thing today as well, not sure what’s up there either. Fwiw, also showing 54…which…also makes no sense (since it’s concurrently showing 45 as my HR at this very second). I suspect it’s a bug. I’ve got it on my to-do list to figure out.
Strange… if you figure it out / speak to Garmin let me know! I’ve also emailed UK Support.
I have seen this mentioned several times re the VIvosmart HR and yes it seems Garmin has an issue getting the RHR thing down. In my mind it is the absolute lowest HR of the day. I asked for Garmin to give us the option as to what we see .. ie Min, Average and Max but they seem to like average. But it is average of what ? It makes no sense. Myself I use a Beddit for continuous HR monitoring during sleep .. so I know what my RHR truly is. I do hope that Garmin fixes this as I am dumping my Vivosmart HR for just this reason.
I had an email from Garmin Support – either update the software or reset the device… seems like a pretty threadbare response.
I haven’t actually got my cable with me at work so I can’t check for an update but I haven’t seen anything about one being released (current version 2.20)? I’m quite reluctant to hard reset because I’ve customised apps and data screens etc. especially when others are reporting the same issue – seems like a bug, not a unique problem to my unit.
For what it’s worth – today it’s saying RHR 46bpm on my VAHR and 38 on GC.
Does anyone know the battery capacity of the Vivoactive HR? I plan to take mine on a backpacking trip as soon as I get it and will be using in GPS mode all day for 4-5 days. Need to figure out what size portable power pack to get.
Interesting question. The only info I found about the original Vivoactive is 150mAh, which sounds about right for a device of that size. My guess is that the HR variant is in the same region. That should give you lots of juice for way more than a full week with even a small portable power pack (3000mAh).
The question is, if you can make it through the days with GPS turned on all the time!?
The original Vivoactive specs say 10 hrs with GPS while the HR ones says 13 hrs. So let’s assume the Vivoactive HR has a battery capacity of 1.3*150=195mAh.
While Garmin specs say “up to 13 hrs”, it’s possible it won’t last the whole day with the GPS on. I could charge it a little while stopped for lunch.
Let’s call that 1.5 charges a day. 195*1.5*5 equals less than 1500mAh. So a 3000mAh lipstick power pack should be good enough.
Don’t mind me asking but, can you explain how did you do these calculations Zack? Thanks much.
For battery capacity, since VAHR lasts 13 hrs compared to VA’s 10hrs, I used VA’s 150mAh and multiplied it by 13/10. So VAHR could have a capacity of 195mAh.
For how much charge would be needed on my trip, 5 (# of days) * 1.5 (one full charge at night plus half charge at lunch) * 195 (VAHR battery capacity) equals 1462.5 mAh. Round it to 1500 mAh.
Now we should also consider any losses in the portable power pack circuitry. If we assume 40% loss, then the mAh for the power pack should be 1462.5 (from our calculations above) divided by (100-40)%. That’s 2437.5 mAh for the power pack.
Audio Prompts\Alerts
I wonder when on a run with a VAHR and if connected to your phone will Garmin Connect on the phone broadcast via Bluetooth audible status alerts to your headphones. IE> every 1km or every 5 minutes that sort of thing?
got my VAHR this morning and straight went for a run with it. the device looks nice, feels nice, easy to operate, screen is easy to read, fits well and comfortable on my 17.5cm wrist. so lots of positives. however… i had VAHR on my left wrist, and Suunto Ambit2 with Schosche Rhythm+ on my right wrist and forearm respectively. The HR was pretty much identical on both devices for most of my 13km run but the distance was off from the start. i have 1km autolaps enabled on both VAHR and Suunto. after every km, VAHR was slower/lagging by roughly 20 metres. So Suunto would be at 1km, while VAHR at 0.980km, after 2km Suunto would be at 2.0km while VAHR would still be at 1.96km and so on. I was running at roughly 4:45-4:50min/km pace and from around 7km increased the pace towards 4:20-4:30 and VAHR started lagging even more. so at the finish my stats were showing:
Ambit2 – total distance 13.11km, total time 1:00’17, avg speed 13.1km/h, avg pace 4:35min/km, avg HR – 146, total kcal 721
VAHR – total distance 12.77km, total time 1:00’06, avg speed 12.8km/h, avg pace 4:42min/km, avg HR – 147, total kcal 688
So according to Garmin I ran 340m less than according to Ambit2 (that’s roughly 1 and half minutes off for an hour’s run). I trust my Ambit2 because I tested it many times, compared to my Polar RC3 GPS numerous times and I would get identical distances (+/-20-40 metres or so).
I will test more but if the distance is off by so much, it will be quite disappointing
Hi andy,
Which GPS setting did you use? ON or GLONASS? Default is just ON but if you select GLONASS, it will use GPS together with GLONASS (better performance but reduced battery life).
hi skat,
i had gps on but not glonass. on my next run i will try with glonass on
Hot off the press, a video review of the Vivoactive HR!
link to youtube.com
I noticed the RHR shown is this video is also 54. Looks like Garmin has a bug.
Hi. I have the original VA. Overall I have been very happy with it. I would love to hear some feedback for the VAHR in swim mode. Unfortunately I have had lots of problems with the VA swim mode add meters… granted I am not the most consistent type of swimmer as far as speed and technique goes, but I do frontcrawl most of the time.
I would love to hear the accuracy of the swim metrics. Also interested in hearing feedback from someone who has both the VA and VAHR as far as size and whether there are any truly BIG differences apart from the HR built in. (Curious about accuracy from the Garmin HR strap&VA as compared to the the VAHR stats)
I’ll keep testing my VAHR for a day or two, but so far I’m think I’ going to stick with the FR 235. The VAHR is a great device. But I find it too bulky – the FR 235 is slimmer and nicer to look at (like an acual watch). I like the extra exercise features on the FR 235 (customized workouts, goals, intervals, Vo2max and so on) and the fact that it has beeps instead of vibes only. I also like the option to keep the backlight on during a workout (very handy in the evening or indoors) which is missing on the VAHR. The extra workout apps on the VAHR are nice, but hey can be replaced by IQ apps (i.e. for swimming). The touchscreen of the VAHR is very good, but it is a bit glossier than the FR 235 screen which I therefore find easier to read. The extra fitness tracking widgets on the VAHR are also great, but for me they are actually too much – the same information can be found in the app and I don’ need it it all the time. The remaining extra features (floors climbed, intensity minutes) are not that important to me. Well, I’d like to keep the intensity minutes, but it’s not that big of an issue.
One thing which is clearly superior in my eyes is the music handling on the VAHR, but well, that’s not too bad on the FR 235 either.
Now I’m really torn…I’ve been worried that the VAHR is going to be too big and look like I strapped my old 705 to my wrist. FR 235 is looking attractive other than the extra cost… My primary activities are cycling and hiking with my dog and I really wanted an activity tracker.
I love the FR as an activity tracker. I had the Fitbit Carge HR before and I liked it, but the FR 235 is much better. Much more expensive of course…
Maybe you should check out both devices in a store.
