Heads up!!! Here’s your massive holiday sports tech deals list! This includes the Garmin Epix for just $419, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 for just $699, the GoPro Hero 12 Black for $249, (or the brand new Hero 13 or $299!) and plenty more! Go check out the full list of 100+ deals here!
I’m DC RAINMAKER…
I swim, bike and run. Then, I come here and write about my adventures. It’s as simple as that. Most of the time. If you’re new around these parts, here’s the long version of my story.
You'll support the site, and get ad-free DCR! Plus, you'll be more awesome. Click above for all the details. Oh, and you can sign-up for the newsletter here!
Here’s how to save!
Wanna save some cash and support the site? These companies help support the site! With Backcountry.com or Competitive Cyclist with either the coupon code DCRAINMAKER for first time users saving 15% on applicable products.
You can also pick-up tons of gear at REI via these links, which is a long-time supporter as well:Alternatively, for everything else on the planet, simply buy your goods from Amazon via the link below and I get a tiny bit back as an Amazon Associate. No cost to you, easy as pie!
You can use the above link for any Amazon country and it (should) automatically redirect to your local Amazon site.Want to compare the features of each product, down to the nitty-gritty? No problem, the product comparison data is constantly updated with new products and new features added to old products!
Wanna create comparison chart graphs just like I do for GPS, heart rate, power meters and more? No problem, here's the platform I use - you can too!
Think my written reviews are deep? You should check out my videos. I take things to a whole new level of interactive depth!
Smart Trainers Buyers Guide: Looking at a smart trainer this winter? I cover all the units to buy (and avoid) for indoor training. The good, the bad, and the ugly.
-
Check out my weekly podcast - with DesFit, which is packed with both gadget and non-gadget goodness!
Get all your awesome DC Rainmaker gear here!
FAQ’s
I have built an extensive list of my most frequently asked questions. Below are the most popular.
- Do you have a privacy policy posted?
- Why haven’t you yet released a review for XYZ product you mentioned months ago?
- Will you test our product before release?
- Are you willing to review or test beta products?
- Which trainer should I buy?
- Which GPS watch should I buy?
- I’m headed to Paris – what do you recommend for training or sightseeing?
- I’m headed to Washington DC – what do you recommend for training?
- I’m from out of the country and will be visiting the US, what’s the best triathlon shop in city XYZ?
- What kind of camera do you use?
-
5 Easy Steps To The Site
In Depth Product Reviews
You probably stumbled upon here looking for a review of a sports gadget. If you’re trying to decide which unit to buy – check out my in-depth reviews section. Some reviews are over 60 pages long when printed out, with hundreds of photos! I aim to leave no stone unturned.
Read My Sports Gadget Recommendations.
Here’s my most recent GPS watch guide here, and cycling GPS computers here. Plus there are smart trainers here, all in these guides cover almost every category of sports gadgets out there. Looking for the equipment I use day-to-day? I also just put together my complete ‘Gear I Use’ equipment list, from swim to bike to run and everything in between (plus a few extra things). And to compliment that, here’s The Girl’s (my wife’s) list. Enjoy, and thanks for stopping by!
Have some fun in the travel section.
I travel a fair bit, both for work and for fun. Here’s a bunch of random trip reports and daily trip-logs that I’ve put together and posted. I’ve sorted it all by world geography, in an attempt to make it easy to figure out where I’ve been.
My Photography Gear: The Cameras/Drones/Action Cams I Use Daily
The most common question I receive outside of the “what’s the best GPS watch for me” variant, are photography-esq based. So in efforts to combat the amount of emails I need to sort through on a daily basis, I’ve complied this “My Photography Gear” post for your curious minds (including drones & action cams!)! It’s a nice break from the day-to-day sports-tech talk, and I hope you get something out of it!
The Swim/Bike/Run Gear I Use List
Many readers stumble into my website in search of information on the latest and greatest sports tech products. But at the end of the day, you might just be wondering “What does Ray use when not testing new products?”. So here is the most up to date list of products I like and fit the bill for me and my training needs best! DC Rainmaker 2023 swim, bike, run, and general gear list. But wait, are you a female and feel like these things might not apply to you? If that’s the case (but certainly not saying my choices aren’t good for women), and you just want to see a different gear junkies “picks”, check out The Girl’s Gear Guide too.
I’m sorry but these seem another randomly spit out some kind of numbers without any scientific backup. But I guess this is what the majority want – ” more features”. Anything. Who cares how (in)accurate they are.
These sound like great updates. Unfortunately my 2+ year old Pace 2 died right after the last update & wont recharge. Coros reports that the battery can’t be replaced, so now it’s a piece of e-waste. I wish Coros would warn consumers of this fact at purchase.
I’m with you, it died a few months out of warranty. I gave in and got a garmin 6s off a friend.
Hi, found this maybe you could try by yourself ?
