JUMP TO:

First Look: Body Heat and Solar Powered Matrix PowerWatch 2 GPS

DSC_4881-2

Each year at CES people invariably ask me what’s the most interesting thing I’ve seen on the show floor. Some years, there’s many options to choose from. This year? Not so much. Still, my answer this year oscillates between this crazy bread machine, and the PowerWatch 2 GPS.

Which isn’t to say that civilization needs either, or that either will be successful as products (actually, pretty sure the bread machine will succeed). But they both represent interesting tech to me. And thus, I’m going to talk about one of them (sadly, not the bread machine).

The PowerWatch 2 is the second generation smartwatch device from Matrix, the first being a much more slimmed down (feature-wise) variant back a year or two ago. These devices rely on taking your body heat (from your wrist), combining it with a side dish of solar power, and then running forever.  There are a number of differences between PowerWatch 1 and 2, the main being the addition of GPS. It’s also got a far more powerful backlight.

I had a chance to play with a unit indoors the other night at a CES media event, and put together a quick video of it here:

Or, you can read on for my slightly deeper thoughts on it.

The Tech Details:

DSC_4870

Make no mistake, the PowerWatch 2 isn’t a Garmin Fenix 5 or Suunto 9 killer. At least not today.

But, that’s also the end-state goal of the company. They were crystal clear that their hopes are to bring the technology to the point where ultra runners are their target audience. They want a person to effectively be able to go all Forrest Gump – and run forever.

Today though, the reality is a bit more harsh. The current prototypes get about 60-90 minutes of GPS-on time, before you’ve gotta stop and let it ‘refill’. As you might expect, turning on GPS is like turning on a gigantic fuel burning blowtorch. As with virtually any wearable on the market, it’s the #1 battery killer out there (aside from crazy brilliant displays on something like an Apple Watch).  So the balance Matrix has is to find a way to ensure that the charging (your body heat and solar) just barely outweighs what’s being spent by the watch for the display, GPS, accelerometers, and other processing.

First though, let’s start at the back of the watch. That’s where the “thermoelectric generator”, or effectively, a heat sink that takes your body heat and converts it into energy. This technology isn’t new, nor mysterious. Companies have been doing this for years in a variety of industries.

Here’ a nifty diagram from their Indiegogo page on what’s going on just below the surface.  Now, since I’m not some sort of thermoelectric engineer, I’m just going to have to leave this here:

image

Ultimately, from a sports tech standpoint, I don’t much care what the precise underlying energy conversation tech is – as long as it meets the requirements. Just like I don’t really care whether a trainer uses an actual power meter or not, as long as it’s ultimately accurate when I test it.

Of course, as I noted a few paragraphs ago, right now the energy conversion tech appears to be a bit short on that equation. Whether or not the company can bridge those shortfalls to achieve longer GPS-on time is the question (more on that in a minute).

Now, that’s just the body heat portion of the equation. Atop the face of the watch there’s also solar panels. If you look at the two units below, one is a current prototype (functional), where the other is the goal end-state device (non-functional).  You can clearly see the panels in the current prototype (to the right), whereas the goal device has these hidden under the display edges a bit more (to the left):

DSC_4864

I asked what the breakdown of power ‘revenue’ was. Meaning, did body heat or solar charge it faster/more? The answer? Solar – by a long shot. They noted that the stats they looked at shows the average American spends only a single hour outdoors (if that), and the remainder indoors. In that scenario, 50% of the daily energy of the watch would come from that single hour outdoors, whereas the other 50% from body heat.

Whereas if you were on a semi-sunny winter day as it was today in Las Vegas, and spent most of the day outdoors, that the power source would be overwhelmingly solar-generated.

Meanwhile, in the middle of all that is the display itself. The watch will show all the activity tracking basics you’d expect like steps, calories, distance, and even current resting HR. In fact, you could see that HR sensor on the back in the photos up above. And on the unit I tried, the HR sensor was indeed detecting resting HR at a believable reading.

DSC_4881-2

This is a good time to point out that the HR sensor design they have doesn’t lend itself well to being accurate for workouts. With only a single LED on a heavy device, it’s likely to be mostly trash. Sure, I could be wrong – but in doing this whole optical HR testing thing for a few years, that’s like bringing a butter knife to a tank fight.