Thanks for your comparison with the FR235 Karen! I now start to think I want that device, even though I don’t really need the intervals and VO2Max etc. Could you explain a bit more about how the VAHR works in the dark? If there’s no backlight on, do you have to press a button to see the screen, or rely on a finicky wrist motion detection? I do a lot of my workouts at night, so it sounds like this could be an issue. How do you like the FR235 screen now? I searched for backlight in this post and found your comment (at least I think it was yours) where you say that you were disappointed with the FR235 screen. Did you get used to it?
Also, I asked above, but I think it got lost in the many comments, could you maybe confirm if the VAHR only has auto lap by distance and not by GPS position?
Hi Helena,
yes, the VAHR has auto laps by distance only (same as the FR 235, I think – I don’t care about auto laps). About the FR 235 display – coming from the Fitbit Blaze, at first I was a little bit disappointed.Then I found out that you can change the watch face to a black on white display (plus there are numerous watch faces from the IQ App store which also have custom colurs). I’m perfectly happy with the FR 235 display now.
In the daylight, the screen is very good and easy to read, even with a dark background. Additionally you can tell the watch to keep the backlight on in exercise mode, which is great in the evening or for indoors draining when the light is not so great. The VAHR does not have that feature, or at least I didn’t find it. From my yesterday workout I remember that I had to tap the screen to put the light on, but I could not reproduce this now … weird. Pressing a button will put the light on, though. You can choose how long the light stays on (10 s being the default I think). Maybe continuous backlight will be added in a firmware update, but for now it soes not seem to be there.
Apart from that, the displays of the FR 235 and the VAHR are equally bright and readable. The only difference I found is that the VAHR display reclects the light a bit more (due to the fact it is a touchscreen, I think).
These are exactly my two primary activities.. dog walking/hiking and cycling!! I have a Edge 500 for cycling and was going to get the VAHR for activity tracking and dog walking.. But my wrist is small at the very end of the scale for fit.. Not sure what I’m going to do.. Maybe just get a more basic activity tracker and a new 520 for cycling… but would love to have maps for dog hikes…
Andrea,
I have the FR235 and my main activities are hiking and bike riding. I know it is geared towards runners, but I like the watch profile that it has and it does a great job with those two activities. It’s my daily activity tracker and it’s so light and comfortable that I actually wear it everyday. I’m sure the Fenix 3 HR would be the ideal solution for me since it has those specific activities built in, but I couldn’t justify the cost difference at this time.
Thanks for the feedback. JAA I also have the Edge 500 for cycling, but I sure do miss my 705. I’m hoping the next 500 series GPS will have the option to add extra memory for maps which the 520 doesn’t have. In the meantime, I have Ride With GPS on my iPhone which is fine for the occasions when I want a map.
I took a close look at the FR235, and the very short list of activities is turning me off. I do indoor cycling and strength training regularly so I appreciate that the VAHR has a nice complete list of activities and options for custom additions.
The FR 235 does have indoor cycling out of the box, and there are various Connect IQ apps for other activities like strength training and even swimming.
Thanks so much Karen, for your detailed impressions and for answering my questions! I’m so bummed, I now read up on it and it appears that Garmin has removed auto lap by distance from all recent watches 🙁 I just assumed it wasn’t on the VAHR because they see it as a premium feature for the higher end watches, but it isn’t even there apparently 🙁 I love that feature on my 310XT.
The backlight sounds like it could be an issue, and I never even would have thought about that, so thanks for mentioning it.
You’re welcome – but auto lap by distance IS there, on both devices. I suppose you mean auto lap by GPS?
I got my hands on a FR235 at a local running store and I really like the size and weight. The clerk actually handed me her FR235 when I asked to see one. She also has tiny wrists and she is very happy with it. I do hate spending the extra money if the VivoactiveHR will fit well though…looks like it will be a while before I could get my hands on one in Canada.
Hi…I am in the same debate. I did do preorder but may return. Worried it will be too large and uncomfortable. May order the 235 and just return one. But following others comments for now. Please update if you decide either way thx
What does the girl have to say about this? Need woman’s perspective.
Could anyone please enlighten me of which display is better through the polarizer sunglasses: Fenix 3 HR or the Vivoactive HR? I’m considering pros and cons to make a decision, and neither device is available at the store display yet here in Russia. Thanks in advance!
I wear prescription polarised sunglasses, which were absolutely fine. On other devices (like the GPS in my boat), I cannot see the screen at all with those glasses. Despite being a tiny bit darker (they are a dark tint), the screen is crystal clear on the VAHR. I cannot comment on the other unit.
Hi Roastman
Are you still happy with your VAHR – i.e. is the hr reading properly. Still reading other reports saying the hr is still a bit flakey, and waiting for the review from Ray – but thought as you have had yours for a few days now you would have a better hands-on idea of what’s working and what’s not.
Must admit I am wavering between the VAHR and the FR235, but don’t really want a fullt dedicated running watch such as the FR235, and am hoping the VAHR is a better all-round fitness watch. All depends on the HR reliability really.
Cheers
Hi Noel
Happy at the moment. I am doing a 10 km interval run in the morning and will report back after that. Definitely not as forgiving as the Tomtom watch in terms of placement, but it is narrower and naturally sits closer to the wrist bone. I really like it at the moment, but was very concerned with it before I worked out the optimum arm placement. Doing intervals during my 10 km should give a good indication, as it is during the rest periods that it caused issues. I am confident it will be OK, but tomorrow morning will give me a better indication. I’ll report back in about 10 hours!
Hi Noel
I did not have time for a long run this morning, so I did a 30 minute hill session with 2 minute walk/run intervals. The optical HRM was excellent for nearly all of the run. I had two small sections where it read a bit higher than the Tomtom watch (the Tomtom watch was definitely correct). Still not 100% sure about the heart rate monitor and I am certain my other devices are better in this respect. It seems to be far fussier about wrist position than anything I have used before. In these two instances, even though I started with the watch quite snug and considerably higher on my arm than normal, a gentle push up the arm fixed the HRM issue. However, if I had not been wearing a device to compare the heart rate, I would not have realised it was 10-15 beats incorrect. Long term, I don’t want to be wearing two watches, which is why I am replacing the Tomtom watch and my Apple Watch with the VAHR. I will continue to test over the next few days, paying ridiculously close attention to position of the watch. I am a little concerned about keeping it long term, but undoubtedly will, as it has lots of nice features and I can probably live with the occasional HRM glitch. Realistically, given how good some of the optical HRM’s are, it is disappointing that they don’t seem to have got this quite right. It will undoubtedly work better for some people than others (skin colour, amount of hair, wrist thickness etc), but I don’t have issues with my other devices, so this is a little disappointing. More testing may help me achieve an optimal position etc. I am still thoroughly enjoying the watch and must stress the two HRM “drop-outs” were only for very short periods. The average heart rate for the run was within 2 beats per minute and the maximum was identical. Distance was also within 10 mtrs. Not a bad result for a watch in this price range and with some excellent activity tracking features. The Garmin Connect interface is much better than Tomtom, linking flawlessly to external apps such as Myfitnesspal. I have just linked it to Strava as well, but I cannot see if that works, as my Tomtom watch is also connected to Strava (and I assume it only uploads one of the watches, as it assumes correctly they are a duplicate). I would be interested to hear how others find the automatic export to Strava etc, as I do not wish to unlink my Tomtom watch yet.