B18 PACE 2 Teardown Internal Photos Setup photos Coros Wearables .
Coros Wearables . PACE 2
link to fccid.io
Page 4, a photo of the battery
I believe that you are missing Apex Pro (1st gen) from th elist thtat gets the update
(If the stress level is implemented similarly to Gamin, it is a good tool for recognition of sickness pretty early on – more like data confirmation when I don’t feel good. In that case I don’t care how it includes sport activities – I’m looking there just for data from a single day where I know when I was active. I don’t believe in average stress being anyhow usefull)
Good catch. Oddly, there was no exact list of units that were/weren’t supported this time (usually it’s at the top of the firmware update list). So had to piece it together myself. Thanks!
All information tracked by Garmin automatically during a run are also tracked by Coros in any run (provided you wear the Pod). Doing a Form test you have instead other information (like strike angle, leg stiffness, peak ground reaction force) that contribute to create an evaluation summary.
Right, but there’s zero reason that other information can’t be tracked/shown for every run (assuming you have a pod attached, as you said).
“When I met with COROS’s CEO’s back earlier this winter, one of the key messages I told them was that they needed to understand the features they were copying from others”
— But isn’t that their entire portfolio and product lineup?
I don’t think that COROS is copying any more than other GPS watch companies from each other. The truth is that any new feature is pretty soon implemented by the others. Just a few random examples when COROS was probably first (or at least ahead of Garmin – I don’t have time for proper research):
– dual frequency GPS
– low power consumption during GPS activities
– wrist-based running power
– option to wear Vertix on carabiner; cool foldable charging cable
– limited touch screen (enabling such a new feature only where it made sense – other manufactures had touch either enbaled or disabled but not only enabled on a map whjch makes alot of sense)
– night mode (constant 20% backlight during night activities)
But for me personally it’s much more about the UI – COROS is very focused on serious athletes and I love their various graphsregarding training load – simple EMAs that makes sense instead of random clevernumbers from the others.
A few notes on that. I had a coros apex 2 pro. And the dual band was at best as accurate as the Fenix 6s pro in all systems mode. Coros implementation of dual frequency before the pace 3 was pretty bad. Huge battery hog and bad results. Which makes it so that coros actually doesn’t have great battery consumption during a activities anymore, as you need dual frequency to get another manufacturers all system accuracy. Coros also abandoned running power in favor of their own effort pace. Which is a worse version of grade adjusted pace as it supposedly adjust to the person. But you don’t know how or if it does. So it doesn’t become actionable.
Limited touchscreen is a good example of how coros tends to release products too early. With the apex 2 pro it took them half a year to patch a bug where setting the touchscreen to map only kept it on at all times during an activity. Having done some coros beta testing, that is a massive issue for them. They continuously release features before they are ready. As it’s more important for them to get the feature out, then it is to get it right. Running fitness didn’t update for months because they didn’t properly test it for example. Turn by turn still misses around 50% of turns as well
You forgot about track mode?
Personally, I wish that these companies did away with gimmicky features such as body battery, stress and effort pace and focused on HRV, Resting HR, Training Load and Running Power/Grade Adjusted Pace.
Minor odd and ends:
1) Polar was actually first with wrist-based running power, back in Sept 2018 with the Polar Vantage V1. COROS added it 2 years later with the Pace 2 launch.
2) COROS was the first to introduce running track mode in Nov 2019, Garmin followed a bit under a year later in Sept 2020 with the FR745. COROS was definitely the first though, and it was generally quite well implemented at launch. Some minor quirks, but they iterated quickly.
3) COROS was first for dual-freq when compared to Garmin and COROS, via the Vertix 2 in Aug 2021, but, as noted at that review and countless others, it really wasn’t that good. It was no better than not-multiband (and certainly worse than Garmin’s not-multiband on the newer 2022+ chipsets). Frankly, they didn’t finally figure it out till the Pace 3 in Sept 2023, and even then, not till about a month or so after launch it finally started looking solid. Given so much of getting it right is antenna design, hopefully, they’ll have that sorted/understood for the next hardware launch (whenever that is).
4) Lower power consumption in GPS activities is sorta a see-saw thing. The companies go back and forth, depending on who decides they want to hold the title – and where they are in product refresh cycles. Sometimes Garmin, sometimes COROS, sometimes Suunto, etc…
5) The COROS carabineer thing is cool for climbers, in the same way Garmin’s quick-release kit is/was cool for triathletes. COROS has focused on the climbing realm, Garmin has focused elsewhere. To each their own.
—
All that aside, my criticism in this post for COROS copying features is actually rather specific to the physiological metrics. Both here, as well as Evolab when it launched, and others. COROS does some cool innovative things (like the track mode at the time). But when it comes to the wellness/etc type metrics, each time they seem to be implemented without really understanding the nuances of why/how those metrics should be calculated/used.
