Hands-on: Wattbike introduces new Atom stationary bike (with ANT+/BLE and more!)


Today Wattbike has introduced their first consumer-focused smart stationary bike.  And unlike some of the other ideas floating around – this one is actually real, here today, and with production underway.  So much real that a unit has been sitting in the DCR Cave for a few weeks now.

And while it’s easy for some to dismiss a stationary bike as not a real bike and trainer (I’d often do the same), upon reviewing the specs…and pricing…this thing is pretty darn compelling for a solid chunk of folks.  It’s going to be the standard bearer for the next year as companies race to compete in the renewed indoor bike realm.  So without further ado, let’s dive into it.

However, if you want the quick and efficient version of this, I’ve done a consolidated 14-minute video about the Wattbike Atom here:

(Oh, and yes, as always the Atom in the DCR Cave will be going back to Wattbike.  The poor guy that had to drive it over from the UK to France to drop it off, will also pick it back up again when I finish my in-depth review in about a month or so.  He’ll also get the pleasure of getting it back up the tight staircase in the cave.  Bonne chance, mate!)

The Tech Details:

I suppose it’s best to start with the size of the unit shipped, or delivered as it may be.  In this case, here’s the Atom, boxed inside the back of a large courier van, next to a grown adult.

2017-08-24 11.18.56

And here it is sitting atop the tiny staircase into the DCR Cave:


Now despite my significant concerns prior to shipping on how it might get into said Cave, it actually comes in just a few pieces that are fairly easily transportable.  A beastly treadmill this was not.


Putting it together was pretty darn quick and easy.  While I had a few minor suggestions for the manual (this was production unit #9), I’ve been assured some of those suggestions have already been incorporated.  Setup couldn’t have taken me more than 10 minutes – and that’s including taking a boatload of photos and video.


Once things were all setup, here’s how it looked:


So let’s dive right into some of the bulleted specs.  I’ve got some massive comparison sheets, but I think these are the most notable specs:

Resistance Type: Magnetic control
Wattage Range & Accuracy: 2,000+ watts at +/- 2%
Gradient Simulation: 0-25%
Connectivity Control: ANT+ FE-C Control, Bluetooth FTMS Control (so apps like Zwift, TrainerRoad, The Sufferfest and more)
Connectivity Broadcasting: ANT+ & Bluetooth Smart Speed, Power, Cadence
Heart Rate Data: Compatibility and pass-through of ANT+, Bluetooth Smart, and Polar analog straps.
Total bike weight: 44KG
Handlebar controls: Electronic shifting built in, supported in Zwift and other apps.
Flywheel: 4.64KG (10.2 lbs)
Power required: Yes (but battery pack coming in October)

All of the above are more the technical trainer-focused specs, but it’s important not to overlook the bike fit side of the house.  For example, you can adjust all of the following:

Handlebars: Vertical and horizontal micro-adjustment, or, put your own 26mm and soon 31.8mm handlebars on there
Saddle: Vertical and horizontal micro-adjustment.
Pedals: Swap out your own, comes with flats
Display holder: Increase size to fit anything from phone to full tablet

Note that the crank arms are set for 170mm, so that piece isn’t so swappable, but that shouldn’t be a huge issue for most.  What’s most interesting about this is that some of these bike fit things aren’t even available on the higher end bike they have (Pro/Trainer).  In fact, almost none of the tech pieces listed in the first section are.  There’s no FE-C control or similar, nor is there any Bluetooth Smart support of any type.  Lacking both of which you basically wipe out 3rd party app support.

For adjustability aspects, you’ve got a slew of options as noted above.  On the back of the bike you’ve got a simple lever to loosen the seat post, which can slide up/down and has markings on it, so you can easily remember what setting you’re at.


Similarly, the seat can be adjusted forwards/back, as well as an additional layer within the saddle rails itself as normal.


On the front portion of the bike, you’ve got the same quick-release style lever for overall height:


And then you’ve got a further pile of adjustability with the loosening of a single hex bolt in that red square.  That includes forward and back, and then with another bit of loosening you can slide the aerobars inwards/outwards.  The display stand is actually built into the front portion of the aerobars.


The entire handlebar system can be swapped out for your own 26mm handlebars (though they’re working towards 31.8mm compatibility too).  That, in turn, means you could also swap for your own aerobar setup as well.

I will note that on the production unit I had, the holes were drilled just ever so slightly off on the aerobar pad holders, making them tilt slightly inwards/outwards, driving my brain nuts (it has no tangible effect on fit or stability – just straight lines).  Since that’s a dollar part and something I brought up last week, I suspect it’ll be addressed well before you see units.  Seems like just an automation error.

In any event, probably one of the most interesting things for most folks coming from the trainer realm is the addition of shifters to the end of the handlebars.  This allows you to actually shift within the game.  The two black nubs to the right of the word ‘Wattbike’ are the shifters.  The red portion is just cosmetic.  There are shifters on both sides.


While these shifters are propriety, the company notes they actually looked at both SRAM RED eTAP and Shimano Di2 initially (and started building out on eTAP at first), but eventually went with this method as including handlebars equipped with either of those would have dramatically increased the cost of the ATOM.

Now while the inclusion of shifters are cool in theory, I’m giving them about four to five weeks to make them cool in reality (read: by my in-depth review).  I found the shifting a bit sluggish to the point it didn’t provide much value (actually, more frustration than value).  The company says this is a mere software update (and I generally agree) that should be iterated on quickly.  And while that will help the sluggish aspect, I noted I really would prefer just regular bike shifters here that ‘feel’ and click like a bike.  Two little rubber buttons that don’t click at all when pressed feel like…a 1980’s VCR.

The company says they were aiming for a quieter/silent bike, which was a request they heard frequently.  I get that…but still…give me my click!

Still, it’s the thought that counts – and I’m sure it won’t be long till this is fine tuned a bit.

Oh, and before we wrap-up, the unit does require power.  But that shouldn’t be too much of an issue for indoor use.  They’re planning on introducing a battery pack of sorts in October, enabling you to bring it camping with you atop your Mini.


And it’s also got nifty little rollerblade style wheels that make it easy to roll-around.  I show this in the video a bit.


Finally, when it comes to road feel, I haven’t had a ton of time on it – but all feels like a mid to mid-upper end trainer to me, which is logical given the flywheel weight matches those.  It’s not quite as perfected as a higher end trainer in terms of inertia, but I’ll also give them a few more weeks to fine tune that too.

App Integration:


Because the Atom has ANT+ FE-C and Bluetooth Smart FTMS built in, virtually any app out there can control it.  I’ve talked about ANT+ FE-C before, and plan a post on FTMS shortly.  But basically it’s a Bluetooth Smart variant of FE-C, albeit so new that the maturity of implementations by both equipment companies and apps is still a bit…fresh.  So we’re seeing some growing pains.  I’ll give props to TrainerRoad here that they’ve become a bit of the de facto troubleshooting hub for various companies like Elite, Wattbike and Tacx to figure out the quirks.

In any event, with ANT+ FE-C you’re going to cover not just apps like TrainerRoad or Zwift, but also even head unit devices.  Both Garmin Edge and Wahoo ELEMNT/BOLT units support FE-C control of trainers, and that would now extend to the Wattbike Atom. This allows you to take something like an outdoor ride and re-ride it on the ATOM.  In general, you see more desktop/Android apps using FE-C, since it relies upon ANT+ which isn’t natively available on iOS.  For iOS you’ve still got Bluetooth Smart FTMS of course.


And then there’s the native broadcasting of both regular ANT+ & Bluetooth Smart power, speed, and cadence sensor data.  So you could use virtually any sport watch that supports sensor data from either to collect things like speed, power, and cadence onto your watch.


Last but not least is the interesting re-transmission of both Polar legacy analog heart rate transmission as well as ANT+ HR transmission over to Bluetooth Smart.  This means that on the Wattbike app (I’ve only tried iOS), it’ll actually allow you to pair to both ANT+ & legacy Polar analog HR straps.  The way this works is that the bike does the pairing using goodness inside the unit.  Then from there it translates that signal to Bluetooth Smart and sends it onwards to the Wattbike app.

I haven’t fully tested whether or not they are re-broadcasting it as standard Bluetooth Smart heart-rate accessible to other devices/apps (my initial look says no, but perhaps it’s premature there).  Still, that’s pretty darn nifty if ya ask me.