I cannot comment on the Vivoactive HR (will not get mine for 2-3 weeks as not available here yet) but can on the VIvosmart HR .. same sensor and it was very good on the HR part. But it does help to push it up your arm .. and even if I did not it was still very very good (unlike my past Fitbit Surge which just sucked at the HR part period. I dumped it). I also have low body fat % and thus very good veins .. which likely helps a lot with OHR. I would suspect that DCRainmaker is much the same. That is likely why some people have more issues with the OHR part than others. It also does help to warmup to get those veins all primed up.
Roastman,
Thanks for the detailed observations. Could you explain what you mean by the watch being narrower and how that affects placement on your arm? Also you suggest that the HRM on the Tom Tom is reliable. What don’t you like about it that leads u to want to buy the VAHR? Look forward to your reply. Thanks
The width on my wrist seems a bit narrower than the Tomtom Spark and Apple Watch. I like both of these devices for different reasons and miss having the Apple Watch on my arm the most. I still have both, but the Apple Watch seems to have been claimed by my wife. Specifically, what don’t I like about the Tomtom? It is probably not so much what it does, it is what it cannot do. I play golf, tennis, go to the gym, run indoors and out and have started indoor rowing. I don’t always want to carry my phone when outdoors. I really want a good activity tracker to replace my dead Fitbit (numerous dead Fitbits actually, but that is another story). Apple Health is a bit weak and relies on third party interaction to be decent. Tomtom activity tracking is pitiful and the interface is clunky. It is mainly the activity tracking that pushed me to Garmin. My wife has told me how happy she has been with Garmin fitness trackers, after numerous Fitbit replacements (ah, there it is again). I have been very impressed with the step count on the Garmin unit. Very few false step counts and it seems to capture everything I do. The GPS seems good, although rain today has stopped me from trying it on the golf course. Notifications seem OK, although the vibration alert is sadly quite pathetic. It is more of an “all in one” device for me, as although I love the Apple Watch, it has disappointing third party apps for Golf (once again relying on the phone GPS) and is only reasonable as an activity tracker. Great in all other respects, including being able to use Siri etc.
The form factor of the Garmin is interesting. It is longer across my wrist than the Tomtom, although the Tomtom has got the extra four way button that adds considerable length along the strap. In terms of the width (imagining the direction you are measuring is up your arm, as opposed to around your arm), the Garmin appears narrower than the Tomtom unit. With the HRM sensors being directly in the middle of the watch, if you assumed they were the same size, this means the sensor is closer to your wrist bone, if you place the leading edge of the watch in the same position. Hence why the Garmin needs to go further up the arm, to get the sensor away from the wrist bone. I still think this may he a slight hardware deficiency as well, but it seems good enough over my past couple of tests. More rigorous testing will tell me more. As I cannot get onto the golf course today, a long run will be in my near future, plus another try on the rower.
I hope this helps. Ray is obviously the real expert on this stuff, as my opinion is more from someone who is looking for improved health and fitness, rather than being a hard-core athlete. Those days are gone for me now!
As I have beta tested previously for other devices, I would love to get onto the beta test team for this device, to see if it can be made even better. The bad side of beta testing is that you get lots of issues with devices, but the good thing is seeing the finished product. At least Garmin would not need to send me a watch!
Hi Roastman
Many thanks for all the feedback so far. It sounds as though you are not having too many issues with the Hr at all.
I have had a Basis Peak for nearly two years, and am aware of the importance of positioning the optical hr in the correct spot.If it is a little out, or a little loose, Hr can be badly affected.
I also have an Atlas wristband, which is dedicated to gym work and weight-lifting, etc.
I have had a really mixed bag with optical hr’s – the one on the Basis Peak has become progressively worse over time and following firm-wear updates, to the point where Basis are going to replace it for me. Unfortunately, the Basis never really lived up to its promise, and development and support are pretty poor, to say the least. Pity, because as a 24/7 tracker it is pretty good – counts steps very well, gets calories pretty much spot on, has a terrific ‘Habits’ section which encourages increased performance, and the sleep tracking is next to none. It is just about the only unit on the market that I know of that actually registers light, deep, and REM sleep. Unfortunately, the HR is so erratic that it can suddenly spike to show a hr 40-80bpm higher than what I am showing on my Polar chest-strap, and Basis admit they don’t know how to fix it – and this is a company owned by Intel.
O)n the other hand, I simply love the Atlas – it tracks all my gym work, and is about to improve further next week when they release ‘Learning Mode’ for it, wherein you can ‘teach’ the unit new exercises, machines, etc such as Pec machines and all sorts of complicated gym exercises.
Importantly, however, one of the best aspects of the Atlas is its HR tracking ability. The sensors are supplied by Valencell – I believe one of the foremost leaders in this field, and also rated by Ray as superior to Mio. The only issue is that the Atlas is designed for the gym, and not (yet) for 24/7 monitoring.
As I have lost complete faith in the Basis Peak, and really want an all-round, 24/7 monitor with GOOD Hr ability, I am looking at the VAHR, so your reports are invaluable.
I will be very interested in what further you find over the next couple of weeks, and what Ray thinks when he gets around to a full review.
Like you, I want an all-round fitness tracker – my ‘athlete’ days are well past me, but I still go to the gym four times a week, cycle, and walk the dog around 8 kms every day, and with some past health issues, knowing my CORRECT Hr is very important.
Looking forward to your next update.
Cheers.
I played 18 holes of golf with the watch today. Some quick comments:
* GPS distances were not as accurate as the Tomtom Golfer, although were mostly acceptable
* Some of the other distances (eg. dogleg, layup etc) were totally incorrect and made no sense. I was getting junk figues regularly on these distances
* The scorecard feature is very, very broken. I enabled the score card, which apparently should turn on when you get to the green. It did turn on (three times for the round) and was gone so quickly I could not put a score in. There needs to be a better means to access the scorecard entry system (eg. swipe to the right to go to a manual scorecard). Total fail, so hopefully this will be fixed
* We were on course for about five hours and the battery dropped about 40%. Not bad.
* Hole detection was great. When I stepped onto every tee the hole had automatically changed. Excellent!
Is anyone else seeing a problem with the back light on the VAHR? I just got mine yesterday via Argos in the UK. The backlight seems to be very heavily concentrated in one corner, spilling out on to the front and not balanced across the screen. Am I expecting too much here, or is it a production problem with this copy?
Can other please let me know if they are seeing anything similar?
Also got mine from Argos – and use that same watch-face.
No issue, light consistent across the back, would take that back immediately.