Nonetheless, I’ve had another chat with them since this post, and I think they are taking the feedback to heart. Good to hear!
+ 1 for HRV. Given that HRV is becoming a more meaningful and universal metric for recovery-load balancing, I’d rather see Coros include HRV tracking on more of their watches (Pace series) than other quasi-proprietary metrics. Which often cannot be meaningfully used in platforms such as Training Peaks.
Cor0s was also first for C2 Rower with PM5 computer connection, Garmin needed only weeks to enable it in their Software, they just had no pressure to do it. Now we can track distance, speed etc within rowing, not only stroke rate.
To be fair though, Garmin has had Connect IQ and an app for it for 7 years now: link to apps.garmin.com
Kinda just depends on what level of integration you want.
And even support for the PM4 many years before that, using the Ant+ FIT profile. See link to concept2.com for instructions for using it on your FR60 ;)
Ehehehe, ‘serious’ athletes who want a bunch of half-baked metrics and sloppily implemented ‘features’ while basic functionality continues to be inaccurate, awkward, and unreliable.
Hi Ray, The one thing I do like about Coros is that as my fitness ebbs and flows, the pace zones change to reflect the current situation. I don’t think they are copying Daniels formula verbatim but they are close enough to reality. Do any of the competitors offerings offer the same feature? I remember back in day Garmin would detect lthr but that was about all
Garmin auto-adjusts both LTHR (with chest strap) as well as VO2Max, which in turn adjust workout intensity for Daily Suggested Workouts, as well as the training load impact based your efforts (to Training Readiness/Load/etc…).
Polar does more or less the same thing, and Suunto to a bit lesser extent.
Thanks Ray
What I’m not sure I understand is how the Wellness check works on the non-ECG watches, like the Apex Pro 1 and Pace 2. It seems that it’s included in the test and it provides an HRV number, but is that possible to be calculated without the appropriate sensor?
I am using Coros Apex 2 for running & cycling. The training load measuring is good for running but for cycling I am not sure if hr-based calculated training load here is that “realistic” especially if the cycling workout based on the same hr zones which where used by running mode?
I would like to know/understand how coros will calculate the training load for a cycling session depending on the (hopefully senseful determined) LTHR value which is originally optimized for running. Thanks.
No, it doesn’t really scale well there on COROS.
How I can see after final release firmware the watch is still accumulate stress during activities. The watch accumulate stress even when I not wear the watch and use Polar H10.
Hey Ray, I find most of these algorithmic interpretations to be gimmicky; whether it is from Coros or Garmin. All of these algorithms make generalizations.
The interpretation of the users collected data is so obtuse. For example, Garmin’s Training Readiness never has delivered a value consistent to my experience for me to consider.
What is worse is the companies appear to have a limited understanding a well. Their support pages, videos, and associates deliver at best a marketing definition, but fail to give a detailed explanation and best use practices. Ray, I’m sure your experience differs, as you have greater access to teams who created these algorithms (or at least are close to the projects).
In Coros’ case: How is the running from test not actionable?
One of the generated assessments is the foot strike angle. Which seems actionable to me as you can re test while being cognizant of your foot strike and associates from. Perform drills that focus on better form, etc. This assessment alone could be useful info for someone who has never had coaching, new and/or returning to the activity from a hiatus.
Thank-you and have a good weekend
“In Coros’ case: How is the running from test not actionable?”
I think the key difference here between Training Readiness (which is constantly changing throughout the day, and for the vast majority of people, seems pretty actionable, and based on pretty predictable things) – is that the COROS test requires you go out and do a specific test, rather than monitoring your running constantly.
Then, once that test is done, it actually doesn’t tell you what type of drills to do, or even provide any evidence that you should do them. Generally speaking, the overall industry trend in running biomechanics, footstrike, and form is to “stop trying to eff with it and just run”.
Most times people try and tweak running form, they end up getting themselves injured. Footstrike is literally the best example of that, all the recent studies in the last few years have shown that it just doesn’t matter, and there’s no efficiencies that have proven out as legit in these studies.
Good points and I agree. Probably, why Coros just stops at just identifying your form with little insight. Then the individual can bring it up to a physio (or comparable). Less liability in this litigious world.
🤷♂️ IDK
Really what interests me is enviro & activity metrics that don’t require much proprietary voodoo.. E.g.: pace, distance, nav, SPM, elevation, baro, cadence, HR (and trend), HRV(measurement with trend only). Sleep tracking, training readiness, body batt, stamina, etc don’t find useful; one of the reason why I moved from Garmin to Coros. Why pay for all of that? Additionally, Coros’ simplicity it makes it easy to strip similar features out.
I know it is possible with Garmin, but… one can get into the weeds stripping out numerous layers software “features”. Honestly, I wish Garmin had a user onboard script to make it easier to determine what you want (and don’t) along with a clear explanation of what you will be missing (or gaining) feature-wise.