Difference to the existing Wattbike:

There’s a slew of differences between the Wattbike Atom and the existing units.  I’ve covered what I feel are the most interesting ones up above, but of course – to each their own.  For example, the max rider weights (135KG for Atom, 150KG for Pro/Trainer) might not matter to most, but could be key for others.  As such, I’ve taken the gigantic comparison chart that the company sent over and kerplunked it into a table.  Said table is below:

Wattbike Model Comparison

Sale/DeliveryWattbike AtomWattbike Pro/Trainer
Cost£,1499 inc. VAT£2,250 inc.VAT
Boxed and assembled delivery available?Yes - Nb - the Atom is pre-assembles with only the tablet mount and pedals that require fitting Yes
Availability RegionsUK (warranty supported)Global (via distributors for warranty)
Sales RouteE-commerse (direct to consumer model)e-commerse and regional distributors
Warranty2 years / 6 moths on wear and tyre items2 years / 6 moths on wear and tyre items
Uses phone/tablet as control unit 'Device used to 'control' bike'?Yes - Android/iOS with Wattbike App/Third Party AppModel B Monitor - connects to iOS / Adriod device via Bluetooth for App use N.b not via FEC
Polar viewYesYes
Left/Right leg balanceYesYes
Pedalling Effectiveness ScoreYesYes (via app)
Electronic ShiftersControl app and bike. 3 button controls on each shifterNo
Gears1 - 22. Across Power CurveAir (1 - 10) and magnetic resistnace (1 - 7). Across Power Curve
Gradient0 - 25%None
Ergo ModeYesNo
Climb modeClimbs available in Wattbike App ( developed with velo viewer)Virtual climbs not compatible
Ability to replicate road bike & TT set upYesYes
Sound70 decibels at 70 cadenceAt 70 cadence in gear 5 pro & trainer are 79 decibels
Ability to update firmwareYes (via app)Yes (via USB cable & laptop)
Training contentYes - tests, workouts and plans (via app)Yes - tests, workouts and plans (via B monitor & app)
In built testingYesYes
Resistance typeStep motor driving natrual magnets to replicate the Wattbike power curveAir & Magnet
Wattage range40 - 2000+ wattsTrainer 0 - 2000 watts Pro: 0 - 3760 watts
Accuracy+/- 2% - across the full power range+/- 2% - across the full power range
Electronics systemSmart control wireless electronics.N/A
ANT +YesYes
BLE fitness machineYesNo
Heart rateBLE, ANT+ANT, ANT + & Polar
Speed & CadenceYesYes
Wattbike HubSave, share and analyse your dataSave, share and analyse your data
Third party appsYes - Any ANT+/ANT+ FEC/BLE enabled app. Custom BLE control via Zwift. BLE Exercise Machine Control support to follow after launch. Zwift, Sufferfest, Trainer RoadYes - via ANT +/BLE Zwift, TrainerRoad and Sufferfest. Manual adjustment of resistance required
Data analysis abilityWattbike Hub and connecting to Strava, TrainingPeaks and TCX exportWattbike Hub and connecting to Strava, TrainingPeak and TCX export
Trainer control
Supports ANT+ FECYesNo
Supports Bluetooth ControlCustom integration with zwift, BLE Exercise Machine Control support to follow after launchNo
BLE fitness machineYesNo
Technical Specifications
Power requiredMains adaptor OR battery pack (functionality coming in October) (5 volt 1.6amps)External power not needed, internal generator
Ability to moveYes, 2 Coaster WheelsYes, 2 Coaster Wheels
Max rider weight135KG150KG
Rider size5' - 6'55'1 - 6'4 (7'1 with extra long stems)
Bike weight44KG55KG
Footprint100cm (length) x 50cm (width) x 80cm (height to road bars) or 100cm (height with tri-bar & tablet holder)125 x 66 x 130cm
Handlebar adjustability (micro adjustment)Yes - vertical and horizontalYes - vertical and horizontal
Ability to fit own handlebarsYes (currently 26mm, working towards 31.8mm)Factory fitted drop handlebars (not interchangeable)
Saddle adjustability (micro adjustment)Yes - vertical & horizontalYes - vertical & horizontal
SaddleLow profile saddleLow profile saddle
Ability to fit own saddleYesYes
Crank length170mm170mm
Q factor160mm173mm
PedalsChangable for user + Combination pedals - flat for trainers Changable for user +E148 Wellgo (MTB SPD, Look Keo & toe cage for trainers)
Ability to fit own pedalsYesYes
Tablet holderCan accomodate from 70mm - 240mm in heightComing soon
Power measurememt measuring the chain tension over a load cell. The Wattbike measures angular velocity twice per crank revolution measuring the chain tension over a load cell. The Wattbike measures angular velocity twice per crank revolution
Number of water bottle holders21
Flywheel2x4.64Kg flywheelsMagnetic- 7.5kg & Fan- 5.6Kg (13.1Kg)
Drive trainChain & timing beltChain to Drive Belt
Needs calibration?Factory setFactory set

As for road-feel like nuances between them, the vast majority of my riding on the existing Wattbike products has been within races (indoor tri’s), and honestly that was about the least important thing I was worried about at those moments.  Obviously, the larger (especially wind driven) flywheel means you’re going to get more inertia though than on the Atom.

Note that I *may* look at adding indoor bikes into the product comparison database down the road, we’ll see.  At present, I might just stick it in as a trainer and note some differences.  I wouldn’t want to enter units into the product comparison tool until they’re close to shipping or locked in spec.  For example, the Tacx Neo Smart Bike I noted a few days ago, that’s still about a year away from shipping, and as such I see too much variability there to make purchasing decisions on – so I feel like including it in the product comparison tool is a bit premature.  Just my two cents.

Going forward:


When companies first contact me about checking out their product, I usually have a rough idea within a few seconds of reading the e-mail whether or not I think it’ll do well.  When I first saw Wattbike in the sender’s domain, I cringed a bit as likely a product that was out of touch with what the indoor training market wanted these days.  But after I got through the e-mail and the specs they laid out – I was pretty intrigued.

However more importantly was that the product as delivered exceeded those expectations.  First off, it’s stunningly pretty.  Or maybe I’m just a MKBHD-like sucker for a sweet black and red paint scheme.  And the assembly was quick and efficient,  I’d argue faster than assembling some trainers.  And from a spec standpoint, it actually bests much of the existing higher-end Wattbike product line.

But more than all that is the connectivity aspects.  This is the core of what makes this product interesting to me.  Like it or not, widespread app integration is critical these days to the indoor trainer market.  And without it, your product is dead to me (and most others too).  And Wattbike nailed that.  They’ve adopted every standard known to mankind, and even included translation for older ones like Polar’s legacy HR straps.  That’s cool.

Of course – there are still areas for improvement.  The shifting is a big one, and the company is also having to fight the good fight to sort out the growing pains of the Bluetooth FTMS control.  Major apps like TrainerRoad will have those aspects compatible well before you see a bike of course, but many other apps will likely have growing pains too (the entire industry really, trainers too).  And then the fact that it’s only shipping to the UK this winter is a major bummer.  I think Wattbike has a very finite window before fall 2018 and the flood of new indoor smart cycles.  It’d be in their extreme best interest to at least re-prioritize figuring out US/Canada/Europe distribution while they’ve got the lead on everyone else.

Note that as I said in my Tacx Neo Smart Bike post, while I think there’s space for some new smart indoor stationary bikes on the market, I’m not convinced there’s room for every trainer company to introduce one.  Nor is there room for many options that are super-expensive.  But at the price point that Wattbike has (1,499GBP, which converts to 1,633EUR or $1,941USD), they’ll do exceedingly well.  Hence you can see why there’s not a chance in hell Tacx can sell their similarly equipped bike for 2,500-3,000EUR next fall (when prices will invariably be slightly lower with renewed competition).

In any case – plan to see a full in-depth review in early October, once I’ve had a bunch more time on the bike.  With that – thanks for reading!


Hopefully, you found this post useful. The website is really a labor of love, so please consider becoming a DC RAINMAKER Supporter. This gets you an ad-free experience, and access to our (mostly) bi-monthly behind-the-scenes video series of “Shed Talkin’”.

Support DCRainMaker - Shop on Amazon

Otherwise, perhaps consider using the below link if shopping on Amazon. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. It doesn’t cost you anything extra, but your purchases help support this website a lot. It could simply be buying toilet paper, or this pizza oven we use and love.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
If you would like a profile picture, simply register at Gravatar, which works here on DCR and across the web.

Click here to Subscribe without commenting

Add a picture



  1. Ryan

    Well done Wattbike and thanks Ray for the great review (as always).
    Knowing the price of the old Wattbikes, I couldn’t believe the price of this when I read it – this should do really, really well. Wattbike already have a trusted brand name and they really have specced the trainer out very well indeed – I currently have a Kesier M3 for the bad winter days, but I think I’ve just found a reason to upgrade and join the Zwift world!

  2. Derek Chan

    With so much adjustability you could use it as a bike fit station. And not too pricey either.

  3. Tom Carter

    Another indoor trainer to keep an eye on is the new Concept 2 BikeErg

    link to concept2.com

    Rowers around the world will recognize concept 2 (they make the standard rowing machine which more or less every serious rower uses to train and test on) and they are pretty well known for being solid machines that can take a pounding.

    On paper Its a lot more basic than the wattbike (no gears, manual resistance adjustment) but considerably cheaper at less than $1000 and has ANT+ and Bluetooth so if support is added by the developers then could also work with smartphone apps like Zwift using the smartphone adapter

    link to concept2.com

    • CB

      Concept 2 make solid, reliable kit (I come from a rowing background, so uncomfortably familiar with their rowing machines), but my god……….is it loud. Air resistance technology is fine for the gym, but for home, you’d have to be out in the ‘cave’ rather than in a spare room

    • JB

      no power… no go… any serious cyclist/tri would not get this….