Backlight is even across my entire watch face…
Yours seems really bad. I do have a noticeable backlight bleeding in the bottom left corner but mine looks more like the photos in Ray’s FR630 review link to dcrainmaker.com
I have the same problem with the screen. The backlight only comes from the lower left corner. Looks pretty bad especially if you look from the side. This is my first sport watch, maybe my expectation are too high?
My first one from Argos had no working backlight at all. The replacement is fine and the light is even. I’d get that one swapped.
Thanks all for your advice in relation to the backlight. It went back to Argos the next day, and the replacement watch has a perfect backlight.
I would advise anyone who sees the uneven backlight that myself and openyoureyes experienced to send it straight back and get a new one.
Adam
Is the backlight on your replacement perfect? Can you see the light coming from the lower left hand corner at all if you look directly down from the top? Or is it totally even? Trying to decide if I should return mine from Best Buy or not.
The VAHR looks like a great device, has everything I need except the beep for auto laps. Then I have to ask myself do I need to pay an extra $80 for the 235 so I can hear the beep! I’ve the 620 and I don’t always notice the vibrate every 1km, but definitely hear the beep, even in huge races like NYCM, Paris marathon etc
I get disturbed when in a race all runners around me suddenly go beep-beep.
By the way, I have just noticed that Ray probably has an error in the comparison charts – the VAHR has a magnetic compass.
Very happy with the watch as an everyday/night activity tracker, but actually very disappointed at the moment with the HR accuracy during interval runs.
link to connect.garmin.com
I dont know if you guys can open the above link, but I did 3 intervals of 350m each approximately.
1st interval: HR only catches up with the speed about halfway.
2nd and 3th interval: HR does NOT catch up during interval, only afterwards!
Now, I know it wasnt going to be perfect, especially in high intensity sessions, but this is not really acceptable. I guess I’ll have to keep using my ANT+ strap for my interval trainings… I really hope they can finetune the sensor.
Ray,
Will the review be out next week? I’m considering trying to get one of these for my wife for mother’s day. I may go ahead and order one, can always return it if there are problems with it.
Thanks!
Jason
I don’t expect it to be out next week, but probably the week after. I’d like to ensure I get in about 2-3 weeks of running/riding/swimming.
Ok, thank you!
In some videos I saw the VAHR with an option to accept or decline an incoming call of a connected phone. Can anyone confirm that this feature exists? I only get the option to mute a call on my devoce, but it might be a problem of my phone (Samsung Note 3, Android 5.01)
On my iPhone, you can get the option to answer/decline. I can’t speak to Android though. Photo attached.
REI apparently didn’t get the number of VA HR they expected so have canceled about 500 orders (you’ll probably get an e-mail). Not sure why they don’t just let you know they are delayed and give you the option of canceling. In any case, they are expecting a significant number around the end of May. Personally, I’m still going to buy through REI as I can return it, no questions asked, if it doesn’t workout for me.
Anyone know when it might be available on the Garmin website to buy? I have to buy it through Garmin to get my health insurance discount.
You are going to be waiting for quite a while .. as Garmin told me that they fulfill their dealer base first .. then they offer it themselves. I know here in Canada we are not getting them at all until the very end of May or early June.
Best Buy CA seems to have this in stock. My order now has a UPS tracking # and I am hoping to get it no later than Tuesday
Hi John, curious to know, when did you place your order pls? I did on 4/12 on bestbuy.ca and am not seeing an update yet.
I put my order in on 4/24(after cancelling my REI order). I am almost embarrassed to say that I have elite status with BB. That may have bumped me up in the line(?). You might want to check your order Nav.
Oh John, you elite bugger 🙂 I just checked again (30 seconds back), same status 🙁 Oh well, maybe the universe is teaching me a lesson in patience. he he. Thanks anyways buddy. I’ll just have to wait it out i guess. Cheers.
I’ll tell you if my GPS is working when I’m flying over on my private jet. ??
ha ha, make sure to record your pace per mile too!
I also ordered yesterday from Best Buy after canceling my REI order. I just got a UPS shipping # and it will arrive Thursday next week. I am not elite BTW!
My experience with REI was terrible which is why I canceled my other order.
First, they never sent me a notification email to keep the order open after 30 days (CC issue) so my order got randomly canceled. Then I had 1 REI customer service rep tell me there was nothing she could do. Then the 2nd REI rep actually ordered it again for me with the same delivery date of 4/30. The 2nd person also finally admitted there is a glitch in their system and sometimes the potential cancellation notifications don’t get sent out. That was after a lot of back and forth. Then the next day my delivery date changed to 6/1. Needless to say, REI did not handle this very well. I need it for my wife’s Mother’s Day gift so can’t wait.
Order in with Best Buy-US for store pick up. Status changed this morning to “ready for pickup”, made the trip over and nothing. It was apparently supposed to be on the truck today, but was not. Unfortunately they don’t get deliveries on Sat/Sun and I leave on Monday so will have to wait a few weeks–bummer. They weren’t sure why it didn’t make the truck, but did not that they only had 2 units allocated in the first shipment. I still have my Amazon order in for overnight (order on 2/22) so still possible if it ships today, but I am not holding my breath. Tough sometimes being an early adopter–all that anxiety anticipating the new gizmo.
I just received an e-mail from Clever Training. Apparently my February 23 order was not early enough to qualify for the first small shipment they just received. I’m not willing to give up the 10% discount to try ordering elsewhere, so it looks like I’m in for an even longer wait. Sigh. So for anyone who ordered well after the announcement, it might be a while. Based on the stories from numerous retailers (like the REI debacle,) it sounds like Garmin is still ramping up production and most retailers got fairly small initial orders.
I don’t like giving CT a free loan while my order waits. I think their policy of charging the full about is BS. I will never use them again.
I agree on the prepayment. Definitely not a fan. This was my first order with CT; I’m not sure if I’d do it again or not. The savings made a difference, but it will depend on how this VAHR order eventually plays out.
I’m with you on that. I made my order on Feb 22 and am still on the waiting list. However my previous experience with CT has been pleasant. I’m starting to doubt that I can rely on them for new releases.
Thanks for the support via CT. They are looking to implement a new policy that doesn’t require the payment hold.
As for new releases, keep in mind that Garmin dictates when and what quantity, mostly regardless of pre-orders. As was pointed out by others above, some 500+ people had their REI Vivoactive HR orders outright cancelled. Which is surely worse than still waiting in line.
I’ll definitely stick with CT for future purchases and understand they’re doing their best with Garmin’s distribution.
Running is the only activity I track. I have preordered the VAHR from Amazon, but after reading and rereading posts here I’m wondering if the FR 235 wouldn’t be a better device for me. I’m coming from a FR 220. I would like wrist HRM. The post run metrics seem like they’d be useful/interesting.
If I’m not going to track other activities, is there any reason to get the VAHR? (Other than the barometric altimeter, which sounds really cool! And the $80…)
Input greatly appreciated!