DSC_4861

At present the unit doesn’t support connecting to any ANT+ or Bluetooth Smart sensors, so things are a bit limited there too. Nor does it have aspects like following a course or structured training. It’s mostly just about recording your overall GPS track. It does have a backlight though that illuminates when pressed (and immediately turns off when you release the button). And that backlight as seen in the video is basically just as bright as any other smartwatch I’ve tried. I didn’t get a chance to test vibration alerts or smartphone notifications, though both are specified as included. Additionally, it’s waterproof to 200 meters.

Note that the display of the prototype didn’t have the colors seen in either their photos or the final production unit models. Though I didn’t ask when the switch-over will occur.

From a sport mode standpoint, their goal for launch is running and cycling modes, followed shortly thereafter by swimming modes.  Said differently, this watch seemed more aimed towards casual GPS trackers than super-athletic types. At least at this point or for the near future.

Once you’ve completed your activity the watch will produce a GPS track file in their app:

DSC_4869

The company is using u-blox GPS chipsets within the watch, the same chipset used in a wide variety of wearables over the years, including from Polar and TomTom. The company says that by leveraging their accelerometers and gyro’s, they can reduce the GPS sampling rates and extend battery life (without impacting GPS track accuracy significantly). Essentially the same technique Suunto has employed on their Suunto 9 watch with the ultra-focused modes.

Once a workout is complete their plan is to enable uploads to a variety of platforms, including specifically noting Strava. The current recording rate is once every 1-2 seconds, which is probably more than acceptable for 98% of the people out there. Heck, Garmin still unexplainably defaults to ‘Smart Recording’ (once every 4-7 seconds usually) for all their watches.

I’d like to have been able to show more or say more, but honestly, that’s all there is to show. Which isn’t necessarily wrong in terms of their delivery schedule, but just a reality of the current prototype devices they had on-hand.

Going forward:

DSC_4877

At the Indiegogo price of $199, it’s a compelling offering, if they can pull it off. At the planned retail price of $499, it’s mostly a non-starter. Still, crowdfunded projects rarely end up selling for as much as these companies hope by the time the dust settles.

The bigger part for a company like Matrix is actually licensing deals for their technology. The company touted in a CNET article that they had landed a big name wearable for later in 2019. Whether that is true remains to be seen. I’ve talked to a few in the industry over the last few days, and I remain skeptical it’ll be licensed by any major fitness devices immediately. Most of the bigger fitness companies have far larger power need footprints than the PowerWatch (1 or 2).  Thus, instead I suspect we’ll see it licensed by a fringe fitness player. Perhaps a company that is a well-known name, but not in the fitness/sport game.

All of which may sound like I’m being negative – I’m not. As I started this post out, it’s one of the most interesting wearables things I’ve seen at CES. But I’m not convinced it’ll be practical yet for the majority of the market. However, if the company can get their battery life closer to 4-5 hours of constant GPS-on coverage, and do so while maintaining good GPS tracks, it’ll be super compelling. Even more, if they can get closer to 8-12 hours of GPS-on time, which would make it very interesting for those doing week-long hikes without having to recharge (since it would re-charge easily during GPS-off time).

So while I won’t be a backer this time around, I’ll certainly be watching how things progress.

Obligatory reminder: This is a crowdfunded project. As such, the success rates for tech products tend to be pretty low (defined as either delivering on time, delivering at all, or delivering what you expected or were promised). I’ve written extensively about the failures of crowdfunded projects over the years, as well as standalone posts on identifying worrisome items in crowdfunded projects. Still, every once in a while you get something cool out of one. I don’t know if this will be that project. Still, treat crowdfunded projects exactly like money in a Las Vegas slot machine: Assume you’ll get nothing back, and celebrate if you break even. If you do that, you’ll be just fine.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
If you would like a profile picture, simply register at Gravatar, which works here on DCR and across the web.

You can click here to Subscribe without commenting

Add a picture

*

22 Comments

  1. Walter S

    And here I was hoping to read about that bread machine… though might need the sourdough one mentioned in the article, to replace my homemade sourdough…

    (If you need an excuse to talk about it Ray, it’s clearly running related; just use it as a fresh nutrition source for longer races!)