    • Dave

      If you’re talking about the Concept2 bike, it does indeed have power. It’s one of the key metrics the PM5 is designed to display.

    • Concept2 still does not support the ANT+ profiles PWR, CAD and SPD, nor FE-C (wouldn’t make sense for RowErg and SkiErg), but *only* the very old and not really/widely supported FE (some old Garmin watches like FR610, FR310XT support that).

      Tools like Zwift, TrainerRoad and others *do not* support ANT+ FE. Instead they rely on ANT+ PWR, CAD, SPD (and FE-C).

      The ErgBike has very little adjustability and even that is quite bad (eg. as saddle height influences the fore/ aft of saddle as seat tube has an angle).

      SkiErg and RowErg are quite noisy devices, so BikeErg will be too.

      Damper settings on RowErg/SkiErg are usually a quite static thing, but not on a Bike, where you need to shift (change damper) regularly/often to stay in ‘your range of cadence’.

      I find the RowErg/SkiErg great devices, but the BikeErg I find crap – TBH.

      The last couple of years Concept2 has playing deaf for the wish/need of ANT+ PWR, CAD, SPD transmission. Some users with serious skills have been building ‘bridges’ (link to p729.com) to work around this topic.

    • Neil Jones

      Yeah, totally agree, Concept make a great rower but they’re in too comfortable a position in that market that they don’t have to look to improvement, by which I mean the technology aspect with data now being such a big thing (even a key motivator) for many people. The fact that Concept seem to have no interest at all in driving compatibility with Garmin etc, just saying ‘it’s up to Garmin’ and leaving users to find third-party workarounds says it all.

      That’s fine when you dominate a market sector, but take that approach in a market where there’s big-player competition and they’ll be dead in the water (no pun intended)

    • Brad Silverberg

      Neil, I was just talking the other day with a personal trainer friend how Concept2 has gotten too comfortable in its niche and not been keeping up with the technology aspect, as others like Peloton have done. Technogym has just come out with an erg, the SkillRow link to technogym.com, that has interesting data, display, and group capabilities.

    • Dave

      Quite agree with your on their glacial pace of change. The instant there’s a PM6 or whatever available, I’ll be buying it for my Model D.

  4. JB

    im all over this… are more compact bike, excellent price point… my smart turbo will be on sale as soon as this becomes available…

  5. Brigitte

    Thanks for the first hands-on, very appreciated! One question though – how does it handle resistance within Zwift?

  6. Ian L

    I am struggling of reasons not to get one of these for the cave. It ticks all the boxes, quiet, low maintenance, looks the business, integrates with everything, excellent price point (direct UK sales help here for us).

  7. Nathan B

    Wow! I’m impressed with this!

    When my old man got knocked off his road bike last year, he was planning on doing a lot more indoor riding, and was considering a Lemond or a Wattbike. I convinced him to get a Neo, and now he loves it!

    If this had been on the market at the time, I think I would have actually suggested this to him instead! It looks like a great package!

    What I find even more interesting, is that you may see these in some gyms soon, so a 30 min warm up, may include TrainerRoad or Zwift!

    One question Ray:
    Once you’ve got it setup the way you like it, does it *feel* like you’re riding on a bike (on a stationary trainer)? When I ride the old Wattbike, it feels to me like I’m riding a Wattbike. Granted the grips are all different, so I’m curious as to whether it feels like a proper bike setup?

    • Dan

      I would think this would be a big hit in the gym industry — providing the fit adjustments are robust enough. Not sure gyms or gym users would be keen on Allen keys… But I see these devices, a massive improvement over standard (crap) gym stationary bikes, being very popular.

      Presumably you could do spin style classes with the resistance across all machines set and controlled by the instructor!

  8. Eric

    So Ray, just to confirm, I’ll be able to control this WattBike from either my Garmin 820 or my iPad? Is that correct?

  9. Kimmo

    This is interesting piece.
    How is the Q-factor?
    Just to confirm that only 170mm cranks available?

  10. Philippe

    Very impressed with pricing a potential capabilities!
    I was going to pull the triger on Tacx Neo and put my old bike on it and might now change my mind and wait.
    I like the fact that both my wife and I can use same indoor bike and recreate our tribikes settings.
    I am a little bit worried about noise since it seems noisier than Tacx Neo

    • emile

      You can either swap bikes on the NEO or change all the settings on the wattBike, how does having 1 wattBike if you are going to share make any sense?

  11. Mike Robinson

    Just wait for another month or so of Brexit negotiations and that price will be even cheaper in EUR and USD ;)

    I can definitely see the appeal of an integrated trainer compared to the faff of attaching a bike to a separate trainer and this type of product will likely appeal to the fitness market and maybe some gyms as well?

  12. Michael Hanrec

    Hi Ray,
    Thanks as always. FWIW your 14 min video is not loading on my browser…may it is answered in your video, but, my Q is:
    Does the Zwift (or other app) control work smoothly? Can it deal with intervals for example?

  13. Chris Walters

    Does the holder fit the larger iPad Pro?

  14. Ryan

    I may have just bit the bullet and ordered one! :-)

    I’ve been crying out for a company to make a product just like this – the fact that its been done by one of the most respected names in training bikes with a lot more features than expected at half of what I thought they might charge…..it was a no brainer for me.

    Really can’t wait for my winter training this year.
    Thanks as ever Ray for the quick review – there was no way I would have ordered without your thumbs up.

  15. Mike P

    I really love this idea, sharing the trainer with my wife would become much easier than having to swap bikes, however the crank length is a show stopper, we are both tiny and ride smaller cranks.

  16. Terra72

    Pretty impressed with the price – remember this includes 20% VAT so the comparable pre-tax and pre-shipping price is £1,250 or ~US$1,600 / CA$2,000.

    Look forward to reading the full review in a few weeks.
    Two questions which would help me convince the wife that this is great idea:
    (i) Are you able to assess if the version you have received will be compatible with North America voltage?
    (ii) I’m a Zwifter but the wife prefers spinning. Would this be a good bike to use with the Peloton app?

  17. Daren

    Can the 6 moth warranty be extended to butterflies?

  18. fisao

    New Kickr + Climb (+ my own bike)? Neo smartbike? The Atom? Which is the “ultimate” indoor training setup?

    Since the question of price is not entirely settled yet, I have to choose another factor in my decision for the winter of 2018 (I live in France): convenience.

    My wife would like to use indoor programs and apps every now and then and the Atom and Neo smartbike have my attention thus far, they tick all the connectivity boxes and the gym-equipment like measures on the atom would ensure we can both setup in under a minute.

    The price of the atom also hits a very defendable expense point.

    I would have never thought that I’d contemplate buying a Wattbike, but given this product….nice !

    Thanks Ray and the competition for making the choice harder and more interesting.

    • Tim Grose

      I think the “ultimate” factor here is whether you can ride indoors just like any actual bike you have assuming of course you may want to ride outside and indeed even have a “real” bike. For me I ride a TT bike and a road bike and want to do indoor training in either position. So, to do so, I swop said bikes on my single trainer. A recent bike fit suggested 175mm cranks are “best” for me. So at a stroke the Atom cannot exactly replicate my position on either. I do often ride a Wattbike Pro at the gym – the position is close to my road one but not the same. So the Atom is all very interesting but just does not quite tick all the boxes.

      Don’t forget the Neo Smartbike is at about a year away from being available to buy so if my comments above are no issue then yeah this Wattbike looks compelling.

    • Paul S.

      The “ultimate” indoor training experience?

      You open the door of your VR room on a cold late December day and step inside. You see the grey summer skies of Pennsylvania overhead (the day you recorded this was cloudy) and a gravel road in front of you surrounded by forest. You hear and feel the crunch of gravel beneath your feet. Your full suspension mountain bike is leaning against a tree (you really have to clean that thing). You mount all of your mountable devices, wake up and pair all of the sensors, start your head unit mount and set off. Climbing up the long 7% grade everything feels just the way it would feel outdoors, your bike rattles on the gravel, the summer forest surrounds you, but you get tired of the grey sky. “Sunny day” you say and the skies are blue. You reach the level part, go down the little hill, and start grinding up the 10% part. “Fall colors”, and the trees suddenly blaze like they did in mid-October. Reaching the crest, you head downhill, but you’ve edited out the run off tracks filled with small debris and the general gravel crud that DCNR throws on the actual roads so you fly downhill not touching the brakes. Right on the dirt road, across the mud patch that seems to always be there, past the overlook (you look left and see the view but don’t stop), dodge the potholes filled with water and cross the rock gardens. “Proceed with the plan”. The right hand turn that would be coming up is there but it’s paved instead of gravel. Make the right, and suddenly the skies of the French Alps are overhead and you’re at the beginning of the famous climb of L’alpe d’Huez where you’ve never been. The bike underneath you is a high end road bike that you don’t own, but everything feels natural. Some ways up the climb, your alarm rings, and you say “We’ll start off here tomorrow, and then I want to continue on the La Ruta course in Costa Rica”. As you leave the VR room, your wife enters, and before the door closes you see her canoe pulled up on the bank of that stream in Colorado she so loves to paddle. As you head for the shower, you think “God I wish it would snow. I hate riding indoors.”