My input and just my opinion (we all have one) .. the barometric altimeter is total junk. Just in general and has not reflection on the VivoactiveHR. It is used for floors .. and Fitbit and Garmin both should stop the madness and just give up. You cannot control the weather .. which is really what you are trying to do when using a barometric altimeter. Am I wrong ? Just go to the Garmin or Fitbit forums and you will see people complaining about the lack of accuracy on floors.They never should have started doing this as it is a game that they cannot possibly win. But it is all about people that do comparisons of one model vs another. That as we all know could mean money and lost sales and why it is there. Personally I never do floors and I would highly recommend that if you look at other things to consider in the Vivoactive HR. I personally think it will be a great unit. In combination with my Forerunner 610 I think I will have all the bases covered. I totally would love if Ray commented on floors and this feature.
I am actually quite impressed with the floors it counts, it has been spot on for me, the 2 days I have the device. If its a usefull feature or not, thats another question.
Tomaz, if you want OHR and more of a running watch, definately get the FR235. It has more running features than this watch, which is maybe more allround and includes others sports.
HOWEVER, if you think HR accuracy is important, stick with a chest strap. Like I said in a post yesterday, my first interval run was a huge disappointment, my HR would jump up only AFTER the interval.
None of these devices will be perfect at counting floors, but it seems OK to me. Most people are only looking for an indication anyway (if they are using it as a gentle nudge to get moving).
For floors, thus far, it doesn’t seem to shabby to me. I haven’t been exactly counting my floors the last few days, but it’s in the right ballpark. I’ll do more floor counting when I get home (since it’s easy to split out).
That said, what I look for is false-floor counting. Most companies will use a combo of the altimeter + steps. So if the altimeter increases, but steps aren’t there, then it shouldn’t increase floors. Historically that works out, but when I do see errors with products, the easiest way to do so is an elevator ride (preferably a tall one).
Actually I’m finding that the floor and even steps functions are not working well. For example: Saturday I went on a 16+ mile hike with altitude gain of 3,000+… but it only tracked 63 floor climbed and 18,175 steps for the day. I think it might have to do with using trekking poles but that is ridiculous.
Example 2: walked up 4 flights of stairs this morning at work and it counted 3. The 2nd time I walked up the same 4 flights, I kept glancing at my watch as I climbed… it then counted ZERO. Still says my total floors climbed is 3 even though I have now climbed 8.
Indoor stair counting for one flight definitely seems a bit hit or miss so far (mostly miss).
Did you explicitly start an activity for your hike? I did a similar hike (though only 9.5mi and 2,400ft) of elevation with the VAHR. I used the Hike2 app (I’ll try the “Walking” activity next time) and saw the following:
1. Elevation gain was quite accurate, very closely matched a couple other people with standalone GPSes. I don’t even think GLASNOSS was on, though I’m not sure (there is no option for it in the Hike app).
2. HR recording seemed accurate when it actually took a sample, but took way too few samples. At one point during the hike it didn’t record HR data for 30min. In general, there are many many 10-15min gaps in the heart rate data. Seems like a major problem… since I was recording an activity and going from flat to steep hill and my HR wasn’t changing. (See below though)
3. Garmin obviously does not know what to do with data when using hiking/trekking poles (which I was using) – Garmin IQ thought I was swimming. Not only would a “hiking” activity be great, it should either be smart about pole use, or have an option to specify using poles.
4. I did about 3:15 of GPS recording and that plus about a day of use used 25% of the battery which seems about right – quite happy with battery life so far.
5. I also did some indoor rowing and DID get a ton of HR samples for that, so I’m hoping when using the Walking activity rather than the Hike2 app there will be more HR samples.
Overall, I’m happy with the GPS, altimeter/barometer (outdoors/during activities), battery life, and HR when it does take samples – great device, and happy (so far) I went with it rather than the Fenix 3.
I have the same problem hiking with trekking poles. Basically, it just counts the left trekking pole’s movement as steps (I wear VAHR on my left wrist). Interestingly, my daughter’s Fitbit Charge HR counted steps correctly even with a trekking pole.
hi ray! great review! just wondering, can it read both magnetless garmin ANT+ bike speed and cadence sensor simultaneously? and show the readings on one screen?
i notice current vivoactive cannot read those sensor simultaneously.. CMIIW..
Bestbuy.com now shows store pickup as Wednesday May 4th at all my nearby locations. Clever training didnt ship mine with the first go round. I’m hoping BB will be have one available so I can see just how large it really is.
I currently use my iPhone as my bike computer with a wahoo cadence and speed sensor. I use the wahoo app. If wearing the VAHR, will it display my HR on my phone? Or will I need to keep looking at my wrist?
Also, I have a 180mm wrist, should I go with the reg or XL?
I preordered the xl, I measured my wrist at 19 to 20cm (roughly) but went to the store today to try a regular size and it fits, got about 5 holes left on the strap.
As far as I know, VAHR uses for ReBradcasting HR data ANT+ protocol, but iPhone doesn’t support ANT+ (only if you buy special dongle) but you can do it different way.. Get Wahoo HR strap, that will transmit data to iPhone via BT and to VAHR via ANT+…
I’m currently using Tickr Run + S4mini + Echo + Wahoo Blue SC… But also looking forward on VAHR
I know the VAHR connects to the phone via Bluetooth for notifications, but wasn’t sure about sending the rest of the data.
I’ve been following your channel a long time ago. Love your spirit and reviews. After owning a Suunto Ambit 2 and upgrade for the Fenix 3 and VivoSmart HR my questions are the following:
I bought, one year ago, the Garmin vivoactive on Amazon (Spain) and returned because of the inside low visibility of the screen. Is the visibility similar to the Fenix 3? Is this model much more readable in low light conditions with backlight off? Greetings from PORTUGAL :)
Mhh. How do I manually set the sleep mode? And switch it off in the morning. I do not trust the automatic detection at all. It often is way off!
Just finished a 32 km trail run. I compared my new Vivoactive HR with a FR 610 linked withe a mio Link. Heart rate accuracy on the vicoactive was comparable with the mio Link.
Against my expectations the vivoactive recorded 700 meters less than the FR 610(which I am sure is correct), Gps mode was on Glonass.
Overall I am satisfied with my vivoactive HR( Bought it yesterday)
link to connect.garmin.com Fr610 with Mio Link
link to connect.garmin.com Vivoactive HR
Does anybody know how to put the heart rate data on one graph?
Hi Ray! Does the screen has the same visibility of the Fenix 3 or is more dull (indoor perspective with backlight off).
Does it has the option of invert the display with white background? Thanks 🙂
Three days in, and I’m pretty happy with my Vivoactive HR. I have noticed one slightly annoying feature though. Today I went on a hike, with my Vivoactive HR broadcasting HR information to my eTrex 35 Touch. The problem I was getting, was every time I hit a step or floors goal, a notification would be displayed which would disable the HR broadcast (since I did 3 times my step goal and 7 times my floors goal, this happened quite a few times).
Hopefully a firmware update will fix this issue.