  2. Paul S

    One question I had when I saw their ad on Facebook yesterday (didn’t click through): does it have a way to charge from a cable attached to a power source or does it completely rely on solar/body heat?

    • Steven

      From an Amazon review of a previous model
      ” “powered by body heat”, which it will do some places, but not in warm climates….Support will then send you a “thermal charger”.”
      That sounds pretty interesting but if this has solar than a desk lamp to charge.

    • Paul S

      Yeah, but its solar panels are tiny and solar power is largely about the collecting area of the panel (the actual presence of the sun is also important). If it can’t charge from an external source, they’re really limiting themselves. I can’t imagine anyone going on a multi-day anything not carrying a battery to recharge various electronics. If away from the grid, it’s going to be solar (with panels much larger than this watch) or crank based, but given the ubiquity and usefulness of electronics that need to be recharged it’s pretty much a requirement. Not being able to take advantage of that is strange.

  3. Robin White

    Body heat / solar power for your basic fitbit step tracker etc? Their batteries last ages already why not my make them indefinite?

    Gives them chance to sort out the power tech before going into high power requirement?

  4. ReHMn

    …just two side-tracks:

    1. to the bread machine: there is no such thing as “no-carb”. Anything you eat will contain carbohydrates…
    2. There is a forever running device, developed for container tracking. It is self-charging, even if there is no movement with the container mounted onto…
    link to business.att.com

  5. Sandro

    If the delta of energy generated by the device during non-GPS usage is positive, wouldn’t a larger batter solve the issue? I’m also wondering if there exists any technology (that could fit in the watch) for harvesting power from arm movement during a run.

  6. Roel

    As you say the technology is probably not quite there yet to fully power all the features that, say a Garmin has to offer. Still I would find it interesting to see them add this kind of tech to simply *extend* battery life. Should still give a decent boost for people that don’t do too many long workouts and where the majority of battery drain happens slowly in watch mode.

  7. It will be very interesting to see how the body heat and solar powered watches are going to turn out.

  8. karl

    As the body heat charging relies on temperature differential, anything that makes the top temperature closer to the bottom (your skin) temperature, such as covering by long sleeves (winter) or hot out (summer), means less charging. That is still likely their biggest obstacle to making body heat charging more useful. They just need to find a way to get around the laws of thermodynamics. Or find humans with a fever.

    • john

      Or, you can sprinck watch with water — it evasporates and lovering watch temperature thus.
      or even better, going to the swim.
      and apart of that, on doing physical activity, your body temperature increases.
      so, thing, in general, was good…
      strange, it has no make solar battery to all face area – i suppose, a casio solar powered have solar who cover all watch face in underlay…

  9. Sam T

    Seems like a larger solar panel on a tether would be useful, although maybe that would impact the waterproofing. Similarly, having a larger thermal conversion unit on, say, the torso connected by a tether might be interesting if not too cumbersome.

  10. Jac

    Don’t know how packed your schedule there is, but would really like to get your take on this while you’re there at CES: link to wareable.com

  11. Tim

    “…that’s like bringing a butter knife to a tank fight.” A great analogy that I hope they are aware of, and Ray definitely still has his mind on bread.

  12. Tim

    “…that’s like bringing a butter knife to a tank fight.” A great analogy that I hope they are aware of, and Ray definitely still has bread on the mind.

  13. Lou

    I could see this being useful for multi day/stage events and also for the very casual user for smartwatches (rather than activity trackers) as smartwatches tend to need the charges daily whereas this might extend it greatly.

  14. Eli

    Seems like body heat charging is more for cool indoor use. It doesn’t charge off heat. It charges off a differential in heat

  15. ekutter

    wonder what the size/weight of these charging mechanisms are compared to adding a bit of extra battery. Short of being able to refill the battery during long periods away from the grid, it’s not clear there are many scenarios where this is a net win. For most scenarios, one of the those battery packs with a solar panel is probably a better bet.

  16. JD

    Theoretically wouldn’t powered-by-motion based on arm swing while running capture more energy than thermo-electric based on body heat at your wrist?

  17. Mihail337

    In the healthcare business, nurses are finding that individuals who have pursued an RN-BSN diploma program tend to be times prepared to proceed from traditional patient care to distinct roles in the health care sector. You can read more at here