      Later that night you have to talk down the room’s UI after your grandchildren used the room with their Disney World simulation. You half expected this, since DC Rainmaker’s review of the device said that his teenagers really caused chaos when he let them try it. After the UI seems to have recovered, you say “Good night” and leave it to whatever UI’s do when they’re free. You remember the UI once saying something about “Skynet”; maybe they “chat” with each other during the night.

      In other words, once you can’t tell the difference, then you’ve reached the “ultimate”. We may get there soon enough. Until then, it’s still boring old indoor riding.

  19. Ian S

    The pro version was well out of touch in terms of both functionality and price point, so kudos to wattbike for addressing. This seems like a much more reasonable proposition.

    But for the consumer market, I still don’t really get it. For anyone with a bike, a kickr or neo gives you all of this functionality at half the price plus you are riding your bike (i.e it’s a perfect fit for you..in theory). And you still have a bike you can ride outside.

    For anyone getting into the sport you can buy a relatively good beginners road bike, and a kickr/Neo for the same money, and have more flexibility in the future. Plus if you upgrade your bike you have a ready made turbo only bike.

    The only real use case I can see is gyms, where it makes sense. For consumer use I can’t think of a reason not to get a turbo with a road bike.

    • Mike Robinson

      You aren’t considering the faff of needing to attach and reattach a bike to a turbo trainer.

      In my case, my “cave” is on the second floor (third floor for Americans ;) Hauling my road bike up stairs every time I want to use the trainer means I will never use the trainer so I bought a cheap bike for my KICKR. The price difference with this Wattbike then starts to look smaller.

      Then there is the “spousal acceptance factor”. How many people are lucky to have a dedicated “cave”? A Wattbike in the corner of a bedroom is a lot more practical than a turbo + road bike.

    • Ryan

      The Neo certainly wouldn’t be half the price Ian, but I agree there are much cheaper ways of achieving the same result.

      However, there are many advantages of a dedicated trainer bike:

      1. It is much more sturdy for one – any trainer I have ever used before has always had that slight movement in it and never felt 100% sturdy – especially out of the saddle.

      2. Much cleaner – no dirty chain to worry about inside the house and the actual unit is much better looking too (if you care about aesthetics – being inside the house I find it important too)

      3. No setup – it is hard to place a value on having everything set up and just ready to jump on every morning, no faffing with QR skewers, cleaning the bike to take it inside etc.

      They may all sound like small issues, but added altogether they turned into massive annoyances for me when training 2-3 times a week indoors.

      Agreed, you could get a dedicated bike for the turbo, but you still have the problem of point 1 listed above, which was actually quite a big one for me. A dedicated trainer bike will always feel more solid and secure.
      I was considering the Neo for this winter, but at nearly £1000, the wattbike is not a huge step up – and when you look at what your getting from a technical and hardware point of view, it seems like really good value to me.

      It won’t be for everyone I agree, there are always more than one way to achieve the same result at different price points, this just happens to be the most elegant one I have seen….and I’m willing to put my money where my mouth is – and I think there may be quite a few who will agree.

      Wattbike have a very good reputation but have always been out of a lot of peoples price range – this drops the price and adds all the features we could have asked for – they deserve great credit for listening to the market and producing something that hits the mark – and also appears to be pretty well matured from a software point of view in regards to connectivity with the major training platforms.

    • JB

      if you are training, set the position up like you would your road/TT/Tri bike and just hassle free….

      if you are inclinded to use zwift or similar, hook up a ipad on the mounts.. hassle free.. with a road bike you have either use a stand or buy another attachment mount etc etc ive been there and its a total headache.. i want to get on and beast it, wife get on and beast it.. small change of height and bars and boom done..

      pretty much every TT guy i know has a wattbike or cycleops one..

    • Thomas

      These things are obviously personal. My girl would kill me if I were to place something as permanent as one of these stationary trainers in our bedroom (or anywhere else in our apartment, for that matter). Instead, she’s very fine with a fold-away trainer that can be easily removed when guests come over. In exchange, she doesn’t bother about the noise (but it’s a Stac, so the only noise is from the bike). Goes to say: it’s great both types of products exist, and while I still find this crazy expensive, at least it’s not as ludicrous as Tacx’ proposal.

  20. Dave

    If it wouldn’t result in a divorce, I’d sell my Kickr for one of these in a heartbeat. Zero hassle, built like a tank…what’s not to like???

  21. Is it a smart trainer? like computrainer, kicker etc
    any financing option?

  22. Ronald Meier

    How was accurancy compared with the P1 pedals?

  23. Ron Gurney

    Ray -Would the Girl prefer this Watt Atom or the Peloton bike she has asked for? Would she prefer Zwift or other apps compared to instructor led cycling classes such as those offered by Peloton? Both bikes are about the same price in USD. Let us know. Her opinions are as valued as yours are. Thanks.

    • Chris

      Couldn’t she use this bike with the peleton iOS app? I’m hoping so.

    • Sorta. She could use it, but it won’t show any metrics (not even HR). Kinda a bummer.

      As for Ron’s original question – honestly, it’s tough because she hasn’t spent time on either yet. She’s going to likely try the Atom with both Zwift and Peloton app (as slimmed down as it may be), and see if that fits her bill.

    • Patrick

      The peloton app shows HR now if you pair a bluetooth HRM.

  24. fisao

    After watching your Youtube video:

    -Why put a measurable adjustment scale on a bike to indicate quick and easy repositioning of the saddle and handle bars and then make them only movable with an allen key? that is plain silly. That will be the first thing swapped out if I can find a replacement.

    -Also, it does seem a bit loud (I have a Neo and might be a bit biased).

    still love the pricepoint and product in general though.

    • Tim Grose

      Maybe something to do with the Atom only seemingly been aimed at home users not gyms. Indeed when I goto my gym which has 4 Wattbike Pro bikes often I have to move along to the next one as somebody has tightened one of the supposedly easily adjustable bolts so much it just will not budge. Probably would budge with a pedal spanner type wrench!

  25. Peter Lin

    Bluetooth Fitness Machine specification still only covers reading data, but not controlling the fitness machine. It will be nicer once the specification covers machine control.

  26. Scott E

    The Cave doth runith over Ray. Keep taking on stationary trainers and Cave Duex will be needed.


  27. Tommy

    Hi Ray. Thanks for the review.

    I am very much in that market for a smart trainer. I’m glad i held on, because the £500 extra over the competition seems like a no brainer here.

    Just one question, is there a USB port to charge the iPad while its on there?

    Now i’m just looking for the financing options they offered on the bigger brother.


  28. Johnny B

    Thanks for the quick review.

    I kinda struggle to see the relevence for most of the Wattbike Trainer / Pro now at their original price point? Only real difference i can see is the ability to get above 2,000 Watts? Which in reality i spend about 0% of time at (but i appreciate some will do more at that level). At £1,499, it’s a serious piece of kit and would make me question upgrading my turbo.

    • I think the basic aspect would be:

      A) Slightly more road-like feel with wind flywheel addition
      B) More wattage resistance (though, my bet is that you actually can go over 2,000w just fine. And my bet is that’s just a fake spec. Regrettably, I can’t put out 2,000w.)
      C) Slightly higher rider weight max
      D) No power required

      Realistically C & D won’t matter to 99.87% of cyclists looking to buy this unit. And then that ignores the other 23 line-items which favor the Atom. So yeah, I’d agree with you that they’ve sunk their own battleship there.

      But, I’d also say…they had to. Indoor trainers have gotten so good in the last 12-24 months at such lower price points that Wattbike saw the writing on the wall: People just weren’t buying antiquated indoor bikes that didn’t have legit Zwift integration. Simple as that.

    • Johnny B

      Thanks, that’s kinda exactly what i was thinking, but thought i must have missed something with the £600 odd price difference. Makes this look incredible value.

  29. Jeff Rey

    I can see a few minor things this needs. For this to work in my house I’d have to sell it as something for me AND my wife to use. That creates 2 issues.

    To make this “wife friendly”
    1. The handlebar adjuster needs to be something you could change WITHOUT tools, not allen key.
    2. The seat adjuster needs a tool free adjuster.

    I have to say after watching the video, it seemed quite a bit louder than I expected, but I’ll wait for a side by side comparison with “regular trainers”

    Otherwise they have addressed the many other things that would make it work for a married scenario.

  30. Jean-Christophe Bettinelli

    Regarding the shifting, I understand that it will simulate the shifting of a real bike, but what is the benefit in the application like Zwift? What is the interaction?

  31. Dave Craig

    I’ve been waiting for something like this! I’ve been looking for something to use with Zwift/apps when the weather makes the trails too hazardous. It’s way shorter than a bike + Kickr like trainer, and my MTB isn’t always clean enough for indoors anyway…
    The review and the marketing focus on tablet support, but presumably the Atom works with Zwift/apps on a PC+dongle as well?