Fitness watch faceoff: Garmin vivoactive HR vs. Fitbit Surge
link to cio.com
That’s a pretty useless ‘faceoff’. No comparison of the accuracy of the GPS, accuracy or rate of measuring HRM, battery life, etc, etc.
To be fair, he did walk around for 40 minutes 😉
Couldn’t he have at least jumped into the pool for a few laps? Super weak comparison. I could have done better than that.
“Couldn’t he have at least jumped into the pool for a few laps? ”
No, that’d have killed the Surge. 😉
If his friends jumped in the pool he would have as well for sure! Everyone knows you buy a watch so you can compete against your friends. Ray when is your review coming out?? We are forced to read these amateur articles while we wait for you…. pure torture.
My guess for a VAHR review between the 13th and the 19th.
I have been awaiting the arrival of mine any updates on shipping date?
I have seen May 9th and May 15th.
Supposedly, Best Buy has early release. I ordered mine today from there and should have it by May 4th.
Same here. I ordered mine from BestBuy today and have delivery date of May 4.
I know the VIVOACTIVE HR doesn’t have a triathlon feature.
But if you were doing a triathlon, would it automatically change from swimming to biking to running, since it automatically detects these activities? If it does, all you would loose is transitions time, and it would just be added to the other activities.
Could you hit a button to stop the activity then allow it to auto detect the new one?
Thanks
I just got mine today through Best Buy US, which is great. I am having issues pairing/connecting to my phone and thought I would post here as there seems to be a lot of knowledgeable people here. I have android. When I connected through android wear, I could not pair through the Garmin Connect app. When I paired first to Garmin Connect, android wear would not recognize the phone. Therefore, I could not access the smart lock feature. Anyone have any practical advice on this? Thanks
I can’t tell you what steps will make it work, but I can at least verify that it is possible to use Smart Lock on Android with your VAHR. I spent a few hours reading forums and trying stuff before it finally came alive. From the wide variety of methods I read for accomplishing this with other Garmin devices, it seems there is no one method that works reliably, but that if you mess around with it enough it will eventually work. The key seems to be to pair with your phone’s stock Bluetooth app first, then with Garmin connect. That sounds easy, but in practice your phone’s setting and the Garmin Connect app seem to want to keep you from setting it up this way. It wasn’t until my Bluetooth headset had problems that caused me to forget and re-pair it that the option for Smart Lock on my VAHR finally worked. I have no idea why Sorry I can’t give you directions but, on the plus side, I can verify that it’s worked for five days now with my Nexus 6.
Thanks Dan. I have the Nexus 6P so I’m sur it’s doable. I had a feeling that the order you are recommending is the way to go. I’ll unpair from GC and see if I can get this to work. Much appreciated.
Sorry if this is a repeat Q, but do you know how to change from the dark to the white background? I can’t seem to find this in the settings.
I’m really interested in the Vivoactive HR and really like how frequent the Fitbits check HR. How often does the Vivoactive HR check heart rate in 24/7 mode and can this be adjusted to where you can specify to check every 5 seconds (if needed)? Thanks.
Completed my first ride with it yesterday.
My GPX file shows Smart recording and now 1second recording. Ride, with Glonass and GPS. On a 1hr 17min ride it only samples 1120 times, which is every 4 seconds.
Really disappointed as it straight-lined a lot of tight switchbacks.
Yeah, I’ve got it on my list to poke them today as to why the VAHR is showing Smart Recording for me as well.
Obviously keep us posted! Fingers crossed it comes in via an update, if not im returning it.
Was it originally billed as 1s recording in GPS?
It was.
Any update on 1s recording? Is kind of a go/no-go for me for this watch…
I just got the Vivoactive HR in the mail yesterday. I was disappointed that it did not have an elliptical setting. I tried putting it on walk mode and it was completely inaccurate. Is there a way to get an accurate elliptical reading?
Hi Nancy,
Read your comment re: Eliptical machine not tracked. This news is bad for me. The so-called “Automtic Tracking” of very common fitness activites is mainly what I want a VAHR for, as well as GPS for running.
My FitBit Blaze tracks Eliptical perfectly.. I don’t have to manually start the watch picks up the movement of the Eliptical and along with my heart rate estimates calorie burn.
I’ve worked out a few times on an elliptical using the “cardio” mode. It works fine for tracking heart rate and time but doesn’t give any speed information. link to connect.garmin.com
This is fine for me since speed is so dependent on the resistance setting anyway. You can recategorize the activity to “Elliptical” in Connect after the fact.
Correct me if im wrong but cant you just use the indoor running to get distance/cadence etc then manually update the distance, if different, to what the machine shows?
I tried the AutoIQ and it picked up an elliptical as a swim lol.
For me the auto isnt great as it cant be exported as an activity to something like strava.
There is an Connect IQ app (workout genius) which can be set up with several activity profiles, elliptical being one of them. It works fine, you can even set up HR alerts. It does not count steps and distance, though. I wonder if the Garmin footpod or the cadence sensor could help with that.
Move IQ does recognize the elliptical, but as all Move IQ activities it appears only in the timeline within Garmin connect (web version) and not in the activities list.
I normally do elliptical and then do strength training each morning. Has anyone tried any kind of strength training with the Vivoactive HR when lifting or pushing weights?
PC Magazine Looks at the VAHR
link to pcmag.com
That’s the first time I’ve seen a gray face and band VAHR anywhere. Still waiting for mine from CT, they seemed to think they’ll get enough in the next 2 or 3 weeks to fulfill all of their preorders.
2-3 more weeks? Bummer. But I guess that’s better than months.
BT – did they give you a sense of whether that they would be receiving one big shipment at some point in the next 2-3 weeks, or that they’d get numerous shipments and earlier pre-orders might get it sooner than that?
Julian – In the email you probably received as well, they said shipments throughout May. In a reply to an email I sent which mentioned the pre-orders, they said shipment. But who knows as they are at the mercy of Garmin…
Actually, they said 2nd shipment in regard to the pre-orders…
Has anybody tried it with SUP or rowing? I’m curious as to what metrics are available, I didn’t see much about it in the manual other than you can select it as an activity.
I used the SUP mode for a whitewater rafting trip this past weekend. link to connect.garmin.com If you click on the “splits” tab, you can see all the stroke rate metrics it tracks. Those same stats can been seen on the device during your activity. The river was pretty fast so we didn’t have to do much paddling!
Thanks Dan!
I tried rowing on my Concept II tonight and it didn’t go so hot. link to connect.garmin.com
Heart rate tracked way too low the first 20 minutes, then jumped around before getting to a realistic range and staying there. At least I know it’s capable of reading an accurate heart rate. The workout was steady state and my HR should have been 145-155 throughout. It also failed to get a stroke rate at all. I’m not sure what’s up with that.
I also have the same issue with the HR, I don’t believe any wrist measurements are going to be accurate with rowing, I have gone back to using my scosche rhythm plus which pairs with the watch. The scosche rhythm plus only gives accurate readings for me when on placed in the upper arm, not on the wrist where it gives the same issues as the watch. As for the stroke count, it worked fine and matched that of the Concept 2 rower.
