<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for DC Rainmaker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dcrainmaker.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dcrainmaker.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Incredible deals: Garmin FR910XT for $299, FR310XT for $169, Edge 800 for $229, Ambit for $349 by Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2013/05/incredible-fr910xt-fr310xt.html#comment-130512</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dcrainmaker.com/?p=13333#comment-130512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m mostly a runner, but I also like to do some kayaking in the summer. Since that doesn&#039;t really involve my arms going under water, can I presume that the 310 and the 910 (even the TRT 2.0 for that matter) would all be perfectly fine for simply tracking distance and pace?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>I&#8217;m mostly a runner, but I also like to do some kayaking in the summer. Since that doesn&#8217;t really involve my arms going under water, can I presume that the 310 and the 910 (even the TRT 2.0 for that matter) would all be perfectly fine for simply tracking distance and pace?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A San Francisco Swimming Flight Connection Layover by Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2013/05/francisco-swimming-connection.html#comment-130510</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dcrainmaker.com/?p=13454#comment-130510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone already posted a link, but just to be clear: PLASTIC DOES NOT LEACH CARCINOGENIC CHEMICALS. There&#039;s no basis at all for that claim. 

This link was already posted, but rebuts it quite well: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/healthyliving/cancercontroversies/Plasticbottles/

You are probably at a much higher risk of harm by having a glass bottle near a pool (don&#039;t do that!) or drinking from a metal bottle (especially a non-lined aluminium one).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Someone already posted a link, but just to be clear: PLASTIC DOES NOT LEACH CARCINOGENIC CHEMICALS. There&#8217;s no basis at all for that claim. </p>
<p>This link was already posted, but rebuts it quite well: <a  href="http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/healthyliving/cancercontroversies/Plasticbottles/" rel="nofollow">link to cancerresearchuk.org</a></p>
<p>You are probably at a much higher risk of harm by having a glass bottle near a pool (don&#8217;t do that!) or drinking from a metal bottle (especially a non-lined aluminium one).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to download free maps to your Garmin Edge 705/800/810 by Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2013/05/download-garmin-705800810.html#comment-130507</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dcrainmaker.com/?p=13516#comment-130507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The resolution is excellent.

In my experience (in Australia) the accuracy is slightly better than Google Maps (especially for off-road trails). 

The cycling specific maps are quite a bit better than Google Maps because they tend to update quicker. That means when the legal status of a trail changes (eg, are bikes allowed on it or not) Open Street Maps tends to be updated quicker.

(Of course, you&#039;ll need to download the latest version yourself manually, but that is the same in any case).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>The resolution is excellent.</p>
<p>In my experience (in Australia) the accuracy is slightly better than Google Maps (especially for off-road trails). </p>
<p>The cycling specific maps are quite a bit better than Google Maps because they tend to update quicker. That means when the legal status of a trail changes (eg, are bikes allowed on it or not) Open Street Maps tends to be updated quicker.</p>
<p>(Of course, you&#8217;ll need to download the latest version yourself manually, but that is the same in any case).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A San Francisco Swimming Flight Connection Layover by Monica</title>
		<link>http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2013/05/francisco-swimming-connection.html#comment-130501</link>
		<dc:creator>Monica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dcrainmaker.com/?p=13454#comment-130501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a beautiful pool and looks like perfect weather! Perfect setup to swim all day!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>What a beautiful pool and looks like perfect weather! Perfect setup to swim all day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stages Power Meter In-Depth Review by Stephane</title>
		<link>http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2013/01/stages-power-meter-in-depth-review.html#comment-130494</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dcrainmaker.com/?p=7500#comment-130494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does someone have loss reading power/cadence problems with the Stages Power and the iPhone ?

I used the Stages Power Bluetooth with iPhone 5 and RFLKT. Reading of power/cadence frequently stop for few seconds (data is absent from TCX file). I noticed that the distance between the Stages Power and the iPhone seem to affect more.
EX: iPhone in my jersey back pocket, loss reading 45 seconds per minute, iPhone in my little tri bag, 3 to 5 seconds loss reading every 1 or 2 minutes

Distance between Bluetooth Speed/Cadence sensor, bluetooth heart rate strap, RFLKT and iPhone could be more then 20 feets without any loss...

Thank you for your help]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>Does someone have loss reading power/cadence problems with the Stages Power and the iPhone ?</p>
<p>I used the Stages Power Bluetooth with iPhone 5 and RFLKT. Reading of power/cadence frequently stop for few seconds (data is absent from TCX file). I noticed that the distance between the Stages Power and the iPhone seem to affect more.<br />
EX: iPhone in my jersey back pocket, loss reading 45 seconds per minute, iPhone in my little tri bag, 3 to 5 seconds loss reading every 1 or 2 minutes</p>
<p>Distance between Bluetooth Speed/Cadence sensor, bluetooth heart rate strap, RFLKT and iPhone could be more then 20 feets without any loss&#8230;</p>
<p>Thank you for your help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My 2012 Sports Gadget Recommendations by Rainmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2012/11/my-2012-sports-gadget-recommendations.html#comment-130491</link>
		<dc:creator>Rainmaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/2012/11/my-2012-sports-gadget-recommendations.html#comment-130491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For running they do. Unless you&#039;re running underwater for 30 minutes - you&#039;ll be fine.  Also, I&#039;m not exactly sure why I wouldn&#039;t review a unit just because of less than ideal waterproofing.  As that would mean that up until last summer - no-one would have reviewed any sub-$400 GPS watches on the market.

Now, don&#039;t get me wrong - I&#039;m the most aggressive person out there on hammering companies on the waterproofing issue.  And I think it&#039;s been solved going forward - since I started really ringing the bell on it, all new products I&#039;ve seen have true waterproofing - for example, the TRT2 has it, FR10 has it, and others.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>For running they do. Unless you&#8217;re running underwater for 30 minutes &#8211; you&#8217;ll be fine.  Also, I&#8217;m not exactly sure why I wouldn&#8217;t review a unit just because of less than ideal waterproofing.  As that would mean that up until last summer &#8211; no-one would have reviewed any sub-$400 GPS watches on the market.</p>
<p>Now, don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; I&#8217;m the most aggressive person out there on hammering companies on the waterproofing issue.  And I think it&#8217;s been solved going forward &#8211; since I started really ringing the bell on it, all new products I&#8217;ve seen have true waterproofing &#8211; for example, the TRT2 has it, FR10 has it, and others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