  32. Gryphon

    Ray…Just curious why, given that the resistance is magnetically controlled, does this unit not support gradients < 0%, like the Neo supports? Is it simply that it is a much more costly from a tech standpoint, or is it more that these manufacturers just don't see the value added? Thank you.

    • When it’s less than 0%, then the unit must have a motor internally to drive the flywheel forward. I’ve got a video somewhere on YouTube of the Tacx Genius doing that, basically screaming the wheel forward with the bike by itself on the trainer.

  33. Simon

    Has the Tacx Neo bike just become obselete, 12-18 months before release?

    The (hopeful) ease in swapping between TT and road position, as well as person to person, makes this interesting. Was thinking of upgrading my kirkr v1 next year, and this interests me a lot.

  34. Daniel

    Why not adjustable cranks? Doesn’t seem like it would be that complicated. Arguably it’s a more Important measurement if trying to mantain bike fit. Lots and lots of triathletes are using 165mm and below cranks. And it would be an easier sell to the decision maker if she could get her cranks length also

  35. Wyatt Kuntz

    Does this have a fixed hub like a spin bike or can you stop pedaling and have it keep spinning like a regular bike?

  36. Charles Morgan

    Will be interesting to see how distribution works in the U.S. Will it be direct like Canyon Bikes just started doing, or will Wattbike still use the Woodway Co., like is done now with the older Wattbikes?

    • It’s planned to be direct to consumer, which they say is a large reason why they’re able to lower the prices a bunch.

    • Jim Murray

      But aren’t current Wattbikes ‘direct to the consumer’, I bought mine direct. Also, in the comparison chart it says current Wattbike has 10 gears, air resistance, but this isn’t quite true as you have almost infinite range of gears as you can vary the resistance all the way through the 1 -10 settings.

    • They do direct to consumer, but they also do distribution. With the Atom, purely direct to consumer.

      As for the chart and gearing, I’d have to defer to Wattbike there. I just copied and pasted that one (if/when I pull it into the product comparison database, I’ll validate/normalize things).

  37. Jonny Stoddern

    I’m pretty sure the answer to this is yes but I thought I should double check…. Does the Atom connect to a PC happily? Their compatible deivces (link to wattbike.com) mention only android and iOS but would it work with zwift or trainer road on a PC?

  38. Tim Grose

    As a fairly regular user of a Wattbike Pro at the gym this is very interesting. I do so mainly as I goto to the gym to run on a treadmill as I don’t have one but sometimes I fancy a ride and they are next to each other. It would have to be my setup for duathlons on Zwift! The big “problem” with the existing Wattbike is that I cannot even replicate my road position even despite buying their extended seat pin. OK if it was my Wattbike I could use Speedplay pedals that I use but am still “stuck” on the 170mm cranks as I use 175mm and there is no way of getting anywhere close to a decent TT position.

    That said, I can get a useful session on the Wattbike but I can’t see me ever buying one because of the fit compromises.

    And with the Atom same problem it seems. Also it looks quite hard to get a low TT position with a such an upright sloping top tube. Also I seem to be right on the edge of their range for height.

    This certainly would be nice to see at my gym but studying wattbike.com this does not seem likely any time soon as they are only offering warranties for home use.

    Also what’s the score with their existing Pro & Trainer models. No price change at all and although they probably work better for elite sprinters than the Atom, you still end up with something that feels at least 10 years out of date in “tech” terms. I wonder if they will “modernise” their flagship models as at the moment it is odd that their “best” product would seem to be also their cheapest.

  39. Tim Grose

    I use a Wattbike Pro fairly often at the gym. Would never buy my own as cannot replicate even my road position net alone TT one. Crank length and (lack of enough) fore-aft adjustment main problem.

    The new Atom seems great apart from this one very important detail.

    But would be great to have the Atom at my gym except this seems somewhat unlikely given they are only offering home warranties and an allen key adjustment hardly seems practical for commercial use.

    Will there be a new Pro/Trainer model I wonder as, at the moment, the price of these seems ridiculous given it has not changed given this new somewhat more attractive proposition.

  40. Phil A

    Was curious. Is the seat post angle adjustable, or is it closer to a road or tri bike? I know that makes a big difference on how riding in aero feels on the bike, and actually how the different leg muscles are used.

    • It is. You can see it within this photo here: link to dcrainmaker.com

      It allows you to adjust the pitch.

    • Tim Grose

      Not sure I understand there. Seems to have a reasonable amount of fore-aft adjustment. That angular scale though of +/- 40 degrees – is that saddle tilt or something more subtle?

      Wattbike Pro position (for me at least) is certainly a road position and even with the fore-aft adjustment as far forward as it will go both on the saddle itself and on the “adjustable” rail it still feels further back than my own road bike. Maybe I am “odd” because 1.95m tall though.

  41. Sean

    I have no internet wifi in my garage can I use Atom in there for Zwift etc ?

  42. RunningMatt

    I think Smart Bikes ‘could’ be a game changer when combined with Zwift loaded on something like Playstation or Xbox. Imagine picking up a Smart Bike bundled with a PS4, already bluetooth paired and a years Zwift subscription.

    With products looking like the WattBike I can imagine many more homes have a smart bike bike inside rather bikes and trainers being confined to garages/sheds/pain caves.

    • Tommy

      Why a console over the iPad or equivalent? The console doesn’t have a screen but is just a pricey. Its also hard wired so would have to live where your bike does or need extensive set up each ride.

  43. Tim RPM

    Can you use ANT+ to use this Atom bike with a PC or laptop with a suitable dongle? Or does it only work with little tablets and phones for the display?

    I’m lucky enough to have a PC in my winter bike cave, and I’d rather have all the rides from Veloreality, as well as PerfPro to train with, on a decent sized monitor. On the website it only lists iOS and Android under ‘connectivity’ but this seems like something they would have thought of…

  44. Nate T

    Are you expecting more players to enter this market in 2027/early 2018 with a shipping product? For someone with a small house that has to squeeze their bike and trainer into an already cramped office, this seems like it could be a perfect fit! Just wish it was easier to adjust… would help with selling to the wife if she could easily use it too!

    • I expect many options by fall 2018. But likely not many before then. I expect some of those will pop out sometime next summer, sorta like trainer announcements have shifted towards summer. Especially with Eurobike moving to mid-July next year (all companies I’ve talked to said they’ll shift announcements to be present at Eurobike at latest).

  45. sam

    Any idea when it will be available in US?

    • Przemek

      Ray, do you think the base can be detached so that the whole thing fits through a narrow opening to the attic (or any other narrow entrance…). If it does not, it is a no-go in my case. Won’t fit !

      Btw – how did they ship it to you ? Additional cost or pre-arranged for testing purposes ?


    • I’ll measure it in the morning (or try not to forget anyway), as well as double-check and see if there’s some other bolt/etc to detach. I’d guess off-hand though that if you can fit a bike handlebar through the entrance, you’ll be able to fit this.

      As for shipping to me, they sent one of their employees over in the truck seen above from the UK to France. The same for pick-up. They had me assemble it without him giving any technical assistance, though he recorded video of a lot of my thoughts as I did so, so they could get me feedback on some of the manual related stuff for setup.

    • Daniel

      Just placed my order for an Atom, and look forward to having some fun with it. I’ve been riding and training with power for a while, so this should be a nice addition to my training suite. I suspect I’m 6-8 weeks from delivery of the Atom, but a discussion forum has been created here : link to groups.google.com

      It would be nice to connect with other Atom owners, and “soon-to-be” Atom owners as we explore the device and its connectivity.

    • Przemek

      Ray, any news re removability of the base ? Also, is it possible to completely pull out the handlebars – in my case it is not the matter of narrow doors but a circular stairway. So getting anything bulkier up through it is a bit tricky.

      And.. was the box heavier than 55kg ? The bike is 46kg, according to their website at least, so total package ready for shipment should not be more than 55kg, I suspect. Thanks !

    • Daniel

      A little bird told me the shipping specifications are 105cm x 57cm x 95cm and 47kg.

      I suspect the shipping weight is indeed closer to 55kg, but them dims should be accurate.

    • Yes! Sorry, meant to circle back.

      Ok doing some poking, you can definitely remove the silver base. I didn’t do it – but the screws are all there and looks pretty clear cut. You can also remove the handlebars (since you can swap them out). If you remove both those parts, it’s skinnier than I am when I turn my body.

      I didn’t measure the box weight. But I’ve got another unit coming next week or so – so I’ll measure it then.

  46. David Veatch

    Unfortunately, it’s unavailable as of yet in the United States. Attempting to add myself to their notification list results in: “An error occurred. The reason was ‘internal server error’.”

    Has anyone else in the U.S. seen this? I’ll try again tonight, regardless.

    • Not sure on why their e-mail list isn’t working. But as noted in the post they don’t expect delivery to the US till late 2018.

    • David Veatch

      Thanks, sir. I missed that in my initial read – too much multi-tasking.

      I’ll keep trying to get on their notification list, but clearly there’s no rush.

      Excellent pre-review, by the way. Thanks for all your hard work!