Hi Dan and to anyone else that have used the SUP mode.
I noticed the SUP mode on your Whitewater rafting trip captured AVERAGE DISTANCE PER STROKE.
Is there anywhere in on the watch, in Garmin Connect or in the raw TCX or FIT file where the SUP mode captures actual distance per stroke? Looking for actual raw data or a graph of STROKE plotted against DISTANCE PER STROKE.
Trying to decide if Garmin’s SUP mode will meet my needs in paddling. There isn’t a lot of information I can find on it. Any feedback is much appreciated.
Thanks,
Thomas
I don’t know the answer, Thomas, but I exported the data from the above rafting trip via Garmin Connect and put the files in a folder here: link to drive.google.com I don’t know how Garmin would be able to tell how much distance came from one stroke vs the stroke before or the stroke after but help yourself to the data and let us know what you find.
Thx Dan.
I took a quick look at the files you send. Doesn’t look like Garmin currently captures detailed stroke metrics.
In theory by correlating GPS position with the accelerometer, you can capture when each stroke is taken and how far you have travel since the last stroke (there are some limitation with the sampling rate of the GPS at 1sec, but most rowers row at the rate of 20-35spm and paddlers are anywhere from 55-90spm, so the data should still be somewhat accuracy.) Dedicated rowing & paddling devices are able to this.
Distance per stroke (aka glide) is an important metric in paddling & rowing sport, as it allows you to play with and determine optimal stroke rate for a given race distance and it also allows you to study how your glide is affected by varying blade and body mechanics.
I was hoping Garmin’s SUP app will capture this information, but it doesn’t look like so.
Thanks again,
Thomas
Looks like you’re about to drop into lower keeny on the New. Nice.
And from tom’s guide, a review by someone who seems to actually have used the device … 🙂
link to tomsguide.com
Well, another worthless review. They compare the HR Accuracy against the FR235. It’s the same sensor, which gives the same results, duh!
I am curiously waiting for Ray’s review to see it against a chest strap. It is very inaccurate when doing intense workouts, and I’m amazed so little people here complain about it. I hope they come with an update very soon…
Got mine today (ordered it via Qantas Frequent Flyer store in Australia on 22/4), my initial impression is that’s it very comfortable and I really like the form factor. However the touch sensitivity of the screen is slowly driving me mad as I am selecting things when just trying to swipe up and down. I’m sure I’ll get used to it.
Overall I really like it…although I haven’t taken it for a run yet.
if I use a vivoactive as an activity tracker and for runs but use an edge for biking will the activity data/calorie count go from garmin connect to the vivoactive for rides?
I asked the same question at link to forums.garmin.com .
No, it wil not. Got my Vivoactive yesterday and did a bike ride without vivoactive today. Synced both Edge and Vivoactive afterwards and no data from the bike ride came from GC to Vivoactive. Would be nice if it did though. I use a powermeter so recording my bike rides with the vivoactive is a no go…
Do you know if the screen is made of plastic or gorilla glass? I just got one yesterday, and I can’t tell. I’d like to know how scratch resistant it will be. Thanks!
Anyone figure out how to change music during an activity? In watch mode you have access to the music control widget. However, during an activity I can’t find a way to access? I have a Vivosmart HR as well and it allows music control during an activity.
In the Run app, press the Back button to return to the watch face and from there you can switch to the music widget. If you press the Back button again, you will go back to the activity app. Other activity apps may handle the Back button differently though.
Anyone tried using the Music widget to manage Spotify? I have an IPhone and don´t use the native Music app, prefer Spotify. But I tried (only briefly) to switch a Spotify track from the VHR the other day and it started up the iPhone Music app (and therefore paused my Spotify feed).
On my Android phone, Spotify works flawlessly. The I’ve heard though that itt’s not working on iPhones.
Hi Karen,
do you use Spotify Free or Premium?
Spotify Premium. But it works with online streaming equally as offline with downloaded files.
Spotify control is not working on iPhone. Apple music works fine.
It won’t read heart rate while swimming, but If I come up out of the water and sake drops off, will it start to read my heart rate then?
It doesn’t start/resume HR enablement until you press the stop button on the swimming activity.
It actually showed heart rate while swimming for me on garmin connect. When starting the activity it said HR monitoring will be disabled but once i uploaded the activity to garmin connect i can see HR during the swim.
Weird. No HR for me during my swim two days ago: link to connect.garmin.com
It doesn’t show up under the activity but look under the timeline in the connect app and it shows HR recorded during swims. I can confirm it i went swimming twice now and both times I can see the data
Hi Ray,
I have looked at your link.
I do not have my VHR yet :-(. Yesterday shops in Poland were informed that it will be additional 3 weeks of waiting :-(.
But I would like to ask… what SWOLF is? It shows in your Garmin Connect data…
Hi Tom, Amazon Germany has it in stock now. Maybe they deliver to Poland?
Hi Karen,
thanks for info. I know and they do. Same as UK Amazon (not sure if they got it in stock though).
However local Garmin distributor (if I wait a bit longer) offers 3 yr of guarantee on them.
Considering that price is the same and I am able to wait a bit longer (I don’t have any other device to run with but phone and Endomondo – so it does not hurt to much – don’t know what I am missing) I am fine with the wait.
Perhaps DCR will publish ful review in the mean time and i’ll still be able to change my mind?
But as for now I do not see a better, more versatile device in this price range.
Thanks again!
PS. You mentioned that you can operate Spotify via watch. Do you use Premium or free Spotify? I use free and I am wondering if this will work with free ver as well…
What about volume control?
Hi Tom, I have Spotify Premium. Volume control works fine.
SWOLF stands for swimming golf – you can Google for an explanation of how it’s calculated.
Same for me. I’ve done a couple swims with the watch and HR is definitely recorded as part of the watch’s normal heart rate monitoring. Not included in the actual swim activity. When you view HR on the watch (last 4 hours), you can see the HR spike during the swim time.
I use the free Spotify on my LG G3 and the Vivoactive HR controls it perfectly. Play/Pause, skip, and volume controls work as expected.
Hope it will work on W10m as well.
Do you think if I set it in SUP mode I would be able to track my distance and pace doing open water swimming?
Are any of you having issues with the do not disturb mode? On my watch, it seems to turn it on itself during the day. I know it is supposed to turn on automatically during your designated sleep hours. However, mine is doing that on its own diring the day. And, in certain watch faces, you can’t tell you are in this mode as it does not show the half moon. Anyone have any ideas on this one? Thanks.
I found the problem with the do not disturb function. As so often is the case, it was my own error. I had plugged in 12pm-7am for my designated sleep times.
Hi Ray,
I have noticed that Garmin miscalculates the elevation gain/loss (ascent/descent). From what I see in my half marathon splits, the total elevation gain/loss is basically a sum of all elevation gain/loss splits. This would be fine but splits’ elevation gain/loss seems to be just the difference between the split’s start and end altitudes, which obviously ignores partial inclines/declines within the split.