  47. Andy Kerr

    Hi Ray

    As a long term user (but not owner) of Wattbikes (both pro and trainer), I have the following question:

    The one real downside of the original wattbikes was the magnetic resistance and lack of controllability and consistency of the magnet dial. Are the steps between the gears on the Atom consistent?

    • Kernow Rider

      I agree – the magnetic adjuster on most Wattbikes become really inconsistent.

      You would think, and hope, that as this is the means of resistance on the Atom it is going to be very reliable!!

  48. John

    Hi Ray, thanks for the great review. I was sounding my wife out about getting one and she stumped me with a question. “How does this differ from an old exercise bike in the gym (the electronic type)?” I know the benefit of a turbo is having that familiar bike set-up but this loses that (somewhat). ANT+ and FE-C open up data/app options but other than that, is the benefit just road-feel/inertia? Help me answer this please! Thanks – love your work!

  49. Anthony Wright

    I’m thinking of replacing my current bike/wahoo kickr set up with this (to avoid the faff of moving my bike around) but I currently run zwift on my macbook and use a projector for the display – clearly the atom is set up for phone/tablet use but will it connect to any bluetooth enabled device like a macbook ?

    • Anthony Wright

      my apologies – i can see this question has already been asked and answered on 6th Sept – think i’m going to pull the trigger

    • Dave

      Totally feel the same way…and I wouldn’t get actually murdered by my wife I’d be ordering one right quick. Getting a Speed Concept on and off a Kickr is actually a bit of a hassle (well, getting the rear wheel back on the SC is). I’d really like a “get on and go” replacement.

  50. Ray, how about a review of the Cycleops Indoor Cycles? They have been shipping for years, are well-loved by their owners, and seem rock solid. Someone considering one of these new and/or vaporware indoor cycles is certainly looking at the Cycleops offerings as well. Thanks for the great reviews!

    • Possibly. I haven’t seen anyone ask for a review of one till today, so balancing that a bit with the lack of space problem in the DCR Cave. I’d like to see them support ANT+ FE-C though and Bluetooth Smart FTMS.

      While CycleOps power control is fairly widely supported in the core trainer apps, having the standards onboard would make it easier for smaller apps.

  51. Eboys02

    I can’t help feeling stung having bitten-the-bullet a few months back and bought a WattBike Pro. I made sure to check for any new product releases and none were mentioned by Wattbike. If I’d known about the Atom I would have waited a few weeks and saved myself a grand. Needless to say Wattbike aren’t willing to do anything about it , and have been very defensive when I approached them. I’ve noticed quite a few people online with a similar issue and a number of Wattbikes are going cheap on EBay. Nice one Wattbike!

  52. Joe

    Can we create a structured workout in GC and run it through a garmin unit to the watt bike?

  53. Tim

    Thanks Ray…

    I am following this and all these products as I routinely stay at a long-stay hotel each month and want to recommend a stationary bike to them to see if they will look into it.

  54. Simon Stickley

    Thanks Ray – appreciate your review as always

  55. Kernow Rider

    Hi Ray – have mine on order – arriving w/c 24 Oct. Wanted to get it ordered to guarantee before Christmas & take advantage of 30 Day returns based on your initial thumbs up. But really interested in you follow up review as if I do send it back I lose the £60 P&P. When will you be posting the next review?

    • They were working to get me a slightly different unit – but that hasn’t shown up yet. So my guess is a review later this month.

    • Richard Clare

      Thanks. I’ll ping my thought up here too. Really keen to see if you can toggle through Zwift screen on iPad and the Wattbike App as I want to access the WB App data but ride Zwift concurrently. Do you know the answer to this already?
      Thanks again.

    • That would ‘sorta work’. You could pair Zwift to the power meter output (not the control side), and then the WB App would utilize the control side. But it’d result in a less than awesome Zwift experience.

      I don’t think (haven’t tried), there’s a way to connect to the power-only (non-control) side via the WB App.

    • Kernow Rider

      Thanks. First time (active) on your site and hugely impressed with speed and engagement of replies. Will do my best to feed in my thoughts when I take delivery in late Oct / early Nov.

    • Daniel

      My delivery timetable is about the same. Interestingly, on the Wattbike website, current delivery dates are now 15 weeks! Either that’s really good news for the company’s revenue stream, or really bad news in terms of manufacturing complexity, supply constraints, or (worryingly) some newly found QC issue. Either way, they’ve got my money, and I’m pumped to have it in my pain cave relatively soon.

  56. Dave Craig

    My Atom delivery date has slipped out a bit. I ordered on September 6th with an estimated lead time of 6 weeks (around 17th October). It’s now slipped to between 23rd October and 6th November so 7 to 9 weeks from ordering :-(

    • Mine too. September 9th Order, delivery now between 6 and 20th November. The email suggest overwhelming demand. I’m not so sure.

    • Daniel

      Same here…

      “Due to the incredible demand, we’re sorry to say delivery lead time has been extended. We know you’ll be keen to get your feet firmly on the pedals and the Wattbike team are working hard to ensure delays are kept to a minimum.

      Your new expected Atom dispatch date is between 27/11/2017 and 11/12/2017, you will be contacted nearer the time by our courier to arrange a suitable delivery date.”

    • Ryan

      I ordered mine immediately when it came out.
      Just got a similar email, but delivery between 9th – 23rd October.

      They also offered 1 month free on sufferfest as an apology – I’m already signed up, I wonder can you still use it to get a free month within the membership?

    • David Wayne Veatch

      I hear you. Mine slipped from the ~6 weeks delivery when I started reading about it to 48-54 weeks by the time I was done.

      I’m in the U.S.

    • Dave Craig

      The numbers do seem to suggest overwhelming demand. It looks like every day after launch adds about a week to the delivery date for the first week.

  57. Ross

    Just to add another data point (which fits in with the demand theory). Ordered on 8th. Estimated 30th Oct to 13th Nov.

    For households with multiple cyclists, it’s the perfect choice. Not surprised it’s popular. Looking forward to the full review!

  58. Peter L.

    I finally ordered mine on 20th of September. Leadtime was 6 – 8 weeks then.
    Reveived this email yesterday too. The new expected delivery date is between 4/12/2017 and 18/12/2017.
    What makes me a bit angry is that only the day before still 6 – 8 weeks were confirmed by the customer support… :(

  59. emile

    Aren’t most power meters at 1.5% now?
    Is the crank length changeable (thinking about the shorter arms for TT-tri folks out there)

    Looking a little bit out of shape (I know life gets in the way) but since it’s your business to review sport gear….

  60. Rob

    I can’t find the maximum dimensions of the Wattbike Atom. I am 201 cm tall, so I would like to know if the Atom is suitable for me.

  61. Ryan

    Received my atom on Thursday.

    Will not work in ERG mode in either the Sufferfest (ANT) or Trainerroad (ANT or BLE).
    I’m using an iPad Pro (with wahoo ANT adapter).

    Reached out to Wattbike, The Sufferfest and Trainerroad and awaiting a reply.

    Have you had any gremlins with yours??

    As I can’t use ERG, I tried riding the mountain course on Zwift. The ‘gear changes’ are very slow, to the point of by the time they kicked in, the Zwift gradient had changed, so I spent a lot of time spinning or grinding and pressing gear buttons all over the place.
    Added to this, there is no onscreen display of what virtual gear you are in which all in all leads to a very frustrating experience.

    I’m hoping a very quick firmware update or something will sort this out, but after spending so much money, I really expected it to be fully functional out of the box.

    It’s leaving me with such a bad impression at the minute I might just return it unless Monday brings a fix.

    • ANT+ mode should work for TR, I haven’t tried it in SF though yet. Doing a bunch of sweep tests this week with it to see what apps do/don’t work on the final unit I now have.

      Agree on shifters, I had hoped they’d have figured that out (made it faster) in the last 5-6 weeks, but it doesn’t sound like that’s happened unfortunately. I’m going to circle back to them this week and see what the issue is.

      I would say that on the app compatibility issues, I’d reach out to TrainerRoad – as they are super responsive on trying to sort through app compat issues. I worked with them to get the Atom piece at least reading correctly. They’re (both companies) implementing FTMS, so in theory it should work out of the box, but theory is rarely valid when it comes to brand new standards and companies trying to all implement them the first time at once.

    • Ryan

      Thanks a lot for the really fast response Ray.
      Tried for an hour this morning, plugging things in and out, resetting etc, but just no go with regards to ERG.
      I’ve contacted TR & the sufferfest, so hopefully will get a response on Monday.
      As you say, you have it working ok, which makes me worried it’s something to do with my unit.
      I’ll update the thread once I have more news.
      Thanks, as ever Ray for all the work you do.

    • Kernow Rider

      Ryan – thanks for this. I’ve been keeping my eyes peeled for some first adopter reviews. Shifting makes me nervous about taking delivery!!
      For me I am keen to use ERG but no plans to use with TR. Would be interested in how it performs in ERG mode generally.

    • Ellis M

      Mine is due for delivery this week and I’ve suddenly become a little nervous about it. The shifting issue was a major aspect that I was unsure about but took trusted in Ray’s ability to sway manufacturers decision making. Hopefully they’ll put out some indication whether or not they’re actually going to change it.

      Almost sounds stupid but I feel like shifting is a major part of making cycling indoors feel closer to the real thing.

  62. Ryan

    I got an email from Wattbike this morning to say theres an app update out today that updates the firmware to sort compatibility issues with 3rd party apps.

    I’ll be installing as soon as I get home from work and will let you all know what happens.
    Not sure if they have addressed the slow shift issue, but ill try that too.

    • Chris

      Today’s release notes from the Wattbike Hub iOS app mention “improvements to BLE Atom control (FTMS) and resistance/gear changing”.

    • Ryan

      Thanks for that Chris – looking forward to giving it a test out later

    • Richard Clare

      Thanks Ryan & Chris ?
      Get the feeling Wattbike are listening.

    • Fwiw – I tested out the new firmware today, and was able to validate that Zwift and TrainerRoad work via iOS on current production builds.

      Kinomap captured power, but not speed from the Atom. And ANT+ FE-C control via the Garmin Edge 820 did not control at all (but did read). Further, Zwift gear changing continues to be both too much of a step (30-50w per gear shift), as well as kinda laggy.

      I’ll be following up with all companies a bit later today.

    • Ryan

      Thanks a lot for the update Ray.

      Just updated my own with the new app update & firmware and Trainerroad seems to be responding well over BLE.

      Tried the Sufferfest over ANT+ on iOS, but still not responding to ERG mode.
      I’ll have to email them again to see whats going on…my typical luck that its the sufferfest I’m holding out on to use!

    • Ryan

      Ah, just tried Trainerroad over ANT+using the iPad with Wahoo adapter and its still not responding to ERG mode either.

      The Atom is showing up ok and I can get power and cadence readings, but it will not adjust the resistance no matter what I do.

    • Just a quick logistical question: Why use the ANT+ adapter for TrainerRoad on iPad?

      Meaning, you can do it over BLE and it works just fine.

      (Side note: I suspect the issue is that Wattbike isn’t doing FE-C correctly, since it’s doing the exact same thing on the Garmin. By using ANT+ on the iPad with the adapter, you’re forcing it to FE-C.)

    • Ryan

      Hi Ray,

      I was just just testing ANT+ in trainerroad as well, to make sure the ANT+ issue wasn’t solely related to The Sufferfest app.

      Even worse news – I have just tried to do the 8 minute FTP test in Trainerroad (using BLE).
      It is supposed to drop out of ERG mode once you hit the tests, however although it said it did (I went into settings to check), I couldn’t get power above 100W no matter what I did.

      If definitely wasn’t ERG mode kicking in, because it was asking for over 200w – I also checked trainer resistance percentage in the TR settings and booted it all the way up to 100% – nothing changed, still stuck at below 100W no matter what.

      The strange thing is I could move down gears to lessen the watts, but when clicking up, I couldn’t get above 100w.

      Had to abort the FTP test – another night wasted, and even more infuriated than ever with the Atom.

    • Ryan

      Hi Ray,

      Have you had any update from Wattbike since the initial firmware upgrade?
      I still can’t use the sufferfest at all and have had silence from all companies over the past 36 hours.
      Thinking I might pack it all up and ask for a refund if not sorted by tomorrow.
      I’ll just go for a Neo or Kickr.

    • I’ve had a bit of a torrent of e-mails back and forth between them and others about it – and in fact just sent another about two minutes ago to them on things.

      They said as of yesterday they were running through a battery of tests on FE-C to see where/why it broke, and they were hoping to complete that last night. I suspect that’s what’s causing your issues across the board, since it appears that it’s ‘simply’ FE-C that’s broke for control. So it doesn’t much matter whether using TR, SF, Edge, or anything.

      Unfortunately, SF in particular doesn’t support any BLE control today except Wahoo.

    • Ryan

      Thanks so much for the super quick update Ray – if only the trainer companies were as quick as you!!

      I don’t think I’m prepared to wait much longer for them to fix it to be honest.
      The FE-C problem, along with the gear problem is enough for me to really resent having paid out a premium for the Atom.

      I think I might actually prefer the mechanical, instant click of a gear if using it on Zwift – and of course the option to jump up or down on the front rings if needed. When dealing with the rolling terrain, you really need the feedback and instant response I don’t think they will be able to achieve with the gearing.

      This would be a minor problem, as ERG mode would be my main focus with SF or TR, but when you pay for a premium product, you really don’t expect to have to make compromises (or be a beta tester for what is meant to be a finished product).

    • Ryan

      Wattbike support have been in touch to say a new update has been submitted to the app store focussing on Bluetooth FTMS connectivity.

      Still no update on ANT+ FE-C which is what I want to get going with the sufferfest!!

      Quite ironic considering Wattbike are sharing a lot of the sufferfest’s tweets about 4DP…..

  63. Freddie

    When’s the the atom review coming please

    • I’m looking for them to solve at least a few of these app connectivity implementation issues first. Which isn’t so much giving them a pass, as it is me not wanting to re-write entire sections of reviews a week later when they fix it. They’re all easy fixes*, I think they’re just trying to put out a bunch of fires at once.

      *Except maybe shifting, that might not be easy. But I’m also talking with Zwift about that in a ‘larger picture’ kinda way.

    • Kernow Rider

      Thanks again for this Ray. Again great context about the 3xtent of the issue.
      At the end of the day poor shifting is a huge issue for ‘real feel’ indoor training. But when it effects connectivity with Zwift then it becomes a game changer for both parties.
      Will be interesting how this develops but to not get this absolutely right first time seems a rookie error.

    • Freddie

      Thanks for responding Ray I’ve ordered one now so let’s hope they get stuff sorted


  64. Paul Howcroft

    Sorry coming to the thread late. Can I clarify the cost. The review says £1,499 including VAT but the wattbike website says plus VAT, plus delivery and I note delivery is now saying 15 weeks?

  65. Paul Howcroft

    Kernow Rider – sorry predictive txt kicked in just as I was sending previous msg.

  66. Gavin

    Hey, when is in depth review scheduled for?

  67. Ant Henson

    I’ve read some threads in FB groups and forums where people are saying latest firmware updates have sorted the gear change lag on Zwift. Can you please confirm if this is the case, and if it is indeed sorted then how long till the in depth review please?

    • I’d agree mostly, things are definitely better with the latest firmware.

      Are they awesome though (gear-shifting-wise)? No.

      For me for example, I don’t tend to do Zwift racing (just not my thing), so the impact is minimal. But if you race on Zwift, I can’t see how you could counter-attack or do a last second sprint. It’s just not fast enough to iterate through gears like a real bike.

    • Kernow Rider

      Thanks Ray.
      I’m interested in Zwift – but not for racing and also for some top end intervals & structured training.
      Still not got mine yet – but in the delivery window ? – but it will be interesting to see how you could do 40/20s with this lag too. On a normal Wattbike you could just reach down and push the air brake to the necessary position in a instant. Not so easy now.
      And then there has been some feedback on FB that erg mode isn’t working properly either – not altering resistance to match cadence!!
      If the machine is poor and I decide to send it back I’ll be asking for my P&P back too!!

    • For ERG feedback, it’s great there (no shifting needed). With Zwift though, keep in mind that ERG mode is funky compared to apps like TrainerRoad.

    • Ryan

      You’ve nailed it there Ray.
      I found it very frustrating using the gears on Zwift – you were never quite sure if it was the gear was changing, or the gradient, which led to all sorts of button pushing and confusion!

      Theres a lot to be said for the click of a gear lever and being able to see and feel the chain on the cogs – you know exactly where you are gearing wise and what you have left – plus I don’t think they’ll ever be able to replicate the immediacy of the shift, the option to shift 3-4 gears at a time, or change the front cog.

      I’ve arranged to send my Atom back. Despite the recent firmware updates, for the price paid, I just can’t justify the cost. Shifting is a no-no, and the feel is….ok – no better or worse than trainers around the £5-600 mark. So I end up paying £1000 premium just to have a nice looking bike with no front wheel.

      I’m actually thinking of going for a Kickr Snap, with the option of trying the Climb module when it arrives – I would still have change left over for a dedicated trainer bike from the Atom refund!

  68. Dave

    With regret, after reading some reviews and feedback I’ve cancelled my order and gone for a Kickr instead. Quick question though – does anyone know if the WattBike Hub Climb mode is compatible with the Kickr? That was something I was quite interested in. If not, does anyone know of a comparable app that does the same or similar?

  69. Kernow Rider

    Just as an FYI – I cancelled my Atom order.
    Feel that with the feedback it was the right thing to do.
    I love the feel of a Wattbike Pro (gym based) and can do some great structured sessions on this platform. But felt the reviews of the Atom fell well short of what this bike could provide and specifically against what I wanted – 40/20s, 10/50s with big step changes in power in a short space of time.
    I get that this might be ironed out but actually I think you can achieve all of the above with a Kickr Snap or Tacx Vortex.
    And Zwift performance seems dodgy too with the rider not fully understanding whether it is gradient or gears kicking in as you move around Watopia.
    Overall why would you want to take a punt with £1500 with this feedback??
    I am thinking a Wahoo Kickr Snap with Climb and enjoying both great structured training on Trainer Road and immersive Zwift for 4 years with the savings.