However, when I look at the trackpoint altitude data from the TCX or GPX file, and sum up all partial inclines and declines between all successive trackpoints, the total ascent/descent is almost spot-on with the map trace (assuming the possible inaccuracy of the barometric altimeter and smart recording frequency).
Could you please check with Garmin if they can do a proper elevation gain/loss calculation based on each consecutive trackpoint altitude difference?
Just to amend my first paragraph above – I do not think that Garmin simply use the start and end altitude for the split elevation gain/loss since that way either elevation gain or elevation loss would always need to be 0, which is not the case. They do calculate elevation gain and loss somehow but it does not seem to be the sum of each successive trackpoint altitude difference. It is also interesting to note that each split elevation gain/loss is integer whereas the altitude data values have a better precision and are decimal. I may also speculate that Garmin just copied the legacy code from Vivoactive and use GPS altitude but GPS altitude is even less accurate than GPS latitude and longitude.
Just got my VAHR, I noticed there is no option to enable the backlight to always stay on. I have that option on my Fenix 3 and from what I can remember it was also available on the original Vivoactive. Can any one confirm?
On the vivoactive (not HR) in Settings -> System -> Backlight set the Mode to Manual and the Timeout to Stays On. The left button then just turns it on and off. Don’t know about the HR.
Got my HR yesterday. Once again Garmin provides little to no info on how to set things up. I did figure it out the basics. But have no idea what some of the things on screens mean because there is no explanation anywhere of different screens and their features. However I can not get the phone notifications to work. Yes my phone is connected but nothing happens and yes I have the notifications turned on for none activity and activity. Downloaded the SMS widget and it doesn’t work either. As for the HR it was way off most of the time when working out (bike riding) and would turn it self off about every 5 min. That sucks because one of the main reasons to getting it was to get rid of the chest strap.
Tell me if you think this is a fair analogy: fitbit is apple[simple interface], while garmin is android[better specs, but much harder interface]. I have had a really rough two days of ownership of this from getting the right bluetooth connection to notifications. I have thought about returning and getting the blaze. I was not getting notifications either. During sleep time, you won’t get notifications. When I looked at my default sleep time, I finally noticed that it said 12PM(not AM) to 7AM. Hope this helps.
I just got a shipping notice from Clever Training! (For reference, I placed my order around midnight on February 23rd.) It’s shipping USPS and the tracking number is too new to get an ETA yet.
Now I’m just crossing all my fingers and toes that it won’t be too big to be comfortable.
I got a notice from CT as well, but I didn’t order until 4/5. I probably would have ordered earlier if it wasn’t for the prepayment requirement. I almost jumped ship and bought it from Best Buy, but figured I’d be patient and save the 10%, thanks DCR. 🙂 I’m guessing it’ll be Monday or Tuesday for the USPS…
Hi. I am running 2.20 and can’t start an activity while broadcasting HR, contrary to what the manual states. I queried this with Garmin Facebook and their response indicated the manual is wrong. “Hi Alan,
To clarify, the vívoactive HR can either broadcast HR data to another device or start and record an activity, but not both. For assistance with getting the data fields to appear correctly, please contact Garmin Customer Care: link to j.mp
Best regards,
^DK”
Start the activity first, then enable optical HR broadcasting. The activity will continue recording in the background (though annoyingly, at the moment you can’t see what’s going on with it). But it will keep recording.
Many thanks for that. Have posted it back in the Garmin forum so Product Support will learn that it can be done.
Thanks for that information. Any news meanwhile, if Garmin allows to enable re-broadcasting and e.g. use DW MAP’s navigation tool (follow a route on DW MAP) on the Vivoactove HR simultaneously? Thanks from Germany, Mirko
Got the vivoactive HR from best buy 2 days ago. While checking heart rate data during sleep i noticed that its sampling on 1 or 2 times during the 7 or 8 hrs sleep. Is this normal? I thought it would do it every 15 mins atleast
I just did a spin class with my Vivoactive HR I ordered from Bestbuy (ordered on Monday – received on Wednesday) while I am waiting for my pre-order from Clevertraining that finally shipped out today (Ordered on 4/10/16).
Anyway, I am comparing the Vivoactive HR OHM to the Scosche Rhythm+ (connecting to Wahoo). The Vivoactive HR is on FW2.2, and Scosche Rhythm+ is updated to FW2.7. I exported the Wahoo file to Garmin Connect, then downloaded the TCX file from Garmin Connect and plotted the two using the same exercise time frame. I have used the Scosche Rhythm + for over 1+ years, and it is quite accurate and reflective of the exertion during the spin class (sometimes it will lag by 1-4 seconds in the beginning of an interval, but it catches the interval/HR fairly quickly, and tracks the heart rate coming down really well).
Overall, I am quite disappointed with the initial OHM on VIvoactive. I called Garmin and I am sending them the Excel file. Please see below for what my thoughts are on the Vivoactive HR OHM on a scale of 1-10.
While Resting, sitting – 9+ in accuracy
Exercising (when holding the same pace) – 6-7
Spinning/interval training – 1
I think some of the issues can be mitigated with more frequent sampling. Overall, I am really disappointed because I like a lot of the features of this watch. I will use the Scosche Rhythm+ for exercising for now, and hope Garmin can improve their OHM algorithm.
Glad Im not the only one who complains about the poor OHR, Albert.
As you can see on your 3th and 4th interval, it only picks up HR afterwards… They really need to improve this. For outdoor cycling for instance, its just all over te place.
Ray, can you make sure to test Move IQ? My girlfriend owns the Vivofit 3 and while it clearly states that it tracks swimming and cycling among other workouts, it did not record any cycling activity when we went for a 1 hour bike tour.
I also do a lot of indoor cycling .. and found that my VivosmartHR (same OHR sensor as the VivoactiveHR) performed much better when the device was pushed up my arm.This is recommended by both Garmin and Fitbit. There is a very good reason why the Rhythm+ is placed where it is. I have found my HR measurements to be +- about 3 bpm compared to my chest strap when doing indoor cycling.
I picked up my vivoactivehr today at Best Buy. I’m pretty disappointed in the backlight. The difference between 2 and 5 for instance, is very little. Even at the highest setting of 5 it’s still very dim looking when inside. I was going to try and take a picture to show how dark it was, but the screen shows twice as bright as it truly is in the picture. For those of you that have one, how bright is your backlight? I’ll give it a few days but I’m not sure if I’ll be keeping it as it’s quite difficult to see sometimes.
RE: Sleep HR
Yeah, it’s a Garmin annoyance (in general with their Elevate sensor during sleep). Mine is equally kinda lame in that regard.
RE: Move IQ
Yup, on my list to set aside and test. It’s sorta a sad-panda because I basically have to ‘give up’ good data on a workout to test it (meaning no GPS data, lesser optical HR data, etc..). So I’m planning some shorter workouts that aren’t my core workouts to do it with.