    • Ryan

      This is the exact setup I’m thinking of going for too – all the ERG benefits for The Sufferfest, plus the Kickr climb really looks like it could make Zwift much more immersive….and still at less cost!

  70. jon RHODES

    Just got my Atom. Love the build quality, love the feel and love the simplicity of just jumping on pressing go … but what am I doing wrong? I am also new to Zwift – so some of my issues may be there.

    So, first up I signed up to Zwift and decided to ride a workout:

    1 – I think my FTP was wrong … I reckon this is because I had inputted correctly into Wattbike Hub, but not found the place to input on Zwift App (using IPAD)

    2 – I wore an ANT+ HRM, but Zwift couldn’t find it

    3 – the power numbers (ERG mode as this was a workout ride) bounced around a lot … e.g. asked to hold 220w for 10mins, I was registering 190-240 … which made it difficult to find a rhythm, and Zwift keep telling me to increase or reduce power. I found a slider on the Wattbike Hub for 3 second smoothing, but that didn’t make any difference in Zwift

    4 – the ride had a few 600w x 1 sec sprints. The necessary resistance didn’t seem to kick in until 5 seconds, so these were a bit pointless

    5 – and one that is clearly a Zwift issue … how do I get rid of the league table on the lefthand side of the screen so that I can see what interval is coming next in the workout?


    • 1) FTP Wrong: Yeah, you need to put that in Zwift, there’s no carry-over from the Wattbike app to Zwift

      2) No ANT+ on iPad: No iOS devices natively support ANT+, which is why you can’t connect to it. The Wattbike can actually pull that data in to it’s own app, but not to 3rd party apps.

      3) Zwift ERG Mode: That’s the dirty little secret of Zwift ERG mode: It sucks. It’s not really ERG mode, it’s like a fake ERG mode that forces you to shift cadence to maintain it. Thus the fluctuations you see. Doesn’t matter if it’s the Wattbike or a Tacx Neo.

      4) 600w x 1 second sprints: If in ERG mode in Zwift, see #3 above. But honestly, any workout that has 1-second 600w sprints is pointless.

      5) Zwift table: For that one, I’d have to defer you somewhere else, not sure there. Sorry!


  71. Jon

    Really helpful
    The 600w segments were 10 seconds, but I take the point
    Are you saying the easiest thing is to get a different Hrm or use a wahoo dongle with iPad?
    And am I to assume that I won’t have such a problem with stabilising the power reading using Sufferfest and Trainer Road?

    • Yeah, a dual ANT+/BLE strap is what you want. Something like the Wahoo TICKR, but there are others. The adapter is Ok, but honestly at this point it’s just prolonging the inevitable.

      For 10s sprints (like the Zwift Jon’s Short Mix’ workout, they’re basically impossible to hit perfectly on ERG trainers for all of them).

      I’ve had no issues doing 10s intervals with TR and the Atom.

  72. Michael T

    Hi ray,

    Sorry if this has already been asked but but we need to own a “recent” ipad? I have the 4th gen (pre air).


  73. Hayley Winder

    Seriously thinking about trading in my Tacx Neo for the Atom. The Neo is great but I worry about the wear and tear it does to my bike (carbon frame), chainset etc. Has anyone made the switch from Neo to Atom? What will I lose/gain?

    • CHB

      I’d be wary of doing that, and would instead buy/build a cheap turbo-specific bike. That way, the main drivetrain wear occurs on your cheap-to-service/replace turbi bike rather than a relatively unserviceable indoor bike.

      Also, I reckon it will be slightly easier to sell on a Neo than an Atom, not least because of the logistics of physically shifting an item even larger & heavier than a Neo.

      My existing turbo bike is at the end of its life, and I was considering buying an Atom. Instead, I’m likely to get a Neo and buy/build an el cheapo turbo bike. I think it’s a better long term plan.

    • I’d agree with CHB.

      I’d personally consider the Wattbike a lesser experiance than the Neo, specifically for Zwift anyway. For other applications it’s on-par in my testing, but I’d still probably pick Neo in most cases since I already have a bike.

  74. Ryan

    Well, I sent mine back and got a refund.
    No regrets – waiting for a Kickr on Black Friday now and thinking about the Climb upgrade in the future for Zwift.

    However one funny point – after getting the refund, I had a knock on the door….a brand new Atom had arrived….at no cost!
    Don’t ask me how or why….it was quite tempting to keep it and say nothing, however my conscience got the better of me and I let Wattbike know – and they have now scheduled a collection.
    Hopefully karma will pay me back with a great deal or two on Black Friday!

  75. Philippe

    Is there anybody happy with their Atom?
    I was eager to guy one when they released it but after seeing delays in shipmemt I bought a Tacx Neo and I am very happy with Neo/trainer road combo.
    By now, many people should have received their Atam but we cannot find many feed back!
    Thanks for your reviews.

    • Philippe

      I was eager to buy one!

    • Daniel

      YES. Extremely happy with it. Works perfectly with TrainerRoad (which I use) and of course the Wattbike Hub app. Shifter speed, with latest firmware updates, is as fast as I can imagine I’d need on the trainer. Sound is decent — and really, when the fans are blowing and I have my earbuds in, who really cares what the trainer sounds like? My family, in other rooms of the house cannot hear it when I’m on it.

      I am genuinely surprised by the folks who order/cancel/return their Atoms. I believe this is likely a category-setting device for many types of riders. In my cave, I can alternate between the Atom, Kreitler rollers, Elite/FE-C rollers, and a dumb fluid trainer. I feel like I can pick the right tool for the right workout each time. My Tacx Vortex was (for real) tossed into the trash this morning.

  76. Sean G

    My Atom is awesome and even better since the latest firmware update

    Awesome on Zwift, Sufferfest, Wattbike Hub!

    Really really glad I ordered

  77. Just as a quick heads up to folks, the full Wattbike Atom In-Depth Review is now up! You can check it out here: link to dcrainmaker.com

    As is usually the case I’ll be closing this preview post to new comments here by tomorrow, but feel free to comment on that post. Just helps keeps things today going forward.

  78. I own a Cycling studio with 15 Cycleops 300 indoor cycles (soon to be dinosaurs), so I for one, would be interested in an indoor cycle/stationary bike comparison if that comes about. I was on your site to see if there was anything new to override the proprietary ant+ that Cycleops used on their indoor cycles so I could take advantage of some group cycling apps, because as you said, the fact that my bikes are NOT able to integrate with any of the new ant+ connected apps, and they are becoming dead to me.
    Unfortunately, Cycleops is of no help – they have promised 3 times to have an engineer contact me about changing their ant+ protocol to make it useable by something other than Rouvy, but nearly a year later they have not delivers.
    Then I saw your review of this stationary bike/indoor cycle. I agree – that is a pretty sweet looking. As much as I hate to do it, I may just have to replace all the Cycleops indoor cycles with Wattbike Atom or something similar. Nice review!

    • Kris Mays

      Is there any update to availability in the US? Have any other competitors emerged that will be offering a full bike, similar to the Wattbike? The lack of options in the field is frustrating. I have a Kickr, but would like a dedicated, adjustable bike set up.

      Thanks for all you do! Your reviews are great!

  79. barry mulligan

    Hi there

    Thanks for your (as always helpful) review of the watt bike atom.

    You mentioned doing another review? Is that out yet?



  80. Saulius

    Thanks Ray for the great review.
    In the Wattbike Atom key specs summary you wrote:
    – Connectivity Broadcasting: ANT+ & Bluetooth Smart Speed, Power, Cadence
    – Heart Rate Data: Compatibility and pass-through of ANT+, Bluetooth Smart, and Polar analog straps.

    I have Garmin FR935 (same functions as Fenix 5). Does it mean I can add to Garmin FR935 ‘Bike Indoor’ profile settings ‘Sensors&Accessories’ Power and Speed/Cadence sensors from Atom? Will it work the same way as Garmin Vector Power Meter?

  81. Andrew

    Just got mine. Really easy to set up. Substantial bit of kit. Deceptively simple connectivity (I used my Garmin chest strap and my Samsung Tablet as the HUD without even thinking about what was going on – seamless integration of communication protocols).

    The only downside is that I think it is a little noisy. Not as loud as my old turbo-trainer but certainly not quiet. I don’t think it to be generally a problem for my neighbours but I would be reluctant to chance it and use it late at night for example.

    I found the gears pretty responsive but there have been some firmware upgrades following this post. I agree that the absence of any haptic or sonic feedback on the change affects how the change “feels”. Getting an optional audible click should be a pretty simple firmware enhancement, maybe followed by a little derailleur noise (and perhaps the sound of the chain coming off now and then!)

  82. Michael Schertenleib

    Nice article.
    What’s the actual size measurements of the unit shipped? Thank you so much for your support!

  83. Does anyone have a bluetooth dump from nrfconnect for this bike? I’d like to analyze how they’re sending the shift data to Zwift for the gear indication popup.